Original source · versioned page text
Swmp
Design Storm Event Existing Case Proposed
Developed Case
1-Year ARI
17 L/s 16L/s
(63% AEP)
10-Year ARI
29L/s 29L/s
(10% AEP)
100-Year ARI
51L/s 51L/s
(1% AEP)
Table 4.1 Rational Method Calculation Peak Flow Rates
Results for the design storms listed in Table 4.1 are comparable between the existing and
developed case. The 10-Year and 100-Year ARI was found to be 29L/s and 51L/s,
respectively, for both existing and proposed development scenarios. This is attributed to the
relatively small site catchment, and high existing fraction impervious value, which the
proposed development marginally reduces.
Peak stormwater flow discharging from the property will be relative to the existing case.
Refer to Appendix C for calculations. In the existing case the entire site drains to Noosa
Drive, whereas the proposed development will pipe the roof, and a small portion of ground
catchment will discharge as sheet flow to Noosa Drive. By reducing the sites fraction
impervious, the development ensures no worsening of flows from the site.
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalSearchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.