26 0116 - Change Req Letter

                                                     remains unaltered. The planter box is not visible from
                                                     the public domain or neighbours to the south.
 (d) changes the ability of the proposed development The development will continue to operate as
 to operate as intended;28 or                        previously approved under MCU17/0559.04.
 28
    For example, reducing the size of a retail complex may reduce
 the capacity of the complex to service the intended catchment.
 (e) removes a component that is integral to the        The proposed change does not remove any integral
 operation of the development; or                       components from the development.
 (f) significantly impacts on traffic flow and the transport
                                                        The proposed changes will not result in impacts to the
 network, such as increasing traffic to the site; or    transport network nor increase traffic to and from the
                                                        Subject Site.
 (g) introduces new impacts or increase the severity of No new impacts will be generated by the proposed
 known impacts; or                                      change. All existing boundary fences and boundary
                                                        landscaping will be maintained thus, overlooking
                                                        between properties will not occur. The planter box
                                                        does not act as a visual buffer or screening device that
                                                        restricts overlooking between Unit 2 and the
                                                        neighbours to the south.
 (h) removes an incentive or offset component that The proposed change does not seek to remove any
 would have balanced a negative impact of the incentive or offset component of the development.
 development; or
 (i) impacts on infrastructure provisions.              The proposal will not result in any significant impacts
                                                        on the provision of infrastructure, location or demand.

  ii.      if a development application for the development, including the change, were made when the Change
           Application is made would not cause—
        A. the inclusion of prohibited development in the application; or

The proposal does not constitute prohibited development.

        B. public notification if public notification was not required for the development application.

The original development application (MCU17/0559) and the subsequent most recent Change Application
(MCU17/0559.04) did not require public notification. If a new development application for Material Change of
Use was lodged based on the proposed change, the level of assessment would remain Code Assessable as per
Table 5.5.2 of the Planning Scheme.


This letter demonstrates that the proposed change does not impact on the nature or intent of the existing
development permit, nor does the changes constitute a substantially different development. Accordingly, we
request that the Council approve the proposed Change Application as a minor change in accordance with
Section 78 of the Planning Act 2016.

We trust the above and attached information is sufficient for Council’s assessment. We look forward to your
response in due course. Please contact the undersigned should you require any further clarification or information
on the proposed changes to the development.

Yours sincerely,



Brock Acworth



                                                                                                          Page 7 of 8