Council archive · source document
08/2078 - MCU - Detached House [As Published] · 132008.2078
2. We are also seeking to have the rear boundary setback relaxed (volume of encroachments is 4.9m3 and a plan area of 8.4m2 approx.) in order to minimise the impact of greater boundary setback encroachments on the street side of the lot. A mostly open balcony to take in the ocean views has been employed with a skillion roof design to facilitate a marginally reduced line of sight to ocean views by neighbouring dwellings. The inclusion of louvered screens to the southern end of the balcony to buffer strong southern breezes have also been employed but which are within the 6.0m setback allowed. Further, we also acknowledge the need to provide a drainage solution, which would be provided by a hydraulics engineer at building approval stage, for the discharge of water from the basement level (including grated drain to front of garage door). This would be designed in a manner that does not rely on mechanical pumping with our initial enquiries revealing that the catchment area of concern is mostly contained within the driveway itself. Orours Sincerely Michael Bugden Page 2 of 2 gbd_maycock/2244-PR2 ]
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
08/2078 - MCU - Detached House [As Published]Related documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 2.7 MB (large file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.
Original file
Log in to download the original file
The download may take up to a minute.