Skip to the record
Noosa's #1 Council Tracker.

Original source · versioned page text

2022-11-08 P&E Agenda - Item 6 - Attachment 1 - Current & Historical Distribution of Seagrass in the Noosa Estuary (40 pages)

of 40

Page text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Page text read automatically using OCR, there may be inaccuracies

Very large file: it may take a few minutes

The original of this document is very large (16.5 MB). Opening the original or downloading it may take a few minutes. Please be patient and don't click again. The page text is quick to read. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.

Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.

                                                              Ecological Service Professionals
                                                                                  Sustainable Science Solutions




    Figure 3.4 Small patch of Zostera muelleri growing along the Goat Island in the main Noosa
               River Channel in November 2020

3.2 Seagrass Condition
The seagrass growing in the Noosa Estuary was showing signs of stress, as a result of
sedimentation in some areas. Further, many of the seagrass beds growing in the relatively
clear and shallow water of the estuary were covered in a high load of epiphytic algae. The
dense Z. muelleri was typically in moderate condition, with long blades up to 50 cm long that
had a high coverage of epiphytic algae (greater than 40% of the blade) (Figure 3.5). In some
areas of Weyba Creek around Keyser Island, and along the main creek channel further
upstream, the coverage of epiphytic algae on the Z. muelleri blades was extremely dense
(> 80%) and in some cases it completely smothered the seagrass (Figure 3.5). The coverage
of epiphytic algae was particularly high in dense beds around freshwater inputs such as
stormwater drains.
Elsewhere, the coverage of epiphytic algae was sparser, particularly in areas where the
coverage of Z. muelleri was also lower (Figure 3.6). The coverage of epiphytic algae on
H. ovalis was typically very low, although this seagrass species was typically observed along
the fringes of Z. muelleri beds and in areas of increased turbidity such as in Lake Doonella.
There were also instances where seagrass patches were being smothered by shifting
sediment. This was particularly the case along sections of the channel in Weyba Creek and
at the entrance to Lake Weyba (Figure 3.6 & Figure 3.7). The non-vegetated intertidal and
subtidal habitat within the study area was generally characterised by coarse, sandy

Assessing Distribution of Seagrass in the Noosa Estuary                                                    10
Log in to download the original file

2022-11-08 P&E Agenda - Item 6 - Attachment 1 - Current & Historical Distribution of Seagrass in the Noosa Estuary (40 pages)(PDF, 16MB).pdf · 16.5 MB (very large file)

Very large file: the download may take a few minutes. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.

Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.