Skip to the record
Accept no imitations.

Council archive · source document

Response to Council_Information rRequest - Change DA_51975.3702.03

of 3

Text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

   25 September 2012

   Our Ref: 11357 / Office: Sunshine Coast
   Council Ref: 51975.3702.03


   SUNSHINE COAST REGIONAL COUNCIL
   LOCKED BAG 72
   SUNSHINE COAST MAIL CENTRE QLD 4560

   ATTENTION: Mr Glen Conforti



   Dear Glen

   INFORMATION RESPONSE

   JACARANDA - CHANGE TO DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL

   12 HASTINGS STREET, NOOSA HEADS
   LOT 1-15 AND COMMON PROPERTY ON BUP2550



   We refer to your email of 23 May 2012 raising issues required to be addressed before the assessment
   can be progressed for the change to development application and now respond in full to each of the
   items raised.


   Car parking

   Issue
   Council has concerns with the affect the proposed arbour and planting (works included in this change
   application) and the covered space for lot 1 will have on the manoeuvring space required to access
   the carparking for Units 2-11.

   Information Required
   1. Provide plans of the vehicle manoeuvring paths for vehicles entering and exiting the proposed
       carparking spaces for units 2-11. The plans must demonstrate:
       a. That vehicles can enter and exit the space between the existing columns:
       b. The vehicles must be a B99 vehicle as described in AS/NZS 2890.1:2004,
       c. The manoeuvring paths must be in accordance with AS/NZS 2890.1:2004,
       d. Include dimensions of the aisle and;

   Response:
   The issue raised for manoeuvring is somewhat contrary to item 2 below which indicates that the
   existing carparking situation includes 4 spaces are parallel to the eastern boundary that comply with
   Australian Standards. The proposed arbour and covered space for Lot 1 do not change the location of
   or increase the size required for parallel spaces acknowledged by Council as complying with Australian
   Standards. Both the arbour and covered car space are cantilevered as shown on plan DA.302 and will
   not have any impact upon the existing situation. The dimension of the existing/proposed aisle


                     PLANNING | SURVEYING | PROJECT MANAGEMENT | COURT APPEALS

Brisbane                                        Sunshine Coast                                       North Queensland

Suite 1, 14 Lever Street, Albion Qld 4010       Suite 1, Corner Surf Road & Gardak Street            1C/41 Sturt Street, Townsville Qld 4810
PO Box 266, Albion DC Qld 4010                  Alexandra Headland Qld 4572                          PO Box 5027, Townsville Qld 4810
p | 07 3262 1200 f | 07 3262 1499               PO Box 6380, Maroochydore BC Qld 4558                p | 07 4721 3066 f | 07 4721 3088
                                                p | 07 5443 2844 f | 07 5443 7146

                     Ken Hicks & Associates Pty Ltd ACN 010 278 823 ABN 74 308 405 611 trading as KHA Development Managers
Full text of the other 2 pages

Page 2

between the carparks and the arbour exceeds 6.2m which complies with the aisle width requirement
under AS/NZS 2890.1:2004.

Issue
Council considers there are 18 existing onsite car parking spaces, of which 14 spaces exist under the
building and 4 spaces are parallel to the eastern boundary that comply with Australian Standards. It
appears the proposal results in a net loss of 2 car spaces onsite as the arbour has replaced 2 car
spaces.

Information Required
2. Provide amended plans indicating 18 car parking spaces on site. The car spaces must comply with
    AS/NZS 2890.1:2004.

Response:
16 carparking spaces are proposed on the site. This provides for 1 covered car space per residential
unit and 1 uncovered car space for the proposed retail use of Lot 1. This carparking provision is
considered an appropriate outcome for the site having regard to planning scheme provisions and
approvals issued by Council for development within Hastings Street over the last 10 or so years. The
carparking requirement consistently applied for residential units is 1 covered car space with no visitor
car spaces provided. This provision recognises that the residential units in Hastings Street are largely
used for visitor accommodation not permanent occupancy.            This consistent carparking approach
approved by Council justifies the proposed outcome.

Stormwater

Issue
A new concrete driveway is proposed as indicated on Bark Design Drawing No. DA.001 Revision D.
The applicant has not submitted any stormwater design plans that indicate the existing stormwater
system or any proposed improvements to the system.

Information Required
3. Provide a plan of the existing and proposed stormwater drainage system. The plan for the
    proposed system must include a grease and oil arrestor or other stormwater quality improvement
    device for those areas of the driveway that are being re-laid.

Response:
No change to the existing stormwater system is proposed as part of the site refurbishments. The new
driveway surface will not change or impact upon the existing stormwater drainage, but will provide
both an amenity and safety upgrade of the existing situation. The requirement for a grease and oil
arrestor or other stormwater quality improvement device associated with a ‘resurface’ of an existing
driveway would be an unreasonable imposition with the proposed permissible change.

Landscaping

Issue
No landscape details have been provided for the plantings to the garden around the Energex
transformer located at the front of the site. The proposal plans indicate all vegetation along the
western boundary between car parks 2 and 11 is to be removed. The proposal redesigns the
landscape treatment to the pool area and removes gardens within the rear setback.

Information Required
4. Please provide landscaping plans for the whole site that includes;
    a. Landscape treatment to the Energex transformer.
    b. The garden to the eastern side of the retail unit continued around to the front of the building,
       parallel to Hastings Street boundary.

Page 3

    c. The retention of trees along the western boundary between car parks 2 and 11 or
       alternatively provide sufficient justification for their removal.
    d. Landscape treatment to the pool surround including the retention of mature Cupaniopsis
       anacardioides and Pandanus trees.
    e. Details of the proposed landscape treatment within the rear setback (to the inlet) including
       the intention for the mature Cupaniopsis anacardioides and Euroschinus falcate located to the
       south east corner of the building.

Response:
A Landscape Management Plan prepared by JFP Urban Consultants is attached. This plan provides
details of the landscape intent for the site, including proposed retention and removal of existing
vegetation.



Should you have any questions with respect to the above, please do not hesitate to contact me direct.

Yours faithfully
KHA DEVELOPMENT MANAGERS




Scott Sobey
DIRECTOR

Used in these records

About this file

File size
68 KB (small file)
File type
PDF

No other editions are linked here.

Original file

Log in to download the original file

Response to Council_Information rRequest - Change DA_51975.3702.03.pdf · 68 KB (small file)

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.