Original source · versioned page text
Appendix F - Flood Study
Attached to the e-mail Multiple Housing Type 3 Retirement & Special Needs (48 units) - MCU18/0009.
Flood Study
Noosa Care - Carramar
Figure 3-2 Catchment Area
A kc value of 1.97 for the 10% AEP and 1.84 for the 1% AEP gave the best match to the Rational Method
discharges without underestimating flow at the outlet. A non-linearity factor ‘m’ of 0.8 was adopted.
Table 3-2 compares the peak flow values from RORB to the results of the Rational Method. The values indicate
that the hydrologic model is generating consistent peak flows compared to the Rational Method.
Table 3-2 Hydrology Validation
1% AEP Peak Flow
AEP
(m3/s)
(%)
Rational Method RORB
10 68.8 68.8
1 122.9 122.6
24 July 2017 Cardno 7
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
The download may take up to a minute.