Council archive · source document
Development Application part 2 Application Forms REC11/0145
Very large file (24.3 MB): the whole original can take several minutes to open, especially on a phone. Text is quick to read.
LANDPARTNERS
AND
516.2 Vegetation removed is replaced with-
a) the equivalent number of trees or plants
of local origin; or
b) twice the number of trees or plants of
local orlin.
Compliance
S16.1 Complies - The attached vegetation assessment includes replanting recommendations
including;
• plant six Pondanus pedunculats
• plant 20 Casuarina equisetiflia
• plants are to be well established specimens in 200mm pots with a minimum height of
500mm
• plants are to be sourced from endemic (local) seed stock if this is practical
• plants are to be protected by plastic trees sleeves with three timber stakes and mulched for a
diameter of 100cm
• prickly pear and asparagus vine is to be removed in the area 20m each of the east
boundary.
S16.2 Complies -The proposal recommends replanting 26 trees which is well in excess of the
requirements.
Fire management No solution provided
017 Fire management measures are
adopted based on ecological principles,
a) maintain and enhance biodiversity;
b) minimise threat of fire to the natural
environment, life and property; and
c) provide for effective use and
maintenance of buildings and structures.
Compliance
017 Complies - The attached Bushfire Assessment identifies the site as being low risk from both
internally risk and external risk.
Natural Hazards Overlay Code
Column 1 col=12
n Specific outcomes Acceptable solutions (if self.ossessable)
Ptobabre solutions (iif code assessable)
13.32 Effects of use
General 51.1 The proposed development is not
01 Development is located to ensure it does not located in a landslide hazard area as
compromise the safety of people, property or indicated on Overlay Maps OM1.3-0M9.335;
hazardous materials manufactured or stored in OR
bulk by increasing risk of landslide; 51.2 The development site is not subject to
AND landslide, either internally or from sloping
land above the site {eg. slopes are less than
1 in 10 (10%)
AND
51.3 Development, including necessary
earthworks within Precinct F of the Nooso
Springs site, improves the stability of any
non-natural landform so it is not at risk from
landslide either on the site or from sloping
land above the site.
Compliance
Si .1 Not Applicable - The proposal complies with 51.2
Si .2 Complies - A Slope Stability Assessment (Appendix E) has been included within the report which
identifies the site as low risk of landslip. This assessment uses the Guidelines for Landslip Risk
BRSS6220.000 Report for Lodgement 68
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
Development Application part 2 Application Forms REC11/0145Related documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 24.3 MB (very large file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.
Original file
Log in to download the original file
The download may take a few minutes. On mobile data, it is best to wait for Wi-Fi.