Original source · versioned page text
RFI - Attachment F - Engineering Report
Very large file: it may take a few minutes
The original of this document is very large (15.7 MB). Opening the original or downloading it may take a few minutes. Please be patient and don't click again. The page text is quick to read. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Evaluation of Gully Pit Inlet Litter Control Systems– Brisbane City Council and Gold Coast City Council
Discussion:
For the 1% longitudinal slope, 76% of the litter was retained at an
approach flow of 320L/sec (see Figure 1). The remaining 24% passed
through the inlet beneath the bar or bypassed the inlet. The high capture
efficiency is due to the lower approach flow velocities at flatter grades.
The majority of litter retained in front of the bar was plastic bottles and
milk cartons.
At the steep (12%) slope the inlet retained 30% of litter at an approach
flow of 60L/sec. The high velocity forced the majority of litter past the
inlet. At an approach flow of 320L/s only a plastic bag remained stuck
on the grate.
Figure 1: Pollution remaining after 320L/sec at 1% slope.
The horizontal bar caused a build up of litter at the downstream end of
the inlet. Water was observed ‘jetting’ over the downstream transition,
due to the litter caught, at higher approach flows and more significantly
at steeper slopes (see Figure 2).
Urban Water Resources Centre 8 University of South Australia
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
Very large file: the download may take a few minutes. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.