08/1491 - MCU - Detached House [As Published] · 132008.1491

Page 2

MIDDAP DITCHFIELD

ARCHITECTS

27 August 2008

The Sunshine Coast Regional Council
Tewantin Office

PO Box 141

TEWANTIN Q 4565

Attn: Gten Conserti
PROJECT: PROPOSED RESIDENCE

51 WITTA CIRCLE
e NOOSA HEADS
SUBJECT: | MATERIAL CHANGE OF USE - ACID SULFATE SOILS
Dear Glen
Please find enclosed :-

IDAS Assessment Checklist

a.
b. Part A Common Details

c. PartD Material change of use assessable against a planning scheme. Con thont ~ Ont
d. Acid Sulfate Management Plan iodine

e. Cheque for $630.00 being the appropriate fee. $665

Deni Cmne—t-
If you require any further information please do not hesitate to give me a call.

Play.

   
 
   

Yours faithfully

harynO’Neill
MIDDAP DITCHFIELD
ARCHITECTS

   
    
 

27 NE fos

5 SOR fewantin L~/
eS FFeaatounter: Aw £

+

9 — Ze

    

 

oi Te MiiESss Senge) (vs
oO oe five GY SEE) GL VHS. DOIG. OOM. OU
ones COSIQNOTOGES.COT.AG CT A SEEM

Page 3

o

INTEGRATED PLANNING ACT 1997 Part A, Version 3.1, 3 March 2008

 

 

 

(na ton proved an the IDAS Application Form is correct. This information is relied upon ty the Assessment Manager and any refS altige i i '
deciding this application, By lodging this application, the Applicant incurs the obligations and responsibilities prescribed by the IPA. Any develope! eri or preliminary i
tapproval that may be issued as a consequence of this application will be issued fo the Applicant) __ _..

snes en

 

Company/organisation name (if applicable) [

 

Individual applicant/Contact person (if there is more than one applicant, provide additional applicent details on an attachment to this form)

Title [vr &Mrs__ | Firstname [Warren L& Ellen R Last name [Walker

Postal address INo. 7 Kareela Avenue, Noosa Heads Q 4567

Contact telephone number [5455 4334 Mobile phone number
Facsimile number e-mail address [[email protected]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Details of the premises (ie. the and on which the development is proposed - -referto the advice at the end of the form) / md
1. \dentify the premises by completing Table A, or Table B and/or Table C (ensure adequate information is ; given to identity the premises)
Table A If the application is for a mobile and temporary Environmentally Relevant Activity (ERA), complete Table A onty. Then go to Q2.

 

 

| Name of each local government area in which the mobile and temporary ERA is proposed to operate

[4
oR
Table B Street address for the premises (tick applicable box/es below and insert property description in the table. Identify each lot in a separate row.)
(i) [LJ Street address / lot on pian for the premises (Appropriate for most applications including building applications); OF

 

 

 

 

(ii) [J Street address /lot on plan for the land adjoining or adjacent to the premises (Appropriate for development in water 0.9. jetty,
pontoon etc) (Note: Loton plan details may be obtained from title documents, a ‘Rate' notice, or from the local government.)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Ta Street Address Lot on oan cecctption Local government area (eg. Logan,
No. | No. |  SteetName and official suburtvlocalty name | Post Code | Lat No. Plan {ype ber Caims)
4 51 Witta Circle, Noosa Heads 4567 114 21845 Noosa
AND/OR
Table C Coordinates and/or a map of the premises (Appropriate for development in remote areas, over part of a lot, in water (e.9. channel dredging in Moreton
Bay) atc.)
Coordinates
(Note: place each set of coordinates in a separate row} Zone Datum Local government area
Easting Northing Latitude Longitude Reference (if applicable)
1 FF pepaga
[7 weses
[Other -

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2. _ Identify if any of the following apply to the premises by completing Tables D, E, or F. (Note: in most instances, the premises will not involve any of
the following charecteristics, however some applications may involve one or more of these characteristics - complete only if applicable}

Page 4

INTEGRATED PLANNING ACT 1997 Part A, Version 3.1, 3 March 2008
Table D Complete if the premises are adjacent to or associated with a water body, watercourse or aquifer (e.g. rver, creek, take, canal)

 

Name of water body, watercourse or aquifer (if known)

 

[1 [Noosa Sound Canal
Table E Complete if the premises are on Strategic Port Land under the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994
Lot on plan description for strategic port land Port Authority for the fot
(1

Table F Complete if the premises are in tidal water

 

 

 

 

 

 

[" Name of local government for the tidal area (if applicable) Name of port authority for the tidat area (if applicable)
[1 Noosa

 

 

 

 

 

3. Indicate the total area of the premises on which the development is proposed: (Note: The total area may include land both above and below water)

 

Total area of premises

 

624.00 m? [hectares (Tick applicable unif)

 

 

 

 

Existing use of the premises

4. Current use/s of the premises: (e.g. vacant land, house, townhouses, apartment building, shop, service station, school, sugar cane farming ete.)

 

| 1 | vacant

 

5. Are there any existing easements on the premises? (e.g. for vehicular access, electricity, overland flow, water etc.)?
Xx] No oO Yes - Ensure the ‘ype, I location and dimensions of each easement are included in plans, submitted with the application

Proposal, details
6. Brief description of the proposal (e.g. 6 unit apartment tuiding, 20 ot residential subdivision, a bore, aquacuiture)

 

 

2 Story residence

 

 

7. Does the poposal include new buildings or operational work (including any services) on the premises?
(No [X] Yes - Ensure the nature, location and dimensions of the proposed works are included in plans, submitted with the he application

‘Resource entitle entitlement (7 app (if appicable) ~ futher information i is provided in the advice section at the end of the form

ene

 

8. Does the application involve taking or interfering with a State resource and therefore require a resource entitlement? (e.g. the application
involves State land (leased and freehold), declared Fish Habitat areas, taking quarry material, taking or interfering with water under the Water Act 2000, etc.)

No - Goto 09 Oo Yes -Complete Table G - provide details for each evidence required on a separate row, if applicable. Evidence of resource
allocation or entitlement must be submitted with the application. You do not need to answer Q9 - go fo the next section.

‘Qwner's consent {iFapplicable) - further information is provided in the advice section at the end of the form

9. Complete Table H for applications involving a material change of use; reconfiguration of a lot; work on land below high-water mark and
not within a canal as defined under the Coastal Protection and Management Act 1995, or work on rail corridor land defined under the
Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 - provide details for each owner on a separate row, or on an attachment to this form if applicable.

 

 

 

Premises Owner's name/s Details of the premises owned . * Date consent
Table H and postal address (street address or lot on plan description) Owners signature was obtained
Warren L & Ellen R Walker
1 No.7 Kareela Avenue, 51 Witta Circle, Noosa Heads
Noosa Heads

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

* Owner's signature cannot be provided on the form if you intend to submit the application electronically. Owner's consent must be provided to the assessment manager on an
attachment containing appropriate written documentation of the owner's consent. If the owner is a company, 8127 of the Corporations Act 2007 (Cwealth) details how a
company may sign as owner. Templates for the provision af owner's consent are avaitable on the IPA website .

‘Attachments and supporting information (Complete Table | - Use @ separate row for each type of attachment or information, including Information required

under this Parl) Please ensure ail documentation submitted with this form, inciding other Parts of Form 1, or owner's consent, etc, are securely attached to this Part of the Form.

 

 

Description of attachment or information

- Titte (if applicable) Method of delivery to
Table | fog. ceclninitoret panies ea (0.9, General Aubarly, James SteotTrafte Repo) | Date assessment manager

 

 

 

 

 

 

1 Part D of Form 1 over the counter

 

Page 5

INTEGRATED PLANNING ACT 1997 Part A, Version 3.1, 3 March 2008

‘Portable Long Service Leave {PLSL) levy (Applicable for certain buiding end construction work valued over $80,000 only)
10. The Portable Long Service Leave Levy (PLSL) is not applicable to this application if any of the following apply: ( Tick box if applicable)
([] the application seeks a preliminary approval only,

the application is not for building and construction work under the Building and Construction Industry (Portable Long Service
Leave) Act 1991, section 3AA (e.g. the application is only for a change of use, or for the following types of work carried out solely for
farming purposes: land clearing, site preparation, earthworks, fences, fodder harvesting, clearing of encroaching vegetation, clearing of
regrowth, thinning vegetation or controlling weeds or pests),

CL all costs, that relate to the work both directly and indirectly, ara less than $80,000, inclusive of GST; or

L] the work is being carried out under an owner-builder permit issued under the Queens/and Building Services Authonty Act 1991 -

Complete and submit a QLeave Notification and Payment Form (no payment required if owner-builder permit number stated). The receipted form must be
sighted by the assessment manager before a development pennit can be given.

11. Is payment of a PLSL levy applicable to this application? (Refer to Q10 and the Advice below for more information)?

No - End of Part A
(1 Yes - Answer Q12 below

 

O OFFICE USE ONLY (For use by the Assessment Manager / Private Certifier) (Optional)

 

Receiving officer's

. Ref
Fee (S)) (Z| Datoreceived 1.4) x oy name Py Xucee} numbers o8(17~a)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

"NOTIFICATION OF ENGAGEMENT OF PRIVATE CERTIFIER

 

To; ‘council. | have been engaged as the private certifier for the building work referred to in this application.

 

 

 

 

Date of Sf marth ‘1 ee te
engagement Name BSA Certification number Building classification/s

 

 

 

 

 

 

QLEAVE NOTIFICATION AND PAYMENT (for completion by assessment manager or private certifier if applicable)

 

 

 

Date receipted
Description of the work QLeave Project Number | Amount paid ($)] Date paid fom ghee Name of offer who sighted the
O manager
1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Privacy Statement
The information collected on Form 1 will be used by the Department of infrastructure and Planning (DIP) in accordance with the processing and assessment of your Application.

Your personal details will not be disclosed for a purpose outside of the IDAS process, except where required by legislation (including the Freedom of information Act 1992) or as
required by Parliament. This information may be stored in a DIP database. The information collected willl be retained as required by the Public Records Act 2002.

 

Advice for completing Part A

General advice
e Part A of IDAS Development Application Form 1 must be completed and accompany all development applications. The applicant is responsible

for answering all questions fully and correctly, unless following a response there is a statement to go directly to another question. The

Assessment Manger may refuse to receive an application that is not properly made.
The IDAS Assessment Checklist must also be completed for all development applications, other than those requiring assessment against the

Building Act 1975 only, i.e. those applications requiring the completion of Parts A and B only.

Applicant details

. If the applicant is a company or organisation, a contact person must be nominated. The applicant's signature is not required to be provided
under the IPA.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Page 6

 

INTEGRATED PLANNING ACT 1997 Part A, Version 3.1, 3 March 2008

 

Details of the premises

The term ‘premises’ is defined by the IPA, schedule 10 to mean a building or other structure, and land (whether or not a building or other

structure is situated on the land). The term ‘land’ is also defined to include the estate in, on, aver or under the land.

Details of the land are not required if the application involves a mobile and temporary Environmentally Relevant Activity only. Instead complete

Table A

The premises may be identified in a number of ways —

» Street address and lot on plan are most common and will apply to most applications.

¢ Coordinates may provide the best means of accurately identifying the location of development proposed in waters, or on a relatively small
development site distant from property boundaries on a large lot. Sufficient coordinates need to be provided to identify the boundary of the
premises the subject of the application. Eastings and northings using GDA94 datum is preferred, but longitude and latitude and other
(specified) datum such as Zone Reference or GS84 may be provided.

The definition of ‘water body’ and ‘watercourse’ can vary from Act to Act.

StrategicPortLandis within a local government area but a local government's planning scheme does nat apply onStrategicPortLand.

StrategicPortLandis declared under the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994. For further information go to IDAS Guide 141 (Development on

strategic port and) and the Queensland Transport (Ports) website.

“Tidal water’ is defined in the Coastal Protection and Management Act 1995 (Schedule) and ‘tidal area’ for a local government and for strategic

port land is defined in the IPA (schedule 10). Generally, the area below ‘high-water mark' (defined by the Coastal Act in relation to high water

mark at spring tides) establishes the boundary of a tidal area, Land below high water mark is not within a local government's area unless

provided for under the Local Government Act 1993. Unless otherwise provided for by legislation, a local government has no jurisdiction below

high water mark. A tidal area for strategic port land is within the jurisdiction of the relevant port authority, while the Environmental Protection

Agency generally has jurisdiction for a local goverment tidal area, However, the IPA gives local governments jurisdiction for assessing and

deciding applications for prescribed tidal works within the local government tidal area, and the planning scheme may be applied to that

assessment (to the extent provided for in the code for prescribed tidal work).

 

Resource entitlement

Section 3.2.1(5) of the IPA requires evidence of resource entitlement be given for applications if they involve taking or interfering with a
prescribed State resource. Schedule 10 of the integrated Planning Regulation 1998 (IPR) prescribes the State resources, including State-
owned land, where evidence is required to be given, and the evidence required to support the application. Link to Integrated Planning
Regulation, Section 3.2.1{10)(a)(ii) states an application cannot be taken to be properly made without the required evidence.

For applications involving the taking or interfering with water under the Water Act, the development application may be made at the same
time as the request for resource entitlement, and the Department of Natural Resources and Water will accept the application as properly made.
For State-controlled roads, a resource entitlement is not required for an activity that is exempt ancillary works or encroachment (identified by
gazette notice under the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994, section 50), or if the activity requires referral to the Department of Main Roads.
Evidence may be required from more than one Department responsible for a State-owned resource, e.g. from the Environmental Protection
Agency for quarry material below high water mark, and the Department of Natural Resources and Water in relation to the State-owned land
above high water mark.

 

Owner's consent

Section 3.2.1(3) of the IPA prescribes that an application must contain, or be supported by, the written consent of the land owner/s, if the
application involves: a material change of use; reconfiguration of a lot; work on land below high-water mark and not within a canal as defined
under the Coastal Protection and Management Act 1998, or work on rail corridor tand defined under the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994.
Evidence of this consent may need to be provided before the application will be accepted as properly made by the Assessment Manager, during
the processes of the application or in the event of an appeal about the outcome of the application.

“Owner for the purpose of a lodging an IDAS development application means the person at the time of lodging the application, entitled to
receive the rent for the land (or would be entitled to receive the rent for it if it were let to a tenant at a rent).

Templates are available from the IPA website for the provision of owner's consent as an attachment to this form. However other documentation
may be used for providing owner's consent provided it is clear the documentation relates to the development application for the premises.
Owner's consent, if required, must be provided even if the applicant is the owner. Owner's consent is not required for a mobile and temporary
ERA.

 

Portable Long Service Leave (PLSL) Levy

The Building and Construction industry Portable Long Service Leave Scheme provides tong service leave entitlements to workers in the building
and construction industry who would be unlikely to accrue enough service with one employer to qualify for long service leave. To fund the
scheme, a Portable Long Service Leave Levy (PLSL levy) is collected on certain building and construction work carried out inQueenstand.

The PLSL levy amount and other prescribed percentages and rates for calculating the levy are stated in the Building and Construction Industry
(Portable Long Service Leave) Regulation 2002, Included in the amount collected by QLeave is the Workplace Health and Safety Fee and the
Building and Construction IndustryTrainingLevy.

The Building and Construction Industry (Portable Long Service Leave) Act 1991 (PLSL Act) defines the building and construction work subject to
the PLSL levy and includes renovating, relocating, constructing, altering, demolishing, maintaining or repairing buildings, pools, roads, jetties,
pipelines, fences or earthworks, and works for subdividing, irrigating or draining land.

The PLSL levy need not be paid when the application is made, but the PLSL Act requires the levy to be paid before a development permit may
be issued.

The Assessment Manager must sight an approved form issued by QLeave advising of the status of the payment of the PLSL levy, Building and
Construction Industry Notification and Payment Forms are available from anyQueenslandpost office or agency, on request from QLeave, or can
be completed on the QLeave website at www.gleave.qld.gov.au. For further information contact QLeave (Tel: 1800 803 481 Web:

wow. leave. qid,gov.au )

 

 

Page 7

$*\ INTEGRATED PLANNING ACT 1997

 

‘Nature of the proposed material change of use (wcu)
2.

Part D, Version 3.1, 3 March 2008

 

 

relevant zone for each lot) - provide details for each lot on a separate row

 

 

 

 

 

 

Lot description A . .
(ie. street address or lat on plan details) Applicable zone /precinct /area Applicable overlays
1 | 51 Witta Circle, Noosa Heads Natural Hazards: Bushfire and Acid

 

 

How is the proposed use/s defined in the applicable planning scheme?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

What type of approval is being sought?

[X] Development Permit

 

. Planning scheme definition {include each | No. of dwelling/ |Days & hours of) No. of
General oan othe proposed use definition in a new row or on attached tenancy units operation employees
~ documentation if applicable) (if applicable) (if applicable) | (if applicable)
1 | Acid Sulphate Soil Natural Hazards; Bushfire and Acid r NA 0
High Potential Acid Sulphate Area

 

 

 

 

(7 Preliminary Approval

{[] Both (Provide details below)

Are there any current approvals associated with this application for the change of use of the premises? (e.g. a Preliminary Approval for

the use )

{X] No

LD Yes - Provide details for each associated approval on a separate row

Does the proposed use involve:

 

 

 

() the reuse of existing buildings on the premises No (] Yes - Complete Table A
(ii) new building work on the premises [1] No Yes - Complete Table 8
(iii) the reuse of other existing operational works on the premises No (7 Yes - Complete Table C
{iv) new operational work on the premises No (5 Yes - Complete Table D
Table B | Proposed floor area fasoome i (ititi‘S;*™*™*~*~”
Proposed site cover Ck
Proposed maximum number of storeys kt...

 

 

 

Proposed maximum height above natural ground level

————————

 

 

 

 

Page 8

‘\ INTEGRATED PLANNING ACT 1997 Part D, Version 3.1, 3 March 2008

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

‘Mandatory Information
6. Confirm that the following mandatory information accompanies this application:
Confirmation of
lodgement Method of lodgement
For all applications
(i) Plans showing the nature and location of the proposed use on the premises and a statement about the
intensity and scale of the proposed Use (2.9. number of employees, days and hours of operation, number of visitors, Confirmed over the counter
number of seats, capacity of starage area)
When the application involves reuse of existing buildings
(it) Plans showing the size and location of the buildings to be reused {]_ Confirmed
Not applicable
When the application involves new building work
(iii) Plans showing the size and location of the proposed new building work Confirmed
= over the counter
([]_ Not applicable
When the application involves reuse of other existing works
{iv) Plans showing the nature and location of the works to be reused {]_ Confirmed
= over the counter
Not applicable
O When the application involves new operational work
(v) Plans showing the nature and location of the proposed new operational works (] Confirmed
= over the counter
Not applicable
OFFICE USE ONLY
Date received Reference numbers
Advice for completing Part D
General advice
° Part A must also be completed for all IDAS development applications.
° The applicant is responsible for answering all questions fully and correctly, unless following a response there is a statement fo go directly to
another question.
. When paying fees to the Environmental Protection Agency by electronic funds transfer (EFT) for coastal development applications, use the

process from the information sheet Electronically paying fees to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and securely attach the form
Electronic Funds Transfer (EFT) payment notification to this application.

 

Q3 A development permit authorises development to occur. A preliminary approval is a step in the approval process and does not authorise
O development to occur - a subsequent application for a development permit must be sought.

 

Table Dif the MCU application involves operational work that is the building of a retaining wall on the premises, the application is taken also to be for the
operational work if approval for the operational work has not been applied for in this application or in a separate application.

 

 

 

Page 9

if3 709 LU

€20 292 60H0 « PEEP SSS 20
L9S¢ ‘OD ‘SOVAH VSOON
SAV V1aSuVy 2

YSN TIVM “YS 8 TM

ae0

 

-fyadend exoge axg jo ssaad rexaxidy Burping ap Gump gaunoy Aq paanbas
syenaudde Aue 20; jueaaddy se joe o} sematy praguaNa deppsy 20) 1uasUCO ex Aqazay OM

“WEPEW [8S £30
IN3SNOO JO ¥3LLI -L03/aNs

SOV3H VSOON “STOUID VLLIM 1S
BONSGISTY MAN -L193fOUd

Sosy 0 NILNVMSL
teh #08 Od
Iounod ESOON

Page 10

"

INTEGRATED PLANNING ACT 1997 {DAS Assessment Checklist, Version 21.3, 9 May 2008

 

 

     
  

 

{DAS Development Application Form 1 is the approved form for all development applications under the /ntegrafed Planning Act
1997 IPA). Form 4 is made up of various Parts.

Part A (Common details) of Form 1 must be completed for all applications. The relevance of other Parts of Form 1 depends on
the nature of the application.

Form 1 also includes this IDAS Assessment Checklist, which is used to assist in determining State assessment and referral
requirements, and the Parts of Form 1 relevant to the application.

Section 1 and all other relevant sections of the IDAS Assessment Checklist, as identified in the Table below, must be
completed for all development applications except those proposed on land in an urban development area, or for building work
requiring assessment against the Building Act 1975 only.

For more information about development applications on land in an urban development area, refer to www.ulda.qid.gov.au.
For more advice about building applications refer to Part B of the IDAS Application Form.

 

 

Answering the following questions will assist you in determining which sections of the checklist must be completed for your application. If
unsure, phone or visit your focal government or log onto the DIP website www. dip.qid,gov.au for help

For all IDAS development applications (except those for building work requiring assessment against the Building Act 1975 only) - complete Section 1 of this
checkist

Does the application seek approval to materially change use of the premises? BYes |CINo
if yes - complete Section 2 of this checklist

 

 

 

Does the application seek approval to reconfigure a lot?

 

 

 

it yes - complete Section 3 of this checKist and Part F of DAS Application Form 1. Assessment is by the local government. (CiYes |[x]No
Ps tise atc Cave [ane
Does the application seek approval to carry out building work requiring assessment against the Fisheries Act 1994? Ces |pqNo
if yes - complete Section 5 of this checklist

Have you received a referral agency response under section 3.3.2.of the IPA, in relation to this development application?

if yes - complete Section 6 of this checklist. O1Yes |[>x]No

 

Does the application seek approval to carry out building work requiring assessment against a local goverment planning
scheme? ' OYes |[]No
if yes - complete Part E of DAS Application Form 1. Assessment is by the local government.

Does the application seek approval to carry out building work requiring assessment against the Building Act 1975?
if yes - go to Appendix 1 of this checklist for advice on building referrals. Complete Part B of IDAS Application Form 1. (Yes |[x]No
Assessment is by 2 building certifier

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

SECTION 1 Section 1 must be completed for all applications that require completion of the IDAS Assessment Checklist

‘HERITAGE
1.4A ls any part of the proposal intended to be carried out on a Queensland Heritage place under the Queensland Heritage Act 1992?

No-Goto118 (_] Yes

ri ohedvte & pat t fable Stem 2 Peter teased bbs Then tape ftom ter To (Deliution, terms wed inde Spier t)

Page 11

INTEGRATED PLANNING ACT 1997 IDAS Assessment Checklist, Version 21.3, 9 May 2008

148 Does the proposal involve development, cther than development mentioned in the integrated Planning Act 1997 Schedule 9
(development that is exempt from assessment against a planning scheme), that is intended to be carried out on a place entered in
a Local Heritage Register under Part 11 of the Queensland Heritage Act 1992?

No - Goto Q1.2 LL Yes - (Complete Form 1, Part C,) This application requires assessment by the relevant local government against the IDAS
Code in the Queensland Heritage Regulation 2003. If the development involves building work and the local
govemment is not the Assessment Manager for the application, the local govemment has jurisdiction as Concurrence
Agency.

Op ba Te a ete ty ttt nt cb pee een,

IPA sched Ce one
Quaensiares * eB RS

 

"REMOVING QUARRY MATERIAL; WILD RIVER AREA

412 Does the proposal involve removing quarry material from a watercourse or lake as defined under the Water Act 2000?
No-Gotoa13 ((] Yes

IPA, schedule 8, part 1, table 5, item 1; IP Regulation, schedule 2, table 2, tam 11, IP Regulation, schedule 1, table 5, item 2 (wild river area); Water Act 2000,
section 966C; Wild Rivers Act 2005, section 43A

"ENVIRONMENTALLY RELEVANT ‘ACTMITY; WILD RIVER AREA

1.3 Does the proposal involve an environmentally relevant activity (ERA), other than a mining activity or a petroleum activity?
[X] No-Gotoar4 {[_] Yes

    
  

 

‘WITHIN THE LIMITS OFA PORT ___ . ee .
14 Is any part of the premises 5 within the limits of a port under the Transport Infrastructure Act 49947
[X] No - Goto 01.5
CJ Yes
IP Regulation, schedule 2 table 2, items 15 and 16
DECLARED FISH HABITAT AREA —
1.5 Does any part of the premises adjoin a declared fish habitat area under the Fisheries Act 19942
[X] No - Goto Q1.6

(1 Yes - if answers to questions in other sections of this checklist indicate that the proposed development is assessable under IPA, schedule
8, this application requires assessment by the Department of Primary Industries and Fisheries (DPI&F). If DPI&F is not the
Assessment Manager for the application, the agency has jurisdiction as Advice Agency.

IP Regulation, schedule 2, table 2, item 26
COMMUNITY INFRASTRUCTURE

1.6 Is any part of the premises designated for community infrastructure?
No - Goto 01.7
(Yes
IP Regulation, schedule 2 table 3. item 7
‘WASTE WATER MANAGEMENT
17 Does the proposal invoive the establishment or expansion of a waste water disposal system?

No -Endof Section 1 [] Yes
JP Regulation, schedule 2. table 3, tem 5

 

 

 

ISECTION 2 + Section 2 must be completed when the application seeks approval to materially change the use of premises.

 

PLANNING SCHEME
21 Is the proposed use assessable under the planning scheme?

[] No- Gote 022 Yes - Complete Form 1, Part D and answer Q2.1.1 - 2.1.13 below

If yes, does the application request that the proposal be assessed against a superseded planning scheme?
No — ([] Yes- (Complete Form 1 Attachment 1)

Page 12

INTEGRATED PLANNING ACT 1997 IDAS Assessment Checklist, Version 21.3, 9 May 2008
STATE-CONTROLLEDROAD
24.1 Is any part of the premises located in part of a future State-contralled road, or within 100m of a State-controlled road?

(] Yes No
if no, is the proposed use listed in schedule 5 of the Integrated Planning Regulation 1998 and does it exceed the specified
threshold?
No {[] Yes - This application must be referred to the Department of Main Roads (DMR) as Concurrence Agency.
IP Regulation «chuuie 2 fave 3 tens ta and?
‘ACID SULFATE SOILS
2.1.2 Is the use proposed in a local goverment area listed? ' in State Planning Policy 2/02: Planning and Managing Development
Involving Acid Sulfate Soils?
([] No -Goto 02.1.3 Yes

21 purukun, Bowen, Brisbane, Broadsound, Bundaberg, Burdekin, Burke, Bumett, Caboolture, Caims, Calliope, Caloundra, Cardwell, Carpentaria, Cook, Coolooia, Douglas,
Fitzroy, Gladstone, Gold Coast, Hervay Bay, Hinchinbrook, Isis, Johnstone, Livingstone, Logan, Mackay, Maroochy, Maryborough, Mirium Vale, Momington, Noosa, Pine
Rivers, Redeliffe, Redland, Rockhampton, Sarina, Thuringowa, Tiaro, Torres, Townsville, Whitsunday

If yes, is the natural ground level of any part of the premises tess than 20m AHD?

[J No (X] Yes

If yes, will the proposed use involve the following?

(i) Excavating more than 1,000m? of soil or sediment at or below 5m AHD x] No 0 Yes
(ii) Filling the premises with 1,000m? or more of material with an average depth of J No Yes
0.5m on land, soil or sediment at or below 5m AHD

If yes to either or both (i) or (ii) above - This application must be referred to the Department of Natural Resources and Water
(NRW) as Advice Agency.
IP Regulation. schedule 2 table 3, item 4; State Planning Policy 2/02: Planning and Managing Development Involving Acid Sulfate Sots, section 3.6

COASTAL MANAGEMENT DISTR RICT
2.1.3. Does the proposed use involve the following?
(i) Canying out operational work, completely or partly in a coastal management district [%} No (Yes
(i) Carrying out building work, comptetely or partly in a coastal management district, thatis the x] No Yes
construction of new premises with a gross floor area (GFA) of at least 1,000m?
(ii) Carrying out building work, completely or partly in a coastal management district, thatis the [x] No (Yes
enlargement of the GFA of existing premises by more than 1,000m?
If yes to any one of (i) - (iii) above - This application must be referred to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) as Concurrence Agency.
IP Regulation, schedule 2, table 3. item 6

VEGETATION CLEARING / . .

2.1.4 Dothe premises include a ot containing the following?
(i) Acategory 1, 2 or 3 area shown on a Property Map of Assessable Vegetation (PMAV) [*) No 0 Yes
(ii) If there is no PMAV for a lot, remnant vegetation —] No 0 Yes

JP Regulation schedule 2, table 3 item 11

‘CONTAMINATED LAND - UNEXPLODED ORDNANCE
2.1.5 is any part of the | premises in an area for which an area management advice has been given for unexploded ordnance?

[x [3] No - Go to Q2.1.6 Oo Yea - (Complete Form 1, Part N) This application must be referred to the Administering Authority as Concurrence
Agency.
IP Regulation. schedule 2 table 3 tem 12
PUBLIC PASSENGER TRANSPORT

2.1.6 _ Is the proposed use of premises listed in schedule 13C of the integrated Planning Regulation 1998 and does it exceed the
specified threshold?

No - Goto 02.1.7 {J Yes - This application must be referred to Queensland Transport (QT) as Concurrence Agency.
IP Regulation schedule 2 table 3 item 14

Page 13

INTEGRATED PLANNING ACT 1997 IDAS Assessment Checklist, Version 21.3, 9 May 2008
‘RAILWAY SAFETY AND EFFICIENCY

2.1.7 Is the proposed use of premises listed in schedule 13D of the integrated Planning Regulation 1998 and does it exceed the
specified threshold?
No - Goto 02.1.8 (71 Yes - This application must be referred to Queensland Transport (QT) as Concurrence Agency.

iP Regulation, scheduie 2 tabie 7 tem 15

KOALA CONSERVATION

2.1.8 ts any part of the premises in a koala conservation area or koala sustainability area?
No- Gotoaz1.9 (_] Yes

iP Regulator schecue ¢ tate j tem 18

EASEMENTS AND SUBSTATIONS

2.1.9 Is the use associated with reconfiguring a lot?
Yes -Gotoq2.1.40  [_]No - Answer both (a) and (b) below

JP Regulation schedule 2. table 3, item 8 {electricity easernent): 1P Regulation. schedule 2 table 3, item 16 (pipeline easement); IP Regulation, schedule 2, table 3.
item 9 (substation,

"RESIDENTIAL, COMMERCIAL OR INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT IN A WILD RIVER AREA

2.1.10 Is any part of the premises in a wild river area declared under the Wild Rivers Act 2005?

No -Gotoa24.11 {] Yes

IP Regulation, schedule 1. part 2 table 5, item 1{a}: Wild Rivers code (Note: the code does not currently contain applicable provisions for residential, industrial or
commercial development inside a designated urban area}

2.1.11 Is the proposal only for the construction or use of a single residence on a lot and any reasonably associated building or structure?
Yes -Gota21.12 [_] No
JP Regulation. schedule 2, table 3, item 20

‘WETLAND

HERITAGE cee . -=. ed * wot . —_—- _ - !
2.1.12 Do the premises include a lot sharing a common boundary with a Queensland Heritage place under the Queensland Heritage Act
1992?

No -Gotoa2.7.13 [—] Yes - This application must be referred to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) as Advice Agency.
JP Regulation, schedule 2, table 3 item 22

CERTAIN PRELIMINARY APPROVALS .

2.1.13 — Is preliminary approval sought for the application under the IPA, section 3.1.6?

(J No - Gato 2.2 (C1 Yes - (Complete Form 1, Attachment 2) This application must be referred to the Department of Infrastructure
and Planning (DIP} as Advice Agency.

JP Regulation, schedule 2 tabie 3 item 23
BROTHEL

2.2 Is the proposed use a brothel as defined under the Prostitution Act 1999?
No -Goioaz3  [[] Yes
IPA, schedule 8. part 1, table 2. item 2° Prostituban Act 1999, section 64

‘STRATEGIC PORT LAND

2.3 |s any part of the use proposed on Strategic Port Land under the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994?
No-Gotoa24 {_] Yes

IPA schedute 8. part 1 table 2. tem 3. JP Regulation schedule 2. table 2 tem 6

Page 14

INTEGRATED PLANNING ACT 1997 IDAS Assessment Checklist, Version 21.3, 9 May 2008

MAJOR HAZARD FACIUTY
24 Is the proposed use a major hazard facility or possible major hazard facility under the Dangerous Goods Safely Management Act
2001?

[X] No -Goto.a25 [—] Yes - (Complete Form 7, Part L) This application requires assessment by the Department of Emergency Services
(DES). if DES is not the Assessment Manager for the application, the agency has jurisdiction as Concurrence
Agancy.

IPA, schedule 6 part 1 table 2 dem 4° iP Reguiatior schedule ? table 2 item: +

‘CONTAMINATED LAND - REGISTERED LAND

25 \s any part of the land forming the premises on the Environmental Management Register or Contaminated Land Register under the
Environmental Protection Act 1994?
No-Gotoa26 (_] Yes
IPA, schedule 8, part 1 table 2, item 5; IP Regulation, schedule 2, table 2, item 22

CONTAMINATED ) LAND «I NOTIFIABLE ACTIVITY

‘26 Is any part of the land forming the premises currently used for a notifiable activity, or if there i is no existing use was it last used for
a notifiable activity?

No -Gotoa27 [—] Yes
IPA, schedule 8 part 1, table 2, tem 6. IP Regulation schedule 2, table 2 tem 22

 

‘CONTAMINATED LAND - INDUSTRIAL ACTIVITY

27 Is any part of the premises currently used for an industrial activity (other than fora mining activity or petroleum activity), or if there
is no existing use was it last used for an industrial activity (other than for a mining activity or petroleum activity)?
No -Gotoqzs ((] Yes
IPA, schedule 8, part 1, table 2. item 6, IP Regulation, schedule 2, table 2, item 22

‘CONTAMINATED LAND - AREA MANAGEMENT ADVICE (NATURAL MINERALISATION OR INDUSTRIAL ACTIVITY)

2.8 Is any part of the premises in an area for which an area management advice has been given for natural mineralisation or industrial
activity (other than for a mining activity or petroleum activity)?

[XK] No - Go to Q29

(1 Yes

IPA, schedule 8, part 1, table 2, item 7; 1P Regulation, schedtde 2, table 2 item 22

(AQUACULTURE; WILD RIVER AREA oe BO oF

2.9 ls the proposed use for aquaculture as defined under the Fisheries Act 1994?
No -Gotoq2.10 ([] Yes

IPA, schedule 8. part 1, table 2 item 8: JPA, schedule 8, part 2, table 2 item 1 (self-assessable aquaculture). [P Regulation. schedule 2, table 2. tem 27
Fisheries Act 1994, section 76DA (wild river area}: Wild Rivers Act 2005. section 434

AGRICULTURAL AND ANIMAL HUSBANDRY ACTIVITIES IN A WILD RIVER AREA

2.10 {s any part of the premises in a wild river area declared under the Wild Rivers Act 2005?
No -Gotoaz11 [_] Yes
JPA, schedule 8, part 1, table 2. tem 11, IP Regulation. schedule 2, table 2, item 36 ; Wild Rivers Act 2005, sections 42, 434

‘SEQ REGIONAL PLAN

2.11A — Is any part of the premises within the South East Queensland (SEQ) Regional Plan area?
No -Gotoa2.118 [_] Yes
SEQ Regional Ptan 2005-2026 Amendment 1, Regulatory Provisions. division 2. IP Regulation. schedule 2. table 3. tem 13, IPA secton 2.58 1213)

STATE PLANNING REGULATORY PROVISIONS (REGIONAL PLANS}?

2.11B Is any part of the premises within a designated region under Schedule 1 of the draft regulatory provisions?
No -Gotoa212 [_] Yes
22 State Planning Regulatory Provisions (Regional F-ans} are the draft regu.atory provisions

Slate Platanty any iatory Provisions (Reyna Ban) divsth 21H Ag uatet Jcnedu's 2 lade 3 dem 1.0 Reguaton sctedun 3A

Page 15

.

INTEGRATED PLANNING ACT 1997 IDAS Assessment Checklist, Version 21.3, 9 May 2008
ro : :
CONSERVATION ESTATE

 

 

2.12 Is the proposal for urban purposes, as defined under the IPA?

No -Gotoaz13 (_] Yes
JP Regulation, schedule 2 fable 2. tem 40

REMOVAL; DESTRUCTION OR DAMAGE OF A MARINE PLANT
2.13 Does the proposed use involve the removal, destruction or damage of marine plants under the Fisheries Act 1994?

 

 

Disclaimer:
White the Department of Infrastructure and Planning (DIP) believes that this information contained on this form and provided as part of
this process will be of assistance to you, it is provided on the basis that you will not rely on the information without first making your own
enquiries regarding the interpretation and application of the applicable legislation to your circumstances.

To the full extent permitted by law DIP expressly disclaims all liability (including but not limited to liability for negligence) for errors or
omissions of any kind or for any loss (including direct and indirect losses), damage or other consequence which may arise from your
reliance on this process and the information contained on this form.

 

 

 

Page 16

4 .

ay

 

 

 

 

 

 

i~N

Bio-Track

      

ACID SULFATE MANAGEMENT PLAN
FOR A PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AT
51 Witta Circle, Noosa Heads

Prepared For
Middap Ditchfield Pty Ltd
By
Bio-Track Pty Ltd
26 August, 2008

   
   
   

 

  

A
RECEIVED
27 AUG 2008

781 Mount Glorious Road, Highvale, Brisbane, Australia 4520

Bio- Track Pty Lid email [email protected] Phone 617 32897179 Fax 617 32897155

 

 

 

 

Page 17

”

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

 

  

   
 
 
 
 
  
 

INTRODUCTION .... 22.2. ee eee 1
SUMMARY OF CONTROL MEASURES ........ 0-20-2200 ec eee 4
DESCRIPTION OF THE STUDY AREA ...........-----... 00.2200 ce eee eee 4
3.1 Acid Sulfate Soi! Properties 41
3.2 Surface Drainage .....-......... 0200000. 1
3.3 Sub-Surface Drainage ..............-0...02.0---08. 1
3.4 Groundwater... 2. ee eee 1
PROPOSED MANAGEMENT .............5- 05-00. - 22 cee eee eee
4.1 Lime Treatment Strategy ..............0...0...00000-
42 Lime Application ............... 0.000.020.0002 0 ee eee
4.3 Lime Storage ............ 0.000 ee eee
44 Piacement of Excavated Soil ............-........
45 Bunding of Excavated Soil .................--.04.
46 Treatment Pad Design ................---....---
47 Exposed Cut Surfaces .....................-004.
4.7.1. Vegetated Cover ...............2....00....
4.7.2  Non-Vegetated Cover ..............-.....
48 Runoff Controt 2.2... eee
49 Ponded Water ............. 0.22222 eee ee eee
4.10 Groundwater ............0..0.. 2.0.40 e eee eee
4.14 Management of Groundwater ....... 2.0.00. eee
VALIDATION ©... 20.22 eee
5.1 Validation Sampling ..............-......2..0000-
§.2 Scheduling of Validation Sampling
RECORD KEEPING ...... 0.2 te eee eee 6
IMPORTANT LIMITATIONS ..... 2.0022 eee 6
APPENDIX 1 SUPPORTING INFORMATION ..........0.00 00000 cee eee ee 7
8.1 SOIL CHEMICAL ANALYSIS «2.0002 eee 9
8.2 SITE & ENGINEERING DRAWINGS ... 2.2.0 eee 12
8.3 SOIL BORE LOG DESCRIPTION ........ 00.00.02. eee 13
8.4 GLOSSARY OF TERMS ........ 2.2.0 eee 17
INTRODUCTION ©2000 ce eens 1
SUMMARY OF CONTROL MEASURES ..... 2... nee 4
DESCRIPTION OF THE STUDY AREA ... 2... 6. eee 1
3.1 Acid Sulfate Soil Properties ©... 2.0... cc eee 1
3.2 Surface Drainage .... 2.2... eee i
3.3 Sub-Surface Drainage .. 1
3.4 Groundwater .. 2... eee eee 2
PROPOSED MANAGEMENT ...........00 0.0000 ee ee eee bene 3
4.1 Lime Treatment Strategy .. 3
4.2 Lime Application ..................-. 3
4.3 Placement of Excavated Soil... 2.026. cc eee 3
4.4 Bunding of Excavated Soil... 22. eee 4
4.5 Treatment Pad Design .... 2.0... cc eee eee 4
4.6 Exposed Cut Surfaces .... 0.2.0... ce eet teen e tne 4
4.6.1 Vegetated Cover... 0.62 een 5
46.2  Non-Vegetated Cover ..... 2.0.2.2. eee 5
47 Runoff Control - 22. eee 5
48 Ponded Water .........-2 0.0022 eee 5
4.9 Groundwater... eens 6
VALIDATION «200.00 ee eee 7
5.1 Validation Sampling 7

 

784 Mount Glorious Road, Highvale, Brisbane, Australia 4520

o-T rack Pty Ltd email [email protected] Phone 617 32897179 Fax 617 3289 7155

Page 18

°

6 RECORD KEEPING |... 0... 2 ete eee 9
7 APPENDIX 1 SUPPORTING INFORMATION 10
7.4 SOIL CHEMICAL ANALYSIS ..........----.0.-.--055 1
7.2 SITE & ENGINEERING DRAWINGS .................. 413
7.3 SOIL BORE LOG DESCRIPTION .... 0... 0... eee 14

 

This report has been prepared by Peter Edmiston 8.App.Sc.(Hons), M.Phil. for and on behalf of

Bio-Track Pty Lid (ABN 91 056 237 275).

Peter Edmiston
Director Bio-Track

Technical Assistance

The evaluation of technical reports is sometimes difficult. Bio-Track remains available.to answer questions
regarding this report. Users of this report are encouraged to contact Peter Edmiston on (07) 3289 7179 to
resolve technical issues raised within this report that require clarification.

781 Mount Glorious Road, Highvale, Brisbane, Australia 4520

Bio-T fa ck Pty Ltd email [email protected] Phone 617 32897179 Fax 61 7 3289 7155

Page 19

ACID SULFATE MANAGEMENT PLAN
FOR A PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AT
51 WITTA CIRCLE, NOOSA HEADS

4 INTRODUCTION

Bio-Track Pty Ltd has been commissioned by Middap Ditchfield Pty Ltd to prepare an acid sulfate soil
management ptan (ASSMP) for a proposed development at 51 Witta Circle, Noosa Heads. This study is
based upon soil chemical analysis data, site drawings and bore tog information. A copy of this information
is included as Appendix 1.

2 SUMMARY OF CONTROL MEASURES

Itis anticipated some or all of the excavated material will be removed. Given the difficulty of separating soil
strata during a relatively small scale excavation it is recommended all soil being excavated is to be treated
with agricuitural lime at a rate of 8 kilograms of lime per cubic metre of soil. This allows for a bulk density
of 1.8 tons/m3 and provides a safety facto of 2.2. Analytical data is available to a depth of 2.2 m below
ground level and the depth of excavation may extend to 3 metres. The lime treatment rate has a slightly
higher safety factor than normal to cover the uncertainty of soil properties in the 2.2 to 3.0 m depth range.

One validation sample will be taken for chemical analysis using either the SPOCAS or chromium reducible
sulphur test suite.

The need for de-watering will depend on the tide and recent rainfall. With luck de-watering may not be
required. In the event that de-watering is necessary then the water to be extracted needs to be pH checked
and treated to maintain the discharge water pH between the values of 5.5 and 8.5.

3 DESCRIPTION OF THE STUDY AREA

The proposed development area has the following attributes:

Location 51 Witta Circle, Noosa Heads
Area 624 square metres

Existing Elevation ~3mAHD

Elevation of Final Cut ~0.2 m AHD

Depth of Cut ~3m

Volume of Cut ~150 m3

Cut Material sand

Parent Materia! beach sand

3.1 Acid Sulfate Soil Properties

The surface soil (0-0.7 m) is weakly acid and has a very low buffering capacity. The sub-surface soit (1.2-
2.2 m below ground level is weakly acid and has a significant sulphide concentration (>0.03% chromium
reducible sulphur), These soils are regarded as potential acid sulfate soil and will require management.

Oxidation of this material will lead to development of acidity. Treatment of the sub-soil with agricultural lime
will neutralise this potential acidity.

3.2 Surface Drainage

Surface drainage has not been studied. The site is immediately adjacent to a canal or channet and
drainage wiil either be north to the kerb storm water drain and into the canal or as overland flow south into
the canal.

3.3 Sub-Surface Drainage

The groundwater has not been studied but the direction of flow is expected to be south into the canal.
3.4 Groundwater

Groundwater has been observed at a depth of 2.5 metres.

Bio-Track Pty Ltd 1

Page 20

4 PROPOSED MANAGEMENT

41 Lime Treatment Strategy

A safety factor of two is recommended for sites regarded as sensitive to acid export. These include areas:
* within 50 metres of a drainage line, stream or other surface water
* where the watertable is within 2 metres of the surface
* where the site is below the 50 year flood line.

A safety factor of 1.8 is recommended where more than 5% of samples have a %S,,, or %S,, greater than
0.03% or TAA greater than 100 moles/ton. A safety factor of 1.6 can be used for samples with tower teveis
of acidity or potential acidity.

The treatment rate is calculated using the average of all samples with a % S,, > 0.03%. The worst case
sample must have a minimum safety factor of 1.2.

In the absence of field bulk density measurement the design in-situ bulk density is 1.65 tons/cubic metre
and the excavated (loose spread, uncompacted) soil bulk density is 1.2 tons/cubic metre.

4.2 Lime Application

It is recommended the disturbed soil is spread across fill areas in jayers with the appropriate quantity of
lime being spread across the surface. The lime is then cultivated through the layer to provide uniform
mixing. The depth of the fil! layer will be affected by compaction requirements, machinery, the physica!
condition of the soil and operator preference. The exact method of mixing is of no consequence provided
lime is mixed uniformly through the placed soil. Itis steessed care should be taken with mixing as validation
samples will subsequently be taken for chemical analysis. if the uniformity of mixing is poor the validation
tests are likely to fail.

4.3 Lime Storage

Agricultural lime and hydrated lime (builders lime, calcium hydroxide) needs to be stored on-site in a
secure manner. It is recommended the hydrated lime (normally supplied in bags) is held in a locked
shipping container or similar site building. It is recommended the agricultural lime is held in a bunded
storage area. If supplied in bulk then the lime should be covered to prevent dust becoming a nuisance.

4.4 Placement of Excavated Soil

itis preferred to retain treated soil on the development area. If off-site placement is required then the
following actions must be undertaken:

the land holder must agree in writing to accept the treated material
the land holder must be provided with copies of soil analysis reports and a written declaration of
the volume and placement location
prior to placement local authority must be provided with copies of soil analysis reports and a
written declaration of the volume and placement location. Check with the focal authority to ensure
the placement complies with any local reguiations.
transport of treated soil should be performed using covered vehicles and no drainage water must
escape onto public access areas
the following areas are regarded as having higher environmental sensitivity for treated soil
placement

* within 50 metres of a drainage line, stream or other surface water

* where the watertable is within 2 metres of the surface

* where the site is below the 50 year flood line.

oe

Should these more sensitive locations be selected for placement then it is recommended the
excavated soil be treated at the source and validation tests be proved successful prior to
placement.

45 Bunding of Excavated Soil

*

It is proposed to bund any area with untreated disturbed soil, either at the excavation site or
placement site.

. It is proposed to size the bund to retain a Q=2, 60 minute storm event plus a 200 mm
freeboard. For relatively flat areas a surrounding bund height of 500 mm is likely to be adequate.

Blo-Track Pty Ltd 2

Page 21

All excavated soil will be stored in a bunded area by the end of the working day unless lime
treatment has been undertaken.

The bund must either be constructed from non-ASS material or from lime treated ASS material.
The bund should drain to a sump or other water collection point.

The bund floor and wall should be clay or other impermeable material to minimise infiltration of
water. The floor should have a hydraulic conductivity of less than 1 x 10% m/d fora minimum depth
of 400 mm or have an equivalent resistance to the passage of drainage water. Compaction is likely
to be required to achieve this level of hydraulic conductivity.

Any water trapped within the bund or excavation site must be pH tested prior to discharge.
The pH must be adjusted to be within the range of 5.5 to 7.5 prior to discharge. The use of
calcium hydroxide (builders lime) is suggested for this: purpose.

If a bund is impractical smaller stockpiles can be covered with plastic sheeting or similar materiais
to exclude rainwater. The stockpile must not be located in a runoff flow path.

46 Treatment Pad Design

If lime is incorporated with soil at a specific mixing area then the treatment pad should be bunded (as
specified in section 4.5).

If the pad floor is constructed from untreated acid sulfate soil then the floor must be lime treated as
specified in section 4.1.

Validation testing of lime treated samples will require time for sampling, sample transport to a laboratory,
sample drying and analysis. This process can easily require 5-7 working days. The treatment pad and any
storage areas need to be sized to accommodate treated soil that remains to be validated.

47 Exposed Cut Surfaces

If excavation areas will be left exposed then these should be capped to minimise oxidation of sulphidic and
acid soil. The minimum depth of limed capping should be 800 mm.

4.7.1 Vegetated Cover

if the excavated area is to be revegetated then topsoil should be placed at the surface. The lime treatment
rate is conservative and an alkaline soil pH is expected. This may not suit re-vegetation and could result
in nutrient deficiency (eg. Zn, Fe, Mn & P). To avoid this problem it is recommended the existing 0-200 mm
soil layer is stripped from the site and stockpiled. This assumes the 0-200 mm soil layer is currently
vegetated, non-saline, well oxidised and non-sulphidic. Care must be taken to restrict the topsoil removal
to this depth to avoid sulphidic material deeper down.

The final placement over the cut material should be:

0-200 mm replaced topsoil, uncompacted for revegetation (existing pH/acidity)

200-400 mm limed cut material, low level of compaction to allow for drainage and root
penetration (strongly alkaline, no acidity)

400-1000 mm limed cut material, high level of compaction to minimise oxidation and deep

drainage (strongly alkaline, no acidity)
4.7.2. Non-Vegetated Cover
\f the excavated area is not to be revegetated then no topsoil is required.
The final placement over the cut material should be:

0-800 mm limed cut material, high level of compaction to minimise oxidation and deep drainage
(strongly alkaline, no acidity)

Bio-Track Pty Ltd 3

Page 22

48 Runoff Controt

It is recommended a runoff diversion drain be constructed to divert runoff water away from untreated
excavated soil and excavation areas should these lie within a runoff pathway. The drain should be checked
daily to ensure it is servicable.

49 Ponded Water

If stormwater becomes ponded in bunded or disturbed areas affected by the presence of acid sulfate soil
then the pH should be checked prior to any off-site discharge. The pH should lie in the range of 5.5-8.5.
lf the pH is less than 5.5 then then pH can be raised by adding builders lime (staked lime or calcium
hydroxide). The builders fime is more soluble than agricultural lime but agricultural lime can be used if
necessary. The lime should be added in doses, mixed and the pH measured. The pH is likely to resist
change until it rises towards a value of 5.5. After this it will often rise quickly with small additions of lime.
The mixed water will be turbid but should settle overnight. it is preferable to allow the sediment to settle
prior to any discharge. If discharge of turbid water is necessary then sediment can be removed by filtration
through sand filter tanks or by stow overland flow across grassed areas.

Water quality should conform to the following criteria prior to discharge:

pH §.5-8.5

dissolved oxygen >=80% saturation
turbidity <100 NTU
suspended solids <25 mg/L
dissolved aluminium <0.1 mg/L
dissolved iron <1 mg/L

4.10 Groundwater

No groundwater analytical information is available.

441i Management of Groundwater

Geotechnical studies of the site have revealed the presence of groundwater and strata likely to provide a
significant groundwater flow. In the event of groundwater being encountered the management plan will
follow the actions described for "Ponded Water" in section 4.9. All water is to be pH tested prior to any
discharge.

 

Bio-Track Pty Ltd 4

Page 23

5 VALIDATION

Validation testing is regarded as an essential component of the management plan. Due to the variable
nature of mixing soil and fime, care must be exercise to obtain a representative sample for validation
analysis.

The engineer, project manager, geotechnical officer or other suitably qualified person must ensure the
validation testing has been performed and the results are satisfactory. A copy of the test certificates is to
be submitted to the local authority (or referral agency).

5.1 Validation Sampting

‘ The sub-samples must be representative of the treated soil volume. The location of the samples
should span the depth as well as the horizontal area for placed soil. For stockpiled soil the
samples should be evenly spaced through the soil mass.

The distribution of lime in a lime treated soil mass is typically highly variable on a small scale.
Whilst this mixing is adequate on a “landscape” scale it makes accurate sampling difficult. It can
be expected to collect some sub-samples with no lime and others with a high lime content. it is
necessary to collect a large number of sub-samples to form a composite sample that provides an
“average” lime content.

This process will take from one hour to one day per composite sample depending on the time
required for sub-sample extraction. If sampling is biased towards samples with a high lime content
the analysis results will be at odds with the known volume of lime that was applied.

Use a sampling device to obtain a minimum of 20 and up to 40 approximately equal volumes of
limed soil. The minimum sub-sample size should be in the range of 100-200 cc in volume. Mix
these carefully on a plastic sheet or container taking care to avoid segregation of the fine and
coarse fraction. Quarter down to retain a 200 gram composite sample.

* The location of the sample area/depth is to be recorded.
‘ Perform validation testing at the following rates:
* one test per 500 cubic metres for on-site placement
* one test per 250 cubic metres for off-site placement
. one test per 125 cubic metres for off-site placement within 50 metres of a drainage line,

stream or other surface water or where the watertabie is within 2 metres of the surface or
where the site is below the 50 year flood line.

Validation testing should include chemical analysis (GPOCAS or chromium reducibie sulphur test
suites) and calcium carbonate.

* It is recommended the sampling and mixing method is carefully documented and performed
according to plan. A proportion of samples will "fail". This is statistically predictable even though
the correct rate of time has been applied. Adherence to rigorous sampling and mixing techniques
makes it difficult to blame the sampling stage should a test fail.

* Samples are regarded as successfully treated provided they meet the following criteria:
a) oxidised pH >6.5
b) equivalent suiphur content below 0.03%
* In the event of a validation test failure a re-test is required. if the subsequent test fails then the

material must be re-timed to meet the test standard.

5.2 Scheduling of Validation Sampling

Validation testing of lime treated samples will require time for sampling, sample transport to a laboratory,
sample drying and analysis. This process can easily require 5-7 working days. Where soils are treated and
then placed the schedule of placement should allow sufficient time for the validation process. In the event
of sampies failing the validation test it will be necessary to add additional lime and re-test the treated
material again.

Bio-Track Pty Ltd 5

Page 24

6 RECORD KEEPING

It is proposed to maintain a record of the volume of excavation material and the location of
placement. The record is to be updated at the end of each working day.

It is proposed to maintain a copy of all purchase and delivery documentation describing the
quantity of lime delivered to the site

It is proposed a suitably responsible person (eg. geotechnical engineer, engineer, surveyor,
project manager, etc) supervise the lime treatment procedure to ensure the correct quantity of lime
is applied. A daily record of this activity is to be maintained.

* (f any water is retained on the site and requires discharge then a record of the water pH and any
corrective action is to be maintained by a suitably responsible person.

* Altrecords (eg. validation analysis, excavation, placement, time delivery, lime treatmentand water
quality) are to be retained for a period of five years by the project manager.

7 IMPORTANT LIMITATIONS

Significant variation in soit properties is normal, especially for low tying soits. A conservative approach is
recommended. If excavation of soil reveals material significantly different to that described in this report
then it is recommended further assessment is undertaken.

Should the design change to involve disturbance of soit with unknown properties then this should be
subject to further investigation before disturbance. The level of investigation specified by the state and
local authorities should be adopted.

This report does not address the effects of aggressive or corrosive soil upon structures or any other

services. Saline, sulphurous or acid soil (or groundwater) can have a serious corrosive effect on some
structures and this needs to be considered by an appropriately qualified person.

Bio-Track Pty Ltd 6

Page 25

8 APPENDIX 1 SUPPORTING INFORMATION

 

Bio-Track Pty Ltd

Page 26

PIT Aid 49e11-O1g

— ALRLISMLSL MBL LD Wal deh Nl! Gf

= 214 Keser’ we Vk
O-ONOUDISY asks |) “ESS |

oF sheet NA tats hem i tees 17,

ra SRS MG.

senonanattd

 

         

 

 

 

Ma gap eran

 

 

|
l
|
Loa

 

 

|

tH
il

 

|

     

———

—_——

 

Page 27

8.1 SOIL CHEMICAL ANALYSIS

The results of the chemical analysis are presented in Section 8.1.

Blo-Track Pty Ltd

Page 28

A.S.S. FIELD SCREEN ANALYSIS REPORT

)

 

Bio-Track
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
ae

Analysis By: Blo-Track Pty Ltd aan 91 056 237 275 781 Mi. Glorious Road Highvale, Brisbane, Australia, 4520 Ph. 07 3289 7179 EMAIL [email protected]
DATE OF REPORT 07 AUGUST 2008 Page 1 of 1
Report Pages.
CLIENT NAME MS SHARYN O'NEILL
CLIENT FIRM MIDDAP DITCHFI=ELD YOUR PROJECT/JOB REFERENCE 0729-WALKER
CLIENT ADDRESS CNR MARY & THOMAS STREETS NOOSAVILLE QLD
PROJECT NAME 51 WITTA CIRCLE SAMPLING DATE 08-04-2008
NUMBER OF SAMPLES 5 SAMPLE TYPE SOIL SAMPLE FOR ACID SULFATE STUDY
PACKAGING SAMPLES LABELLED - INTACT
SAMPLES DISPOSED ON 1/12/2008
LOG-IN DATE 04 AUGUST 2008 LAB REF. LRO4088.667

TEST METHODOLOGY FOR pH_f AND pH fox AS PER QASSIT 2004 Laboratory Methods. Indications based on pH data only.
RATE: O-none l=slight 2=moderate J=high 4=very high (steam evolved) visual observation at 0-5 minutes.
TEMP: Surface temperature rise ('C} oxidised sample at § minutes.

eo To Upper Lower (m) pH_f pK_fox change RATE TEMP INDICATION

BH 3 0.2 0.5 4.7 1.9 +2.8 2 0 low TAA & high TPA & sulphide possibie

BH 3 0.7 1.0 4.5 3.2 “1.3 4 0 low TAA & moderate TPA

BH 3 L.2 1.5 6.2 2.9 -3.3 2 oO low TAA & moderate TPA & high sulphide/low buffer
BH 2 1.7 2.0 6.2 1.9 “4.3 4 0 low TAA & high TPA & high sulphide/low buffer

BE 2 2.2 2.5 6.1 2.0 -4.1 4 Q low TAA & high TPA & high sulphide/low buffer

i Lolo? Signatory For and behalf of Bio-Track Pty Ltd

Bio-Track Pty Ltd

Page 29

P37 Aid 49841-9108

DETERMINATION OF ACID SULFATE SOIL PROPERTIES

 

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
Analysis By: Bio-Track Pty Ltd aan 91 056237 275 781 Mt. Glorious Road Highvale, Brisbane, Austratia, 4520 Ph. 07 32897179 Fx, 07 32897153
LAB REFERENCE UR19088.453 DATE OF REPORT 26 AUGUST 2008 917:53:49 Page 1 of 1 Report Pages.
CLIENT WAKE MS SKARYN O/NETLL c/o MIDDAP DITCHFIELD CHR HARY & THOMAS STREETS NOOSAVILLE QLD
PROJECT NAME 51 WITTA CIRCLE YOUR PROJECT/JOB REFERENCE 0729-WALKER
SAMPLING DATE 08-04-2008  NUNBER OF SAMPLES 5 Samples supplied by client | SAMPLE TYPE:SOIL SAMPLE FOR ACID SULFATE STUDY
DATE RECEIVED 19 AUGUST 2008 PACKAGING SAMPLES LABELLED - INTACT Ground Oven Ory Samples DISPOSED ON 1/5/2009

Sample ID ag received. METHODOLOGY: As per (ONR GASSIT May 2004), oven dried (85/C), 71000 um shell removed, fine grind. All reported values gravimetric, dry mass.

LIME1 rates calculated to neutralise TPA (or TAA if >TPA)+ aS_RAS -ANC_E/1.5 LIME2 rates calculsted to neutralise TAA + aS_POS or S Cr + aS_RAS -ANC_8T/1.5

W9. Line rates assume 97% lime neutralisation but DO NOT include any safety factors. Suggested factor=1.5-2. Rates are kg/ton. Multiply by bulk density to convert to kg/m.
Fineness Factor=1.5 C&W POS: moles carbonate alkalinity released by oxidation assuming (Ca POS - Ca KCL) + (Mg POS - Mg KCL) is due to carbonate solution.

Slanks represent unmeasured vaiues, zeros & <O.x represent measured values. 1f pH KCl>4,5 then s-RAS (calculated from acid extract) may be zero for undisturbed soit. Ca NAS is the
acid reactive calcium catcutated as the difference between 1 4 KCL and 4 M HCL soluble Ca.

10. DEPTH pi pH «TAA «CTPA OTSA S KCL OS P SPOS «6S Cr s-MAS SEQCa KCL CaP Mg KCL Mg P CBN POS LIME! LIMEZ SANC_BT Ca NAS
m KCL Ox  omyt at wt x % x x x % mgfkg mg/kg ma/kg mg/kg mt ka/t ka/t XxX mg/ko
Analytical Method Codes 234 a 23F 236 23H «23Ce «=623De = 23Ee 228 s2QJe 3 23Vh 23h 0 23Sm—23Tm a2SURN 619AZ
BH 3 0.2 4.84 <A <0.01 <0,01 <0.01 0.002 8B 22 9 22
BH 3 0,7 4.97 <A 0.01 <0.01 «0.01 0.001 36 19 o 26
BH S 1.2 5.21 J 0.01 <0.01 <0.01 0.000 % 3 9 24
BK 3 1.7 5.02 <1 <0.01 0.04 <0.01 0.042 122 26 1 20
BH 3 2.2 4.83 J <0.01 0.05 <0.01 0.050 59 3 2 «10

Signatory p. Ct. L- For and on behalf of Bio-Track Pty Lid

 

Page 30

» 8.2 SITE & ENGINEERING DRAWINGS

: : Shop 1, Cor Broadmeadows Road and Acn-

Gco Investigations Pty Ltd Mane Close

== Maroochydore QLD 4558
INVESTIGATIONS Gcotechnical Consultants in the Earth Sciences Phone: (07) S443 6989

ABN 46724001 176 Fas: (07) $479 LSR9
Email grahama'geoconsuliing.comnau

Field investigation Report
Client: WALKER W.L & E.R Job No: 15356

Sita Location: Loi 114, Witta Circle, Noosa Sound Your Ref:

investigator. LM
Bore Method: Rig. WindLoad: N3 Visit Datefs: 22/7/2008

 

SITE CONDITIONS:
Vegetation:
Crossfalt:
e@ Drainage:
Adjacent Construction: WaterTabts:

Remarks:
APPENDIX A

Ath Dem Eprtisnal
At

 

Fridwy. 15 August 2008

Bio-Track Pty Ltd

Page 31

8.3

SOIL BORE LOG DESCRIPTION

Shop t, Car Broadmendows Road and Ann-

 

Geo Investigations Pty Ltd Mane Close

Maroochydore QLD 4558

—aas sult j Phone: (07) S443 6988
Geotechnical Consultants in tho Earth Sdences

INVESTIGATIONS eee aeecaant te Fax: (07) $479 1999

Field Investigation Report cont'd

CHlent: WALKER W.L&ER Job No: 15356
Site Location: Lot 114, Wita Circte, Noosa Sound Your Ref:

 

OCP Values Bore No.: 1

 

 

 

100mm
0 Pa on To] becation: 6 metre boundary, 7.5 meire left hand (eastera) skte boundary
02 4 {22 9 |Depth Description Symbol Comments
0.3 2 4/238 450 FILL SAND fine sands, fight brawntight grey, Saco silt, stghity most, SP
04 4 [246 ‘080
05 3125 6 700 FILL SAND fine sands, fght grey, samo gill, slightly moral,
06 3/263 ‘eose' medium dang
07 31273 1150 FILL SANO fre-madium sards, browndsrk brown, toe cay, moist, SF
‘pote.

08 2128 3
09 2/292 1750 FILA SAND fing-macnin sands, grey, trace sil, moistisaturated, SP Cave-in: tm,

° " medium dense.
40 2130 3
1124312 2200 FILL. SAND fine medium sands, dark braan, soma caytsill, wat, SP

. . madum densa,
12 21322 /
13 4/33 2 2700 SANO Finesmedhm sands, grayilight gray. iraco itt, wet, loose, = SP \tster Table 2.8m
14591342 asco SANO fine«nedum sands, roy, some sti, wel. loose’medium sp END

° “ dense.
15 7 $35 2
16 7 136 2
170-9 437 2
18 7138 2
19 4 1/39 3
20 7 14.0 4

 

 

DCP Values GoreNo.: 2

 

 

 

per 120mm.
o1 tlo1e Location: 4 meter front boundary, 3 meter left hand (eastarn) side boundary
0.2 2 |22 5 |Depth Description Symbol Comments
032723 6 400 FILL SAND fine sands. brewnvlight! fawn, trees clay/sill, slightly moist. SP
O4 2 124 4 1100 FILL SAND fine sands, sgh bran, trace day, mowl, ose/mecum = SP
05 2425 4 denso.
06 2126 2 1800 FIL, SAND fina sands, dark brown, vace clay. mois! medium dence. SP
OF 2127 2 7 yeog FILL SAND frre-mediv mands, tracn ely, SP
O08 4/128 3
o9 6 |296 2100) FILL SAND fino-modium sanda, ight broan, wrace clay, sP
" . molstsaourated. matiumn cense.
10 6 (306
400 SAND fne-mediwn sands, gray, some silt, saturatedswot, medium SP Water tevel 2.5m
119/313 dense.
12 8 [323
600 SAND Fine-coarze sands, grey brown, some clay'sitt, trace fine END
13907 133 7 graved, wat, tcose,
14 7 (949
16 7 135 9
16 7 (36 4
17:9 537 6
169/36 5
19 8 13.9 6
20 6 (40 6

 

 

 

 

Friday, 15 August 2008 Page 2 of §

Page 32

Field Investigation Report cont'd

 

Client: WALKER, W.L & E.R Job No: 15356
Site Location: Lot 114, Witta Circle, Noosa Sound Your Ref:

 

OCP Values Bore No.: 3

 

 

 

0 _ meri Location: 14 metre rear boundary, 9 metre left hand (castern} side Doundary

0.2 22 Depth Description Symbol Comments

0.3 23 $50 FILL SAND Nine-medium sands. grey broan, some sill bace clay, $P

04 24 mast, loaswimedium corse.

0.56 25 $400 FILE, SAND fine-macium sands, fight brawn."ignt groy, race ciayialt,

06 26 meist, medium cense.

0.7 27 1800 FILL SAND fine-mevium sands, ght gray. trtoe silt, moist, medium se

oe 28 eres.

0.9 29 2550 SAND fine-mediuin sands, grey, some silt, saturated, medium se END
dense,

1.0 3.0

WW 3.1

1.2 32

1.3 33

14 3.4

15 3.5

1.6 36

17 37

1.8 38

1.9 3.9

20 4.0

 

 

DCP Values BoreNo.: 4

 

 

 

 

 

aren 7 Location: 16 meve front boundary . 8 metre right hand (westem) side boundary
0.21 (227
03 2 123 5
04 2 424 5
OS 4 125 5
06 3 (26 6
0.7 3 42.7 6
08 4 (28 8
09 § |29 10
10 4130 41
41.5 13.5 410
12° $ 1329
13°65 (33 8
14 5 $347
1S 6 135
1.6 6 13.6
47 4437
18 3 /38
19 $ $3.9
2.0 7 140
Friday, 15 August 2008 Page Sol 5

Bio-Track Pty Ltd

Page 33

Field Investigation Report cont'd

 

Client: WALKER, W.L& E.R Job No: 15356
Site Location: Lot 314, Witla Circle, Noosa Sound Your Ref:

 

 

NOTES ON REPORT DOCUMENT
() The report was prepared for a specific purpose and as directed by the client.

(i) shoutd be acknowtedgad that soil investigations identify actual sub-suriace conditions only at
those poinis where and when samples are taken. Oata derived through sampling and/or
subsequent testing are extrapotated to render an opinion about overall sub-surface conditions.
Even under optimal circumstances, actual conditions may differ from those infetred to exist.
because no consultant, no maiter how quatified, and no sub-surfaco exploration progranime, no
matter how comprehensive can reveal what Is hidden by easth, rock and time. Tho actual
interface batweon materials may be far more gradual or abrupt than our report Indicates. Actual
conditions in areas not sampied may differ from our predictions.

(ili) Interpretation of soil/rock strength terms should refer to our “Glossary of Terms”.

(Fv) Tho s0i depth referenced in our borelog information profite, represents the "end" depth of cach
sail type.

 

 

 

Faduy, 15 August 2008 Page 4 of 5

Bio-Track Pty Ltd

Page 34

Field Investigation Report cont'd

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Client: WALKER, W.L&ER Job No: 15356
Site Location: Lot 114, Witta Circle, Noosa Sound Your Ref:
GLOSSARY OF TERMS
CONSISTENCY O si
Unconfined spr
Description Compressive Strength wai
N" valuo
(kPa)
SOFT 0-35 0-4
FIRM 35-80 4-8
STIFF 90 - 225 8-15
VERY STIFF 225 - S00 15-30
HARD 500 - 700 30 - 50
WEAK ROCK > 900 > §0
ISTE NO} CHESIVE/ GRANU! SO}L:
Dry Density spt
Description (um3) °N" value
VERY LOOSE < 1.460 0-4
LOOSE 1.450 - 1.600 4-10
MEDIUM OENSE 1.600 - 1.750 10-30
ODENSE 1.750 - 1.950 30 - 50
VERY OENSE > 1.950 > 60
co Y. CEME: i
Unconfined
Description Compressive Strangth
{kPa)
WEAKLY 300 - 1500
MODERATELY 1500 - 3500
STRONGLY > 9500

 

 

 

 

Friday, 15 August 2008

Bio-Track Pty Ltd

 

Page 35

8.4 GLOSSARY OF TERMS

Source: Acid Sulfate Soils Laboratory Methods Guidelines, Version 2.1 June 2004
Authors: QASSIT, Qid NRM&E, SCU, NatCASS, GASSMAC, ASSMAC
Published: Department of natural Resources, Mines and Energy, Indooroopilly, Queensiand, Australia, June 2004

(Acid) Fizz test: The field tast used for soils to test for the presence of carbonate minerals, whereby dilute hydrochloric acid is added to the soil. An effervescent
fizzing reaction indicates the presence of carbonate minerals.

Acid Base Accounting (ABA): The process by which the various acid-producing components of the soil are compared with the acid neutralising components
so that the soil’s net acidity can be calculated.

Action ertterla: The critical net acidity values (expressed in units of equivalent % pyrite sulfur, or equivalent mol H+/t) for different sail texture groups and sizes
of soll disturbance that trigger the need for ASS management,

Actual Acidity: A component of existing acidity. The soluble and exchangeable acidity already presentin the soil, often as a consequence of previous oxidation

of sulfides. It ts this acidity that will be mobilised and discharged fallowing a rainfall event. It is measured in the laboratory using tha TAA method. It does not
include the less soluble acidity (le. retained acidity) held in hydroxy-sulfate minerals such as jarosite.

ANC: Acid neutralising capacity. A measure of a soil's Inherent ability to buffer acidity and resist the jowering of the soil pH.

ANCBT: Acid neutralising capacity by back titration. Acid neutralising capacity measured by acid digest followed by back titration of the acid that has not bean

consumed.

®. Excess acid neutralising capacity. Found in solls with acld neutralising capacity in excess of that needed to neutralise the acidity generated by oxidation
of sulfides. The soil is oxidised with peroxide, then a titration Is performed with dilute hydrochtaric acid to a pH of 4, followed by a second peroxide digestion.
(fa soil nas a positive ANCE result then the TPA result is zero and vice versa,

CaA: Reacted calclum. The caicium soluble after the peroxide digest and TPA titration that was not soluble following KCl-extraction and T AA titration. (Cap
-CaKCl). It can be used (in combination with MgA) to provide an estimate of the soil carbonate content, but may be an underestimate if the HCl-titration to pH

4 has not beon performad as part of the TPA/ ANC,
procedure.

CaHCl: Calclum soluble in 4 M HCI, which Includes soluble and exchangeable calcium as well as calcium found in certain carbonate minerals (eg. dolomite,
calcite, aragonite).

Cake: Potassium chloride extractable calcium measured followiig the T AA anatysis, which inctudes soluble and exchangeable calclum as well as calclum
from gypsum.

CaNAS: Net acid soluble calcium. The calcium soluble in 4 M HCI that ls not soluble In 1M KCI. (CaHC!-CaKCl. It can be used (in combination with MgNAS)
to provide an estimate of the soll carbonate content, but may be an overestimate If calcium Is dissolved from non-carbonate or non-acid-neutralising minerals.

&. Peroxide calcium. Calcium measured following the TPA analysis, which includes soluble and exchangeable calcium, calcium from gypsum, as well as
calcium (eg. from carbonates) dissolved as a result of acid produced due to oxidation of sulfides by peroxide.

Bio-Track Pty Ltd

Page 36

~

o

 

Chromium Suite: The acid base accounting approach used to calculate net acidity which uses the chromium reducible sulfur mathod to determine potential
sulfidic acidity. A decision tree approach based on the pHKCI result is then used to determine the other components of the acid base account.

CIN: tnorganic carbon, (CT -CTo}. It is used to estimate the carbonate content of the soil. CRS: Tha acronym often given to the Chromium Reducible Sulfur
method.

CT: Total carbon. A measure of the total carbon content of the soil, encompassing both organic and
inorganic forms.

CTo: Total organic carbon. The carbon in sample measured following a sulfurous acid digestion procedure used to remove carbonate carbon.

Existing Acidity: The acidity already present in acid sulfate soils, usually as a result of oxidation of sulfides, but which can also be from organic material or
acidic cations, it can be further sub- divided into actual and retained acidlty, ie. Existing Acidity = Actual Acidity + Retalned Acidity.

Fineness factor: A factor applied to the acid neutralising capacity resultin the acid base account to allow for the poor reactivity of coarser carbonate or other
acid neutralising material. The minimum factor Is 1.5 for flnely divided pure agricultural lime, but may be as high as 3.0 for coarser shell material.

MgA; Reacted magnesium. Tha magnesium soluble after the peroxide digest and TPA titration that was not soluble following KC1-extraction and T AA titration.
(Mgp -MgKCl. It can be used (in combination with CaA) to provide an estimate of the soil carbonate content, but may be an underestimate If the HCi-titration

eS 4 has not been performed as part of the TPA/ANC, procedure.

MgHCt: Magnesium soluble in 4 M HCl, which Includes soluble and exchangeable magnesium as wall as magnesium found in certain carbonate minerals (eg.
dolomite, magnesite).

MgKCl: Potassium chlorde extractable magnesium measured following the T AA analysis, which includes soluble and exchangeable magnesium.
MgNAS: Net acld soluble magnesium. The calcium soluble In 4 M HCI that is not soluble in 1M KC1. (MgHClI -MgKCl. It can be used (in combination with
CaNAS) to provide an estimate of the soil carbonate content, but maybe an overestimate if magnesium is dissolved from non-carbonate or non-acid-neutraltsing

minerals,

Mgp: Peroxide magnesium. Magnesium measured following the TPA analysis, which includes soluble and exchangeable magnesium, as well as magnesium
{eg. from carbonates) dissolved as a result of acid produced due to oxidation of sulfides by peroxide.

Monosulfldes: Tha term given to the highly reactive iron sulfide minerais found In ASS that have the approximate formula 'FaS' and which ara soluble In”
hydrechtoric acid (as opposed to iron disulfldes such as pyrite that aren't appreciably soluble in hydrochloric acid).

Net Acidity: The result obtained when the values for’ various components of soil acidity and acid neutralising capacity are substituted into the Acid Base
Accounting equation. Calculated as: Net Acidity = Potential sulfidie Acidity + Existing Acidity -(Acid Neutratising Capacity/Fineness Factor)

Field pH. Fleid determination of pH in a ‘Soil:water paste.

pHFox: Field peroxide pH, Field determination of pH In a soil:water mixture following reaction with hydrogen peroxide.

pHKCt: Potassium chloride pH. pH in a 1:40 (W/V) suspension of soil In a solution of 1 M potassium chloride measured prior to TAA titration.
pHox: Peroxide oxidised pH. pH in a suspension of soil In a solution after hydrogen peroxide digestion in the SPOCAS method.

POCAS: An acronym standing for Peroxtde Oxidation Combined Acidity and Sulfate method (Method Code 21.). This method has been superseded by the
SPOCAS method.

POCASm: An acronym standing for the modified Peroxide Oxidation Combined Acidity and Sulfate method. This method has been superseded by the SPOCAS
method.

Potential (sulfidic) acidity: The latent acidity in ASS that will be reteasad if the sulfide minerals they contain (eg. pyrite) are fully oxidised, It can be estimated
by titration (ia. TSA) If no acid neutralising material is present, or calculated from SPOS or SCR results.

Retained Acidity: The ‘less available’ fraction of the existing acidlty (not measured by the T AA) that may be released slowly into the environment by hydrolysis

Bio-Track Pty Ltd

Page 37

of relatively Insoluble sulfate salts (such as jarosite, natrojarosite, and other iron and aluminium hydroxy-sulfate minerals).

SCR: The symbol givan to the result from the Chromium Reducible Sulfur method (Method 22B). The SCR method providas a measure of reduced inorganic
sulfide content using iodometric titration after an acidic chromous chloride reduction. This method is not subject to interferences from organic sulfur.

SHCI: Sulfur soluble in 4 M HCI which includes soluble and adsorbed sulfate, sulfate from gypsum, as well as sulfate from hydroxy-sulfate minerals such as
jarosite and natrojarosite.

SKCI: Potassium chloride extractable sulfur measured fottowing the T AA analysis, which includes soluble and adsorbed sulfate as well as sulfate from gypsum.

SNAS: Net acid soluble sulfur. (SHC! -SKCI. The sulfur soluble in 4 M HC! that is not soluble in 1 M KCI. It provides an estimate of the suifate contained in
jarosite and similar low solubility hydroxy-sulfate minerals (and can be used to estimate retained acidity).

Sp: Peroxide sulfur, Sulfur measured following the TPA analysis, which Inciudes soluble and exchangeable sulfate, sulfate from gypsum, as well as sulfide
converted to sulfate and that released from organic matter as a result of peroxide oxidation.

SP Os: Peroxide oxidisable sulfur from the SPOCAS method. The sulfur soluble after the peroxide digest and TPA titration that was not solubie following KC1-
extraction and TAA titration, (Sp -SKCL. It provides an estimate of the soll sulfide content, but Is affected by the prasence of organic sulfur.

SRAS: Residual acid soluble sulfur. The sulfur measured by 4 M HCI extraction on the soil residue remaining after peroxide digestion and TP A titration
Q SPOCAS method. It provides an estimate of the sulfate contained In jarosite and similar tow solubility hydroxy-sulfate minerals (and can be used
stimate retained acidity).

ST: Total sulfur. A measure of the total sulfur content of the soll, encompassing both organic and inorganic forms,

Sros: Total oxidisable sutfur. An estimate of soll oxtdisable sulfur made from determining the sulfur not soluble in 4 MHCt. (ST -SHCI). It tands to provide

an overestimate of soil sulfide content.

Self-neutrallsing soils: This term is given to ASS where there is sufficient acid neutralising capacity (with the relevant safety factor applied) to neutralise
the potential sulfidic acidity held In the soil (je. the net acidity from the Acid Base Account Is zero or negative). Soils may be 'self- neutralising’ due to
an abundance of naturally occurring calclum or magnesium carbonates (ag. crushed shalls, marine animal exoskeletons, coral) or other acid-neutralising

material.

SPOCAS: An acronym standing for Suspension Peroxide Oxidation Combined Acidity and Sulfur method (Method Code 23), the peroxide-basad method
that supersedes the previous POCAS and POCASm methods,

SPOCAS Sulte: The acid base accounting approached used to calculate net acidity based on the Suspension Peroxide Oxidation Combined Acidity
and Sulfur method. A dacision tree approach based on the values of pHKCI and pHox is used to decide what analytical path Is followed In order to allow

on" of net acidity.

TAA: Titratable actual acidity. The acidity measured by titration with dilute NaOH following extraction with KCi-solution in the SPOCAS method.
Previously referred to as Total Actual Acidity in the POCAS and POCASm methods.

TPA: Titratable peroxide acidity. The acidity measured by titration with dilute NaOH following peroxide digestion in the SPOCAS method. Previously
referred to as Total Potential Acidity in the POCAS and POCASm methods.

TSA: Titratable sulfidic acidity. The difference in acidity measured by titration with dilute NaOH following extraction with KCl-solution and the acidity

titrated following peroxide digestion in the SPOCAS method. (TPA -TAA). Previously referred to as Total Sulfidic Acidity in the POCAS and POCASm
methods.

Bio-Track Pty Ltd

Page 38

 

 

7

  
 
 
   
       
     

7
Zz

7

 

 

7

 

 

 
    
 

 

 

 

mm 2
na
N p m
= >
. i
‘ a 2
SQ) Oo -
NE Bog o
ae a m nN
oz Ss. m 07
xo o as
nex DP 3
eOgd @ =
>~> 3m mM 99
2D BOQ > g
o%, 628 .
oa mk ul
9 as "
4 w x 2
. 2 x
o wn °
Bg 2
3 oO
N It
"
2 rr z >o 4 — 4
S2 t/SPE 508 Be celts aR’ ol229
oF O82 33 a4= S2Eee0 zl 88 ailing aoa
gas ED z gee tr ee eee 2 a2 z=
2 =U go4*20 pst S o
lee bs 3 8 “Ia Hie 4 a2
ste]? 3 [TR a8 BAP 8 im
3° 3 in 3 g aa 3 i ho
= » |e Peay alse
° a ae titi 2/28 a
a as

%

Page 39

 

        
                               
   

02?

as

Existing
Revetment wall

24.384 _240°43 05"

>

y

fl

 

2
g

 

/

 

| Orveway Jf. .
Lf:

  

            

   

Existing Jetty
structure

   

oh
4°

 

a’

30.614m 150°43'05"

\
oo

§

 

 

NOTES

- Contirm all dimensions, building setbacks and
proposed bullding levels on site pnor to
commencement of construction.

- Locate and contirm the position of all services on
site prior to commencement of construction.

+ All construction shall conform to the Bulding Code
of Austratia. all relevant codes and Aystralian
Standards.

= Reler to Eng’s drawings for design of wind loading,
footing and RC slab design, bracing and framing
details,

- Install Kordon Tecmite barrier system in accordance
with manufacturers instructions and the requirements
of AS 3660,

- All work to comply with DA, MCU, ¢ Operational
Works Approvals.

- Connect sewer ¢ stormwater in accordance with
Council requirements,

- Rainwater Tank to be plumbed into all cisterns and
external hosecocks

 

 

Real Property Description
Lot 114 on N21845,
Parish of WEYBA
County of MARCH

SITE AREA: 624m*

SITE COVER (% of site)

    

Ground Floor, 311.5m? (49%)
First Floor, 188nr? (30%)
ae FLOOR AREAS
(yo INTERNAL
‘ Ground Floor 280m?
First Floor 445m?
DECKS (under roof)
New Cross Ground Floor = 29m?
Over to Council First Floor 25m?
Specilication,
ly SOFT LANDSCAPING
~~ 136.3m? (21.8%)
oO
&
~
oO

B 6/78 ~——For Pricing & Construction
A 4fN8 Building Approval
(ISSUE DATE DETALS.

detrei eno bowen parson
Architects
MIDDAP DITCHFIELD Pty Ltd

‘Archinect Reg, No. - P iiddep- 001660 T Dichfiold - 002195
abn. 49064 466 708

 

Ph - (07) 5474 O877 Fax - (07) 5474 0906
Eran - dosignghrnecarc corn.

 

CLIENT
R & W WALKER

PROJECT

PROPOSED HOUSE
LOCATION

LOT 114 WITTA CIRCLE
NOOSA HEADS

DRAWING

Working Drawings

Site Plan

scale date drawn

1100 July2008 «= KAG

Proj no. Dwg no.
0729 WD 1.038

 

 

Page 40

 

 

3399

 

\
0°

28

ic

Line of Building Over

 

(Cantilever Building Over)

Builder to protect
extg. concrete
revetment wa!l______¥

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

     
     

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0" (a}— Concrete 8 Line of Deck Over / g-- 7
Landing = { ee
x une coe - -_
Building Over
E 1g
oi 8 3 perimeter of concrete
< A rramewth = water tank
A Vertical Slats.
oe yy z " Vertical ,0° . ae
i 2 < ae po? | Sits. - aa a 6 Be is
ap oo oO . ~~ : “Water Tank."
‘s : Manhole Over |. +
oA. ; “ ‘Water Tank
u " 4 .' Under Garage.”
3 SEY Li eo : | 80.000 tre,
4 7 . In ppron
(4.3) ; stall approved, potable”
Siding Gates — Compacted Fill waterproof-membrane to, °%
With Vertical to engineer's spec. ‘anside Tacé of concrete
Slats T . water, tank ~~
( C ) I i Blockwork
\ a Over
2 oe x2 4 pole | 1]
oO : . woe ot
ye 9 v> .. 7. Kayak Storage 4 |
4 Frame with .. + ‘Conerete. “+ [ [se back
Vertical Slats. : : . H | Blockwork
abt 200mm to Allow
\ | p for Poot Shell ——
[Refer to |
a x Pap enqgmeer’s détail
e@ L + 2x t ZY |
TUES ee ee Sees
Siding Gates With 3* 3* " |
| Vertical Slats 8 : 8 4
a Set back Blockwork a ot
| [Top of Concrete T 200mm to Alow Swimming Pool H =
Floor Slab to Fall 1.200 for Pool Shel 9 Pool Sheil. —}] 2 ¥8
to Top of Existing ¥ 4 n ~
(E)— Revetment Wall. | \5 | , a | on 26? he =
> ea 7? 2 : ¢ t —_
r 2: 5 2 a,
oJ [ne of Deck Over ACARI SIAR: = = = ae 4 2 bee al B22”
3 PP Sete: suepor Ss? \ | 00 | 40 | Se e
beam over 2 4S 2 »~ ee? | 2 ab |e
+ os ai
D>
Seatbit TWD. Ti A 30.614m {50°4305"
* got Poxnt with veneer S| a Tesnsting block wall
92° 0° Deck over 2 se

 

   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 
  
 

 
  

 

      

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

   

   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

lr

 

 

 

 

 

            

  

 

B 8/708 For Pricing & Construction
A 41108 Building Approval
ISSUE «(DATE = «ETALS

 

‘This drawing Is cubject to copyright and cannot be reproduced in
whole or in part by any medium without the wetten permission of
po
Architects

MIDDAP DITCHFIELD Pty Ltd
‘Avchtect Rag. No.- P Méddap- 001850. T Dichtieid - 002195,
bin. 45 064 468 708

Cnr Mary and Thomas Streets
NOOSAVILLE QLD 4566

Ph - (07) 5474 0877 Fax - (07) 5474 0908
Esra ~ design(jmadarr.oom su

 

CLIENT
R & W WALKER

PROJECT
PROPOSED HOUSE

LOCATION

LOT 114 WITTA CIRCLE

NOOSA HEADS

DRAWING

Working Drawings

Sub-Floor Plan
‘ae Ge cuwn
1:100 July 2008 KAG

Proj no. Dwg no.
0729 WD 2.01B

 

Page 41

 

 

 

 

 

 

CANAL

    

 

 

     

  

 

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

     

        
 

 
 

 

    

 

 

 

 
 

    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

   

 

 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2220 8180 3700 3210 z 3390 4
ot
o? Ut
ee |
Line of Building Over
(Cantilever Building Over) |
Builder to protect
extg. concrete
revetment wall
rr ~ 26374, Busting block wali ()
~ => 2? _-7
‘ Poo lL OSS ry _
Concrete F une of Deck Over / =~ > -s77
Landing = > >S aa
a Line ot _——__y Install approved =
€ Builcing Over ] waterproot membrane to =
3 z perimeter of concrete
5 Frame with g water tank /
Vertical Slats. *
oe ; | we? ; aoueale Denes _. .
a I . rat
ee ws 2 Manhole Over .
Pa ey gels 29 oa? el
24 / | w E + 3 ve 2 “Water Tank
fl . A : bh. . Under Garage..."
2 (EY Lt . . pepe Ho wen u 00 litre, |
4.3 alt Ft tall approved, potable.
Siding Gates — oh eer Compacted Fill 5 aterproof-membrane to
With Vertical mg pe to engineer's spec. sanside Tacé of concrete”.
Slats T Hy. : . tate water, tank ** .
—— — LIS 7
“T Blockwork l T
ve 7 boa
3 _| . «Kayak Storage . a | H | ae |
8 Frame with  Gontrete. 9 | Boer tack Lied b-— ~
Vertical Slats. . . a | Blockwork Y T
at 200mm to Allow (— une of = __J
v | 7 for Pool Shell: Deck
- Refer to Slabover
+— = = a engmeers détail
+ a 7 2 |
Ee $F EEE hors >
Sliding Gates With oF 3* |
| Vertical Stats 8 Rg
2 Set back Blockwork i |
1 (Top of Concrete 7A 200mm to Allow Swimming Pool A ,
Floor Slab to Fall Bebe 200 tor Pool a iad Poot Shell. —}, OF Tl LS emer For Pricing & Construction
to Top of Easting . : a A__#7W8_Bulkting Approval
Revetment Wall. | + \ o jee 2? he? Uy > SUE DATE DeTALA
: 2 Lo
> P a 22 2? @ lo “This drawing fs subject copyright and cannot be reproduced 8)
d There of Deck Over TE aa = zd 2h Pl &, 9 wal orn pat by iy tedium wou tho wren permission of
a wr Cone. support ge | \ e | 37° ul RE, ce ee
- eam Over 3 ott ~ as . ine
aL 4 ! 2 wo 4 Es | ar MIDDAP DITCHFIELD Pty Ltd
Setbic Fy} 30.6141 |50°43°05" v Architect Reg. No, - P Middap - OO1850 T Ditchfield - 002185
wet rent TWD. Timber fame " T Busting block wall | aba. 40 066 468 708
: . — Car Mary and Thomas Streets
° Deck over ! oF, a6 NOOSAVILLE QLD 4566
| Ph - (07) 5474 0877 Fax - (07) 5474 0908
n Emad - design@}madarccomuay
1 CUENT
! R & W WALKER
{ PROJECT
PROPOSED HOUSE
LOCATION
LOT 114 WITTA CIRCLE
NOOSA HEADS
DRAWING ;
Working Drawings
Sub-Floor Plan
ale date “tren —

1.100 July2008 KAG
Proj no. Dwg no.
0729 WD 2.018

 

 

Page 42

 

      

~~ ~OEx. Paim
~

~
~

   

~ ~O 8. Palm

{Sic} it~

   

Tv
BLOG,
x

Gas
~™ aie

 
 

Extend slab to
support doors

   
  

368-9745

  

Inground Concrete Water
Tank Under Garage.

 

Ballustrade
Type }

  
     

Clotheslinel

   

Concrete Landing
below

 

24.384m

 

Timber Stairs.
Removable
balustrade panel

       
 

@-

Removable
balustrade panel

  

Double Garage
Bove Gr 98

   

 

       

 

 

 

 

 

     

     
   

    

         

 

 

 

 

tracks

 

ans \42 oO
EXISTING JETTY Gas bottles x
2m High a
T Fe
New Timber imber Fence Oo
to Jetty.
Mailbox, a
Ballustrade 2m High Blockwall. KR
@ Type | Render and Paint
Finish. AQ
Balustrade Typical Comer. Pool
io s ~
Refer Plan View. @ tL ef Equipment eos
Shding ‘Cone. 2
Concrete beam Gates 9
to support door + (]! | §
Q
z
=
D
io

        

AC:

         

Setour
Point

 

30.614m ee

Aluminum end
Support to aluminum

head section
Qo 7

Timber Top

Ral Over YJ '

40 Shs Refer Baldstrade Type| | Detail

Alununium Posts. on WD6.Q2 for FurtherTypical

 

Details.

   

 

BALUSTRADE TYPE 1
Typical Corner. (Plan View).

Seale 1:5

aN

 
 

 

 

 

- 10 Shs Alummun
Balusters.

& x 40mm Aluminum Flat
Bar Recessed into Nandrat—

 

 

B 8/7108 For Pricing & Construction
A ADB Butiding Approval
TSSUE «DATE =—COETANS

 

‘This drawing i6 subject to copyright and cannot be repraduced in
whole or In part by any medium wilhout the written peratssion of

OE EN TS
Architects

MIDDAP DITCHFIELD Pty Ltd
(rchiict Reg. No.- P Middap - 001850 T Ditchtiekd - 002105
w.b.n. 49 064 466 708

Cnr Mary and Thomas Streets

NOOSAVILLE QLD 4566

Ph - (07) 5474 0877 Fax - (07) 5474 0908

‘Email - [email protected]

 

CUENT
R & W WALKER

PROJECT

PROPOSED HOUSE

LOCATION

LOT 114 WITTA CIRCLE

NOOSA HEADS

DRAWING

Working Drawings

Ground Floor Plan
Tae Gs oan
1:100  July2008 + KAG

Proj no. Owg no.

0729 WD 2.02 B

 

Page 43

     

 

9 9 9

@-

                   
  

Balustrade
Type 2

  

battens

Void
Balustrade
Type

Balustrade
Type 2

@

 

         

  

OP ¢ Metai
Cover Fe
1

 

  

 

 

 

                 

 

| 20mm Wall

— L

 

 

 

Reter Balustrade Type |
Detail on WDG.02 for Further
Typical Balustrade Details.

300

 

 

AO Shs Aluminum Posts.

 

 

Tunber Top Rat Over
& x 40mm Aluminis im Flat

 

Bar Recessed into Handrail.

o¢ 10 Shs Aumimum
Batusters.

 

 

 

BALUSTRADE TYPE 1 Typical
SHS Offset. (Plan View).

Seale 1:5
| Barge capping to
top of block wall

      

Soaker gutter
flastung

 

Openings
in wall.

 

/
Balustrade Typical SHS Offsot,
/ Refer Pan View.

P.

  

P.

       

Balustrade
P. / Type3

/

 

poof

 

P

P. - 70 x 50 Post

 

; !
|
| ‘

Per

|
|

     

                   

 

 

      

 

Ce eA CTE ee rar pumnerrewurumrece raed
‘This drawing is subject to copyright end cannot be reproduced in
‘whole or in part by sry medium without the written permission of

AIROAP DOD ART
Architects

MIDDAP DITCHFIELD Pty Ltd
(Nchitect Reg. No. - P Middap - 001850 T Dinhiekd - 002195.
abn. 49 064 466 708

Cnt Mary and Thomas Streets
NOOSAVILLE QLD 4566

Ph - (07) 5474 0877. Fax - (07) 5474 0906
Exrcab ~ [email protected]

CUENT

R & W WALKER

PROJECT

PROPOSED HOUSE

LOCATION

LOT 114 WITTA CIRCLE
NOOSA HEADS

DRAWING

Working Drawings

First Floor Plan

‘cae dae dawn
4100 July 2008 KAG

Proj ne. Dwg no.
0729 WD 2.03 B

Page 44

                     

Hwa Sill

©

-- =opdpeseer -z=TTTT

8m Height at
Revetment Wall.

Dp ¢ Spreader
(Metall cover flashing)

Dp ¢ Spreader

Dp & doreader

          

Spitter, Aluminum Rho
Frame for Door
— —Teacks- — — —

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

FL

Type }

 

 

F
Concrete Beam &
Downturn to

Support Door Tracks

                  

 

Top offRevetment Wall

     

Extend Slab to
Support Doors.

 

Hw Framing.
Vertical qm ber Stats

      

       

ex j Removable Ex Jetty.N Siding Gates to
SOUTH | ELEVATION Revetment Wall | Balstrade see Stace” Raya Storage
Panel, Balustrade.

            

8m Height D
at Building

Timber Screen

Metal Barge
Op: Flashing
(Metal cover
flashing)

               

oFFL6.3m

Exsting Block Wall
on Boundary

FFL 3.0m.

oo
oc

     

  

  
   

  

  

FFL 2.715m —_-—-
Garage
ATION © Papel tt Garage Door Waterproof and Render Boundary Existing
Lec SS Sa : with Timber Slats. Boundary Wall and Garage Wall Junction.
| | { | | Refer Section G-G on Dwg WD4.03
6m Height at 1
Front Fence B t
~ 1
2
5
aic2ze 98) Se SSL OS eee
FFL 3.0m : : _~-t --—-
FAL 2.71 Sm
Garage | | Sliding Gate. Atuminusm '

  

\ Frame with Timber Slats,

|
(NORTH) FRONT FENCE ELEVATION

|

Rendered Concrete
Rendered Blockwork

BBB

Fibre Cement Sheeting
with Cover Battens

Weatherboard

B 08/07/08 — For Pricing and Construction

A 04/0608 Bulking Approval

SSSUE DATE ‘DETALS

‘This drawing fs satjact to copytigh and cannot be raproduead tn
‘whole oF In pad by any medium wthout the wrften permission of
NAT are
Architects

MIDDAP DITCHFIELD Pty Ltd
‘Arehitact Reg. No. - P Middap - 001850 T Dtchfield -002195
etn 49 064 466 708

 

Ph - (07) 5474 0877 Fax - (07) 5474 0906
Emad + design¢madare.coms

 

CUENT

R & W WALKER

PROJECT

PROPOSED HOUSE
LOCATION

LOT 114 WITTA CIRCLE
NOOSA HEADS

DRAWING

Working Drawings
Elevations - North & South
wae as can
1:100  Jutly2008 KAG

Proj ne. Dwg no.
0729 WD 3.01B

 

Page 45

        
 

8m Height
at Building _

Openings in Wall.

             

Spitter,
Metal flashing

Removable panel

WEST ELEVATION

    
          

Root Behind
Shown Dashed

      

Metal Cover Flashing Roof Behind
to Rainhood and DP. Shown Dashed. _
8m Height TO 0 SS I) a Ee

at Building i ae
=

~-L.gt eee SSS

 

                
 

Dp

Spreader
Rangehood

duct.com —

(to suit 2 ducts)

42 x 42 Window
Surround.

  

Tamper Walkway

EAST ELEVATION Aropnd Pool
|

  

WE he acts.

GO Rendered Concrete
(HD) Rendered Blockwork
(FQ) Fibre Cement Sheeting

with Cover Battens
(5) Weatherboard

08/07/08 For Pricing and Construction
04/0778 —_Buliding Approval

TSSUE DATE= «ETARS

‘This drawing is subject fo copyright and cannot be reproduced in
viol ra party any medium wet ha wrten permis
NT ee
Architects

MIDDAP DITCHFIELD Pty Ltd
‘Arcthect Rog. No.- P Madkiap - 001850 T Ochtaad - 02188
aban 49.064 466708

Cnr Mary and Thomas Streets.
NOOSAVILLE QLD 4566

>a

 

Ph - (07) 5474 0877 Fax - (07) 5474 0906
Emad - design¢imariart.com au

 

CUENT
R & W WALKER

PROJECT

PROPOSED HOUSE
LOCATION

LOT 114 WITTA CIRCLE
NOOSA HEADS

DRAWING

Working Drawings
Elevations - East & West
scale Gate drawn

1:100 duly 2008 = KAG

Proj no, Dwg no.
0729 WD 3.028

 

 

Page 46

                           
                 

8.0m Height
a

  

   

  

offl.6.3m

      

  

   

TLEEE
As C54!

6006065
Gb LEE:

      
 

  

     
 

Scien

        

    

Do Not Undermne
Existing Blockwork
Footing.

Compacted Sand
Bedding with
Waterproof Membrane.

Appipved Waterproof
membrane. Agricultural

Drau| Pipe. So i f
| [StabsyFootings Indkative Only.

SECTION A-A Rempel enbrae) | [Rar eegued Spee
| | |

Do Not Undermine
Ensting Blockwork
Footing.

  
    

 

     
         

 

 

 

 

Do Not Undermne
Busting Blockwork
Footing.

 
 

Do Not Undermine
Exsting Blockwork
Fooung.

  

Compacted
Bedding
Waterproof iWembrane.

SECTION B-B_ |

SlabsfFooungs
Indicative Only.

             

 

   

   
  

Pool Structure indicative Only.
Refer Engmeers Spec.

  

.
=

Plasterboard Limng
Rendered Concrete

RB} Rendered Blockwork

B8B8B8

Fibre Cement Sheeting
with Cover Battens

Weatherboard

B 08/07/08 For Pricing and Construction
A AITHOS ‘Suilding Approval
ISSUE CATE = CDETARS.

‘This drawing Is subject to copyright and cannot be mpmduced in
‘whole or in part by any medium withou! the writen permission of

Architects
MIDDAP DITCHFIELD Pty Ltd

‘Archbect Reg. No, -  Midkiap - 001850 T Oikchéekd - 002195
abn 49 064 465 708

Cnr Mary and Thomas Streets
NOOSAVILLE QLD 4566

Ph - (07) 5474 0877 Fax - (07) 5474 0906
Email - [email protected]

CUENT

R & W WALKER

PROJECT

PROPOSED HOUSE

LOCATION

LOT 114 WITTA CIRCLE
NOOSA HEADS

DRAWING

Working Drawings

Sections A-A & B-B

 

 

 

scale = dats drawn

1:100 July 2008 KAG

Proj no. Dwg no.

0729 WD 4.01B

 

 

Page 47

8.0m Heigh

it

 

2400h PB
Ceding

 

|
|

3300
2700

 

 

 

Do Not Undermine
ee - Exsting Blockwork |
Footing.

SECTION C-C!
|

|
Pool Structure indicative Only.
Refer Engineers Speg.

t

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

_-g.---Q_.--- OF. O__

AC Galle =

-

FFL 3.0m

  
  

Kayak Storage

    

Slabs/Pootings Indicative Only.
Rad eegneiee Spec. Aa ,

    

Compacted Sand
Bedding with
Waterproof Membrane.

Approved Watbrproot |

i membrane. Agpcultural i
Drain Pipe. :

| |

|

‘

SEGTION D-D

4

   

     

    
   

O 9 9 © ©

 
  

    
  

 

 

SlabsfFootings Indicative Only,
Refer Engineers Spec.

 

 

 

  

() Plasterboard Lring
(BD Rendered Concrete
() Rendered Blockwork
(Fibre Cement Sheeting

with Cover Battens
[) Weatherboard

8 08708 For Pricing and Construction

A 04/78 —_Bullding Approval

ISSUE DATE DETALS

This 6 ond cannot bo
tarienp tymdtniiseonpmn
er AR TS
Architects

MIDDAP DITCHFIELD Pty Ltd
‘Aschitpct Reg. No.- P Middap- 001850 T Ditchfsid - 002195.
LDL 49 064 456 708

Cnr Mary and Thomas Streets
NOOSAVILLE QLD 4566

Ph - (07) 5474 0877 Fax - (07) 5474 0906
Ema’ - [email protected]

 

 

CUENT
R & W WALKER

PROJECT

PROPOSED HOUSE

LOCATION

LOT 114 WITTA CIRCLE

NOOSA HEADS

DRAWING

Working Drawings

Sections C-C & D-D
wae an

4:100 duty 2008. «= KAG

Proj no. Dwg no.
0729 WD 4.02 8

 

Page 48

 

8.0m Height

  

 

Stabs/Footings Indicative Only.
Refer Engineers Spec.

 

 

 

i

Boundary Line

4 =
SRS

    

42 x 42 Expressed
Cover Battens,

Dp +

   

Spitter from
Balcony }

   
  

Billiard

  
 

  
 

80mm Topping Slab
Graded to Door.

— —Deouble Garage—|—

            
 

             

   

   
 
   

             

   

              

     

Le 47 o
GLE: G4 Wie o5, 7 ~
GO: LEG Lit Eas ~~.
ti Vigee ~
43 G3 Storage

L254
yy

     

      

 

Water Tank
60.350 litres

|

Conlpacted Sand

Bedding with

Waterproo! Membrane.
|

| |

     

    

Approved W.
membrane.
Drain Pipe.

           

membraje. Agricultural
Drain Pipe. Compacted
| Bedding with
i Waterproof Membrane.

| !

  

Revetment Wall.

 
   

 

Aperoved Waterproof Seal
to Inside of Water Tank.

SECTION E-E

[— 10mm Hebel
Render to
Boundary Wall
4 Garage Wall

8.0m Height
a a a a TN anne nner rr rrr er rr er oe ee CE Err rom

_——

-
-

—_—

r Continuous
Waterproof
membrane to top
and sides of

 

 

Boundary Wall
and Garage Wall
Junction.

 

 

 

Plasterboard Lining

 

 

 

 

New Garage Block Wall.
Wall Height - 3500mm
Average Maxmum rom
Easting Ground Level—¥

 

 

A
Yt |

Rendered Concrete

     

 

Rendered Blockwork

     

BEBE

              

         

    

r New

Crossover.
88 80mm Topping Sia Hore Cement Shectng
& 3 Graded to Door. Coloured e Ss
gs FFL 2.715m Concrete (EB Weatherboard
oy Drveway

Double Ga Gar.

        

  
  

   

SULA LI ELT

B
A

   
 

ATOB

  

Water Tank

    

    

 

   

 

 

 

 

   

Approved Potable Waterproof
Seal to Inside of Water Tank.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Bian Creda to Archtiect Reg. Mo.- P Middap- 001850 T Dizchtield - 002195
“| — Gasting Zononm Cat Man’ end Thomas Streets
: _ ~(% |]_GarageRL2715 breion)sara oar? ~ (07) 5474 0906
Emel - design madarc.com.au
ot CUENT
—Hew Goncrete _ __ __ | LH <3 a 4 R & W WALKER
Bae bree | “«& Kk KORO LP PROPOSED HOUSE
: 4? SS SS x x i Locamion
/ 4 ALLY |. — AE Z OS Lor ot WTA CIRCLE
S/o J T ORAWING
| Working Drawings

Hew Footing /
Foundations as

Per Engmeers
L Ko Spec.

Do mms AS

Eystng Footing SECTION G-G
Indicative Onty} Seale | > 10 scale date drawn
VA 43100 hdy 2008 KAG
Sh SS, 0729 Wb 4.038
DIIIISIOSYO

08/78 For Pricing and Constuction
Guiding Approval

 

. Compacted Fill.
Ensting Revetment Wall. Refer Engineers 60,350 litres ISSUE DATE ALS
Spec. SlabsfFootings Indicative Only. Ws
. ed W: faterproot ‘This crewing ts subject to copyright and cannot be reproducnd in
SECTION F F Refer Engneers Spec. Approved | Agneultura! membrane, Agricultural ‘whole or In part by eny medium without the writtan permission of
Drain Pipe. Drain Pipe. Moby DIC aD ASCHITECTS,

MIDDAP DITCHFIELD Pty Ltd

 

Sections E-E &F-F & G-G

 

 

Page 49

 

Regional Council

 

Sunshine Coast LAND USE SECTION FEES

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

RECEIPT TYPE
SALE OF DOCUMENTS
Superseded Planning Scheme Documentation 520
Copy of Permit/Approval Letter 110
The Noosa Plan Documentation 111
APPLICATION FEES
Material Ch se€Cosdlimpact b
garaisten oss §21
nt . 521
ti under Superseded Planning Scheme . 521
Modification to a Development Permit "§21
Extension of a Currency Period $21
Operational Works - Landscaping §21
Bldg Work assessable against the Planning Scheme : 521
PRE LODGEMENT REVIEW
Half Hour 522
One Hour §22°
ADVERTISING
Purchase Advertised Applications 523
JETTIES . / .
Jetty Application Fee - 524
Jetty Bond : ‘ ‘ 51
. (Category 4)
BONDS
* Performance Bond 51
. (Category 9) .
SIGNS
Registration Fee ‘ , 222
s CH FEE
Search of Land Use Section fi le. 112
Liquor Licensing Request 113
TOTAL $ & 8 S
NAME: Ce Suh.
avpress: {QO As. 225°
Neesa HEAD s xe?
FLENO: — OG7 I++, pate: '({@loP®
RECEIPT NO: I Signature of TP Officer: [ Anes a
AUTHORITY NO: a?

 

[2 /roee/i49//,