Council archive · source document
Development Assessment Report · OPW16/0016
Attached to the e-mail OPW16/0016 - Operational Works Application.
DEVELOPMENT ASSESSMENT REPORT
2 PARKYN COURT, TEWANTIN
LOT 388 MCH839039, LOT 400 MCH839039 & LOT 178 MCH5169
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FOR OPERATIONAL WORKS FOR
PRESCRIBED TIDAL WORK
File No. 15263 February 2016
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalFull text of the other 43 pages
Page 2
Project Urban – 15253 February 2016
DOCUMENT INFORMATION
Project number: 15253
Report prepared for: Quadrant Holdings Pty Ltd
DOCUMENT CONTROL
Revision # Date Prepared by Reviewed by Authorised by
Draft 01/02/2016 Adam Seaton Scott Sobey -
Final 02/02/2016 Adam Seaton Scott Sobey Scott Sobey
COMPANY DETAILS
Project Urban Pty Ltd
Suite 1 Corner Surf Road & Gardak Street
Alexandra Headland Qld 4572
Tel: 07 5443 2844
Fax: 07 5443 7146
Email: [email protected]
Disclaimer Statement
Project Urban Pty Ltd retains ownership and copyright of the contents of this document including drawings, plans, figures and other work
produced by Project Urban Pty Ltd. This document is not to be reproduced in full or any part, unless separately approved by Project Urban Pty
Ltd. The client may use this document only for the purpose of which it was prepared. No third party is entitled to use or rely on this document.
This report is based on our opinion of the town planning issues that arise from the statutory provisions relating to this site. Comments and
conclusions in or construed from this report relating to matters of law are not to be relied upon. You should only rely upon the advice of your
professional legal advisors with respect to matters of law. This report is provided on the basis that our standard Terms and Conditions apply.
Development Assessment Report Page 1 of 14
Operational Works for Prescribed Tidal Works
2 Parkyn Court, Tewantin
Page 3
Project Urban – 15253 February 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 APPLICATION SUMMARY .................................................................................................. 3 2.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................ 4 3.0 SITE DESCRIPTION .......................................................................................................... 5 3.1 SUBJECT SITE ....................................................................................................................... 5 4.0 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT ............................................................................................... 6 5.0 STATE PLANNING INTERESTS .......................................................................................... 7 5.1 STATE PLANNING REGULATORY PROVISIONS ........................................................................ 7 5.2 STATE PLANNING POLICY ..................................................................................................... 7 5.3 REFERRAL ........................................................................................................................... 11 5.4 STATE DEVELOPMENT ASSESSMENT PROVISIONS ................................................................. 11 6.0 NOOSA PLAN 2006 .......................................................................................................... 12 6.1 LEVEL OF ASSESSMENT ........................................................................................................ 12 6.2 OVERLAYS ........................................................................................................................... 12 6.3 TEWANTIN & DOONAN LOCALITY ......................................................................................... 13 6.4 OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION ZONE .................................................................................. 13 6.5 DEVELOPMENT CODES ......................................................................................................... 13 7.0 CONCLUSION .................................................................................................................. 14 ATTACHMENT 1 – Planning Scheme Code Assessment prepared by Project Urban ATTACHMENT 2 – Prescribed Tidal Work Code Assessment prepared by Project Urban ATTACHMENT 3 – SDAP Code Assessment prepared by Project Urban SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION Proposal Plans prepared by International Marina Consultants Artist Impressions prepared by Peter Morrison Development Assessment Report Page 2 of 14 Operational Works for Prescribed Tidal Works 2 Parkyn Court, Tewantin
Page 4
Project Urban – 15253 February 2016
1.0 APPLICATION SUMMARY
SITE DETAILS
Address 2 Parkyn Court, Tewantin
Real Properly Description Lot 388 MCH839039, Lot 400 MCH839039 & Lot 178 MCH5169
Land Area 14,512m² (1.4512 ha)
Local Authority Noosa Council
Registered Landowner The State of Queensland
Registered Lessee Quadrant Holdings Pty Ltd A.C.N. 009 947 942
Current Use Noosa Marina
PLANNING SCHEME DESIGNATIONS
Planning Scheme Noosa Plan 2006
Locality Tewantin and Doonan locality
Zone Open space recreation zone
Overlays Biodiversity (riparian buffer area & watercourse and drainage
lines)
Natural hazard (flood hazard area, area subject to min floor
height & high potential acid sulfate area 0-5m AHD)
APPLICATION DETAILS
Applicant Quadrant Holdings Pty Ltd C/- Project Urban
Application Type Development Permit for Operational Work
Proposal Prescribed Tidal Works for Deck
Level of Assessment Code Assessable
Referrals Schedule 7, table 2, items 13 and 18 – Tidal works, or development
in a coastal management district
PROJECT TEAM
Town Planning Project Urban
Proposal Plans International Marina Consultants
Artist Impressions Peter Morrison
Development Assessment Report Page 3 of 14
Operational Works for Prescribed Tidal Works
2 Parkyn Court, Tewantin
Page 5
Project Urban – 15253 February 2016 2.0 INTRODUCTION This Development Assessment Report has been prepared to support a Development Application for Operational Work for Prescribed Tidal Works (Deck) on behalf of Quadrant Holdings Pty Ltd. The subject site is the existing Noosa Marina situated at 2 Parkyn Court, Tewantin and is described as Lot 388 MCH839039, Lot 400 MCH839039 & Lot 178 MCH5169. Under the Noosa Plan 2006 the site is included within the open space recreation zone of the Tewantin and Doonan locality. The applicable table of development assessment identifies that the proposal is code assessable. The purpose of this report is to describe the characteristics of the site, detail the proposed development and provide an assessment of the proposed development against the applicable planning provisions. This report should be read in conjunction with the accompanying covering letter, IDAS Development Application forms, Proposal Plans and Artist Impressions. Development Assessment Report Page 4 of 14 Operational Works for Prescribed Tidal Works 2 Parkyn Court, Tewantin
Page 6
Project Urban – 15253 February 2016
3.0 SITE DESCRIPTION
3.1 SUBJECT SITE
The subject site is the existing Noosa Marina situated at 2 Parkyn Court, Tewantin and is legally described
as Lot 388 MCH839039, Lot 400 MCH839039 & Lot 178 MCH5169.
The site comprises an area of 14,512m² (1.4512 ha) and is occupied by the existing Noosa Marina. The
site has a road frontage to Parkyn Court of approximately 112m and a road frontage to Memorial Avenue
of approximately 167m.
An aerial photo of the subject site is included within Figure 1 below:
APPROX. LOCATION OF
PROPOSED DECK
Figure 1: Aerial Photograph of Subject Site, NearMap, Accessed January 2016, http://www.nearmap.com
Development Assessment Report Page 5 of 14
Operational Works for Prescribed Tidal Works
2 Parkyn Court, Tewantin
Page 7
Project Urban – 15253 February 2016 4.0 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT The proposed development is to be located within the existing Noosa Marina, which was originally established under a special development lease granted by the state government. The lease provides for the use of the site for "marine facility purposes, namely a marina for the berthing of sixty-five vessels, a tourist centre and charter vessel/tour boat passenger terminal and common user vessel berth or berths and licensed premises, and facilities as are reasonably associated with the operation of a marina including a fuelling facility, slipway, marine workshop (not to include sandblasting), security and management centre, offices, restaurants and speciality shops." Subsequent use rights have also been previously established under the planning scheme through a historical rezoning and plan of development. The development proposes to remove an existing pontoon and replace it with a deck structure at the north eastern most edge of the existing marina development as shown on the attached proposal plans prepared by International Marina Consultants. The proposal includes approximately 409m2 of decking and a new concrete slab area of approximately 28.5m2. The proposed works are wholly contained within the existing use/lease area and are consistent with existing use rights and provisions of the state government lease and previous Council approvals. The proposed works will provide improved facilities for existing site uses. An artist’s impression of the proposed deck is shown in Figure 2 below: Figure 2: Artist’s Impression of Proposed Deck, Peter Morrison, September 2015. Development Assessment Report Page 6 of 14 Operational Works for Prescribed Tidal Works 2 Parkyn Court, Tewantin
Page 8
Project Urban – 15253 February 2016
5.0 STATE PLANNING INTERESTS
5.1 STATE PLANNING REGULATORY PROVISIONS
State planning regulatory provisions are state planning instruments that regulate development and can
apply to all or part of the state.
The following regulatory provisions are in effect:
State Planning Regulatory Provisions Comment
Draft amendment to the South East Queensland The site is included with the Urban Footprint.
Regional Plan 2009-2031 State Planning Regulatory Assessment against the regulatory provisions is not
Provisions applicable.
Guragunbah State Planning Regulatory Provision Not applicable
The site is not located within the Guragunbah area.
State Planning Regulatory Provision (adopted Not applicable
charges)
Yeerongpilly Transit Oriented Development State Not applicable
Planning Regulatory Provision
The site is not located within the Yeerongpilly
Transit Oriented Development area.
Off-road motorcycling facility on State-owned land Not applicable
at Wyaralong
The site is not located within the Wyaralong area.
State Planning Regulatory Provisions (Adult stores) Not applicable
The proposal does not include an adult store use.
South East Queensland Koala Conservation State Not applicable
Planning Regulatory Provisions
The site is not located within a Priority Koala
Assessable Development Area or a Koala
Assessable Development area.
5.2 STATE PLANNING POLICY
The State Planning Policy (SPP) defines the Queensland Government’s policies about matters of state
interest in land use planning and development. The SPP only applies to development assessment if the
planning scheme has not yet appropriately integrated the SPP. If there is a discrepancy between a local
planning scheme and a state planning policy, then what is outlined in the state planning policy overrides
the planning scheme.
The Noosa Plan 2006 does not reflect the SPP and assessment against the SPP is required.
Part E of the SPP details the interim development assessment requirements for the following state
interests:
Development Assessment Report Page 7 of 14
Operational Works for Prescribed Tidal Works
2 Parkyn Court, Tewantin
Page 9
Project Urban – 15253 February 2016
State Interest Comment
Liveable communities Not applicable:
The proposal is for operational works.
Mining and extractive resources Not applicable:
The site is not within a key resource area (KRA),
the separation area of a KRA or the transport route
separation area of a KRA.
Biodiversity Applicable:
The site does include land that relates to a matter
of state environmental significance in accordance
with SPP mapping and the application is for
operational work. An Assessment against the
Biodiversity State Interest is applicable and has
been included below.
Coastal environment Not applicable:
The site is not located within the coastal
management district.
Water quality Receiving waters - Not applicable:
The proposed operational works won’t disturb
more than 2500m2 of land.
Water supply catchment - Not applicable:
The site is located within an urban area, located
outside the SEQ water supply buffer area and the
proposal does not involve material change of use
or reconfiguration of a lot.
Acid sulfate soils - Not applicable:
The land is at or below 5m AHD but the proposal
does not involve more than 100m3 of excavation or
500m3 of fill.
Emissions and hazardous activities Not applicable:
The site is not located within a management area.
Natural hazards, risk and resilience Applicable:
The site is mapped as being within a flood hazard
area and coastal hazard areas (erosion prone area,
medium storm tide inundation area and high storm
tide inundation area). An Assessment against the
natural hazards, risk and resilience State interest is
applicable and has been included below.
State transport infrastructure Not applicable:
The proposal is for operational works.
Strategic airports and aviation facilities Not applicable:
The site is not located within proximity of a
strategic airport or aviation facility.
Development Assessment Report Page 8 of 14
Operational Works for Prescribed Tidal Works
2 Parkyn Court, Tewantin
Page 10
Project Urban – 15253 February 2016
The following provides an assessment of the applicable states interests identified above:
LIVEABLE COMMUNITIES STATE INTEREST
BIODIVERSITY STATE INTEREST
Assessment Criteria Comment
Development: Complies – The site is identified as being affected
(1) enhances matters of state environmental by the regulated vegetation (intersecting a
significance where possible, and watercourse) overlay by the SPP Mapping. The site
(2) identifies any potential significant adverse is not mapped as containing any significant
environmental impacts on matters of state vegetation by Council or SARA mapping and the
environmental significance, and development does not require the removal of any
(3) manages the significant adverse environmental vegetation. In consideration of the above the
impacts on matters of state environmental proposed development will not have any
significance by protecting the matters of state unreasonable adverse impact on the mapped
environmental significance from, or otherwise matter of state environmental significance.
mitigating, those impacts.
(2) ensures that the disturbance of ASS avoids or
minimises the mobilisation release of acid and
metal contaminants by:
(a) neutralising existing acidity and preventing
the generation of acid and metal contaminants,
and
(b) preventing the release of surface or
groundwater flows containing acid and metal
contaminants into the environment.
NATURAL HAZARDS, RISK AND RESILIENCE STATE INTEREST
Assessment Criteria Comment
Development: Complies - The site is within a flood hazard area
(1) avoids natural hazard areas or mitigates the and coastal hazard areas (erosion prone area,
risks of the natural hazard to an acceptable or medium storm tide inundation area and high storm
tolerable level, and tide inundation area) in accordance with the SPP
mapping. The deck is proposed to be established
at 2.2m AHD which is 1.65m above the Highest
Astronomical Tide (H.A.T). The establishment of
the deck at this level will ensure the proposed
works will achieve adequate immunity from
flooding and storm tide inundation. The proposed
deck has been designed by an RPEQ who
specializes in Marina type developments to ensure
the proposal is adequately designed to withstand
any possible erosion issues. In consideration of the
above the proposed development has mitigated
the risks of natural hazards.
(2) supports, and does not unduly burden, disaster Complies – The deck is proposed to be
management response or recovery capacity and established at 2.2m AHD which is 1.65m above the
capabilities, and Highest Astronomical Tide (H.A.T). The
establishment of the deck at this level will ensure
the proposed works will achieve adequate
immunity from flooding and storm tide inundation
so as not to burden disaster management
capacity.
(3) directly, indirectly and cumulatively avoids an Complies – The deck is proposed to be
increase in the severity of the natural hazard and established at 2.2m AHD which is 1.65m above the
the potential for damage on the site or to other Highest Astronomical Tide (H.A.T). The
properties, and establishment of the deck at this level will ensure
the proposed works will achieve adequate
Development Assessment Report Page 9 of 14
Operational Works for Prescribed Tidal Works
2 Parkyn Court, Tewantin
Page 11
Project Urban – 15253 February 2016
immunity from flooding and storm tide inundation.
The proposed deck has been designed by an RPEQ
who specializes in Marina type developments to
ensure the proposal is adequately designed to
reasonably withstand the potential impacts of
natural hazards.
(4) avoids risks to public safety and the Not applicable – The proposal is for operational
environment from the location of hazardous works for a deck only. The deck will not be used
materials and the release of these materials as a for the storage of hazardous materials.
result of a natural hazard, and
(5) maintains or enhances natural processes and Complies – The proposal largely maintains the
the protective function of landforms and existing natural landform and allows for the
vegetation that can mitigate risks associated with existing flows and natural processes of the Noosa
the natural hazard, and River.
(6) is not located in an erosion prone area within a Not applicable – the proposed deck is not
coastal management district unless: located within a coastal management district.
(a) it cannot feasibly be located elsewhere, and
(b) is coastal-dependent development, or
temporary, readily relocatable or able-to-be-
abandoned development, and
(7) that is the redevelopment of existing Not applicable – the proposal is for a new deck
permanent buildings or structures, is located structure.
outside an erosion-prone area or, where this is not
feasible, redevelopment:
(a) is located:
i. as far landward from the seaward
property boundary as possible, or
ii. landward of the seaward alignment of the
neighbouring buildings, and
(b) provides space seaward of the development
within the premises to allow for the future
construction of erosion control structures, such
as a seawall, and
(8) proposes to undertake coastal protection work Complies – the development does not propose
(excluding beach nourishment) only as a last resort coastal protection works. The proposed deck has
where coastal erosion presents an imminent threat been designed by an RPEQ who specializes in
to public safety or existing buildings and Marina type developments to ensure the proposal
structures, and all of the following apply: is adequately designed to withstand any possible
(a) the property cannot reasonably be erosion issues.
relocated or abandoned, and
(b) any coastal protection works to protect
private property is located as far landward as
practicable and on the lot containing the
property to the maximum extent reasonable,
and
(c) the coastal protection work mitigates any
increase in coastal hazard risk for adjacent
areas.
Development Assessment Report Page 10 of 14
Operational Works for Prescribed Tidal Works
2 Parkyn Court, Tewantin
Page 12
Project Urban – 15253 February 2016
5.3 REFERRAL
Referral to the State Assessment and Referral Agency (SARA) is triggered under Schedule 7, table 2, items
13 and 18 of the Sustainable Planning Regulation 2009 .
5.4 STATE DEVELOPMENT ASSESSMENT PROVISIONS
The State Development Assessment Provisions (SDAP) set out the matters of interest to the state for
development assessment, where SARA is responsible for assessing or deciding development applications as
assessment manager or as a referral agency. The SDAP is not applied by local government in the
assessment of development applications.
Referral is triggered by the application and the SDAP are applicable. Table B.3 of the SDAP identifies that
the following state codes are relevant:
10.1 Tidal works, or development in the coastal management district state code.
An assessment of the abovementioned code is included within Attachment 3.
Development Assessment Report Page 11 of 14
Operational Works for Prescribed Tidal Works
2 Parkyn Court, Tewantin
Page 13
Project Urban – 15253 February 2016
6.0 NOOSA PLAN 2006
Under the provisions of the Noosa Plan 2006 the subject site is included within the open space recreation
zone of the Tewantin and Doonan Locality. An assessment of the applicable provisions of the Noosa Plan
2006 has been undertaken below.
6.1 LEVEL OF ASSESSMENT
In accordance with Table 12.11 of the Noosa Plan 2006 the proposal will be subject to Code Assessment.
6.2 OVERLAYS
The following overlays exist upon the site:
Overlay Comment
Biodiversity
The site is mapped as being partly within a
riparian buffer area and watercourses/drainage
line by the biodiversity overlay. In accordance
with Table 13.1 of the planning scheme the
proposal is not assessable against the
Biodiversity Overlay Code.
Natural Hazards
The site is mapped as being partly within a flood
hazard area and an area subject to min floor
height by the Natural Hazards Overlays. In
accordance with Table 13.7 of the planning
scheme the proposal is not assessable against
the Natural Hazards Overlay Code.
The site is mapped as being partly within a high
potential acid sulfate area by the Natural
Hazards Overlays. In accordance with Table 13.7
of the planning scheme the proposal is not
assessable against the Natural Hazards Overlay
Code.
Development Assessment Report Page 12 of 14
Operational Works for Prescribed Tidal Works
2 Parkyn Court, Tewantin
Page 14
Project Urban – 15253 February 2016 6.3 TEWANTIN & DOONAN LOCALITY In accordance with the Noosa Plan 2006 the site is included within the Tewantin & Doonan Locality. In accordance with Table 12.11 of the planning scheme the proposed development is not assessable against the Tewantin and Doonan Locality Code. 6.4 OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION ZONE The site is included within the open space recreation zone. In accordance with Table 12.11 of the planning scheme the proposed development is not assessable against the Specific Outcomes and Probable Solutions for the Open Space Recreation Zone contained in the Tewantin and Doonan Locality Code. The proposed works will provide improved facilities for existing onsite marina uses which will contribute to the variety of passive and active recreational experiences on offer in the locality, promoting community interaction, wellbeing and a desirable lifestyle for local residents in accordance with the intent of the open space and recreation zone. 6.5 DEVELOPMENT CODES In accordance with the applicable table of development assessment the proposed development is assessable against the Watercourses Works Code contained in the Noosa Plan 2006. An assessment of this code has been included within Attachment 1. The proposed development is also assessable against the Prescribed Tidal Works Code contained in Schedule 4A of the Coastal Protection and Management Regulation 2003. An assessment of this code has been included within Attachment 2. Comment: Attachments 1 and 2 demonstrate that the proposed development complies with all relevant probable solutions and specific outcomes of the abovementioned codes. Development Assessment Report Page 13 of 14 Operational Works for Prescribed Tidal Works 2 Parkyn Court, Tewantin
Page 15
Project Urban – 15253 February 2016
7.0 CONCLUSION
This Development Assessment Report has been prepared on behalf of Quadrant Holdings Pty Ltd to
support a Development Application for Operational Work for Prescribed Tidal Works (Deck) in respect of
land at 2 Parkyn Court Tewantin, legally described as Lot 388 MCH839039, Lot 400 MCH839039 & Lot 178
MCH5169.
Under the Noosa Plan 2006 the site is included within the open space recreation zone of the Tewantin and
Doonan locality.
This report has demonstrated that the establishment of the proposed development on the subject site is
warranted. The assessment of the proposed development against the relevant sections of the Noosa Plan
2006 and the relevant State level requirements indicates that the use demonstrates general compliance
with all relevant provisions.
Grounds for approval are included as follows:
The proposed works are consistent with existing use rights and will provide improved facilities for
existing onsite marina uses which will contribute to the variety of passive and active recreational
experiences on offer in the locality, promoting community interaction, wellbeing and a desirable
lifestyle for local residents in accordance with the intent of the open space and recreation zone.
The proposed works are wholly contained within the existing use/lease area and are consistent with
existing use rights and provisions of the state government lease and previous Council approvals.
The proposed development has demonstrated compliance with the applicable sections of the SPP.
The proposed development has demonstrated compliance with the application sections of the SDAP.
The attached Planning Scheme Code Assessment has demonstrated that the proposed development
complies with all relevant probable solutions and specific outcomes of the Watercourse Works Code
contained in the Noosa Plan 2006.
The attached Prescribed Tidal Work Code Assessment has determined that the proposed development
complies with all relevant probable solutions and specific outcomes of the Prescribed Tidal Works Code
contained in the Coastal Protection and Management Regulation 2003.
The site area to accommodate the proposed works is unconstrained by planning scheme overlays.
Based on the above, it is considered that the proposed development warrants approval from Council
subject to the imposition of reasonable and relevant conditions.
Development Assessment Report Page 14 of 14
Operational Works for Prescribed Tidal Works
2 Parkyn Court, Tewantin
Page 16
ATTACHMENT 1 Planning Scheme Code Assessment [OCR of page images] ATTACHMENT 1 Planning Scheme Code Assessment
Page 17
WATERCOURSES WORKS CODE
Table 14-64 Prescribed Tidal Works (waters outside Noosa Waters canal)
Specific Outcomes Probable Solutions Proposal
14.170 Siting
O1 The construction of new jetties, No solution provided. Not applicable – The proposal is for
wharves and boardwalks on freehold the addition of a deck to the existing
land in largely undeveloped sections of a Noosa Marina.
watercourse is avoided.
O2 The construction of new jetties and No solution provided. Not applicable - The new deck is to be
wharves on public lands is avoided constructed within a privately owned
unless there is a clear demonstrated lease area.
public benefit and public support.
O3 Prescribed tidal works are not No solution provided. Complies - The proposed deck is
located on the southern bank of the located outside the area identified on
Noosa River and tributaries between the Figure 14-28–Noosa Heads Lions Figure 14-28
Noosa Heads Lions Park and Weyba Park to Weyba Bridge
Bridge (Refer Figure 14-28).
O4 Prescribed tidal work does not No solution provided. Not applicable - The proposed works
include extensions of on-site are to provide improved facilities for
recreational areas unless there is a clear Noosa Marina and are wholly contained
demonstrated public benefit and public within the existing lease area.
support.
14.171 Character and Amenity
O5 Prescribed tidal works are designed S5.1 For lots with frontages greater Not applicable – Probable solution
and sited to ensure— than 15m or greater in width, jetties and S5.1 is not applicable as the proposed
a) they are contained within the pontoons are setback a minimum of 3m deck is wholly contained within the
prolongation of boundaries of the lot; from the prolongation of the boundaries, Noosa Marina lease area.
b) that when a vessel is berthed it does except as allowed for in S5.2 and S5.3;
not encroach over the prolongation of (Refer Figure 14-29) While the deck is not a jetty or pontoon
boundaries of the lot; used for the mooring of vessels, it will
c) a high level of visual amenity is Figure 14-29 similar to a jetty being a fixed structure
maintained when viewed from the within and above the water body. The
watercourse and adjoining lands; proposal complies with O5 being located
d) they avoid conflicts with uses in the within the lease area; maintaining a high
water and on the foreshore and level of visual amenity when viewed
adjoining lands; form the watercourse and improvement
e) cluttering of watercourses is avoided; over the current visual amenity of the
f) excessive traffic volumes within pontoon; avoids conflicts with uses in
foreshore areas and adjoining lands are the water; avoids cluttering of the
avoided; watercourse; does not generate any
g) materials blend with the natural additional traffic; and blends with the
surrounds; and existing character of Noosa Marina.
h) they reflect the character and setting OR Not applicable – the lot has a frontage
of the immediate surrounds or the S5.2 For lots less than 15m in width of greater than 15m in width.
locality. (including lots located in canal bends or
on lots located in the head of the
canal)—
a) a joint application is made with the
adjoining owner; or
b) where a joint application is not
possible, jetties and pontoons—
i) are setback a minimum of 1m from
the prolongation of the boundaries;
ii) are not more than 1.2m in width; and
Page 18
Specific Outcomes Probable Solutions Proposal
iii) have no head and are located such
that when a vessel is berthed, it does
not encroach over the prolongation of a
boundary (Refer Figure 14-30);
Figure 14-30
AND Not applicable – the proposal is not
S5.3 For lots that adjoin those described for a jetty or pontoon.
in S5.2, a jetty or pontoon is located
well away from the common boundary.
O6 Jetties and wharves are not roofed S6.1 Roof shelter structures associated Not applicable – The proposal is for
unless they are the main access to land with jetties on Noosa North Shore are— an unroofed deck.
on Noosa North Shore. a) constructed for the purpose of
covering boats in circumstances where
all weather motor vehicle access is not
available to the property;
b) not constructed where the property
can be readily accessed by motor
vehicle;
c) built of lightweight timber
construction;
d) preferably designed as a cantilevered
structure off a jetty, rather than on
separate foundations to minimise impact
on fish habitat areas;
e) constructed with a general head
clearance of 2.4m between the jetty
surface and the underside of the roof
structure;
f) designed not to exceed 3m in height
above the jetty surface level;
g) designed such that the roof area does
not exceed dimensions of 6m by 3m;
h) positioned with the length of the
structure generally perpendicular to the
riverbank;
i) have open walls, rather than solid
walls, and may include materials such as
lattice, timber battening or similar; and
j) have a external colour scheme that
blends with the vegetation and natural
surrounds.
O7 Boat lifting devices (including boat S7.1 No solution provided Not applicable – no boat lifting
storage devices) are only located on devices are proposed.
Noosa North Shore.
O8 Large jetties, pontoons and wharves S8.1 No solution provided Not applicable – The proposal is not
that are capable of serving other uses, for a jetty, pontoon or wharf.
such as for private recreational
purposes, are not permitted.
14.172 Design, Construction and Safety – Jetties, Wharves and Pontoons
O9 Prescribed tidal works are designed S9.1 The maximum width of a jetty, Not applicable – The proposed deck is
and constructed for the sole purpose of jetty head or associated walkway is wholly contained within the Noosa
providing access to vessels and are sited 1.5m, except for at Noosa North Shore; Marina lease area.
and designed to avoid—
a) cluttering of watercourses; AND Not applicable – The proposed deck is
b) excessive traffic volumes within S9.2 For jetties on the Noosa North wholly contained within the Noosa
foreshore areas and adjoining lands; Shore, the maximum width of the jetty Marina lease area.
and head is 2m;
c) conflicts with uses on the foreshore AND Not applicable – The proposed deck is
and adjoining lands; S9.3 The maximum length of a jetty wholly contained within the Noosa
Page 19
Specific Outcomes Probable Solutions Proposal
d) unacceptable risks to personal and head is not more than 7m; Marina lease area.
public safety.
AND Not applicable – The proposed deck is
S9.4 A pontoon head has a maximum wholly contained within the Noosa
width of 3m and a maximum length of Marina lease area.
5m; (Refer Figure 14-31)
Figure 14-31
S9.5 For “Y” and “T” shaped jetty Not applicable – The proposed deck is
heads— wholly contained within the Noosa
a) a maximum area 10.5m2 excluding Marina lease area.
any walkway is provided; and
b) a walkway with a minimum length of
3m is provided (Refer Figure 14-32);
Figure 14-32
S9.6 Gangways and walkways serving Not applicable – The proposed deck is
jetties and pontoons have at least one wholly contained within the Noosa
rigid handrail fitted and meet the Marina lease area.
following—
a) For detached houses – a minimum
width of 750mm and a maximum width
of 1.5m;
b) For other residential uses –
i. the gangway for single berth pontoons
has a minimum width of 900mm;
ii. the gangway for multiple berth
pontoons has a minimum width of 1.2m
if fitted with one handrail and 900mm if
fitted with a handrail on each side;
iii. the primary walkway to multiple
berth pontoons has a maximum width of
1.5m; and
iv. The maximum width of the gangway
is 1.5m;
AND Not applicable – The proposed deck is
S9.7 In Noosa Sound, where quaylines wholly contained within the Noosa
are set, a jetty or pontoon does not Marina lease area.
extend into the watercourses beyond
the quayline32;
OR Not applicable – The proposed deck is
S9.8 Where no quaylines are set, the wholly contained within the Noosa
maximum distance a jetty or pontoon Marina lease area.
extends into the watercourse is 10m,
unless it can be demonstrated that a
distance in excess of 10m is essential to
safely access the jetty.
14.173 Design, Construction and Safety – Boat Ramps
O10 Boat ramps are designed and S10.1 Where there is an existing Not applicable – the proposal is not
constructed to— revetment wall— for a boat ramp.
a) allow access by a wheeled boat a) the levels of a boat ramp surface at
Page 20
Specific Outcomes Probable Solutions Proposal
trailer; the revetment wall is no more than
b) ensure that unacceptable risks to 150mm above the top of the wall, not
personal and public safety are unlikely more than 500mm below the top of the
to be caused; wall and not more than 200mm above
c) avoid cluttering of the watercourse; the existing beach; and
d) avoid excessive traffic volumes within b) The ramp extends into the
foreshore areas and adjoining lands; watercourse no more than 9m from a
and revetment wall;
e) ensure that visual amenity of the
foreshore is maintained.
AND Not applicable – the proposal is not
S10.2 The ramp is constructed at a for a boat ramp.
uniform grade and no steeper than 1 in
5 (20%);
1. AND Not applicable – the proposal is not
S10.3 The outer end of the ramp is no for a boat ramp.
more than 100mm above the level of
the beach;
AND Not applicable – the proposal is not
S10.4 No part of the ramp is to extend for a boat ramp.
closer than 1m to the prolongation of
the boundaries. (Refer Figure 14-33)
Figure 14-33
Page 21
ATTACHMENT 2 Prescribed Tidal Work Code Assessment [OCR of page images] ATTACHMENT 2 Prescribed Tidal Work Code Assessment
Page 22
PRESCRIBED TIDAL WORKS CODE
Column 1 Column 2 Column 3
Specific outcome A probable solution Proposal
Character and amenity (generally)—prescribed tidal work in a canal
Not Applicable – no works proposed in a canal.
Character and amenity (generally)—prescribed tidal work not in a canal
2.1 Prescribed tidal work not in a canal The design and construction of the Complies – the prescribed tidal works
and for a private purpose is compatible prescribed tidal work is consistent with are consistent with the existing use
with its location, having regard to the the following standards— rights for a Marina facility established
following— (a) subject to paragraph (e), under lease from the state Government
prescribed tidal work does not and previously recognised by Council.
a) the character and amenity of the extend past the side boundary No tidal works are proposed outside of
work’s immediate surroundings and the or extended side boundary of the lease area.
locality within which the work is located; the lot connected to the work;
The proposed work is for a new
b) if the relevant planning scheme (b) subject to paragraph (e), unroofed deck associated with the
states the desired character or amenity prescribed tidal work is the only existing marina development. See
for the work’s immediate surroundings work of its type along the edge proposal plans attached.
or the locality within which the work is of the tidal water fronting the lot
located—the stated desired character or connected to the work; The proposed works will not impact on
amenity. the existing character and amenity of
(c) subject to paragraph (e), the site, and are considered to be in
prescribed tidal work that is a accordance with existing use rights and
boardwalk or independent deck terms of the lease.
is not roofed;
The proposed tidal work achieves
(d) subject to paragraph (e), general compliance with the relevant
prescribed tidal work other than sections of the Noosa Plan 2006.
a boardwalk or deck is not
roofed unless it is the main
access to land;
(e) if a relevant planning scheme
standard is more stringent than
the standard mentioned in
paragraph (a), (b), (c) or (d)—
the relevant planning scheme
standard, to the extent it is
more stringent than the
standard mentioned in
paragraph (a), (b), (c) or (d);
(f) any other relevant planning
scheme standard that is not
inconsistent with the standards
mentioned in paragraphs (a) to
(e).
2.2 Prescribed tidal work not in a canal The design and construction of the Not Applicable – the prescribed tidal
and for a non-private purpose is prescribed tidal work is consistent with works are for a private purpose
compatible with its location, having the following standards— associated with Noosa Marina.
regard to the following—
(a) subject to paragraph (c),
a) the character and amenity of the prescribed tidal work used for a
work’s immediate surroundings and the commercial purpose does not
locality within which the work is located; extend past the side boundary
or extended side boundary of
b) if the relevant planning scheme the lot connected to the work;
states the desired character or amenity
for the work’s immediate surroundings (b) subject to paragraph (c),
or the locality within which the work is prescribed tidal work used for a
located—the stated desired character or commercial purpose is not
amenity. roofed unless it is the main
access to land;
(c) if a relevant planning scheme
standard is more stringent than
the standard mentioned in
paragraph (a) or (b)—the
relevant planning scheme
standard, to the extent the
Page 23
standard is more stringent than
the standard mentioned in
paragraph (a) or (b);
(d)any other relevant planning
scheme standard that is not
inconsistent with the standards
mentioned in paragraphs (a) to
(c).
Character and amenity (height, scale and size)
3.1 Prescribed tidal work is of a height, The height, scale and size of the Complies – the height, scale, and size
scale and size to ensure the work is prescribed tidal work is consistent with of the prescribed tidal work is consistent
compatible with the character and each relevant planning scheme with the existing site development and
amenity of its location, having regard to standard. use rights.
the following—
The proposed works will not impact on
a) the height, scale and size of the the existing character and amenity of
natural features of the work’s immediate the site or locality.
surroundings and the locality within
which the work is located; The proposed tidal work achieves
compliance with the relevant sections of
b) the height, scale and size of the the Noosa Plan 2006.
existing buildings or other structures in
the work’s immediate surroundings and
the locality within which the work is
located;
c) if the relevant planning scheme
states the desired height, scale or size
of buildings or other structures in the
work’s immediate surroundings or the
locality within which the work is
located—the stated desired height, scale
or size.
Character and amenity (materials and colours)
4.1 The materials used for, and the The materials used for, and colours of, Complies - the materials and colours
colours of, prescribed tidal work are the prescribed tidal work are consistent used in the prescribed tidal work will be
compatible with the character and with each relevant planning scheme consistent with the existing site
amenity of the work’s location, having standard. development and use rights.
regard to the following—
The proposed works will not impact on
a) the natural features of the work’s the existing character and amenity of
immediate surroundings and the the site or locality.
locality within which the work is located;
The proposed tidal work achieves
b) the existing buildings or other compliance with the relevant sections of
structures in the work’s immediate the Noosa Plan 2006.
surroundings and the locality within
which the work is located;
c) if the relevant planning scheme
states the desired materials to be used
for, or desired colours of, buildings or
other structures in the work’s immediate
surroundings or the locality within which
the work is located —the stated desired
materials or colours.
Lighting
5.1 Lighting, other than an aid to The lighting for the prescribed tidal Complies – any lighting associated with
navigation, for prescribed tidal work is work, other than an aid to navigation, is the deck will be consistent with the
installed in a way to ensure the security consistent with the following standards— existing site development and use rights.
and safe use of the work without All lighting will be designed, installed
causing significant adverse effects on (a) subject to paragraph (c), lighting and operated in accordance with current
the amenity of the locality within which for prescribed tidal work is best practice. No significant adverse
the work is located. hooded and directed effects on the amenity of the locality will
downwards; result.
(b) subject to paragraph (c), each
lighting standard, to the extent
relevant;
Page 24
(c) if a relevant planning scheme
standard is more stringent than
the standard mentioned in
paragraph (a) or (b)—the
relevant planning scheme
standard, to the extent the
standard is more stringent than
the standard mentioned in
paragraph (a) or (b);
(d) any other relevant planning
scheme standard that is not
inconsistent with the standards
mentioned in paragraphs (a) to
(c).
Signage
Not Applicable – No new signage is proposed within tidal works.
Earthwork and vegetation
7.1 Excavation and filling for prescribed The earthwork and filling for the Not Applicable – No excavation or
tidal work— prescribed tidal work is consistent with filling is proposed as part of the works.
each relevant planning scheme
a) is carried out only to the extent standard.
reasonably necessary for the work; and
b) does not have a significant
adverse effect on—
i) the natural features of the tidal
water under, within or over which the
work is located; or
ii) the level of the surface of the land
under the tidal water under, within or
over which the work is located, or any
foreshores near the work.
7.2 The location of prescribed tidal work The vegetation in the tidal water, under Complies – No vegetation will be
ensures vegetation is cleared or within or over which the prescribed tidal affected by the prescribed tidal works.
disturbed only to the extent reasonably work is located, or on land under the
necessary for the work. tidal water, is cleared or disturbed in a
way consistent with each relevant
planning scheme standard.
7.3 Any vegetation damaged, destroyed Vegetation affected by the prescribed Complies – No Vegetation will be
or removed by prescribed tidal work tidal work is dealt with in a way affected by the prescribed tidal works.
under, within or over tidal water other consistent with the following standards—
than an artificial waterway, is replaced
with appropriate vegetation. (a) subject to paragraph (b),
vegetation damaged, destroyed
or removed by prescribed tidal
work is replaced with native
vegetation for the locality within
which the work is located, to the
extent it is reasonably
practicable to replace the
vegetation with native
vegetation;
(b) if a relevant planning scheme
standard is more stringent than
the standard mentioned in
paragraph
(c) —the relevant planning scheme
standard, to the extent it is
more stringent than the
standard mentioned in
paragraph (a);
(d) any other relevant planning
scheme standard that is not
inconsistent with the standards
mentioned in paragraphs (a) and
(b).
Page 25
Public access—availability
8.1 Prescribed tidal work does not have The design and construction of the Complies – The proposed deck is
a significant adverse effect on the prescribed tidal work is consistent with wholly contained within the Noosa
availability of public access to the following standards— Marina lease area and does not restrict
foreshores, including public access existing public access to the Noosa River
proposed in the relevant planning (a) subject to paragraph (b), foreshore.
scheme. prescribed tidal work does not
involve the erection or
placement of any physical
barrier preventing existing
access, along a public
accessway, to the foreshores
near the work;
(b) if a relevant planning scheme
standard is more stringent than
the standard mentioned in
paragraph
(c) —the relevant planning scheme
standard, to the extent it is
more stringent than the
standard mentioned in
paragraph (a);
(d) any other relevant planning
scheme standard that is not
inconsistent with the standards
mentioned in paragraphs (a) and
(b).
Public access—safety
9.1 The location and design of Public access to foreshores near the Complies – The proposed deck is
prescribed tidal work does not adversely prescribed tidal work is consistent with wholly contained within the Noosa
affect the safety of members of the each relevant planning scheme Marina lease area and does not impact
public accessing the foreshores. standard. any public access to the foreshore.
Navigable access to, or egress from, non-tidal work lots
10.1 Prescribed tidal work does not The design and construction of the Complies – the prescribed tidal work is
adversely affect navigable access to, or prescribed tidal work is consistent with wholey contained within the Noosa
navigable egress from, any non-tidal the following standards— Marina lease area and will not adversely
work lot. affect navigable access to, or navigable
(a) subject to paragraph (b), if the egress from, any non-tidal work lot.
lot connected to prescribed tidal
work (the connected lot)
adjoins a non-tidal work lot, the
work does not extend past the
connected lot’s side boundary,
or extended side boundary,
adjoining the non-tidal work lot;
(b) if a relevant planning scheme
standard is more stringent than
the standard mentioned in
paragraph (a) the relevant
planning scheme standard, to
the extent it is more stringent
than the standard mentioned in
paragraph (a).
Infrastructure, including, access, parking, sewerage and water services
11.1 Prescribed tidal work has The infrastructure for prescribed tidal Complies – the subject site is currently
appropriate infrastructure, including, in work is consistent with each relevant connected to all appropriate
particular, road access, parking planning scheme standard. infrastructure, including, road access,
facilities, sewerage services and water parking facilities, sewerage services and
services, having regard to— water services. The proposed works do
not require any further infrastructure
a) the nature and scale of the work; and connections or upgrades.
b) the number of people that may be on
or at the work at any time; and
c) the number of vehicles that may be
on or moored at the work at any time;
Page 26
and
d) the protection of any foreshores near
the work and the vegetation and marine
plants on the foreshores.
Design, construction and safety—all prescribed tidal work
12.1 Prescribed tidal work is designed The design and construction of the Complies – the prescribed tidal works
and constructed in a way to ensure it is prescribed tidal work is consistent with have been designed with regard to all
structurally sound, having regard to the the following standards— appropriate Australian Standards. Please
following— refer to the attached Proposal Plan
(a) subject to paragraph (b), each prepared by International Marina
a) relevant engineering standards; Australian Standard relevant to Consultants.
the design or construction of
b) the location of the work; structures, to the extent
requirements stated in the
c) the purpose for which the work is to Standard apply to the design or
be used; construction of prescribed tidal
work;
d) the impact of flooding, tidal
influences and hydrodynamic changes. (b) if a relevant planning scheme
standard is more stringent than
any standard mentioned in
paragraph (a) —the relevant
planning scheme standard, to
the extent it is more stringent
than the standard mentioned in
paragraph (a).
12.2 Prescribed tidal work does not The design and construction of the Complies – The proposed tidal work
adversely affect the structural integrity prescribed tidal work is consistent with has been designed by an REPQ so as to
of any existing revetment or seawall or the following standards— ensure the structural integrity of the
another existing structure. proposed works and the existing marina.
(a) subject to paragraph (b), Please refer to the attached Proposal
prescribed tidal work, including Plan prepared by International Marina
any shore abutment, piling or Consultants.
other structure connected with
the work—
i) does not place an
additional load on any
existing revetment or
seawall or another
existing structure; or
ii) can be structurally
supported by an existing
revetment or seawall or
another existing
structure;
(b) if a relevant planning scheme
standard is more stringent than
the standard mentioned in
paragraph (a) —the relevant
planning scheme standard, to
the extent it is more stringent
than the standard mentioned in
paragraph (a).
12.3 Prescribed tidal work is designed The design and construction of the Complies – the prescribed tidal works
and constructed in a way to ensure it prescribed tidal work is consistent with will not alter or disturb the existing flow
does not adversely affect the stability of the following standards— of water, or adversely affect the stability
the bed and banks of any tidal water. of the riverbed and banks. Please refer
(a) subject to paragraph (b), to the attached Proposal Plan prepared
prescribed tidal work does not by International Marina Consultants.
cause, by changing the flow of
water, the removal of, or
disturbance to, the sediment on
the bed and banks of any tidal
water;
(b) if a relevant planning scheme
standard is more stringent than
the standard mentioned in
paragraph (a)—the relevant
Page 27
planning scheme standard, to
the extent it is more stringent
than the standard mentioned in
paragraph (a).
12.4 Prescribed tidal work is designed The design and construction of the Complies – the prescribed tidal works
and constructed using materials having prescribed tidal work is consistent with have been designed with regard to all
a long life in marine environments, the following standards— appropriate Australian standards, and
having regard to their ability to resist current best practice. Please refer to the
the following— (a) subject to paragraph (b), each attached Proposal Plan prepared by
Australian Standard relevant to International Marina Consultants.
a) attack by marine organisms; the materials that should be
used, or the measures that
b) corrosion; should be taken to treat
materials used, for structures, to
c) deterioration resulting from abrasion the extent the requirements
or immersion in seawater. stated in the Standard apply to
structures located in a marine
environment;
(b) if a relevant planning scheme
standard is more stringent than
the standard mentioned in
paragraph (a)—the relevant
planning scheme standard, to
the extent it is more stringent
than the standard mentioned in
paragraph (a).
12.5 Prescribed tidal work is designed The design and construction of the Complies – The prescribed tidal work
and constructed in a way to ensure it prescribed tidal work is consistent with will not adversely affect the operation or
does not adversely affect the operation the following standards— maintenance of any existing stormwater
or maintenance of any existing outlet.
stormwater outlet. (a) subject to paragraph (c), vessels
moored at prescribed tidal work
do not impede the discharge of
stormwater;
(b) subject to paragraph (c),
prescribed tidal work does not
restrict access to any
stormwater outlet;
(c) if a relevant planning scheme
standard is more stringent than
the standard mentioned in
paragraph (a) or (b)—the
relevant planning scheme
standard, to the extent it is
more stringent than the
standard mentioned in
paragraph (a) or (b).
12.6 Prescribed tidal work is designed The design and construction of the Complies – the prescribed tidal works
and constructed in a way to ensure it prescribed tidal work is consistent with have been designed with regard to all
does not adversely affect the water the following standards— appropriate Australian standards. The
quality of any tidal water, including, in tidal works will be conducted in
particular, as a result of— (a) subject to paragraph (b), each accordance with current best practice
Australian Standard relevant to and will not result in the release of
a) release, into the tidal water, of the design or construction of contaminants in the river.
materials used in the construction of the structures under, within or over
work; or tidal water, to the extent the
requirements stated in the
b) disturbance to the sediment on the Standard are directed at
bed and banks of the tidal water; or maintaining the water quality of
tidal water;
c) exposure to acid sulphate soils.
(b) if a relevant planning scheme
standard is more stringent than
the standard mentioned in
paragraph (a)—the relevant
planning scheme standard, to
the extent it is more stringent
than the standard mentioned in
paragraph (a).
Page 28
12.7 Prescribed tidal work is designed The design and construction of the Complies – the proposed works will be
and constructed in a way to ensure it is prescribed tidal work is consistent with constructed in accordance with current
safe for persons standing or walking on the following standards— best practice, and will not be slippery or
the work. have any feature that may cause a
(a) subject to paragraph (c), any person to trip or fall. Access to work
surface of prescribed tidal work areas will be restricted by means of
on which a person may stand or physical barriers and signage where
walk is— appropriate.
i) not slippery; and
ii) does not have any
feature that may cause
the person to trip or fall;
(b) subject to paragraph (c), any
part of prescribed tidal work that
is unsafe for persons standing or
walking on the work is
surrounded by adequate barriers
to deter persons from entering
the part;
(c) if a relevant planning scheme
standard is more stringent than
the standard mentioned in
paragraph (a) or (b)—the
relevant planning scheme
standard, to the extent it is
more stringent than the
standard mentioned in
paragraph (a) or (b).
12.8 Appropriate measures are taken The design and construction of the Not applicable – the works are for
for prescribed tidal work for a non- prescribed tidal work is consistent with private purposes.
private purpose to ensure an the following standards—
unsupportable live load is not applied to
the work by persons or vehicles. (a) subject to paragraph (b),
prescribed tidal work has
erected or placed in position on
or near the work, a sign that—
i) is visible at all times;
and
ii) states the maximum live
load that may be applied
to the work, in terms of
the maximum number of
persons that may be on
the work at any given
time or the maximum
number of vehicles of a
particular type that may
be on or moored at the
work at any given time;
(b) if a relevant planning scheme
standard is more stringent than
the standard mentioned in
paragraph (a)—the relevant
planning scheme standard, to
the extent it is more stringent
than the standard mentioned in
paragraph (a).
12.9 Prescribed tidal work, other than a The design and construction of the Not Applicable - Works not in a canal
boardwalk or an independent deck for a prescribed tidal work is consistent with
private purpose, is designed and each relevant planning scheme
constructed in a way that ensures the standard.
use of tidal water in a canal for a non-
maritime purpose is minimised.
12.10 Prescribed tidal work that is a (s 6(2) solution) The design and Not Applicable - Works not in a canal
boardwalk or an independent deck and construction of the boardwalk or deck is
for a private purpose, is designed and consistent with the following standards—
Page 29
constructed in a way that ensures the
use of tidal water in a canal for a non- (a) subject to paragraph (c), a
maritime purpose is minimised. boardwalk or independent deck
does not extend more than 3m
from the waterfront boundary of
the lot connected to the
boardwalk or deck;
(b) subject to paragraph (c), a
boardwalk or independent deck
is at least 3m inside of the side
boundary for extended side
boundary of the lot connected to
the boardwalk or deck;
(c) if a relevant planning scheme
standard is more stringent than
the standard mentioned in
paragraph (a) or (b)—the
relevant planning scheme
standard, to the extent it is
more stringent than the
standard mentioned in
paragraph (a) or (b).
Design, construction and safety—boat ramps and slip ways for private purpose
Not Applicable - works not for a boat ramp or slip way
Design, construction and safety—bridges
Not Applicable - works not for a bridge
Design, construction and safety—boardwalks and independent decks
15.1 Prescribed tidal work that is a (s 6(2) solution) The design and Complies – The proposed deck will not
boardwalk or an independent deck and construction of the boardwalk or deck is be accessible for vehicular traffic and is
for a private purpose is designed and consistent with the following standards— for a group use. The proposed deck has
constructed in a way to ensure it is able been designed to support a uniformly
to support its intended loads, having (a) subject to paragraph (d), a distributed live load of 5KPa and a
regard to its relevant loading matters. boardwalk or independent deck concentrated live load of 4.5KPa.
accessible to vehicular traffic is
able to support at least a live
load of 3.0kPa plus an axle load
of 10kN;
(b) subject to paragraph (d), a
boardwalk or independent deck
that is not accessible to
vehicular traffic and that is for
individual use is able to support
at least a live load of 2.0kPa;
(c) subject to paragraph (d), a
boardwalk or independent deck
that is not accessible to
vehicular traffic and that is for
group use is able to support at
least a live load of 3.0kPa;
(d) if a relevant planning scheme
standard is more stringent than
the standard mentioned in
paragraph (a), (b) or (c)—the
relevant planning scheme
standard, to the extent it is
more tringent than the standard
mentioned in paragraph (a), (b)
or (c).
15.2 Prescribed tidal work that is a (s 6(2) solution) The design or Not Applicable – the proposed deck is
boardwalk or an independent deck and construction of the boardwalk or deck is for a private purpose associated with
for a non-private purpose is designed consistent with the following standards— Noosa Marina.
and constructed in a way to ensure it is
able to support its intended loads, (a) subject to paragraph (c), a
having regard to its relevant loading boardwalk or independent deck
matters. accessible to vehicular traffic is
able to support at least the
Page 30
following—
i) a distributed live load of
5.0kPa;
ii) a concentrated live load
of 4.5kN;
iii) the load of the largest
vehicle capable of being
on the boardwalk or
deck;
(b) subject to paragraph (c), a
boardwalk or independent deck
not accessible to vehicular traffic
is able to support at least the
following—
i) a distributed live load of
5.0kPa;
ii) a concentrated live load
of 4.5kN;
(c) if a relevant planning scheme
standard is more stringent than
the standard mentioned in
paragraph (a) or (b)—the
relevant planning scheme
standard, to the extent it is
more stringent than the
standard mentioned in
paragraph (a) or (b).
15.3 Prescribed tidal work that is a The design and construction of the Complies – The proposed deck does
boardwalk or an independent deck does boardwalk or deck is consistent with the not unreasonably restrict remedial works
not prevent or hinder remedial work following standards— to the banks of the Noosa River.
being undertaken on any bank of tidal
water or for any existing retaining wall, (a) subject to paragraph (b), a
revetment or seawall or another existing boardwalk or independent deck
structure. either—
i) can be easily dismantled
and reassembled; or
ii) does not restrict the
movement of machinery
ordinarily used for
remedial work to any
bank of tidal water or
any existing retaining
wall, revetment or
seawall or other existing
structure;
(b) if a relevant planning scheme
standard is more stringent than
the standard mentioned in
paragraph (a)—the relevant
planning scheme standard, to
the extent it is more stringent
than the standard mentioned in
paragraph (a).
Design, construction and safety—jetties and piers
Not Applicable - works not for a jetty or pier
Design, construction and safety—pipelines and other underground services
Not Applicable - works not for a pipeline or other underground service
Design, construction and safety—pontoons
Not Applicable - works not for a Pontoon
Design, construction and safety—retaining walls, revetments and seawalls
Not applicable – works not for retaining walls, revetments or seawalls
Design, construction and safety—wharves
Not applicable – works not for a wharf
Page 31
ATTACHMENT 3 SDAP Code Assessment [OCR of page images] ATTACHMENT 3 SDAP Code Assessment
Page 32
10.1 TIDAL WORKS, OR DEVELOPMENT IN THE COASTAL MANAGEMENT
DISTRICT STATE CODE
Response column key:
Achieved P/S Performance solution N/A Not applicable
Table 10.1.1: All development
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment
PO1 Development in a coastal AO1.1 Development is located The proposed deck will form part of the
hazard area is compatible with the outside a high coastal hazard area existing Noosa Marina. The proposed
level of severity of the coastal unless it is: works are wholly contained within the
hazard. (1) coastal-dependent existing use/lease area and are consistent
development, or with existing use rights and provisions of
(2) compatible with inundation due the state government lease for the
to its nature or function, or Marina. Marina development is defined as
(3) temporary, readily relocatable, coastal dependent development by the
or able to be abandoned, or SDAP.
(4) essential community service
infrastructure, or
(5) small- to medium-scale tourist
development, or
(6) redevelopment within an
existing built-up urban area, or
is redevelopment of built
structures that cannot be
relocated or abandoned.
AND
AO1.2 Development referred to in N/A The deck is part of Noosa Marina and
AO1.1(6) avoids being located within which is defined as coastal dependent
a high coastal hazard area, or where development.
this is not practicable, minimises the
exposure of people and permanent
structures to coastal hazard impacts.
PO2 Development siting, layout and AO2.1 Development within a coastal The deck is proposed to be established at
access in a coastal hazard area hazard area is located, designed, 2.2m AHD which is 1.65m above the
responds to potential inundation constructed and operated to Highest Astronomical Tide (H.A.T). The
due to a defined storm tide event maintain or enhance the establishment of the deck at this level will
and minimises associated risks to community’s resilience to a defined ensure the proposed works will achieve
personal safety and property. storm tide event by limiting the adequate immunity from storm tide
exposure of people and structures to inundation. The proposed deck has been
associated impacts. designed by an RPEQ who specializes in
AND Marina type developments to ensure the
proposal is adequately designed to
reasonably withstand possible impacts
from Coastal Hazards.
AO2.2 Development mitigates any The deck is proposed to be established at
residual impacts from storm tide 2.2m AHD which is 1.65m above the
inundation in a coastal hazard area Highest Astronomical Tide (H.A.T). The
including by ensuring: establishment of the deck at this level will
(1) habitable rooms of built ensure the proposed works will achieve
structures are located above adequate immunity from storm tide
the defined storm tide event inundation. The proposed deck has been
level and any additional designed by an RPEQ who specializes in
freeboard level that would Marina type developments to ensure the
ordinarily apply in a flood prone proposal is adequately designed to
area under a relevant planning reasonably withstand possible impacts
scheme standard, or from Coastal Hazards.
(2) a safe refuge is available for
people within the premises
during a defined storm tide
event, or
(3) at least one evacuation route
remains passable for
emergency evacuations during
a defined storm tide event,
including consideration of the
capacity of the route to support
the evacuation of the entire
local population within a
State development assessment provisions Module 10 — Coastal protection 10.1
Tidal works, or development in the coastal management district state code
23 November 2015 V1.7
Page 1 of 13
Page 33
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment
reasonably short timeframe (for
example, 12 hours).
AND
AO2.3 Development within a coastal The deck is proposed to be established at
hazard area is located, designed and 2.2m AHD which is 1.65m above the
constructed to ensure exposed Highest Astronomical Tide (H.A.T). The
structures can sustain flooding from establishment of the deck at this level will
a defined storm tide event. ensure the proposed works will achieve
AND adequate immunity from storm tide
inundation. The proposed deck has been
designed by an RPEQ who specializes in
Marina type developments to ensure the
proposal is adequately designed to
reasonably withstand possible impacts
from Coastal Hazards.
AO2.4 Essential community service N/A The proposal is not for essential
infrastructure is: community services.
(1) located so that it is not
inundated by a recommended
storm tide event specified for
that infrastructure, or
(2) located and designed to ensure
any components of the
infrastructure that are likely to
fail to function or may result in
contamination when inundated
by a storm tide (for example,
electrical switch gear and
motors, water supply pipeline
air valves) are:
(a) located above the peak
water level for a
recommended storm tide
event, or
(b) designed and
constructed to exclude
storm tide intrusions or
infiltration (including by
being located in the
ground), or
(c) able to temporarily stop
functioning during a
recommended storm tide
event without causing
significant adverse impacts
to the infrastructure or the
community.
AND
AO2.5 Emergency services N/A The proposal does not involve any of the
infrastructure and emergency services or facilities mentioned by AO2.5.
shelters, police facilities, and
hospitals and associated facilities
have an emergency rescue area
above the peak water level for a
recommended storm tide event.
PO3 Development directly, AO3.1 Development avoids N/A The proposed deck will form part of the
indirectly and cumulatively avoids increasing the number of premises existing Noosa Marina premises.
an unacceptable increase in the from which people would need to be
severity of the coastal hazard, and evacuated to prevent death or injury
does not significantly increase the from a defined storm tide event.
potential for damage on the
premises or to other premises.
PO4 Development avoids the AO4.1 Development that involves N/A The proposed deck will not be used to
release of hazardous materials as a the manufacture or storage of manufacture or store hazardous
result of a natural hazard event. hazardous materials in bulk are materials.
Editor’s note: Applications should: designed to:
(1) prevent the intrusion of waters
State development assessment provisions Module 10 — Coastal protection 10.1
Tidal works, or development in the coastal management district state code
23 November 2015 V1.7
Page 2 of 13
Page 34
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment
(1) assess the risk of storm tide from a defined storm tide event
inundation releasing or into structures or facilities
otherwise exposing hazardous containing the hazardous
materials, including materials, or
appropriate emergency (2) ensure hazardous materials
planning and contingency remain secured despite
measures. inundation, including secure
(2) applications are to be from the effects of
supported by a report certified hydrodynamic forcing
by a Registered Professional associated with wave action or
Engineer of Queensland flowing water.
(RPEQ) that demonstrates this
performance outcome will be
achieved.
PO5 Natural processes and the AO5.1 Development in an erosion N/A The subject site is not located within the
protective function of landforms and prone area within the coastal coastal management district.
vegetation are maintained in coastal management district:
hazard areas. (1) maintains vegetation on coastal
landforms where its removal or
damage may:
(a) destablise the area and
increase the potential for
erosion, or
(b) interrupt natural
sediment trapping
processes or dune or land
building processes
(2) maintains sediment volumes of
dunes and near-shore coastal
landforms, or where a
reduction in sediment volumes
cannot be avoided, increased
risks to development from
coastal erosion are mitigated by
location, design, construction
and operating standards
(3) minimises the need for erosion
control structures or riverbank
hardening through location,
design and construction
standards
(4) maintains physical coastal
processes outside the
development footprint for the
development, including
longshore transport of
sediment along the coast
(5) reduces the risk of shoreline
erosion for areas adjacent to
the development footprint
unless the development is an
erosion control structure
(6) reduces the risk of shoreline
erosion for areas adjacent to
the development footprint to
the maximum extent feasible in
the case of erosion control
structures.
AND
AO5.2 Development in a storm tide The proposed development does not
inundation area is located, designed, affect any dune crest heights or
constructed and operated to: protective natural features.
(1) maintain dune crest heights, or
where a reduction in crest
heights cannot be avoided,
mitigate risks to development
from wave overtopping and
storm tide inundation
(2) maintain or enhance coastal
State development assessment provisions Module 10 — Coastal protection 10.1
Tidal works, or development in the coastal management district state code
23 November 2015 V1.7
Page 3 of 13
Page 35
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment
ecosystems and natural
features, such as mangroves
and coastal wetlands, between
the development and tidal
waters, where the coastal
ecosystems and natural
features protect or buffer
communities and infrastructure
from sea-level rise and impacts
from storm tide inundation.
AND
AO5.3 Redevelopment of built N/A The subject site is not located within the
structures in the erosion prone area coastal management district.
within a coastal management
district:
(1) avoids intensifying the use of
the premises, or
(2) demonstrates that any
intensification of use will not
result in an increase in the
need for erosion control
structures or riverbank
hardening.
AND
AO5.4 Development that is coastal N/A The proposal is not for coastal protection
protection work involves, in order of work.
priority:
(1) beach nourishment undertaken
in accordance with a program
of beach nourishment works
that source sediment of a
suitable quality and type from
outside the active beach
system, or
(2) the construction of an erosion
control structure, where it is
demonstrated that installing an
erosion control structure is the
only feasible option for
protecting permanent
structures from coastal erosion
and those structures cannot be
abandoned or relocated in the
event of coastal erosion
occurring.
Editor’s note: Applications for coastal
protection work should be supported
by a report certified by a Registered
Professional Engineer of Queensland
(RPEQ) that demonstrates how the
engineering solution sought by the
work will be achieved.
Editor’s note: Applications for
erosion control structures should
demonstrate the consideration of
beach nourishment techniques, and
include a statement of why
nourishment (in whole or part) has
not been adopted as the preferred
means of controlling the erosion
risk.
AND
AO5.5 Development involving N/A The proposal does not involve
reclamation: reclamation work.
(1) does not alter, or otherwise
State development assessment provisions Module 10 — Coastal protection 10.1
Tidal works, or development in the coastal management district state code
23 November 2015 V1.7
Page 4 of 13
Page 36
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment
minimises impacts on, the
physical characteristics of a
waterway or the seabed near
the reclamation, including flow
regimes, hydrodynamic forces,
tidal water and riverbank
stability
(2) is located outside the active
sediment transport area, or
otherwise maintains sediment
transport processes as close as
possible to their natural state
(3) ensures activities associated
with the operation of the
development maintain the
structure and condition of
vegetation communities and
avoid wind and water run-off
erosion.
Editor’s note: Applications for
reclamation should be supported by
a report certified by an RPEQ that
demonstrates how the engineering
solutions sought by the work will be
achieved
PO6 Erosion prone areas in a AO6.1 Development locates built N/A The subject site is not located within the
coastal management district are structures outside the part of the coastal management district.
maintained as development free coastal management district that is
buffers, or where permanent the erosion prone area unless the
buildings or structures exist, coastal development is listed under AO1.1
erosion risks are avoided or (1) – (4).
mitigated. AND
AO6.2 Small to medium scale N/A The subject site is not located within the
tourist development is located coastal management district.
outside the erosion prone area
unless it is redevelopment.
AND
AO6.3 Coastal-dependent N/A The subject site is not located within the
development: coastal management district.
(1) locates, designs and constructs
relevant buildings or structures
to withstand coastal erosion
impacts, including by use of
appropriate foundations, or
(2) installs and maintains coastal
protection works to mitigate
adverse impacts to people and
permanent structures from
coastal erosion at the location.
AND
AO6.4 Development that is N/A The subject site is not located within the
temporary, readily relocatable or coastal management district.
able to be abandoned, or essential
community service infrastructure:
(1) locates built structures
landward of an applicable
coastal building line, or
(2) where there is no coastal
building line, locates habitable
built structures landward of the
alignment of adjacent habitable
buildings, or
(3) locates lifesaver towers or
beach access infrastructure to
State development assessment provisions Module 10 — Coastal protection 10.1
Tidal works, or development in the coastal management district state code
23 November 2015 V1.7
Page 5 of 13
Page 37
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment
minimise its impacts on
physical coastal processes, or
(4) where it is demonstrated that
(1) or (2) is not reasonable and
(3) does not apply:
(a) locates built structures as
far landward as
practicable
(b) uses layout design to
minimise the footprint of
the development that
remains within the
erosion prone area.
AND
AO6.5 Redevelopment of existing N/A The subject site is not located within the
built structures not referred to in coastal management district.
AO6.4, and excluding marine
development:
(1) relocates built structures
outside that part of the erosion
prone area that is within the
coastal management district, or
(2) relocates built structures as far
landward as practicable, and
landward of an applicable
coastal building line, or
(3) where there is no coastal
building line:
(a) relocates built structures
landward of the alignment
of adjacent habitable
buildings, or
(b) uses layout design to
minimise the footprint of
the development that
remains within the erosion
prone area, or
(c) provides sufficient space
seaward of the
development within the
premises to allow for the
construction of erosion
control structures.
AND
AO6.6 Redevelopment of built N/A The subject site is not located within the
structures in the erosion prone area coastal management district.
within a coastal management
district, which results in an
intensification of use, mitigates the
erosion threat to the development,
having regard to:
(1) design and construction
standards
(2) installing and maintaining on-
site erosion control structures
within the premises if the
development is not intended to
be temporary.
PO7 Development avoids or AO7.1 Coastal protection work that N/A The proposal is not for coastal protection
minimises adverse impacts on is in the form of beach nourishment work.
coastal resources and their values, uses methods of placement suitable
to the maximum extent reasonable. for the location that do not interfere
with the long-term use of the locality
of, or natural values within or
neighbouring, the proposed
placement site.
State development assessment provisions Module 10 — Coastal protection 10.1
Tidal works, or development in the coastal management district state code
23 November 2015 V1.7
Page 6 of 13
Page 38
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment
AND
AO7.2 Marine development is N/A The proposal is not for marine
located and designed to expand on development.
or redevelop existing marine
infrastructure unless it is
demonstrated that it is not
practicable to co-locate the
development with existing marine
infrastructure.
AND
AO7.3 Marine development: N/A The proposal is not for marine
(1) relies on a natural channel of a development.
depth adequate for the
intended vessels, or
(2) where there are no feasible
alternative locations for the
facility in the local area that do
not require dredging for
navigation channel purposes,
development is located,
designed and operated to
minimise the need for capital
and maintenance dredging for
navigation channel purposes.
AND
AO7.4 Development minimises N/A The proposal does not involve any
dredging or the disposal of material dredging or disposal of material in coastal
in coastal waters during key waters.
biological events (such as fish
aggregations or spawning) for
species found in the area.
AND
AO7.5 Measures are to be N/A The proposed development will not
incorporated as part of siting and impact on any identified ecological values
design of the development to in accordance with Council and State
protect and retain identified mapping.
ecological values and underlying
ecosystem processes within or
adjacent to the development site to
the greatest extent practicable. This
includes:
(1) maintaining or restoring
vegetated buffers between
development and coastal
waters to the extent
practicable, unless the
development is within ports or
airports, or is marine
development
(2) maintaining or enhancing the
connectivity of ecosystems in
consideration of the cumulative
effect of the development in
addition to existing developed
areas
(3) retaining coastal wetlands,
seagrass beds and other locally
important feeding, nesting or
breeding sites for native
wildlife.
AND
AO7.6 Measures are incorporated The proposal is for a relatively small
as part of siting and design of the addition to the existing Noosa Marina.
development to maintain or enhance The proposed deck won’t have any
State development assessment provisions Module 10 — Coastal protection 10.1
Tidal works, or development in the coastal management district state code
23 November 2015 V1.7
Page 7 of 13
Page 39
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment
water quality to achieve the unreasonable impacts on water quality.
environmental values and water
quality objectives outlined in the
Environmental Protection (Water)
Policy 2009.
AND
AO7.7 Development avoids the Any identified acid sulfate soils can be
disturbance of acid sulphate soils, or appropriately managed in accordance
where it is demonstrated that this is with best practice where required.
not possible, the disturbance of acid
sulphate soils is carefully managed
to minimise and mitigate the
adverse effects of the disturbance
on coastal resources.
PO8 Coastal protection work is AO8.1 Coastal protection work is N/A The proposal does not involve coastal
undertaken only as a last resort only undertaken to protect existing protection work.
where erosion presents an imminent permanent structures from imminent
threat to public safety or permanent adverse coastal erosion impacts, and
structures. the structures cannot reasonably be
Editor’s note: Applications for relocated or abandoned.
coastal protection work must be AND
supported by a report certified by
an RPEQ that demonstrates how the AO8.2 Coastal protection work to N/A The proposal does not involve coastal
engineering solution sought by the protect private structures is protection work.
work will be achieved. undertaken on private land to the
maximum extent reasonable.
AND
AO8.3 Coastal protection work does N/A The proposal does not involve coastal
not increase the coastal hazard risk protection work.
for adjacent areas or properties.
PO9 Development avoids adverse AO9.1 Development: The area of the subject site to
impacts on matters of state (1) is set back from matters of accommodate the proposed deck does
environmental significance, or state environmental not contain any matters of state
where this is not reasonably significance environmental significance in accordance
possible, impacts are minimised and (2) avoids interrupting, interfering with SARA mapping.
an environmental offset is provided or otherwise adversely
for any significant residual impacts impacting underlying natural
to matters of state environmental ecosystem components or
significance that are prescribed processes and interactions that
environmental matters. affect or maintain the matters
of state environmental
significance, such as water
quality, hydrology,
geomorphology and biological
processes, or
(3) incorporates measures as part
of its location and design to
protect and retain matters of
state environmental
significance and underlying
ecosystem processes within
and adjacent to the
development site to the
greatest extent practicable.
Editor’s note: Applications for
development should identify any
threatened species or their habitats,
or threatened ecosystems that may
be affected by the proposal. In
particular, applications should
identify and describe how the
development avoids adverse impacts
on any critical life stage ecological
processes within or adjacent to the
development area.
State development assessment provisions Module 10 — Coastal protection 10.1
Tidal works, or development in the coastal management district state code
23 November 2015 V1.7
Page 8 of 13
Page 40
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment
AND
AO9.2 Where impacts cannot be N/A The area of the subject site to
reasonably avoided or minimised, an accommodate the proposed deck does
environmental offset is provided for not contain any matters of state
any significant residual impact on environmental significance in accordance
matters of state environmental with SARA mapping.
significance that are prescribed
environmental matters caused by
the development.
Editor’s note: Applications for
development should identify
anticipated losses, and outline what
actions are proposed to be
undertaken to offset the loss in
accordance with the Significant
Residual Impact Guideline and the
relevant Queensland Environmental
Offsets Policy.
PO10 Development maintains or AO10.1 Development adjacent to The proposed development is wholly
enhances general public access to state coastal land or tidal water: contained within the Noosa Marina lease
or along the foreshore, unless this is (1) demonstrates that restrictions area and does not restrict existing public
contrary to the protection of coastal to public access are necessary access to the Noosa River foreshore.
resources or public safety. for:
(a) the safe or secure
operation of development,
or
(b) the maintenance of
coastal landforms and
coastal habitat
(2) separates residential, tourist
and retail development from
tidal water with public areas or
public access facilities, or
(3) maintains existing public access
(including public access
infrastructure that is in the
public interest) through the site
to the foreshore for:
(a) pedestrians, via access
points including approved
walking tracks, boardwalks
and viewing platforms, or
(b) vehicles, via access
points including approved
roads or tracks.
AND
AO10.2 Development adjacent to The proposed development does not
state coastal land, including land prevent public access to the Noosa River
under tidal water: foreshore.
(1) is located and designed to:
The proposed development will form part
(a) allow safe and
of the existing Noosa Marina. The
unimpeded access to,
proposed deck does not change existing
over, under or around
emergency vehicle access to the Marina
built structures located on,
or State coastal land.
over or along the
foreshore
(b) ensure emergency
vehicles can access the
area near the
development, or
(2) minimises and offsets any loss
of access to and along the
foreshore within two kilometres
of the existing access points,
and the access is located and
designed to be consistent with
State development assessment provisions Module 10 — Coastal protection 10.1
Tidal works, or development in the coastal management district state code
23 November 2015 V1.7
Page 9 of 13
Page 41
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment
(1)(a) and (b).
AND
AO10.3 Any parts of private P/S The proposed deck is wholly contained
development that extend over tidal within the Noosa Marina lease area. The
water are to be designed, proposed development does not prevent
constructed and used for marine public access to the Noosa River
access purposes only. foreshore in accordance with PO10.
PO11 Private marine development AO11.1 Private marine development The proposed deck is wholly contained
avoids structures attaching to, or and other structures such as decks within the Noosa Marina lease area and
extending across, non-tidal state or boardwalks for private use do not does not extend across non-tidal state
coastal land abutting tidal waters. attach to, or extend across state coastal land.
coastal land that is situated above
the high water mark.
Editor’s note: For occupation permits
or allocations of State land, refer to
the Land Act 1994.
PO12 Further development of AO12.1 The design, construction N/A No artificial tidal waterways are proposed.
artificial waterways avoids or and operation of artificial tidal
minimises adverse impacts on waterways maintains the tidal prism
coastal resources and their values, volume of the natural waterway to
and does not contribute to: which it is connected.
(1) an increase in the risk of AND
flooding or erosion
(2) degradation of water quality AO12.2 The design, construction N/A No artificial tidal waterways are proposed.
(3) degradation and loss of and operation of artificial tidal
matters of state environmental waterways does not increase risk
significance (including, but not from flooding.
limited to, coastal wetlands, AND
fish habitat areas and
migratory species habitat). AO12.3 The design, construction N/A No artificial tidal waterways are proposed.
and operation of an artificial
waterway in connection with the
reconfiguration of a lot ensures:
(1) water inlet and outlets
structures are of sufficient
capacity to maintain the water
quality within the waterway
(2) water discharged from the
artificial waterway protects the
environmental values and
water quality objectives of the
receiving waters
(3) dredged material is not
disposed of to tidal water
beyond the artificial waterway
unless there is a beneficial
reuse, e.g. beach nourishment.
Editor’s note: For more information
on environmental values and water
quality objectives see Schedule 1 of
the Environment Protection (Water)
Policy 2009.
AND
AO12.4 The location of the artificial N/A No artificial tidal waterways are proposed.
waterways avoids matters of state
environmental significance, or does
not result in any significant adverse
impact on matters of state
environmental significance.
PO13 Development does not No acceptable outcome is The proposal does not involve
involve reclamation of land below prescribed. reclamation of land below tidal water.
tidal water, other than for the
purposes of:
(1) coastal-dependent
State development assessment provisions Module 10 — Coastal protection 10.1
Tidal works, or development in the coastal management district state code
23 November 2015 V1.7
Page 10 of 13
Page 42
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment
development, public marine
development or community
infrastructure
(2) strategic ports, boat harbours
or strategic airports and
aviation facilities, in
accordance with a statutory
land use plan, where there is a
demonstrated net benefit for
the state or region and no
feasible alternative exists
(3) coastal protection work or
work necessary to protect
coastal resources or physical
coastal processes.
Table 10.1.2: Operational work
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment
PO1 Tidal works that is private AO1.1 The location and design of N/A The proposal is not for private marine
marine development does not result tidal works that is private marine development.
in adverse impacts to tidal land. development:
Editor’s note: In addressing this (1) is on private land abutting tidal
performance outcome, the applicant water and used for property
should comply with the performance access purposes
criteria and acceptable standards (2) occupies the minimum area
set out in the Operational Policy reasonably required for its
Building and engineering standards designed purpose
for tidal works, Department of (3) is not to be roofed or otherwise
Environment and Heritage covered
Protection, 2013.
(4) does not require the
construction of coastal
Editor’s note: Applications should be
protection works, shoreline or
supported by a report certified by
riverbank hardening or
an RPEQ to demonstrate compliance
dredging for marine access
with this performance outcome.
(5) does not adversely impact on
public safety or public access
and use of the foreshore.
PO2 Development does not result AO2.1 The design and construction N/A No artificial tidal waterways are proposed.
in the disposal of material dredged of the artificial waterway includes
from an artificial waterway into onsite provisions for drying, re-
coastal waters, with the exception handling and disposal of dredge
of: material on site to facilitate the
(1) reclamation works, or timely disposal to land or re-use.
(2) coastal protection works, or
(3) the maintenance of an existing
artificial waterway and the at-
sea disposal of material that
has previously been approved
for the waterway.
PO3 The design and construction of AO3.1 The design and construction N/A No artificial tidal waterways are proposed.
an artificial waterway maintains of the artificial waterway provides
coastal landforms. for sand bypassing where this is
necessary to prevent erosion of
adjacent coasts and minimise
sedimentation of the waterway.
AND
AO3.2 Clean sand accumulating
within an artificial waterway is
returned to the active beach system,
in preference to disposal on land.
PO4 Development that involves AO4.1 A management plan for the N/A The proposal does not involve dredging.
dredging includes and complies with development:
a management plan that (1) directs the operation of the
demonstrates how environmental development
impacts will be managed and (2) identifies disposal methods and
State development assessment provisions Module 10 — Coastal protection 10.1
Tidal works, or development in the coastal management district state code
23 November 2015 V1.7
Page 11 of 13
Page 43
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment
mitigated, and how the disposal sites for the removed
requirements of the National material for the construction
assessment guidelines for dredging, and operational phases of the
Australian Government Department development
of the Environment, Water, Heritage (3) outlines how any adverse
and the Arts, 2009, will be met. effects from extraction activities
on sediment transport
processes or adjacent coastal
landforms will be mitigated or
otherwise remediated by
suitably planned and
implemented beach
nourishment and rehabilitation
works.
Editor’s note: The suitability of the
dredged sediment for ocean disposal
is to follow the assessment of
potential contaminants under the
National assessment guidelines for
dredging, Australian Government
Department of the Environment,
Water, Heritage and the Arts, 2009.
AND
AO4.2 For land based disposal of N/A The proposal does not involve dredging.
dredged material, any area used for
storing, dewatering, drying or
rehandling dredged material as
outlined in the dredge management
plan is:
(1) of sufficient size for the
projected volume of dredged
material from relevant capital
or maintenance dredging
(2) protected from future
development that would
compromise the use of the area
for its intended purpose of
material storage and
dewatering.
AND
AO4.3 For at-sea disposal of N/A The proposal does not involve dredging.
suitable dredged material, the
dredge management plan specifies
that material is placed at a dredged
material disposal site only if it is
demonstrated that it is not feasible
to:
(1) dispose of the material above
the high water mark, if the
material is from maintenance
works for an existing artificial
waterway for which at-sea
disposal was previously
approved, or
(2) keep the dredged material
within the active sediment
transport system for the
locality, or
(3) use the material for beach
nourishment or another
beneficial purpose.
AND
AO4.4 For at-sea disposal of N/A The proposal does not involve dredging.
dredged material where the marine
spoil disposal site is a retentive (i.e.
non-dispersive) site, the disposal site
identified in the dredge management
State development assessment provisions Module 10 — Coastal protection 10.1
Tidal works, or development in the coastal management district state code
23 November 2015 V1.7
Page 12 of 13
Page 44
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment
plan has the capacity to hold and
retain the material within its
boundaries during construction and
operation of the development.
Editor’s note: The use of dredged
material for a beneficial purpose
could include development of port or
other marine facilities, use for
construction or industrial purposes,
or use to create or modify land or
waters for an approved
environmental outcome (such as
creation of a bird roosting site).
Further information about beneficial
uses is contained in the National
assessment guidelines for dredging,
Australian Government Department
of Environment, Water, Heritage and
the Arts, 2009
Within a strategic environmental area: riparian and wildlife corridor functions
PO5 Natural regeneration of any AO5.1 There is no impediments to N/A The proposed deck is not located in a
cleared or work area is facilitated the natural regeneration of native strategic environmental area.
wherever possible. plant species in the area of clearing
and works following completion of
works.
Within a strategic environmental area: hydrological processes
PO6 Development avoids or No acceptable outcome is N/A The proposed deck is not located in a
minimises impacts on natural prescribed. strategic environmental area.
drainage lines or flow paths, during
both construction and operation.
Within a strategic environmental area: water quality
PO7 Development avoids or AO7.1 Development demonstrates N/A The proposed deck is not located in a
minimises any adverse impacts on best practice environmental strategic environmental area.
environmental values and water management to meet relevant
quality objectives for receiving environmental values and water
waters (surface and groundwater) quality objectives of the
from pollutants on site or leaving a Environmental Protection (Water)
site located in a strategic Policy 2009.
environmental area.
OR
AO7.2 All stormwater, wastewater, N/A The proposed deck is not located in a
discharges and overflows leaving the strategic environmental area.
site are:
(1) treated to the quality of the
receiving waters prior to
discharge, OR;
(2) reclaimed or re-used such that
there is no export of pollutants
to receiving waters.
State development assessment provisions Module 10 — Coastal protection 10.1
Tidal works, or development in the coastal management district state code
23 November 2015 V1.7
Page 13 of 13
Used in these records
Development Assessment Report.pdfRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 1.6 MB (small file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.