Skip to the record
Search everything, all in one place.

Original source · versioned page text

SBSMR 20004 Revision D - Response to RFI

of 33

Page text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Page text read automatically using OCR, there may be inaccuracies

TABLE D.15 MEDIA FILTRATION NODE ASSESSMENT CHECKLIST (REFER TO SECTION 4.8.3)

MEDIA FILTRATION SYSTEM

(CHECK REPORTING TABLE C15) COMMENTS/ISSUES TO FOLLOW UP

 

Is the extended detention depth consistent
with plans?

 

ls the surface area consistent with plans?

 

Is the exfiltration rate set to zero?

 

If an exfiltration rate has been used, has the
secondary drainage link been used to return the
exfiltrated flows to the model? (Section 4.1)

 

|s the filter area consistent with plans?

 

\s the filter depth consistent with plans?

 

Is the filter media particle diameter consistent with
manufacturer information?

 

Is the saturated hydraulic conductivity consistent
with manufacturer information?

 

Is the depth below underdrain consistent with
plans?

 

Have the K and C* values been retained as
default values or otherwise justified?

 

 

 

 

TABLE D.16 OVERALL APPROVAL ASSESSMENT CHECKLIST

aad ets COMMENTS/ISSUES TO FOLLOW UP

(CHECK REPORTING TABLE C16)

 

Have all water quality objectives been met?

 

ls the MUSIC model approved? J

 

 

 

 

MUSIC MODELLING GUIDELINES Version’ 3.0 - 2018

 
Log in to download the original file

SBSMR 20004 Revision D - Response to RFI.pdf · 3.4 MB (large file)

Large file: the download may take up to a minute.

Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.