Council archive · source document
Development Application part 2 Application Forms REC11/0145
Very large file (24.3 MB): the whole original can take several minutes to open, especially on a phone. Text is quick to read.
form or improved to ensure its ongoing or Community residence interference with
contribution to the natural resources and vegetation does not extend beyond-
biological diversity of the former Noosa a) 30m of a building or 1 Om of a structure on
Shire; and lots greater than l Oha; or
b) Environmental Enhancement Area 10 on b) 1 Om of a building or structure on lots 1 Oho
Biodiversity Overlay Maps OM1.I - or less but more than 0.3ho; or
OM9.1, is protected from the impacts of c) 3m of a building or structure on lots 0.3ha
development by- or less.
i. avoiding edge effects;
ii. avoiding fragmentation; and
iii. maintaining vegetation in manageable and
viable configurations.
AND
Compliance
Sl.1 Performance Solution - The attached Vegetation Assessment identifies the EPA overlay as
containing a low ecological value for the following reasons;
it does not form a intact floral community
it there is no contiguous canopy
there is no linkage to other vegetation
the area is highly modified
it is very close to dwellings
the trees are unlikely to be used for roosting or nesting
the species have a low to modest source of food for birds and other animals
• With the existing land management it is probable the endemic trees would be displaced
• by exotic flora as they die from natural causes
The proposed development recommends a substantial amount of replanting totalling 26 trees. This is
considered a vast improvement to the existing situation.
Si .2 Not Applicable - The application is for an infill subdivision.
02 For the purpose of Reconfiguring a Lot 52. 1 Where interference with vegetation on
new lots are only created where they minimise the premises is for the purpose of
the fragmentation and maximise the retention of
existing vegetation. Reconfiguring a Lot-
a) new boundaries to lots do not transect
and fragment existing vegetation;
b) new lots are created to allow for suitable
7 house site areas or other future buildings
and works to be located within existing
cleared areas or areas of low ecological
value; and
1 c) building envelopes are designated for each lot.
Compliance
S2.1 Performance Solution - The new boundaries are acknowledged to transect the EPA overlay
however as identified within the attached Vegetation Assessment this area contains a low ecological
value. This area is identified to contain four tree species. Two of these species are exotic species
planted for landscaping purposes. The proposed lots are suitably sized to support the future
construction of residential dwellings.
03 Interference with vegetation only occurs 53. 1 No solution provided
where-
a) no other suitable cleared or partially
cleared area is available on the
premises;
b) the development minimises the total
footprint within which all activities,
buildings, structures, driveways and
other works are contained; and
c) the development is located in areas of
BRSS6220.000 Report for Lodgement 63
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
Development Application part 2 Application Forms REC11/0145Related documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 24.3 MB (very large file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.
Original file
Log in to download the original file
The download may take a few minutes. On mobile data, it is best to wait for Wi-Fi.