AGM EGM Motion Results

e John Raftery addressed the meeting and spoke about reasonable and unreasonable decisions. He said the
body corporate having already approved the amalgamation of the two lots may well be seen as unreasonable
to not allow the lot owner to build on those lots within Council regulations. He did also say that technical
issues within the proposed development may be reasonably objected to.

* BCS also queried with the lot owner whether he would be prepared to enter into an agreement with the body
corporate to stipulate the usual conditions applicable to any construction on lots. The lot owner advised he
had no objection to this and was happy to work with the committee and owners to cause minimal disruption.

The Chairperson determined there was no further discussion and the motion was put to the vote.

10 REPLACEMENT OF DWELLINGS ON LOTS 9 AND 10 ORDINARY RESOLUTION
Submitted by owner
Lot 9 and 10 R and P Holyman as company nominees
The owner of Lot 9 and 10 requests your approval to remove the current structures and replace with a new
dwelling within the council approved footprint, the concept sketch of which is attached with all costs to be met
by the owner of Lot 9 and 10.
should permission be granted and subject to Council approval, it is anticipated work would commence in
February 2020.
The owners undertake to meet all regulatory requirements and co-operate with the Manager of The Hastings
Beach Houses in an effort to ensure minimal disruption to all other owners and guests and will comply with
any conditions stipulated by the committee in relation to these works.
RESOLVED that motion 10 be LOST Yes 13 No 14 Abstain 0 Invalid 0

The lot owner requested a POLL be taken of the votes. Following a calculation of the lot
entitlements to form a POLL vote BCS announced the outcome as 48 entitlements voted YES and
56 entitlements voted NO. Therefore the motion remained LOST.

NOTE FROM BCS
BCS apologises as it was erroneously announced the outcome at the meeting as 48 entitlements voted YES
and 50 entitlements voted NO. The calculation above in bold is correct and the outcome remains the same.

 

“THE HASTINGS” CTS 21433 AGM Friday, 31 May 2019
Page 9

Scanned with CamScanner