NPM Submission (Late) - Anthony De'athe - MCU18/0019

To ensure your submission is properly made you must ensure that:
1. be made to the assessment manager

2 bein writing

3. be signed by each person who made the submission unless the submission is made electronically
4. state the name and residential or business address of each person who made the submission

5. state what aspects of the pn Or proposed Sevepemere your seep or oppose and why

As Fetuiired: by: the Planning) Act 201 6, all ditwntesiods, inching individual details, are reakinned on Counce website

and therefore will be accessible to internet search engines. All submissions are published, irrespective of whether or not
they are properly made.

File No. MCU18 / 0019

‘Postal address of f Land | (as advertised) ! 52-62 Goodchap Street & 3-11 | Val Crescent Noosaville
| Nature of Proposed Development - Housing Type 3 Retirement and Special Needs (Aged Care Facility)

 

Full name of Submitter Ast THOaLyY DEATHE =
Postaladdress Bee Ss eee eos See ed
Suburb  AORSAVIL LE : ee ae | eee
saan mh ie le il

Details of Submission

I (We), make the following submission:

1. | object to the proposed development because it will impact on the amenity of the surrounding neighbourhood which j is
Zoned Detached housing. The size and bulk of the proposed development (which is basically one continuous building
taking up 11 lots) will look totally out of place on the site which ij is surrounded by modest residential houses.

2. The residential character of the area will be substantially diminished i in nature asa result of the development.

3. This site is currently zoned Detached Housing. Having a 90 bed aged care facility on this site is in direct conflict with
the Noosa Plan. The Noosa Plan was drafted based on extensive community consultation. The community expects that
the Council adheres to the Plan and does not allow development which blatantly contravenes it, such as the proposed

development. Development that would be consistent with the planning scheme would be 11 dwellings over the 11 lots,

which i is very different to a 90 bed aged care facility, which is commercial in nature.

4.A 90 bed aged care facility i is excessive and is an overdevelopment of the site.

5.1 understand that the Sunshine Coast will need more aged care facilities i in the future, however, they should be located
‘in more appropriately zoned areas. Val Crescent i is not an appropriate site for such a development.

6. The section of Goodchap Street near the hospital and Val Crescent are already under a lot of strain in terms of car
parking, with them being used as an overflow car park for hospital staff, patients and visitors. A 90 bed facility directly
across the road from the hospital which has up to 365 staff, visitors and commercial vehicles will exacerbate this problem
with more and more people parking on Goodchap St, Val Crescent and nearby side streets.

7 7 My EXPERIENCE OF ManAci We KIVERAAN OS VALAGE 0 /WwORINDIL Sy
NOOSA. HOSPITAL Wok) BE WER: BURDENED. Polk THAN 1715 Maun Ag

     

 

WER os Sy Re UR oe RBIS orgasm een ov

Council will use any personal information provided for the inte’
this information in accordance with the Local Government Act 2009 and other Local Government Acts. Your persona
persons authorised to do so. Your personal information is dealt with in accordance with council's privacy policy.

www.novsa.ald.gov.au [email protected] T 07 5329 6500
PO Box 141 Tewantin Qid 4565 ABN 97 969 214 121

 

Page 1 of 1