Council archive · source document
09/0982 - Op Works - Prescribed Tidal Works - Extensions to Jetty [As Published] · 142009.982
“4
INTEGRATED PLANNING ACT 1997
WILD RIVER AREA ‘.:<*
4.15
| STATE-CONTROLLED ROAD: «
ls any of the operational work proposed to be carted out i in a wild river area declared under ihe Wild River Act 20057
LJNo-Gotoas16 [Yes
if yes, is the proposed operational work for the following and also declared under the wild river declaration for the areas to be
assessable?
{i) Agricultural activities as defined under the Wild Rivers Act 2005
CINo CYes
{ii} Animal husbandry activities as defined under the Wild Rivers Act 2005 LINo OYes
If yes to either (i) or {ii) above, is any part of the premises in the wild river high preservation area?
C Yes - An application for the operational work will be taken to be not properly made and the Assessment Manager must refuse to receive it
CONo
If no, is the proposed use in relation to the production of a high risk species as defined under the Wild Rivers Act 2005?
oO Yes - An application for the operational work will be taken to be not properly made and the Assessment Manager must refuse to receive it
Oo No - Unless the application is consistent with any property development plan applying to the land, the Assessment Manager must refuse to
“receive it (Compiete Form 1, Part Q if agriculture. Complete Form 1, Part R if animal husbandry) Subject to the declaration for the
relevant wild river area, this application requires assessment by the Department of Natural Resources and Water (NRW). If NRW is not
the Assessment Manager for the application, the agency has jurisdiction as Concurrence Agency.
ig 4, lem 10; iP Reg
part |,
4.16
Is any part of the premises located in part of a future State. ‘controlled foad, or within 400m ofa Stale- controled road?
EINo - Eng of section 4 0} Yes . Sy, ”
Ifyes, is the proposed operational work associated with either - 2 oO mo
A material change of use.that is assessable under the planning scheme; or
No L1Yes
Reconifiguring a lot that intréases the total number of lots, or incréases the total number of lots
abutting the State-controlled road
.
\f no, and answers to questions in this section of the checklist indicate the proposed operational work is assessable under
IPA, schedule 8 - Answer (a) - (c) below.
(a) an of the proposed operational work associated with access to a State-controlled road?
No
Yes - This application must be referred to the Department of Main Roads (DMR) as Concurrence Agency.
(b) Is any of the proposed operational work for filling or excavation? °
_ CINo CJ Yes
If yes, is the operational work proposed in a future State-controlled road not defined by route?
. C) . /
No - This application must be referred to the Department of Main Roads (ODMR) as Conéurrence Agency.
Yes --This application must be referred to the DMR as Advice Agency.
(c)
Does any of the proposed operational work involve the redirection or intensification of site stormwater from the land,
through a pipe with a cross-sectional area greater than 625m? that directs stormwater to a State-controlled road?
CINo O Yes ”
If yes, is the operational work proposed in a future State-controlled road not defined by route?
Oo
No - This application must be referred to the Department of Main Roads (DMR) as Concurrence Agency. .
| Yes - This application must be referred to the DMR as Advice Agency.
Page 39
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
09/0982 - Op Works - Prescribed Tidal Works - Extensions to Jetty [As Published]Related documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 2.6 MB (large file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.
Original file
Log in to download the original file
The download may take up to a minute.