Original source · versioned page text
2017-04-11 Planning & Environment Committee Agenda
The original of this document is very large (19.6 MB). Opening the original or downloading it may take a few minutes. Please be patient and don't click again. The page text is quick to read. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
PLANNING & ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 11 APRIL 2017
Issues Comments
Places pressure on the environment and will This may occur, given that permanent residents may
alter the character and amenity of the Noosa expect involvement in gardening on site. This may
North Shore. result in the loss of native vegetation in favour of
exotic species and vegetable gardens.
Agreed that the character and amenity of the Beach
Road Holiday Homes may alter with permanent
residents. This maybe in the form of the need for
greater storage of possessions and expectations
relating to permanent occupancy.
Proposal is based on a very narrow and short Agreed. The proposal addresses the dilemma of the
term economic considerations rather than the lack of financial viability, but does not consider the
long term intent of Noosa’s planning long term impacts of such a proposal.
instruments and those factors applicable to
the Great Sandy region.
Potential for conflicts between permanent and Agreed. People on holiday will have a different outlook
holiday occupants. which may create conflicts with permanent residents.
Permanent residents may have a sense of ownership
of the common property, which may impact on visitors’
experience.
Does not provide for greater housing choice Agreed.
as suggested by the applicant.
Traffic will increase. Agreed, that daily traffic may increase around this
node.
Decreased income for on site managers – Agreed. A reduction of eco-cabins in the rental pool
affects their future viability. will decrease the income for onsite managers.
The proposal presented by the applicants is Noted.
inaccurate of the viability of the letting pool
business.
The submitter who was impartial has Noted.
recently purchased a property within the
development – states there are 2 sides and
remains ‘impartial’.
Note: Of those that objected, 5 were owners of 1 or 2 eco-cabins on the site. Additionally, 1 objection
was from the onsite manager.
4. CONCLUSION
The proposed use is inconsistent with the Visitor Mixed Use zone and is not consistent with the
strategic intent of The Noosa Plan and the provision outlined in the overall outcomes of the Noosa
North Shore Locality Plan. The proposal is not supported for the reasons outlined in the
recommendation section of this report and is thus recommended for refusal.
Departments/Sections Consulted:
Chief Executive Officer Community Services Corporate Services
Executive Officer to the Mayor & CEO Community Facilities Financial Services
Executive Support Community Development ICT
Libraries & Galleries Procurement & Fleet
Local Laws Property & Facilities
Waste & Environmental Health Revenue Services
Executive Office × Planning & Infrastructure
Community Engagement Building & Plumbing Services
Customer Service Civil Operations
Economic Development Infrastructure Planning & Design
Governance Planning & Environment
Human Resources Strategic Land Use Planning
Sustainability
Page 84 of 106
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalVery large file: the download may take a few minutes. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.