Skip to the record
Search everything, all in one place.

Original source · versioned page text

RFI - Attachment F - Engineering Report

of 118

Page text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Page text read automatically using OCR, there may be inaccuracies

Very large file: it may take a few minutes

The original of this document is very large (15.7 MB). Opening the original or downloading it may take a few minutes. Please be patient and don't click again. The page text is quick to read. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.

Evaluation of Gully Pit Inlet Litter Control Systems– Brisbane City Council and Gold Coast City Council



                Hydraulic Capture Performance


                On-grade


                When compared to the standard lip in line gully pit, the capture capacity
                of the Enviropod basket was:


                    •   The same for 1% and 4% longitudinal tests
                    •   At 12% grade:
                        •    12L/sec less between 200 and 320 L/sec approach flow for the
                             fine mesh basket, and
                        •    the same at 200L/sec for the coarse mesh basket, and 6L/sec
                             less at an approach flow of 320L/sec.


                It was observed at the 12% grade that a plastic drinking bottle and plastic
                bag were trapped in the overflow outlet, reducing the capture capacity of
                the pit insert (see Figure 8).




                                  Plastic bottle caught in outlet




                                   Figure 8: Litter trapped in overflow outlet.




                Urban Water Resources Centre              17             University of South Australia
Log in to download the original file

RFI - Attachment F - Engineering Report.pdf · 15.7 MB (very large file)

Very large file: the download may take a few minutes. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.

Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.