Council archive · source document
Minor Change Report MCU21 0231 02 (As Published) · MCU21/0231.02
b. a 1 metre wide landscaping strip within the Lot, along the Natasha Avenue and
Katharina Street road frontage of the subject site, exclusive of the access driveway,
generally uncompromised by infrastructure items;
c. provision of 2 x 100 litre pot size street trees within the road reserve of both Natasha
Avenue and Katharina Street frontages.
d. screening landscaping for the full length of all boundaries including screening plants
which grow to a minimum height of 5m at maturity and provided at maximum 1.5m
centres. The screening plants must have a minimum pot size of 200mm.
Applicant’s Request
The applicant has not provided any supporting information to justify the proposed change, despite
Council’s prior correspondence identifying the areas of variation.
Assessment of Request
As identified at the time of inspection, the development has points of variation which do not
generally comply with the approved plans and does not fulfil condition 20(d) of the development
permit including:
1) Removal of landscaped podium adjoining Units K1-K3
2) inground landscaping species that will not achieve a minimum height of 5 metres.
3) Amendment to screening devices as detailed in the K1-K3 Units eastern and western
elevations.
Landscaped podium
The applicant verbally indicated that the change was required in accordance with the building
classification. The change has resulted in a reduction of site coverage for the mid-level. Privacy
between units has been upheld.
Agree to amend the approved plans..
Changes to inground species & screening
The proposed inground species are not capable of achieving a height of 5 metres at maturity.
Consequence of the retaining wall structures the width available for landscaping is marginal, refer
to Figure 8.
On inspection it was clear that the plantings along the southern boundary were not going to serve
the condition’s purpose. Through amendments to screening on this elevation, the levels of privacy
between premises are upheld considering the medium density zoning of the premises. The joining
of the screens as shown by Figure 6 prove more effective that the 3 isolated screens previously
approved.
Page 7 of 13
Document Set ID: 24102514
Version: 5, Version Date: 09/09/2025
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
Minor Change Report MCU21 0231 02 (As Published).pdfRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 1.9 MB (small file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.