Original source · versioned page text
RFI - Attachment F - Engineering Report
Very large file: it may take a few minutes
The original of this document is very large (15.7 MB). Opening the original or downloading it may take a few minutes. Please be patient and don't click again. The page text is quick to read. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
3.1 LABORATORY TESTING METHODOLOGY The laboratory setup consisting of a rectangular channel, wooden apron, hopper, and catchpit containing t CFS is shown schematically in Figure 2. The laboratory catchpit was constructed of plexiglas to dimensio similar to units in the field (catchpit dimensions are presented in Figure 3). The catchpit received water from skewed apron (sloped in the longitudinal and transverse directions at 10° and 6°, respectively, to the horizon! plane) so that flow occurred primarily along the lower edge of the wooden apron. The test procedure involved feeding synthetic road sediment, derived by adding specified amounts of siz sediments to running water, to the catchpit at various flow rates. Tests were performed for five flow rates (C Vs, 1 Vs, 4 Is, 12 Vs, 20 Is), four sediment concentrations (50 mg/l, 150 mg/l, 250 mg/A, 400 mg/l) and fc particle sizes (<100 ft, 100-500 1, 500-1000 pL, 1000-10000 2), yielding a total of 80 tests for each of t following three cases: e Catchpit without a CFS (base case) *® Catchpit with an Enviropod CFS e@ = Catchpit with a Flogard CFS. Constant inflows of synthetic runoff to the CFS were maintained for a minimum of four hydraulic retenti times, corresponding to approximately six minutes for 20 l/s and 30 minutes for 0.5 i/s. The overall C performance was based on the efficiency of sediment capture under specified flow rates, particle sizes, a sediment concentrations. In addition, each of the three cases were tested using street sediments to simulate particle entrapment in- field. The street sediments were obtained by vacuuming a number of streets in Mt Roskill within the Oak Creek catchment. The CFS tests with street sediments were conducted for flows of 4 I/s, 12 l/s and 20 l/s, w an influent sediment concentration of 250 mg/l. Head loss tests were performed on the filter fabric by passing various flowrates across the filter fabric, measuring the head on either side of the filter fabric using a peizometer. Figure 1 below shows a schematic the laboratory set up. Figure 1: Laboratory Setup for Headloss Measurements Head Loss Filter Fabric
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
Very large file: the download may take a few minutes. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.