Council archive · source document
Referral Agency Response - Planning Refusal RAP20 0039 · RAP20/0039
Officer: Glen Conforti Direct Telephone: 07 53296241 Our Reference: RAP20/0039 Your Reference: n/a 18 September 2020 LE Walker & HS Walker C/- Project BA PO Box 45 NOOSAVILLE QLD 4566 [email protected] Dear Sir Referral Agency Response - Refusal Planning Act 2016 I refer to your application and advise that Council, as a concurrence agency for the application, completed its assessment of the application on 23 September 2020. You are advised that Council refused the application. Reasons for refusal are detailed below. application details Application No. RAP20/0039 Street Address: 30 Nairana Rest Noosa Heads Qld 4567 Real Property Description: Lot 127 RP 88934 Planning Scheme: The Noosa Plan 2006 (8 June 2018) type of development The applicant seeks the following type of development approval: Development Permit for Building Works (Detached House) reasons for refusal The application material submitted is not sufficient to properly assess the application. The proposal does not comply with Probable Solution S1.1 of the Building Works Code as the storeroom/workshop and vehicle parking area is a building/structure within the front 6m setback. The proposal does not comply with Specific Outcome O1 of the Building Works Code because the storeroom/workshop and vehicle parking area— does not preserve any existing vegetation to screen the building/structure from neighbouring properties given it encompasses the majority of the front setback; does not allow for landscaping between buildings; and creates a hardstand area to more than 90% of the sites frontage which does not maintain the visual continuity and pattern of buildings in the street. The proposal does not comply with Probable Solution S11.1 h) of the Building Works Code as the building is proposed greater than 8m above the natural and finished ground level and is 3 storeys. The proposal does not comply with Specific Outcome O11 of the Building Works Code because the application has not demonstrated the — building height indicated on the submitted plans is accurate; development presents a building height consistent with buildings/structures in the surrounding area; development will not create additional overlooking and negatively impact on the privacy of neighbouring properties or negatively affect neighbouring access to sunlight; and development will not impede views from dwellings in the surrounding area. The proposal has not demonstrated safe access to the proposed new vehicle parking area in accordance with Specific Outcome O4 of the Detached House Driveways Code, given that car parking is proposed for more than 90% of the frontage and access to the car parking area is across the road verge. The new car parking area renders street parking in front of the development unusable and therefore reducing street parking unnecessarily rEPRESENTATIONS ABOUT REFERRAL AGENCY RESPONSE The applicant may make representations to Council about this referral agency response at any time before the application is decided pursuant to section 30 of the Development Assessment Rules. OTHER DETAILS If you wish to obtain more information about the decision, electronic copies are available on line at www.noosa.qld.gov.au or at Council Offices. Yours faithfully Glen Conforti Development Planner [word/footer2.xml] Page 2 of 2 [word/footer3.xml] PO Box 141 P. (07) 5329 6500 [email protected] TEWANTIN QLD 4565 F. (07) 5329 6501 www.noosa.qld.gov.au Page 1 of 2 [word/header1.xml] 3
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
Referral Agency Response - Planning Refusal RAP20 0039Related documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 73 KB (small file)
- File type
- DOCX
No other editions are linked here.