PM Submission Object - Paul Harbour - MCU16/0153 & REC16/0041

Page 2

 

 

qe : Notice of Submission under the
mm NOOSA COUNCIL Sustainable Planning Act 2009

To ensure your submission is properly made you must ensure that:
be made to the assessment manager

be in writing

be signed by each person who made the submission unless the submission is made electronically
state the name and residential or business address of each person who made the submission
state what aspects of the plan or proposed development your support or oppose and why

6. be received by Council during the formal public notification period

As required by the Sustainable Planning Act, all submissions, including individual details, are published on Council's website and

therefore will be accessible to internet search engines. All submissions are published, irrespective of whether or not they are properly
made

1. Application details

File No MCU16/0153
Postal address of Land (as advertised)
215 David Low Way PEREGIAN BEACH QLD 4573

Ce ON =

 

Land Description Lot 77 SP 231615
Nature of Proposed Development Multiple Housing - Type 4 Conventional, Visitor Accommodation - Type 4 Conventional

2. Submitter details

Full name of Submitter Paul Harbour
Email Address [email protected]
Postal address PO Box 184
Suburb Peregian Beach
Signature(s)

State QLD Postcode 4573

  
   

N.B. This form has been designed fgt'the convenience of the public, and any persons wishing to lodge a submission are not obliged to use this form.

3. Details of Submission

| (We), make the following submission:
| oppose the submission because :-

 

Site density is excessive and does not comply with the intent of the Noosa Plan for the Area. That is, areas are not
designated for visitor accommodation but rather permanent accommodation, Its previous use as a caravan park was
probably its best use given the soil conditions or at least a less intense development requiring lower impact site works.

The site has already had a huge windfall with the approval of the Peregian Market and | see no reason why this
development is required by either the community or the developer to maximise his utilisation of the site.

In the light of no explanatary information, the development grossly affects the wetlands area behind with filling and
treatment of the existing creek. The survey drawing shows this waterway is to be filled in and no alternative treatment is
offered.

 

The spacing of accomodation and lack of sun penetration to a majority of the units compromise the amenity of the site
leading to an inferior design solution.

 

Pedestrian circulation though the area has not been adequately addressed.

The vehicle access to the site is ony through Sandpiper Lane and so with the shared use by the super market and the
hardware store a significant amount of conjestion will ensue. This piece of road is already severly congested at times
because of the addition of the super market and will be exaserbated by the increasing amount of traffic from Peregian
Springs through population increase. The development does not address this problem it has created in stage 1 and

 

Privacy

Council will use any personal information provided for the intended purpose only and for remaining in contact with you. Council is authorised to collect
this information in accordance with the Local Government Act 2009 and other Local Government Acts. Your personal information is only accessed by
persons authorised to do so. Your personal information is dealt with in accordance with council’s privacy [email protected] T 07 5329 6500
ABN 97 969 214 121

 

Page 1 of 2

Page 3

 

 

ignores the impact to the community, in particular the trading situation in the shopping centre.

It can only add to the problem that visitors see during holidays which is conjection on the David Low Way and lack of
parking in the centre.

The last developement proposal by this developer was on the market for presales for 5 years with a minimal result of
sales due to | believe the bad design and the density of the development. This new proposal is no better in fact in many
ways worse because of lack of open space and the added completion of the super market to add to the traffic.

Great pains have been taken over the years to promote Peregian Beach as a Villiage and a preferred destination.
This development in no way fosters that idyll and harms it with il considered design.

 

 

 

 

(if necessary, use separate sheet of paper and attach)

Page 2 of 2