Skip to the record
Search everything, all in one place.

Council archive · source document

MCU14/0067 Driveway and Stormwater Layout

of 3

Text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Check the original when the exact wording matters.

LINDSAY CONSULTING PTY
                   LTD


[OCR of page images]
 

 

 

 

GR

hy
oh gy

    
       

b

LL 4.525

WB .3m approx.
1.0M'X 10M STONE

\
FIXED WITH CEMENT
peo win cogent

  

 

ITCHING.

CONTINUED DRAWING 2

 

 

 

 

 

 

PAD LEVEL -| 4.910

 

 

 

 

 

  
  

 

y———Retaining wall 0.6m approx.

40M STONE PITCHING.
TH CEMENT

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

FFL - 5.210
(upvc AT\GRApE INDICATED ROOF FALL ROOF FALL -
AGWALL AT DRIVEWAY
4
cor “a, 2700
SECTION B by
%
S&S
S oO}
ny iva)
S A Ly
& 8 S
a % S a
A
ROOF FALL ROOF FALL LL 4.525
ts 1.0M X 1.0M STONE PITCHING.

 

 

 

 

  

HEADWALL AT prIvewhy

  

ITCHING.

,
he

Oe

 

 

 

 

EDGE

 

Ox.

 

Xe by
§a “a
‘0 ny

4
e

 

 

 

 

 

€
“2

 

 

.
.
2
&%
<
St

 

 

_ FIXED WITH CEMENT

WALL AT DRIVEWAY

[Retaining wall 0.3m approx.

2 No 100mm UPVC
Pipe to Kerb (See Detail)

 

LINDSAY CONSULTING {7

 

 

THIS DRAWING REMAINS THE PROPERTY OF
LINDSAY CONSULTING PTY LTD AND IS FOR
THE SOLE USE OF THE CLIENT. NO PART
MAY BE USED IN PART OR WHOLE WITHOUT
PRIOR EXPRESS WRITTEN CONSENT OF
LINDSAY CONSULTING PTY LTD

 

CLIENT AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION
RON LOGAN
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT

LOT 2 RENE STREET
NOOSAVILLE

 

DRAWING TITLE
OPERATIONAL WORKS 1/2

 

SCALES

 

 

SURVEY DATUM

 

ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

REVISION LIST
A_| ORIGINAL ISSUE 27/08/14,
[enpoter Fle
140821CP.dwg
DRAWING NOMBER SHEET] REV.

 

 

 

14-0821-C1 T/A

 

 
Full text of the other 2 pages

Page 2

LINDSAY CONSULTING PTY
                   LTD


[OCR of page images]
 

 

        
   

 

         

 

 

 

     
    

  
 
 
 
    
 

 

 

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

  

 

   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

   
  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

pry
Retaining wall Retaining wall Retoining wall Retaining wall Retaining wall) LINDSAY CONSULTING {i
0.5m approx, 0.6m approx _ 0.7m approx 0.9m approx 1.0m approx
\ \ \ 7A
\ ne
\ THIS DRAWING REMAINA THE PROPERTY OF
\ \ LINDSAY CONSULTING PTY LTD AND IS FOR
Z D, D D eS Y THE SOLE USE OF THE CLIENT. NO PART
ee A ‘ 6a, w 8s “ 4a, b % 4a, S&S MAY BE USED IN PART OR WHOLE WITHOUT
0 \ 0 OD ‘0 0 0 PRIOR EXPRESS WRITTEN CONSENT OF
Landscaped areg| [Landscaped areal
Landscaped ared hS | A | Landscaped ared LINDSAY CONCULTING PTY LTD
Retaining wall ve \ | .
ee LL 462s to S Xe we fy HH CLIENT AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION
\ “4 4 4 4 RON LOGAN
&y By Be &y
bs | a! y—Retuining wail 0.9m approx. | PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
— /
: A L525 LOT 2 RENE STREET
% % % x - NOOSAVILLE
fa Ka, 8 40, 40, / \ $4
¥—1,0M X 1.0M STONE PITCHING. °0 %0 %2 %0 ‘9 )<ilex 1.0M STONE PITCHING.
FIXED WITH CEMENT FIMED WITH CEMENT
ji —_ — — \
0 UPVE AT GRADE INDICATED & \
B58, \ DRAWING TITLE
HEADWALL QT DRIVEWAY “ony 60 WALL AT DRIVEWAY
EDGE a &y, OPERATIONAL WORKS 2/2
Poy,
J \ YL,
- S Qe
SCALES
A
ROOF FALL ROOF FALL O41 2 30 hm
2700 a
2/00 S on
4% “Sy,
Oy 0
SURVEY DATUM
A
2 S|
x g
ria) fra
> — ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS
\ y——Retaining wall 0.6m approx.
BEC TION A A \
Retaining wall
| 0.3m approx, o
& & /
tn a nl >
S @
\ FIL 4.525 1% gg5
‘eps
ITCHING. 1.0M X 10M STONE PITCHING.
ITH CEME PAD LEVEL -| 4.910 FIXED WITH CEMENT
. A F.F.L - 5.210
| UPVC ATNGRADE INDICATED, ROOF FALL ROOF FALL _——
HEADWALL NT DRIVEWAY | Spe. WALL AT DRIVEWAY
EDGE ~ “ney
&
\ Ue 2 REVISION LIST
Cc Cr) \ ‘07 A_| ORIGINAL ISSUE 27/08/14,
SECTION B \ hy
Re
CONTINUED DRAWING 1
Fenpotar Fie
140821CP.dwg
DRAWING NOMBER SHEET] EV.
14-0821-C2 2)A

 

 

 

 

 

Page 3

LINDSAY CONSULTING PTY
                   LTD


[OCR of page images]
 

 

fo be confirmed

PROPERTY BOUNDARY

‘00 ~ 1600) 280,

 

| Top of extend
detention Gila,

       
    

20mm Filter Hedia (Sandy
‘Saturated hyraute
conduct “nn?

0mm Tonsten Loyer
Ionrce Sand (05 ~ 7.0mm Neninal Sie)

inn Pefotated Pie at 05%
longitudinal grace towards evetlow pt

 

Refer lst of landscope plants
on tandsape designers pls

   

ing
‘ad 300 lng eats to Be
‘Din below suroce

 

tr snare E.S.L.

 

 

 

/

 

 

280mm Drainage layer (Fine grovel
‘Som heninal Sze

BIO-RETENTION BED DETAIL
ferret PROPERTY BOUNDARY

[ee] AREA OF BIORETENTION BED.

 

conpark

  

QMS AREA OF GRASSED OR LANDSCAPED SWALE

LANDSCAPED SWALES

 

 

 

 

ROCK RETAINING WALL BRIDGING DETAIL

Project

UL ju
Hy yy

 

varies

   

   

300
GRASSED SWALES

    

minim

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

TIMBER RETAINING WALL BRIDGING DETAIL

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

CARPARK/DRIVEWAY BRIDGING DETAIL

Ho-retention basing,

DHETENTION #a5w ovERFLOW PIT NOTES

 

 

BIORETENTION CELL
INFORMATION

‘THIS BIORETENTION BASIN HAS BEEN

DESIGNED TO CAPTURE AND TREAT RUNOFF

IFROM THE SITE THEREBY REDUCING NEGATIVE|

IMPACTS OF THIS RUNOFF AND PROTECTING
THE HEALTH OF THE AQUATIC

WATERSYSTEM

 

 

800

 

 

INFORMATION SIGN - 1 OFF REQUIRED

 

 

 

 

PROPERTY BOUNDARY

Trin ae me Sr |

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

i 25 ut sie
a Chess st PvE

BIO-RETENTION BED - PIT DETAIL

ete Wen Sort only DS

     
   

 

LINDSAY CONSULTING PTY LTD

Project Number

LOT 2 RENE ST, NOOSAVILLE

Client

RAINFALL VOLUME CALCULATIONS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

60036006510 deep Stormwater Pit

 

 

 

 

 

BIO-RETENTION BED - PIT DETAIL

 

140821
RON LOGAN

 

Le

 

SITE INFORMATION

  

\

 

 

Fieretenton meio spatiotin sal bein occrdone ih the fsiy for Afvoncng BHtratbn.
“Cuielines "Sol Fifer Hedi in Bnretentbn Syste". retention hyrauiccondatily shal bein

  
 

Sestve Ubon DesgeCestruin and Estobiehnen Gude - Seales, Sretantin Systene ond
Mellons (water by Desig

2. Under ltd rig pe uPVC or sir to AS 2438.1 or opprovad aminaan, 5% ML
grade. Refer project sawigs fer damatet ord inert level Typo ‘DOD. Pye shuld vet be
instoled whe filer sck surrounding pipe Undr-onoge pps sell be soled ini gis shy grout
ce ota opproved watertight #40

3. Refer to projet roving fr vetted batter los It 3 MAK, 1 typical end tater topo
requrenents

4 Filer lth — sen-woven gett. Fier lth rot tobe pled between ont fier loys apes
line noy te rege suber! fe 2 fectng reqranenis i cttdore withthe "Water Sective
Ubon Design Teta Design Guidelines” (Woe by Desig.

5. Basin ised surfve lee is Yop of fhe neda. Surface to be mulch ond planted as pr
landscape down.

4. Coretta folrones of acunnted in te “Woter Sensitive Urbon Design Centrcton ne
{stobehnen Guidnes~ Swales, Brenton Systeme of Melons” Woter by Dei ert be
xcieved. Construction fleraces ast berated on project plans. vert level of ps, pipes ond bose
Tevls must e noted on project rans

1. Rafe landscape rowing fer port spetotin, flan epctcten nd dest shall be in
corde withthe "Woler Sensitive Ubon Design Techel Design ueles” Water by Design

4 AL nein ve Wy mlinetres unless ofarvice note

SWPSOL DRAW CLEANOUT NOTES

1 Biren

“Guiles for Sol Fifer Mein Biretenin Sytens™ Boreenhon hydraute cond hall en
accardnce th the Faity fo Advosing Sfratin * Procce Note ily Measurement of
Hyrouic Condy". Te number of sompes te be Tested shal be In occordonce wh the "water
Seretive Uton Dein Cre trtivn od Estobichnent Guidelines ~ Swale, Biretentien Syctene oad
Wetlands (woter by Dei,

co apeiento shall bef otcordorce wth fhe foty fer Aden Bitrate

 

2. Underrated ri pipe 0 4S 243.1 o approved equal, D5Y% HR. grade Rete projet
‘owingy fr daneter ond ver level (Typkally UNO), Pipe is stad be ued uring plunbing
fenett ips should wot be istled wih fie! cok surrounding pipe, Ubt-tahage pet shall be
Seale inte ps usng peut or other oppeved watertight sea

2 Refer te project cringe for vetoed otter slop tin 3 MAX, "in 6fypel od Hater tepe
regiments

4 Basin sed surfce level i op of titer nadia, Surface fo be nuthed ond lnted as per
Torscape dawg.

5 Ingernaoble or - HOPE, benoit, cenpacted cay ot oppoved equivalent te bose ond si,
instoled os per monfacarrs ond/er geletnlerghesr'sspeiation, Where congotted clay
liner is pte, fer cloth is fo be ase as pe toe & on PWEAD droweg WSUD-ON Refer 1 the

dat SemtveUrbon Design Centruction ond Extoblshmant Guidelines - Soles, Bireentn
Systems ond Wetlands” (wofer by Dei for dsl

 

6 Conetacton tolerances chcaented in he "water Senite Ubon Dein Cnetuctin and
{efablehnent Guidlines - Swoles,Biereteton Systems od Wellode” (water by Desi wart be
ttheved Construction flores wurt beefed on poet plot,

1 Refer landscape drawing for pont speiicatin. Pont speiotion ond dete shal in
xcardance itt the “Water Serie Ubun Design Techical Design Caelies” water by Desig

A neni ore in wilintre une oars nate

  

 

iter th estan 50 pater ade ‘cat ben

        
 

seco

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

SWALE SUBSOIL DRAIN CLEANOUT

NOT TO STALE

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Project LOT 2 RENE STREET, NOOSAVILLE Total Site Area 4005 sqm
Comments Rainfall Calculations Limiting runoff from Site (Dia 450) 999 m/sec (999 wids this check)
Permeable Pavement Area 0 sqm
ARR Intensity Calculation Data - As obtained from BOM IFD program Storage in bio-retention basins 0 chm
Tnput Data Roof Area into Detention Tank 0 sqm
Duration Effective Site area (Site-Less
ARL_[hr [en [rane Permeable Pavement Area) 4005 sqm
2 B23 «1025 «| Travel length 7 om
50 93.96 23.81 8.66 Site Slope 0.01
Surface Roughness 02
skewness 07] Map7 Land Description L UMD
|Geographical Factor (F2) 4.4) Map 8 Soil Permeability LHigh/Medium/Low (H/M/L)
[Geographical Factor (F50) 17.6] Map9 Light cover bushland, o poor grass cover, or lw density pasture or low cover bare falows
Medium Density Bush, or good grass cover o high densty pasture, oF zero ling eropping
Dense Bushland
Un-Developed Fraction Impenious 0.45 From Fig. 4.05.1 in QUDM (2007)
Developed Fraction Impenious 09 From Fig. 4.05.1 in QUDM (2007)
One Hr rainfall intensity for Q10 72.2511 mmihe
Calculated Travel Time 16 Min —_-Must equal time selected for intensity
Adopted Storm Time 10 min
Detention Tank Provided 18000 It
Retum interval (ARI)
7 2 3 70 20 50 700
Intensity (for Return Interval) 3972 726.5 Te5 oT, 772.69, 75.88, 26.13 249.12
C10 value 0790 0880 0780 0880 0790 0.880 0790 0880 0780 0680 0700 0880 0.700 0.880
Fy Factor 0.80 080 085 «0.85095 0.95 1.00 1001.05 1.05 4.15 1.15 1.201.20
oy 0632 0.704 OB718 0.748 0.7505 0.836 0.79 0.88 0.8295 0.924 0.9085 1.012 0.948 1.056
Q (maisec) 0.07 008 «009s Ott 038 0.15 O17 018 = 0.20 023025) 028 29
Total Rainfall for event (m3) 47 o4 66 102 124 153 176
Total Non-Worsening Volume for Storm (m3) 48 65 9 104 124 5.7 18
Roof Area Runoff for Storm (m3) 0 0 0 0 0 ° 0

 

LINDSAY CONSULTING {7
7

RPEO 4928

   
 

OFF, 2¢782 PARKE/STREET, MAROQHIVDORE PH Su 792 118

 

THIS DRAWING REMAINS THE PROPERTY OF
LINDSAY CONSULTING PTY LTD AND IS FOR
THE SOLE USE OF THE CLIENT. NO PART
MAY BE USED IN PART OR WHOLE WITHOUT
PRIOR EXPRESS WRITTEN CONSENT OF
LINDSAY CONSULTING PTY LTD

 

CLIENT AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION
RON LOGAN
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT

LOT 2 RENE STREET
NOOSAVILLE

 

DRAWING TITLE

BIORETENTION AND
STORMWATER CALCULATIONS

 

SCALES

 

 

SURVEY DATUM

 

ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS

 

REVISION LIST

 

ORIGINAL ISSUE 27/08/14,

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

[Fomputer Fle

140821CP.dwg

 

DRAWING NUMBER SHEET] REV.

14-0821-C3 3/A

 

 

 

 

 

Used in these records

About this file

File size
983 KB (small file)
File type
PDF

No other editions are linked here.

Original file

Log in to download the original file

MCU14_0067 Driveway and Stormwater Layout.pdf · 983 KB (small file)

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.