Council archive · source document
MCU14/0087 Notice of Submission - Peter Court
.:
4. Collflnn that the 10110'0\;ng mandatory supporting ",Ionnallon accompanies this ppllc tion
Manclalory SUPiX'rtfng infonnation Connnnation of hletho<! of
lodgement lo<lgement
All applications .
A site plan drawn 10 an appmpriale scale (1:100,1:200 or 1:500 are g.c.,nftnned
recommended """las) which showslha I_ng:
• tho location and silo area of the land 10which tho application ruI os
(relevant land)
• the nooh point
• the bou"""ri •• of the relevanlland
• any roed frontages 01 the rulevant land, Including the name olthe mad
• lhelocal!on and use of any existing or proposed buildingS 0' _tires
on tho relevant land (0010: where extenslv. demolltion or r>eWwiJdings
are proposed. lWO separoto plans Ian existing .110 plan aod PfOI">Sell site
plan] mey be aPlJroJXiate)
• any existing or proposed easemonts on tho relevanlland and their
funshon
• Ihe location and use 0' buildings on land adjoJning the relevanlland
• all vehlde access points and any existing or proposed car parlUng ••.• as
on the relevant land. Car parlOng spa= for pet""ns with disabilities and
any "lVi"" vehicle a=ss and parking sho<Ild be c1eany mar1<e<!
• f(l(' any n •••• wilding on tho relovanlland.thel"""tJon at reluse s1orallO
• th.locallon
height
of"F'Y proposed retairing walls on the relevant land and their
1
• the location of any pl'opo.ed landscaping on the rel~vanllan<l .
• the location of any stormwater detenlion (In the relevant land .
I
The Mandatory supporting information is lacking in its requirements in regards to the site
plan provided and there is lack of detail in particular to car parking areas, provision for those
with disabilities, service vehicle access etc.
The applicant confirmed that information provided demonstrated the on site parking
provisions, yet the hand drawn plan (not numbered) merely shows a line demonstrating
where access would occur and no direct provision or plans of car parking spaces.
When the application involvns new operational work
Plans .hOM'lg tne nature. location, number of ne •• on-sil. OlIr parking bays, .0'Confirmed
proposed area of new landscaping, proposed type nC new vehicle cross-over
(noo-reside<ltiBl useS), proposed maximum new vehlaJlar seNaog
o Not appllco~e
arrangement (non-reskJenllal uses) or the propo.ed new operotlonOI worl;.
The applicant has also confirmed that plans have been submitted to meet this mandatory
requirement but those provided do not achieve this requirement.
Due to the poor material submitted it is not possible to ascertain the use area, how operation
will occur, and how car parking will be provided.
Size and Scale of development
The submitted plans suggest a use area of 9m2 yet this makes no provisions for how the
boards will be loaded and unloaded of trailer. These boards are up to 305m in length and
require to be removed from the trailer to provide to customers. This will in effect make the
use area of the business expand out from the footprint proposed of 3.6m x 204m to approx.
705m x SAm (40m2). This is in estimation what will be required to service customers as they
chose the hire equipment from the trailer.
•
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
MCU14/0087 Notice of Submission - Peter CourtRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 2.1 MB (large file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.
Original file
Log in to download the original file
The download may take up to a minute.