Original source · versioned page text
planning report 9 bottlebrush
Figure 5: Proposal setback encroachments highlighted
The small encroachments do not unreasonably obstruct views of adjoining or nearby properties,
while the eaves re designed to provide a high level of amenity to users of the subject site. Adequate
space is provided within the building setback to help buffer the development at ground level for
landscaping with landscaping and a high quality built form, consistent with the Performance
Outcomes of the High-Density Residential zone code.
4.5 Works Codes
Recor Engineers include preliminary earthworks, stormwater and traffic turning plans in accordance
with the relevant works codes. Stormwater is collected along the norther boundary and treatment
methods seek the removal of water contaminants of the building and driveways within an
underground rainwater tank.
The existing 20m high eucalypt is to be retained at the front of the site and new coastal tree species
planted within the frontage to complement the built form. The vegetation will be appropriately chosen
not to interfere with overhead powerlines and underground services in accordance with the
Landscaping code.
5.0 State assessment and other matters
5.1 State interests
5.1.1 Matters established in the Planning Regulation
Nil
5.1.2 State Planning Policy
The SPP includes assessment benchmarks that may be applicable where a local government
planning scheme does not adequately reflect the SPP. The Noosa Plan 2020 appropriately
integrates all SPP provisions, except for Natural Hazards, risk and resilience – coastal hazards – in
part. The site is not located in the erosion prone area.
Page 9 of 10
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
Large file: the download may take up to a minute.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.