Original source · versioned page text
Town Planning Assessment Report
what could reasonably be on Biodiversity, Waterways
a) The proposed dwelling would
expected in the rural zone; and Wetland Overlay maps;
not cause environmental harm
c) 10 metres from a road frontage;
or nuisance to sensitive land
b) avoid adverse impact and
on ecologically important uses including adverse
d) 10 metres from the side and rear impacts on amenity values,
areas including National Parks, boundaries or 6 metres where the
watercourses, and wetlands; over and above what would be
lot area does not exceed 1 expected within the zone for
hectare, with the exception that if the following reasons:
c) mitigate risks associated with the height of the building or i. the dwelling is located on
the use of chemicals or air structure exceeds 9 metres
pollutants; and clear and level ground
the setback to the side and rear adjacent to an existing
boundaries is equal to twice its structure and will avoid
d) avoid conflict with rural uses height in metres. causing environmental
and activities on adjoining
harm;
properties.
ii. the dwelling is located
AO8.5 220m from the closest
On properties over 2 hectares in area, dwelling to the west, at 107
a distance of not less than 200 Evans Road, which in itself
metres is provided between contains built to boundary
a sensitive land use and land on an structures;
adjacent rural zone property over 4 iii. the proposed dwelling is
hectares in mapped Agricultural Land separated by a distance of
Conservation Area. 445m from the dwelling
located on the adjoining
property to the north at 16
Palm Grove Road, of which
is also owned Philip and
Debra through their
company TG Equipment;
iv. the proposed dwelling has
large pitched gable roofs
and is of a character and
appearance that is
compatible with the rural
zone;
b) The dwelling will avoid causing
impacts on ecologically
important areas pertaining to
the site, being well separated
from the mapped waterway
transecting the site by a
distance of 145m;
c) The dwelling will not cause
potential risks associated with
the use of chemicals or air
pollutants; and
d) The dwelling will not cause
conflicts with rural uses and
activities on adjoining
properties. As mentioned
earlier, Phillip and Debra own
the adjoining property to the
north and it is only used for low
intensity grazing proposes.
Further, a 4m reduction to the
setback would not impact on
the future uses of the adjoining
property.
AO12 - Complies
Page 10 of 15
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
Large file: the download may take up to a minute.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.