Original source · versioned page text
RFI - Attachment F - Engineering Report
Very large file: it may take a few minutes
The original of this document is very large (15.7 MB). Opening the original or downloading it may take a few minutes. Please be patient and don't click again. The page text is quick to read. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
refereed paper stormwater treatment
NUTRIENTS AND SOLIDS
REMOVAL BY AN ENGINEERED
TREATMENT TRAIN
Field evaluation of a gully pit insert
and cartridge media filter
M Wicks, N Vigar, M Hannah
Abstract one-third of concentrations reported Environment and Climate Change (DECC)
in the literature as typical for urban 2007 recommends Suspended Solids (SS)
The performance claims for individual
catchments in Australia. 85%, Total Phosphorus (TP) 65%, and Total
stormwater treatment devices is often
Nitrogen (TN) 45%) and/or Event Mean
open to debate, as much of the data One storm was also analysed
Concentrations (EMCs) in any stormwater
available has not been subjected to for an expanded suite of nitrogen
discharged into natural ecosystems (e.g.
robust scrutiny and/or the claims are analytes, which determined that more
ANZECC 2000 recommends turbidity
unable to be replicated. The following than half the load was in soluble form.
article summarises the results from a field 2-15 Nephelometric Turbidity Units (NTU),
Furthermore, results from the field trial
trial of two such devices: an EnviroPod® TP 0.01 mg/L and TN 0.15 mg/L for river
and research project indicated that this
and a StormFilter®, arranged in series systems in tropical Australia).
treatment train system has the potential
(or a ‘treatment train’) treating runoff to achieve meaningful load reductions In general, each pollutant is removed
from a small road catchment on Streets of Suspended Solids (up to 99%), from the water column using a specific
Creek, Kuranda, west of Cairns Phosphorus (up to 70%) and Nitrogen physical, chemical or biological process.
in Far North Queensland. (up to 45%) through the use of Arranging these processes in sequence
conventional screening, filtration and provides a treatment train approach that
This field trial complements an earlier
research project undertaken on the ion-exchange removal technologies. addresses and treats the whole pollutant
same system by James Cook University. load. There is, however, a paucity of
Introduction published peer-reviewed scientific
Data was collected from six storm
events, predominantly during the dry Livingston and McCarron (1992) identified information validating the removal
seasons of 2008 and 2009, and includes that pollution loads (gross pollutants, efficiency of each element or device used
simultaneous sampling of both the flow sediment and nutrients) in stormwater within a treatment train – let alone the
rate and water quality on the inflows increase proportionally with the degree performance of the treatment train itself.
to, and outflows from, the treatment of urbanisation in the catchment. Most The research referred to herein provides
train for a suite of particulate and consent authorities in Australia have information to validate the performance
soluble stormwater pollutants. Influent established pollution removal efficiencies claims of an EnviroPod® gully trap and a
concentrations for both Phosphorus to be achieved prior to discharge from the StormFilter ® cartridge arranged in series
and Nitrogen were found to be half to urban catchment (eg, NSW Department of as a treatment train.
Photo: ©Google, ©GeoEye ©Whereis® Sensis Pty Ltd ©Digital Globe
Figure 1. Location of the Kuranda Test Site.
water SEPTEMBER 2011 1
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
Very large file: the download may take a few minutes. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.