Original source · versioned page text
Other Change Decision Notice - Council Meeting Decision 132005 638 04 (As Published)
@ Queensland Government Natural Resources and Mines by Declavation as an area of high nahure conservation value under e8.16-19 of the . Vegetation Management Act 1999; ¢) Use of a covenant over offset areas under the Land Title Act 1994, Land Act 1994 and Integrated Planning Act 1997. 8._ The offset must become ecologically equivalent to the area proposed to be cleared, Factors _ to consider in regard to ecological equivalence are: OO 2) shape and edge effects. Patches of vegetation with a shape that provides a low perimeter to area ratio are less susceptible to edge effects. Therefore the offset area should have a perimeter (metres) to area (hectares) ratio of no more than 200: 1; and b) condition, Condition can be described in terms of genetic or species diversity, Presence and abundance of native fauna, presence and abundance of feral animals, pests and weeds, health of soil and water and general long-term viability of the vegetation; and : c) whether revegetation and/or restoration of the offsct area is required. Offsetting existing intact vegetation is preferable to an offset involving Tevegetation of a severely degraded area. A revegetated area is generally of less biodiversity value, at least in the short to medium term, than an intact natural vegetation community, and there is a higher chance of the offset succeeding over time if the vegetation is intact; and a) connectivity of the offset to other areas of native vegetation. If the offset is linked to other areas of native vegetation, the restoration/revegetation works have greater chance of succeeding and providing long term conservation outcomes. In bioregions where there is a State or a Regional Wildlife Corridor, the offset should preferably be located within the State or Regional Corridor. €) size. Size is strongly correlated with the long-term viability of patches of native Vegctation, Larger areas are less susceptible to ecological edge effects and are more likely to sustain viable populations of native flora and fauna than smaller areas, Small habitat arcas can mean that wildlife species are more vulnerable to disease, bushfire, pests, changes in climate, or inbreeding. 9. The offset proposal must include a detailed revegetation or restoration plan which specifies how the offset area will achieve the desired remnant regional ecosystem status, and scfs out the following: a) risks to the revegetation or restoration project, such as weed infestations and fire, and actions that will be undertaken to minimise those risks; and : b) goals and measures which quantify the realistic stages by which the offset area will reach remnant status; and c) the establishment of a monitoring program, including photo monitoring points and the recording of species composition, abundance and mean heights of species at those sites; and d) remedial actions that will be undertaken if the goal/measure of any stage of the restoration or revegetation plan is not met. Policy Number: Prefix/Number/ Year Version No: Last Updated; 23/09/05 Page 27 of 72 Document Set ID: 24377726 Version: 13, Version Date: 23/12/2025
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
The download may take up to a minute.