Council archive · source document
PM Submission - Julia Walkden - MCU25/0118
3. Traffic and Safety Concerns
The Final Engineering Report notes that:
“There has been no Traffic Impact Assessment completed to date…”
This is concerning given that 130 dwellings could ultimately rely on a single access
point via Dianella Street, a quiet neighbourhood road never intended for high-
intensity traffic.
Increased movements and safety risks
Social and affordable housing typically generates higher service-related traffic than
standard dwellings (support workers, medical transport, deliveries, community
services).
Additional risks include:
• on-street parking pressure
• turning movements at peak times
• increased daily traffic along Lake Macdonald Drive (already affected by dam
upgrade works)
• higher pedestrian conflict risks, especially for children walking to school bus
stops
A full Traffic Impact Assessment for the entire development site is essential before
the proposal can be properly considered.
4. Adverse Impacts on the Amenity of Nearby Residents
The design requires waste collection vehicles to:
• reverse into the site
• manoeuvre close to neighbouring bedrooms
• exit in a forward direction
This creates unacceptable noise impacts, especially from reversing alarms.
Because parking is inadequate, visitor vehicles will likely spill onto Dianella Court,
creating congestion and reducing the amenity of an otherwise quiet residential street.
5. Unacceptable Environmental and Stormwater Impacts
The proposal does not demonstrate that stormwater can be safely managed on and
adjoining a steep, recently remediated slope.
3
Document Set ID: 24330845
Version: 1, Version Date: 24/11/2025
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
PM Submission - Julia Walkden - MCU25/0118Related documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 217 KB (small file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.