Original source · versioned page text
RFI - Attachment F - Engineering Report
Very large file: it may take a few minutes
The original of this document is very large (15.7 MB). Opening the original or downloading it may take a few minutes. Please be patient and don't click again. The page text is quick to read. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
February 29, 2012 John H. Pedrick Contech Construction Products, Inc. 11835 NE Glenn Widing Drive Portland, OR 97220 John, This letter provides a review of my involvement in the evaluation of the Stormfilter Stormwater Treatment System at Mitchell Community College in Mooresville, North Carolina. I was approached by Contech in October of 2010 to serve as a Technical Advisor (TA) for the project. As a TA, I provided support and guidance for the stormwater monitoring and evaluation of the Stormfilter from start to finish. This included review of monitoring methods and procedures as well as a site visit to observe and verify field monitoring setups. I am well qualified to serve as technical advisor for this project. I earned my M.S. degree in 2009 at North Carolina State University by completing a stormwater monitoring project. I have been intensively involved in field monitoring of more than 30 stormwater BMPs in North Carolina, including bioretention, permeable pavement, cisterns, filter strips, swales, and innovative wet ponds. Apart from field data collection, I have been involved in the production of 10 peer‐reviewed journal articles and numerous final reports. Therefore, I have a solid background in statistics and stormwater data analysis. From the start, I have reviewed and approved all reports produced on the data collected on the Mooresville Stormfilter. This included the Quality Assurance Project Plan (QAPP) in October 2010, the first quarterly report in May 2011, and the second quarterly report in August 2011. In short, the methods that have been used to monitor the Stormfilter are state‐of‐the‐science, and provide an excellent indication of how the product performed over the eight month evaluation period. The final report (February 2012) for the removal of solid pollutants provides NCDENR with the requisite monitoring data to show that the Stormfilter removed 85% of TSS during the 10 storm events that were sampled. A second report will be produced on the other analytes that were sampled, including nutrients and heavy metals. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Thank you, Ryan J. Winston, M.S., E.I.
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
Very large file: the download may take a few minutes. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.