Skip to the record
The first. The best. The only NoosaWatch™.

Original source · versioned page text

AS PUBLISHED Approved plans MCU23-0094 OPW23-0113 RAL23-0014 - 13 May 2024

of 68

Page text read automatically using OCR, there may be inaccuracies

Plans and drawings: the text below has words only, no drawings.

Very large file (77.7 MB): may take a few minutes to open.

Log in to see the plans as drawn
                                                  ANNUAL ARBORIST INSPECTION TREETOP ADVENTURES CENTRAL COAST NSW 2287

                 The proposed development foot print has houses of varying ages and as such there impact on the current trees is evident , many of the larger species are
                 all forest form which indicates they were self-sown and already in place when these current dwellings we built . There are no significant species on site and
                 are all tytpical to the region



                 Tree Details


        Tree         Botanical Name           Height   Width   DBH                Age   Health   Structure   ULE     Risk     Arborist Assessment
        Number       Common Name                               (CM)                                                  rating   Risk Mitigation Works
        1            Araucaria heterophylla   14       16      65     26.40457    M     FG       F           15 to   Medium   Arborist Assessment
                                                                      153.05052                              40               This tree was previously lopped and is evident in the trifurcation in the leaders and
                     Norfolk Pine                                                                                             conflicts with the Energex HV lines and are continually being managed only on onside.
                                                                                                                              which creates a weight bias and then coupling that with the weak epicormic growth?
                                                                                                                              these trees in such an exposed position are long term risk that is ever increasing, because.
                                                                                                                              of the attachment concerns
                                                                                                                              Arborist Recommendations
                                                                                                                              Complete removal
        2            Araucaria heterophylla   19       10      78     -26.40477   M     FG       F           15 to   Medium   Arborist Assessment
                                                                      153.05035                              40               This tree was previously lopped and is evident in the trifurcation in the leaders and
                     Norfolk Pine                                                                                             conflicts with the Energex HV lines and are continually being managed only on onside.
                                                                                                                              which creates a weight bias and then coupling that with the weak epicormic growth?
                                                                                                                              these trees in such an exposed position are long term risk that is ever increasing, because.
                                                                                                                              of the attachment concerns
                                                                                                                              Arborist Recommendations
                                                                                                                              Complete removal
        3            Araucaria heterophylla   15       5       67     -26.40456   M     F        F           15 to   Medium   Arborist Assessment
                                                                      153.05060                              40               This tree was previously lopped and is evident in the trifurcation in the leaders and
                     Norfolk Pine                                                                                             conflicts with the Energex HV lines and are continually being managed only on onside.
                                                                                                                              which creates a weight bias and then coupling that with the weak epicormic growth?
                                                                                                                              these trees in such an exposed position are long term risk that is ever increasing, because.
                                                                                                                              of the attachment concerns
                                                                                                                              Arborist Recommendations
                                                                                                                              Complete removal
        4            Eugenia uniflora         4        5       22     -26.40475   M     FG       P           15 to   Low      Arborist Assessment
                                                                      153.05008                              40               As this site is currently developed this tree is on a boundary and as such has all the urban
                     Brazilian Cherry                                                                                         forest pressures such as fences driveways soil compaction and limited or impeded root.
                                                                                                                              growth space as well as uninterrupted root plate exposure to rain from the structures.
                                                                                                                              And as such has an augmented growth because of this which is evident in its growth habit.
                                                                                                                              Also, this is an exposed site and as such long term no ideal conditions for a forest form tree.
                                                                                                                              Arborist Recommendations




Document Set ID: 23014611
                  22619723
Version: 2,
         1, Version Date: 13/05/2024
                          13/10/2023
Log in to download the original file

AS PUBLISHED Approved plans MCU23-0094 OPW23-0113 RAL23-0014 - 13 May 2024.pdf · 77.7 MB (very large file)

The download may take a few minutes. On mobile data, it is best to wait for Wi-Fi.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.