Skip to the record
The first. The best. The only NoosaWatch™.

Original source · versioned page text

Meeting minutes

of 6

Page text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

                       MINUTES


   Planning & Environment
     Committee Meeting

              Tuesday, 7 October 2025

                                9:30 AM
            Council Chambers, 9 Pelican Street, Tewantin




Committee: Crs Amelia Lorentson (Chair), Brian Stockwell, Frank Wilkie, Tom
Wegener




                     “Noosa Shire – different by nature”
Log in to download the original file

036b24924f.pdf · 1.5 MB (small file)

Full text of the other 5 pages

Page 2

PLANNING & ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE MEETING MINUTES                              7 OCTOBER 2025



1     DECLARATION OF OPENING
      The meeting was declared open at 9.39am



2     ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF COUNTRY
      Noosa Council respectfully acknowledges the Traditional Custodians of the lands and waters
      of the Noosa area, the Kabi Kabi people, and pays respect to their Elders, past, present and
      emerging.




3     ATTENDANCE & APOLOGIES

      COMMITTEE MEMBERS
      Cr Amelia Lorentson (Chair)
      Cr Brian Stockwell
      Cr Tom Wegener
      Cr Frank Wilkie

      NON COMMITTEE MEMBERS
      Cr Karen Finzel


      EXECUTIVE
      Chief Executive Officer Larry Sengstock
      Director Development & Regulation Richard MacGillivray


      APOLOGIES
      Nil.



4     CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES

4.1   PLANNING & ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE MEETING MINUTES DATED 9
      SEPTEMBER 2025
      Committee Recommendation
      Moved:            Cr Amelia Lorentson
      Seconded:         Cr Frank Wilkie

      That Planning & Environment Committee Agenda Item 4.1 be deferred to the Ordinary
      Meeting.
      Carried.
      For:              Cr Amelia Lorentson, Cr Brian Stockwell, Cr Tom Wegener, Cr Frank
                        Wilkie
      Against:          None

Page 3

PLANNING & ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE MEETING MINUTES                              7 OCTOBER 2025


5.    PRESENTATIONS
      Nil.


6.    DEPUTATIONS
      Nil.


7     REPORTS FOR CONSIDERATION OF THE COMMITTEE



7.1   PLANNING APPLICATIONS DECIDED BY DELEGATED AUTHORITY – AUGUST
      2025
      Committee Recommendation
      Moved:             Cr Amelia Lorentson
      Seconded:          Cr Frank Wilkie
      That Council note the report by the Development Assessment Manager to the Planning &
      Environment Committee Meeting on 7 October 2025 regarding applications that have been
      decided by delegated authority for August 2025 as per Attachment 1 to the Report.
      Carried.
      For:              Cr Amelia Lorentson, Cr Brian Stockwell, Cr Tom Wegener, Cr Frank
                        Wilkie
      Against:          None




7.2   MCU19/0017.07 - DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FOR OTHER CHANGE TO
      DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL FOR COMMERCIAL BUSINESS TYPE 1 OFFICE,
      COMMERCIAL BUSINESS TYPE 2 MEDICAL TO HEALTH CARE SERVICE,
      HOSPITAL AND HOSPITAL (INFUSION CENTRE) AND RAL 19/0004.07
      RECONFIGURING LOT AT 36-40 HOFMANN DRIVE, NOOSAVILLE
      Committee Recommendation
      Moved:             Cr Brian Stockwell
      Seconded:          Cr Frank Wilkie

      That Council note the report by the Coordinator Planning to the Planning & Environment
      Committee Meeting dated 7 October 2025 regarding                   Other Change to
      Application MCU19/0017.07 Development Permit for Material Change of Use - Commercial
      Business – Type 1 Office, Commercial Business Type 2 Medical and Development Permit
      for Reconfiguring a Lot to a Material Change of Use - Health Care Service, Hospital and
      Hospital (Infusion Centre) and Development Permit for Reconfiguring a Lot, situated at 36-
      40 Hofmann Drive Noosaville and:
                 A. Approve the change to the approved uses so that the approved uses are now
                    Health Care Service, Hospital and Hospital (Infusion Centre)
                 B. Amend Conditions 2, 3, 17, 25
                 C. Note the report is provided in accordance with Section 63(5) of the Planning
                    Act 2016.

Page 4

PLANNING & ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE MEETING MINUTES                                    7 OCTOBER 2025


                 D. Find the following matters relevant to the assessment and sufficient reason to
                    approve the application:
                     I. The proposed extension is located internal to the building and will not
                          impact on the existing streetscape.
                     II. The proposed hospital use more accurately reflects the nature of services
                          provided on-site, which include specialised cancer treatment, dedicated
                          treatment areas, and inpatient accommodation. These functions are more
                          consistent with a hospital use than a general medical centre.
                     III. The proposed carparking provision and information has been peer
                          reviewed. The peer review supports the recommendation the carparking
                          provisions based on the predominant use of the site being for hospital
                          purposes as described by the applicant.

      Carried.
      For:               Cr Amelia Lorentson, Cr Brian Stockwell, Cr Tom Wegener, Cr Frank
                         Wilkie
      Against:           None




7.3   MCU25/0006 - DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FOR MATERIAL CHANGE OF
      USE - SHORT TERM ACCOMMODATION (BACKPACKERS ACCOMMODATION)
      AT 17 RUSSELL ST, NOOSAVILLE
      Committee Recommendation
      Moved:              Cr Amelia Lorentson
      Seconded:           Cr Brian Stockwell

      That Council note the report by the Senior Development Planner to the Planning &
      Environment Committee Meeting dated 7 October 2025 regarding Application MCU25/0006
      for a Development Permit for Material Change of Use - Short-term accommodation
      (backpackers accommodation), situated at and 1-3/17 Russell Street Noosaville and:
                 A. Refuse the application for the following reasons:
                 1. The proposed development is an overdevelopment of the site and is not
                    consistent with Overall Outcomes 6.3.3.2 (2) (a) (c) (d) (e) (f) (h) (j) (n) and (p)
                    and performance outcomes and acceptable outcomes PO6, PO7, PO8, PO9,
                    PO15, AO9.1(c) and AO15.2 and AO15.3 of the High Density Residential Zone
                    Code as;
                     a. The scale of the development is not consistent with structures on adjoining
                        or nearby land and is likely to dominate and adversely impact the
                        surrounding residential amenity.
                     b. The proposed development will result in a site cover which significantly
                        exceeds the site cover requirements of the planning scheme providing a
                        building that is not consistent with the street and surrounding area.
                     c. The proposed development does not satisfactorily incorporate design
                        elements and materials reflective of the local streetscape character of the
                        area, with the building not designed in the Noosa sub-tropical style.
                     d. The proposal will result in a plot ratio which significantly exceeds the plot
                        ratio requirements of the planning scheme and is of a size that is not
                        compatible with surrounding development.
                     e. The proposal rear setback of the third floor and rooftop terrace significantly
                        encroaches into the rear setback as required by the planning scheme and

Page 5

PLANNING & ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE MEETING MINUTES                               7 OCTOBER 2025


                       contributes to building bulk and provides opportunities for overlooking to
                       adjacent properties.
                   f. The proposed roof top terrace creates opportunities for potential privacy
                       impacts on neighbouring properties due to overlooking.
             2.   The proposal does not comply with Overall Outcomes 9.4.1.2 (2) (a) (b) (c) and
                  Performance Outcome 6 and Acceptable Outcomes 6.1and 6.2 of the
                  Driveways and Parking Code as:
                   a. Sufficient carparking is not available on site to accommodate the likely
                       demand for carparking on site and the site is located where on street
                       parking is insufficient and undesirable.
                   b. The proposed car stacker is not suitable for parking as it lacks sufficient
                       clearance for operation and is impractical for use by guests and staff
                       unfamiliar with such systems.
                   c. The development does not provide the required number of functional car
                       spaces including service vehicles as the proposed bus park is not sized to
                       accommodate a small rigid vehicle.
                   d. No provision has been made for motorcycles and bicycles.
             3.   The proposed does not comply with Performance Outcome 7 and Acceptable
                  Outcome AO7.1 of the Driveways and Parking Code as:
                   a. The development fails to provide adequate loading and manoeuvring
                       areas on site to accommodate the anticipated service vehicles.
             4.   The proposal is not consistent with Overall Outcome 9.4.10.2 (2) (d) and
                  Performance and Acceptable Outcomes PO3, AO3.2(b), AO3.2(d), AO3.2(e)
                  and AO3.2(f) of the Waste Management Code as:
                   a. The development has not adequately demonstrated that waste can be
                       serviced on site.
                   b. The proposed waste storage area has not been designed to allow for
                       unobstructed access for collection by service vehicles (i.e., on-site
                       servicing).
                   c. Kerbside servicing is unable to occur while remaining clear from all existing
                       on-street carparks, pedestrian footpaths and without impeding traffic flow
                       on Russell Street.
             5.   The proposal is not consistent with Performance Outcome PO9 and the
                  corresponding Acceptable outcomes AO9.1 & AO9.2 of the Visitor
                  accommodation Code as:
                   a. The proposed area of landscaping is significantly less than the area
                       required by the planning scheme;
                   b. The proposed landscaping widths to side and rear boundaries are
                       significantly less than that required by the planning scheme;
                   c. The undersupply of onsite landscaping area and widths to boundaries
                       results in a development which restricts the ability to incorporate
                       landscaping between the site and neighbouring premises / buildings and
                       to assist with softening the built form.
     There are no relevant reasons to approve the proposed development to vary from
     development intensity specified by the Noosa Plan 2020 for this area.
             B. Note the report is provided in accordance with Section 63(5) of the Planning
                Act 2016.
             C. Note the report incorrectly identifies the required number of bicycle spaces and
                motorcycle spaces which should each be identified as 7.

Page 6

PLANNING & ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE MEETING MINUTES                     7 OCTOBER 2025




     Carried.
     For:            Cr Amelia Lorentson, Cr Brian Stockwell, Cr Tom Wegener, Cr Frank
                     Wilkie
     Against:        None




8    REPORTS FOR NOTING BY THE COMMITTEE
     Nil.

9    CLOSED SESSION
     Nil.

10   MEETING CLOSURE
     The meeting closed at 10.30am.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.