07/2238 - MCU - Service amd Utility Tpye 3 - Tower [As Published] · 132007.2238

Page 2

DALY

ao a

INTERNATIONAL

ee

   

FROM BRISBANE OFFICE
Suite 2 Level 3

131 Leichhardt Street
Springhill

Brisbane

Qld 4000

TEL: 61 7 38325333
FAX: 61 7 38325322

DALY INTERNATIONAL Pty Ltd.
A.C.N, 054 002 461

  
  

&
Rrrened
core 9nn7

- 4

spine COUNGL
NOOSA ND USE

  

www.dalyintemational.com

 

To: Trish Sweene'

@ ORGANISATION: Noe Ste Oucil ~ Harning Derk.
FAXNO: OF oH ble tab _
FROM: Stephe n Ko - Daly ;
supsect: Forms Wart Ya Tart N
pate: SD Nov 200t 2Novernber2007

 

 

PAGES: , 5 {including this page)
This facsimile Is confidential. It you have raceived it in error, please contact us immediately on the above number.
“sh

Aoose Suk ercloch IAS ams Pit Jand
“ost WY os veqrested

e Keacl Repo
0) reper B blacle

DAL-DOC-001C
Revision Five

td 2ecES ZEsBE 40 g1b - Teuorzeuwaqurl RTeG WdIZ?tT 4002 AON +O

Page 3

INTEGRATED PLANNING ACT 1997 Partd, Version 4.1, 4 Septambar 2008

    

Form 1 Development Application

Clearing native vegetation

 

Compiation of all appiiceble questions on Part J is mandstory for all applications involving assessment against tha Vegetation Managament Act 1999
{¥MA) for (he clearing of vegetation.
Part J does not apply to vegetation clearing assessable agalnst a Council's planning scheme or focal law, Where the clearing is aseessable against the
planning scheme, Part E of the form applies.
For further information about vegetation clearing under the VMA rafer to Guide 12 Vé clearing made

Nature of ippiications. :
Operation work: Ceartg of native vegetation
Schedule Bot the (PA makes the cinaring of
‘vegatation to which thy VMA applies susecseble
However, the clearing of native. vegetatorr it
cartaln ciroumstancas Is exaript development.

  
  
   
     

 

‘where the clearing is made assessable

 

   
  
  
   
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
  
 

ipidperty,rniap of assessable vegetation; or
Exemid dovobpient dudes, or exarcie, wagetation:for the fot - remnant
leering to. the extort necessary to, bulld'a ingle .

rasideroe cn alot ard envy raancnatty aesoctated §
“bull ing oF structure, # the buiding of the resktance
has been approved ynder the IPA; and clearing that

Je for essantiel mriapament or rouline .
mMonagemant 26 datiied in Schedule, 10 of the IP/
Matestal change of use (MCU oc MCU
_agotication that eats the refecrel triggers’ (0
‘mutt be, rolerred to. RMW for concurrence:
Reconfiguration of a kt (RaL): a Rab that mao!
the naterral higaérs in Qt (c} myst be, refarred
IRAN for concarence agaessment, Using |

 

 

' property. map-ct assessable vegetation; or
abla’ vegetation for. thetot~ remnant

   
     

 

 

 

 

(22 and 8 only apply th appa lao
+ Operational work for he clearing of vegetation
Kenia Oa) above

   

 

 

 

 

vd 2zes cese 40 «ab - TeuoTzyeuuequyT Aled WdTZitl 4002 SON +0

Page 4

INTEGRATED PLANNING ACT 1997

Type of clearing (can) ,

Q3 only apples & the sppiication is thy aperatonal -.
ort forthe centr of vegan as Wer ed
Q1(a} above:

sen Zi) of the VA proves Cu 2: .
‘vegetaiion clearing applicstion ls not for arekevant
pUrpOR® the spolication is taken Tot tb be a properly
“meade appication end the xzmesement manager
-(russt refine to eoalve the eppicaton.

At application is for a relevant purpose Ifthe chist .

torecutive of NRW ls satisfied the ‘pmposed
doarng is # relevent purpose. Relevant purposes.

ane preacribed under section Z2A(Z} of the YMA. -
Adhics for comme ating Oo. .
Conftmation from the chlet exsazive NRMW or”
delegate ‘hal the apgiicalica Is for a ceievant.
purposa Is raquired for all vegetation csaring
tpplications,, .

 

Subsricstons paeking confirmation fromthe chad “| |

execulve NRW or delegate must indude:
information that demonstrates how the,
Clearing fx ir 2 palevent purpoee.
Subnisaben scnd i es RW Seen
Cenk and wi be forwace 9 tw reerest
“Vegetation Saryioas office.’ .

 

_ Part J Version 4.1, 4 Saptamber 2006
. 18 this:application

     
 
 
 
 
 
  
  
   
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
  
  
 
 

of NRMWcr'detegete, Is attached to this

 

 

RMW or delegate, considers whether
26 identified.in question 2 and

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

plan (PYMP) -
A property ogee on menagarort pn PAE)
Mmusteccompany. el vegeistion casing ”
Applications and must conten aif (ye. information
idonties nQ58 8 :

The FUNP Weft he vegan ete
Ot above, -

 

‘The PVMP mary also taghade. eny ober information
the applicant considers wil ansit in the. °
aapetsment of the application. =
For an application for operational work, the relevant
Code Is the saphena vegetation management code -
applying to tha eras ofthe application:.. =
\bs'enote requipmert fare FYMP % bacproviced

 

   
 
  
   
   
 
 
  
   
  
 
    
   

 

j matters: (eck # appitcabte)
Jeaned — conplsta QB: ,

performance requirements of the

 

application ls shown by =

correspond to ideritifidbie

reteresices:fot each paint,
receives and processes.

 

 

eens’ to Map Gi of Australia 1994

 

2cES ZEBE

20 qqb - Teuvotzeuswazur Rreq WdIid2ilt 4002 SON +0

Page 5

INTEGRATED PLANNING ACT 1997
Cleiting 2s a result of a NCU oF Ral.
G7 only eppies 6 MCU. and FisL-appiiestions.
‘This Iedocmaiion is sequred for sll MCU and Ret.
spplication .
For a MCU application the relevent policy Is the:
RM polly fer eseeesing rharkrtal change of use
applications:

For a Rat spzflealen the relevant policy ia the

RM pokey for assodng meant of aft
_sopticstions, :

Kote Ceering sspetit adn acinar -

 

fe MCURaL incdes:

 

Part J, Version 4.1, 4 September 2006

7. Costirm:by ticking the applicable box(es); that’ the flowing detalls:are provided In plans and
-wtitfertinfo , tion: a

   

 

(2) charg ct aanszestie voosintion tet wll be po

ssproved or sutorted by fee MCU op

appromnt.

“Wpely am @TeEUR Ot the epptorat and

faergranaereneny eset

Ihe proposed usa and dveloprrent ot Be
premises.

Wate caertig of remnant vagetation a rat
Haritied In the application, eny future clnaring of.

the remnent vegetxton will requiw.a seperate * .

‘approval.

   

fend. Acknowledgement Notice

 

PLEASE NOTE: PART JofForm 4 pannot be accepted by ihe essezsmnent manager unless accompanied by PART A the assessment manager may refuse fo accept
an eppication that, et the #me of lodgement, fais to provide al! appficabla information requested by Part A and any other retevant part of Form 4.

OFFICE USE ONLY (applicable to assessment meneger)

 

 

DATE RECEIVED.”

 

 

 

 

 

 

ecES ZEBE

20 aqtb - Teuorzeusaquy Rj~eq Wdi¢gtIt 4002 “ON +0

Page 6

INTEGRATED PLANNING ACT 1897 Pert N, Version 1.0, 4 October 2004

 

        
 
 
  
 

‘For further Information refer to u OF. the Envionments Protection Agency's

rama. céntact the local government.

 

 

|&2Deveiopment permit

~ »1(C] Development permit.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

“The subject land

 
   

beep given:| for nature :
Be ie for. child care,” educational,

 

 
 
 
  

Plans and documents.

For ier fometon abot prebarog a
Proposal repart rofet tp i
proposal) pod,

m. antridusties use to a more
{ porposas);. supply a detailed site

 

PLEASE NOTE
PART N of Farm 1 cannod be accepted by the assessment manger unless accompanied by PART A of Form 1.

The assessment manager may refuse to accept an application that, at the time of lodgement, fails to provide all applicable information
requested by Part A and any other relevant part of Form 1.

 

 

OFFICE USE E ONLY fappliceble to assessment maneger)
sal St 5

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

e@c€S cEBe 20 qqb - [Teuetzeuvagurl KTeG Wdt2:tt 24002 AON #0

Page 7

a

INTEGRATED PLANNING ACT 1997

ommon details

Part A, Version 2.4, 29 May 2006

  

velopment Application

<3
<x
Q

 

The completion of all applicable questions on Part A is mandatory for all applications. Part A must be accompanied by the completed IDAS Assessment Checklist if
required, and by one {1} or more other completed parts of the Form as required. For more information on the parts of the Form refer to www.ipa.qid.qov.au,
Any information requested in the form may be provided in an attachment to the application. For further information about completing the following details, refer to Guide 1.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Description of land 1. Street address: fnciuding house number, street name, suburb/ocality name & postcode} (if applicable)
Allland the subject of the apptication, must be . 4
identified. However, a description of the land is not | Land off Noosa Springs Drive, Noosa Heads, Qld 4567 |
required in retation to a mobile or temporary aa: + + oy ,
Environmentally Relevant Activity (ERA), 2. Name of water body or watercourse, within which the development is proposed: (if applicable)
Advice for completing Q2 - Q2 applies if N/A
development is proposed within a water body or — -
watecoursa. 3. Lot on plan description (eg. Lot 123 on RP 4567) / GPS coordinates:
Advice for completing Q3 - Most land can be
identified by a tot on ptan description. These detaits Lot 15 on SP177649 |
i i through thi arr
Fane blared om tle documents a tvowgh ite | 4 The above description is for: (ck appicable bor
However, if the land on which the devatopment is. XJ (i) the land on which the development is proposed; or
Toe eevee) neater boivor te CO (ii) the land adjoining the water body or watercourse, within which the development is
watercourse) provide - proposed; or
On lan deseron forthe 1 (iii) the water body or watercourse.
ii) GPS dinates where there i
" odornyldaret and (eg: Moreton Bay), 5. Shop / tenancy number: 6. Storey / level: 7. Total area of land: (m? or ha):
ice fo! 17 - Q7 does not apply if the 2 .
davelopment is within a water body or watercourse, LNA | NIA | L 66m? on 135.79ha Lot_|]
Advice for completing Q8 - Q8 applies if in whi is si .
developments witin a local government area, 8. Local government area in which the land is situated: (eg. Esk, Hervey Bay, Woocoo etc.) (if applicable)
Nota: Areas below high water mark ara nat within a [ Noosa Shire Council |
Jocal government's area unless provided for under the ; - -
Local Government Act 1993. 9, Port authority for the strategic port land or strategic port land tidal area on which the
Advice for completing Q9 - Q9 applies if i . ‘ sites) f3 1
developments tn staiega por land ora svaleic development is proposed: (eg. Port of Brisbane, Port of Townsville) (if applicable)
port land tidal area. For more details refer to Guide 11 | N/A |
Proposal details 10. Existing use of the land: (eg. vacant, single house, shop etc.)
If there is insufficient room available, details may be
provided in an attachment to the application. | Vacant |
11. Proposed use of the land: (eg. 6 unit apartment building, 30 fot residential subdivision, ERA for aquaculture in
ponds with a total area of 7 ha for which wastes are released into waters etc).
Telecommunications Facility |
Other applicable parts of Form 1 12, Other parts of Form 1 completed as part of this application: (eg. Part D, Part J, etc)
Parl A must always be accompanied by other | Part D |
completed parts of Form 1. For information about
when a part of Form 1 may apply refer to Guide 1,
Applicant details 13. Applicant's name: 15. Contact person:
Clearly identify who is making the application. The ion Pty L
applicant need not be the owner of the land. one rorporation f ty Ltd Stephen Bullock
When signing and lodging this application 44. Contact y " 16. Facsimile number/e-mail address:
The applicant is responsible for ensuring the . Contact number, 07 3832 5322
information provided is correct. The assessment . .
manager, any toferral agency & the Chief Executive 07 3832 5333 [email protected]
{where applicable) will rely on this information when .
assessing and deciding the application. 17. Postal address:
Hfthe appticant is a company - a contact person J i i j j
beers Level 3, Suite 3.02, 131 Leichhardt Street, Spring Hill, Qld 4000 |
18.

 

Signature: {\ 19. Date: 2p art T2OF

47 August 2007

 

 

 

 

= Daly wtocunbonid

 

 

Page 8

x

1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

INTEGRATED PLANNING ACT 1997 Part A, Version 2.4, 29 May 2006
Land owner's consent (if applicable) 20. Land owner's consent to the making of this application:
Section 3.2.1(3) of the IPA prescribes that an , 7
application must contain, or be supported by, the Name a a _Ssiesature Date
written consent of the land owner's, if the application . . . 7
involves: (i) | Noosa Shire Council
() amateridchangeofuse, Pee eee eek
{i} reconfiguration of a lot; a
{fi) work on land below high-water mark & not within a (i)
canal as defined under the Coastal Protection and | | __ een eee ee ceeeeen ee fone e nee e eee
Management Act 1995;0° -
((v) work on rail corridor land defined under the {iii)
Transport Infrastructure Act 1994. feelin eee eee eee beeen eee eee eee eee eee eee eee e lene eeeneeceee
Section 3.8.1(2}{a) of the IPA provides that .
landowner's consent is not required for a mobile or (iv)
temporaryERA, fl nw nnn nn nnn nnn nn ee ee eee eee eee ee eee eee fee eee ee een eee eee fee eee eee eee
For more information refer to Guide 1, (v)
Resource entitlement (if applicable) 21. Does this application involve a State resource prescribed under a regulation (other than involving
Section 3,2, 1(5) of the IPA requires evidence of quarry material on State coastal fand under the Coastal Protection and Management Act 1995)?
resource entittement be given for applications that oS
involve a prescribed State resource. NO -go to 024 (YES - goto a22

Section 3.2.1(10}(2)i) of the PA prescribes that an se me nieetine 4 . .
Se ee breach reas” |22. This application is accompanied by evidence: (ick applicable box)

without evidence of the resource entitlement. F 3 o .
i) of the allocation of, or entitlem -
ies foreevnleting at & 22 oO allocation of, or entitlement to, the resource - attach evidence and go to Q23(v)

Refer to schedute 10 of the Integrated Planning C1 (ii) the chief executive of the department administering the resource is satisfied the
Regutation 1998 that prescribes the nature of evidence development is consistent with an allocation of, or entitlement to, the resource - go

required by the State in support of the lodging of this

development application. to Q23

LO (ili) the chief executive of the department administering the resource is satisfied the

development application may proceed in the absence of an allocation of, or
entitlement to, the resource - go to Q23

Advice for completing 023 23. Evidence of the resource entitlement:
The information in (i) ~ (v} is mandatory if evidence is

required under 022 (i) or (i) above. (i) Resource entitlement / authority details (vii) Official stamp of the department
The official stamp of the Department of Natural administering the resource (if
Resources, Mines and Water is mandatory where the applicable)

application involves any water or riverine quarry {ii) Name of delegated officer

Section 3,2.1(5A) allows ihe resource manage? to fit

the time the evidence mi used. (vi) must iii ti

compiled the evidences ime ted (i) Position of delegated officer

(iv) Signature of delegated officer

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(v) Date
(vi) ee date of evidence a
Assessment triggers 24. Is the IDAS Assessment Checklist completed and attached to this application?
: , , cat -
thecanplaon of Pa ae Bolte Form zak it ° XK YES oO NO - the assessment manager may refuse to accept this application on the
must be completed for all other applications. grounds that the application has not been property made
Plans / drawings / reports 25. Plans/drawings/reports accompanying this application:
An application should be accompanied by details to . "
support the proposal & enable the assessment Plan / Drawing / Report Number Title Date
manager, referral agencies and any person viewing 7 . .
the application during public scrutiny or public (i) —Q107632-S1 Site Locality & Access Plan July 07
notification to understand the scope of the proposal | f= oo on nn nnn nnn n nnn nanan eee seen nee eee nnn wen ee nn nnn nnn
and any potential impact. Q107632-S2 Site Layout July 07

 

 

 

 

 

 

{iv} Q107632-G1 Lease Layout July 07

 

 

 

PLEASE NOTE: The assessment manager may refuse to accept an application that, at the time of lodgement, fails to provide all applicable information required by Part A
and any other relevant part of Form 1.

OFFICE USE ONLY (applicable to assessment manager's) _

res) FETS | RECEIVED | 2/t) 0? [eww Ps Rroe os | NUMBERS lor/z 23 e |

Notification of Engagement of Private Certifier (Optional format —
To Council. | have been engaged as the private certifier for the building work referred to in this application.

 

Date ofengagement| / / Accreditation Number. _— Name: Signature:

Page 9

INTEGRATED PLANNING ACT 1997

Part D, Version 2.0, 4 October 2004

Form 1 Development Application

Material change of use

assessable against a local government’s planning scheme

 

“2

PARE

r—- -

¥

a)

C
Se

 

Completion of all applicable questions on Part D is mandatory for all applications involving assessment of a
material change of use (MCU) assessable against a local governments planning scheme.

 

Nature of the application

A development permit authorises
development to occur, while a preliminary
approval is a step in the approval process

and does not authorise development to occur.

1.

This application is for: (tick 1 or both if applicable)

XJ Preliminary approval for a material change of use of premises including conceptual

design for any associated works that require approval under the planning scheme (ie.
consideration of the proposal concep!)

AND /OR

LJ Development permit for a material change of use of premises including conceptual
design for any associated works that require approval under the planning scheme.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The subject land 2, How the subject land is identified in the planning scheme (name the zone, precinct etc.)
For the definition of “gross floor area” go to
the planning scheme against which the [Noosa Plan 2006
application will be assessed.
3. _ Existing gross floor area: (if applicable) 66msq |
4. Are there any existing easements on the land?
[NO
(YES - attach plans of the location and details of the purpose of the easement
Material change of use details 5. _ Details of the change to the use of the land: (eg. vacant tand to shopping centre, house to apartment building,
vacant fand to industry (tyre manufacturing) etc.)
| Vacant Land to Telecommunications Tower |
§. Number of employees: [0 |
7. Operating days and hours: [ 7days 24 hours
Associated building works details (f 19 Site cover: NIA
applicable)
For the definition of “site cover’, “gross floor 9. Gross floor area: NIA

area” and “storey” go to the planning scheme
against which the application will be

 

 

 

 

 

aesessed. 10. Number of on-site car parking spaces: [ N/A |
11. Number of storeys / maximum height above natural ground: N/A
12. Number of employees N/A
13. Hours and days the use will operate [NIA |
Associated operational works details | 14. Details of associated operational works (eg. landscaping, cut and fi drainage, road works etc.)

(it applicable}

 

 

[Na |

PLEASE NOTE

This application cannot be accepted unless accompanied by Part A of Form 1.
The assessment manager may refuse to accept an application that, at the time of lodgement, fails to provide all applicable information

requested by Part A and any other relevant part of Form 1.

 

OFF ICE USE ONLY {applicable to assessment manager)

 

L DATE RECEIVED

 

REFERENCE
NUMBER/S

 

 

od

 

Page 10

INTEGRATED PLANNING ACT 1997 IDAS Assessment Checklist, Version 20, 2 April 2007

         

Form 1 Development Application idas

IDAS Assessment
Checklist

(Formerly the “Referrals Checklist”)

 

IMPORTANT NOTE FOR ALL APPLICANTS:
4. This checklist was formerty referred to as the “Referrals Checklist’. Some of the ‘Guides’ to using the IDAS Application Forms continue to refer to this document as the
“Referrals Checklist’. The name of this checklist was changed from 25 July 2005 to more accurately describe its function.

2, Under the IPA and IDAS framework, an application may require assessment by the local Council and/or certain Queenstand State entities (e.g. Environmental Protection
Agency, Dept. of Natural Resources and Water, Queensland Heritage Council etc.).

3. This checklist is provided to assist applicants to determine when an application requires assessment by a Queensland State entity and may also assist the applicant to

determine the assessment manager’ for the application.

Therefore, the completion of all questions in section 1 of this checklist is mandatory for all applications (other than those requiring the completion of Parts A & B only),

It is the responsibility of the applicant to accurately complete this checklist.

Section 2 is mandatory only if the proposed development is located in any part of a wild river area declared under the Wild Rivers Act 2005.

Depending on the nature of the application, an applicable State entity may be either the assessment manager or an IDAS referral agency for the application.

The assessment manager for the application will rely on the information provided in this checklist (as well as any material lodged in support of the application) to identify

any applicable referral agencies for the application in the Acknowledgement Notice. The assessment manager will also rely on this information when identifying if the

application triggers referral coordination?,

9,  Toassist you in answering the following questions a series of guides are available free from the IPA website www.ipa.qid.gov.au, Guide 25 explains the role of the IDAS.
Assessment Checklist in the IDAS application process, and its relationship to the Form 1 development application.

10. Any other parts of Form 1 that this checklist requires to be completed are available from the Council or the applicable State entity, or can be downloaded free from
www.ipa.qid.qov.au,

11. Section 3 provides advice about the referrals that can be required for applications for building work assessable against the Building Regulation 2006.

SN OOS

 

 

SECTION 4 - STATE ASSESSMENT (completion mandatory)

Note: The following state assessment triggers apply to development other than for building work assessable against the Building Regulation 2006.

 

 

Environmentally relevant activity 1. The application involves: (tick applicable box/es)

For more information refer to Guide 4. (1 (i)_ an environmentally relevant activity (ERA) for which a code for environmental compliance
Unless you answered "none af the above" fo Q1, has not been made - complete Part G of Form 4

the application requires assessment by the a ~~. + . .

administering authority? (ii) amobite or temporary ERA for which a code of environmental compliance has not been
fan entity, other than the administering made - complete Part G of Form 1

authority, is the assessment manager for the (iii) none of the above

application, the administering authority is a
concurrence agency for the application in relation
to this matter.

Note; An application involving ERA 19 and/or 20
will also require completion of Part Kz of Form 1
for approval where an allocation under the Water|
Act 2000 is required.

 

Continued overleaf

 

PLEASE NOTE: The assessment manager may refuse to accept an application, which, at the time of lodgement, fails to provide the
completed IDAS Assessment Chechlist (if applicable).

 

OFFICE USE ONLY {appticabie to assessment manager)

— —

| DATE RECEIVED REFERENCE NUMBERS |

|

1 Tha assessment manager is responsible for assessing and deciding an IDAS application. The assessment manager for an application is prescribed in schedule 8A of the [PA.

2 For additional information refer to Guide 6 ‘Does my application trigger the referral coordination process?’

3. The ‘administering authority’ may be either the Environmental Protection Agency, the relevant tocal goverment (for a devolved ERA) or the Queensland Department of Primary Industries and
Fisherles (for a delegated ERA),

 

Page 1

Page 11

INTEGRATED PLANNING ACT 1997

IDAS Assessment Checklist, Version 20, 2 April 2007

 

 

 

 

State-controlled road matters 2. The application involves: {tick applicable box/es}
oo mare nomen wee eee oor C) devetopment on land contiguous’ to a State controlled road and for -
ou answered “noni e “to 02, . ; .
the apptcaton riggers referral to the Department (1 (a) material change of use assessable against the planning scheme;
of Main Reads saieepevenlaneatieh - [2] (b) reconfiguring a fot unless -
srency wile Father aleunsoncee DMR wi « the total number of lots is not increased; and —
be a concurrence agency. « the total number of lots abutting the State-controlled road is not increased;
Schedule 2a he IF Regulation vil assist you to (1 (¢) operational work (not associated with a material change of use assessable against the
concurrence agency for the application. planning scheme or reconfiguring a lot mentioned in (b) above)—
* associated with access to a State-controlled road; or
« for filling or excavation; or
¢ involving the redirection or intensification of site stormwater from the land, through a
pipe with a cross-sectional area greater than 625 cm? that directs stormwater to a
State-controlled road.
C1 (ii) development on land not contiguous to a State-controlled road and -
(1 (a) material change of use -
« assessable against the local government's planning scheme; and
¢ mentioned in schedule 5 of the IP Regulation and exceeding the thresholds set by
that schedule;

CO (b) reconfiguring a fot for a purpose mentioned in schedule 5 of the IP regulation

and exceeding the thresholds set by that schedule;

(1 (c) operational work (not associated with a material change of use assessable against the

planning scheme or reconfiguring a lot mentioned in (b) above)-
« assessable against the local government's planning scheme; and
« mentioned in schedule 5 of the IP Regulation and exceeding the thresholds set by
that schedule.
Ld (iii) none of the above
Clearing vegetation 3. The application involves: (tick applicable box/es)
For mora information refer to Guide 12, ® (i) material change of use -
Unless you answered ‘none of the above" to Q3, : . .
the appcaton requires assessment by the {a) assessable against the planning scheme;
agpunontof Mea Resour and Wait (b) on alot containing -
(NRW). :
itan agency other than NRW is the assessment sa category 1, 2 or 3 area shown on a property map of assessable vegetation; or
manager for the application, NRWisa « if there is no property map of assessable vegetation for the lot - remnant vegetation;
Ganeurrenee agency forthe appication in relation (c) where the existing use of the land is a rural or environmental use; and
Ifyou ticked Q3()) or (ii), your application requires (d) where the size of the land is 2 hectares or larger - complete Part J of Form 1
Teferral to NRW for assessment regardless of C1 (ii) reconfiguring a lot -
whether vegelation clearing is proposed or not. _

(a) on alot containing a category 1, 2 or 3 area shown on a property map of
assessable vegetation or, if there is no property map of assessable vegetation for
the lot, remnant vegetation;

(b) where the size of the lot before the reconfiguration is 2 hectares or larger;

(c) where 2 or more lots are created; and

(d) where the size of any lot created is 25 hectares or smaller - complete Part J of Form 1

(iii) operational work -

(a) for the clearing of native vegetation where the vegetation clearing is made
assessable under Schedule 8 of the IPA; and

(b) not associated with a material change of use assessable against the planning
scheme mentioned in (i) or reconfiguring a lot mentioned in (ii) - complete Part J of
Form 1

Ed (iv) none of the above.
Strategic port land 4. The application involves:

For more information refer to Guide 11,

If you ticked (i) - the relevant Port Authority is the
assessment manager fos the application.

Hf you ticked (ii) Queensland Transportis a
concurrence agency for the application.

 

(CJ (i) development on strategic port land as defined in the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 (TI
Act} - complete Part | of Form 1

C1 (ii) a material change of use that is inconsistent with the land use plan approved under the
TI Act for the strategic port land - complete Part ! of Form 1

EX (ili) none of the above

 

4 Land contiguous to a State-controlted road is defined in schedule 14 of the IP Regulation to mean tand - if part of the land is within 100m of the State-controlled road, or that is part of a future State-

controlled road.

Page 2

Page 12

INTEGRATED PLANNING ACT 1997

Acid sulfate soils
For more information refer to Guide 10.

Unless you answered ‘none of the above" to 05,
the application requires assessment by
Department of Natural Resources and Water
(NRW).

If an agency other than NRW is the assessment
manager for the application, NRW is an advice
agency for the application in relation to this
matter.

IDAS Assessment Checklist, Version 20, 2 April 2007
The application involves development on land situated in an identified5 local government area
and where the surface of the land is: (tick appficable box)
C1 (i) betow 20m AHDS and the development will involve the excavation of 1000m3or more of
soil or sediment at or below 5m AHO, or

Li) at or below 5m AHD and the development will involve filling the site with 1000m? or more
of material

X (iii) none of the above

 

 

Major hazard facilities or possible
major hazard facilities

For more information refer to Guide 17.

tf you answered "YES" to 06, the application
requires assessment by the Department of
Ememency Services (DES).

if an agency other than DES is the assessment
Manager for the application, DES is a
concurrence agency for the application in
relation to this matter.

 

Water related development under the
Water Act 2000

For more information about items (a) ~ (f}, refer
to Guide 15. For more information about item
(g), refer to Guide 14 Does my appfication
involve assessment of a referable dam?

Uniess you answered “none of the above” to Q7,
the application requires assessment by the
Department of Natural Resources and Water
(NRW).

lf an agency other than NRW is the assessment
manager for the application, NRW is a
concurrence agency for the application in
telation to this matter.

Does the application involve a material change of use for a major hazard facility or possible
major hazard facility as defined under the Dangerous Goods Safety Management Act 2001?

INO

(CI YES - complete Part L of Form 1

The application involves:
C(I) operational work, for taking or interfering with water under the Water Act 2000, that is:
(tick applicable box/es)
( (a) ina watercourse, lake or spring, (eg. a pump, gravity diversion, stream re-direction, weir or
dam) - complete Part Kz, K3, Ks, Ke, or Ka of Form 1 whichever is applicable;
(1 (b) for an artesian bore anywhere in the State, no matter what the use - complete Part
K; of Form 1;
C1 (c) for a subartesian bore, in declared subartesian area’, or in a certain area covered
by a water resource plan, for use for purposes other than stock and/or domestic
US€ - complete Part K; of Form 1;
(1 (d) for a subartesian bore, in certain declared subartesian areas, for use for stock
and/or domestic purposes - complete Part K; of Form 1;
C1 (e) for taking overland flow water in certain areas covered by a water resource plan
— complete Part Ks of Form 1;
(1 (f) for interfering with overland flow water in a drainage and embankment area -
complete Part Kio of Form 1
(1 (g) for constructing a referable dam? or works that will increase the storage capacity
of a referable dam by more than 10% - complete Part Ks of Form 1; or

[1 (ii) none of the above.

 

Removal of quarry material from a
watercourse
For more information refer to Guide 16.

If you answered “YES” to Q8, the application
requires assessment by the Department of
Natural Resources and Water (NRW).

Kf an agency other than NRW is the assessment
manager for the application, NRW is a
concurrence agency for the application in
relation to this matter.

Note: Part G of Form 1 is required to be
completed as the activity of removing quarry
material from a watercourse is also an
Environmentatly Relevant Activity (ERA).

 

Does the application involve development for the removal of quarry material from a watercourse?
requiring an allocation notice under the Water Act 2000?

x] NO

(YES - complete Parts Kr and G of Form 1

5 The identified tocal government areas are: Aurukun, Bowen, Brisbane, Broadsound, Bundaberg, Burdekin, Burke, Burnett, Caboolture, Caims, Calliope, Caloundra, Cardwell, Carpentaria, Cook,
Cootoola, Dounglas, Fitzroy, Gladstone, Gold Coast, Hervey Bay, Hinchinbrooke, Isis, Johnstone, Livingstone, Logan, Mackay, Maroochy, Maryborough, Mirium Vale, Momington, Noosa, Pine Rivers,
Redcliffe, Redland, Rockhampton, Sarina, Thuringowa, Tiaro, Torres, Townsvilte, Whitsunday.

Australian Height Datum {AHD).

Referable dam is defined under the Water Act 2000.
Watercourse is defined in sch 10 of the IPA.

wanD

The declared ground water areas are fisted in Guide 13 Development in a deciared catchment area.

Page 3

Page 13

INTEGRATED PLANNING ACT 1997

Operational work that is tidal work or
work in coastal management district
For more information refer to Guide 18. For
more information about prescribed tidal work in
tocal govemment tidat areas refer to Guide 24.
Untess you answered “none of the above” to Q9,
the application requires assessment by the
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

If an agency other than EPA is the assessment
manager for the application, EPA is a
concurrence agency for the application in
relation to this matter.

Local government is the assessment manager
for alt prescribed tidal work.

9.

IDAS Assessment Checklist, Version 20, 2 April 2007
The application involves operational work that is: ( tick the applicable box/es)

DL (i) _ tidal work'® as defined under the Coastal Protection and Management Act 1995 (the
Coastal Act) that is not prescribed tidal work - complete Part M of Form 1; or

(2 (i) tidal work that is prescribed tidal work" other than in a canal’? -complete Part P of Form 1; oF

C1 (ii) carried out within a coastal management district under the Coastal Act and for - complete
Part M of Form 1 if any box/es (a) to (i) below are ticked.

()(a) constructing or installing works in a watercourse between MHWS and HAT (ie.
other than those works in tidal water) where the development has been determined not
to be assessable against the Water Act 2000 ;

(Jb) constructing a canal"? intended to be connected to tidal waters;

(1 (c)_ constructing an artificial waterway;

(J (d)_ reclaiming tand under tidal water;

[1 (e) disposing of dredge spoil or other solid waste material in tidal water;

[1 (interfering with quarry material on State coastal land above high-water mark;

[1 (g)_ draining or allowing drainage or flow of water or other matter across State
coastal land above high-water mark;

[1 (h) removing or interfering with coastal dunes on land, other than State coastal land,
that is in an erosion prone area and above high-water mark;

(OQ) constructing a bank or bund wall to establish a ponded pasture on land, other
than State coastal land, above high-water mark; or

EX] (iv) none of the above.

 

 

Operationat work below high water
mark

For more information refer to Guide 18. For
more information about prescribed tidal work in
local govemment tidal areas refer to Guide 24.
Unless you answered “none of the above" to
Q10, the application triggers referral to
Queensland Transport (QT) {Maritime Safety
Qld) as a concurrence agency.

Local goverment is the assessment manager
for all prescribed tidal work.

 

10. The application involves operational work that is: ( tick the applicable boxes)

(1 (i) tidal work's as defined under the Coastal Protection and Management Act 1995 (the
Coastal Act) that is not prescribed tidal work — complete Part M of Form 1; or

C1 (ii) tidal work that is prescribed tidal work" - complete Part P of Form 1; or
(1 (iii) carried out within a coastal management district'5 under the Coastal Act and for -

(1 (a) disposing of dredge spoil or other solid waste material in tidal water - complete Part
M of Form 1;

[1 (b) reclaiming land under tidal water - complete Part M of Form 1; or

{1 (©) constructing a canal’2, if the canal is associated with reconfiguring a lot - complete
Part M of Form 1;

Bel (iv) none of the above.

 

 

Coastal management

For more information refer to Guide 18.

Unless you answered “none of the above” to
Q11, the application requires assessment by the
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

\fan agency other than EPA is the assessment
manager for the application, EPA is a
concurrence agency for the application in
relation to this matter.

 

11.

The application involves: (tick the applicable box/es)

(C1 () a material change of use assessable under a planning scheme involving operational
work carried out completely or partly in a coastal management district’

Ci (i) a material change of use assessable under a planning scheme involving building
work, carried out completely or partly in a coastal management district that is —

e the construction of a new premises with a GFA'® of at least 1000m?
« the enlargement of the GFA of existing premises by more than 1000m?

CI (iii) reconfiguring a lot assessable under schedule 8 of the IPA where the land is situated
completely or partly in a coastal management district

(iv) reconfiguring a fot" assessable under schedule 8 of the IPA and in connection with
the construction of a canal’? - complete Part M of Form 1

EX] (v} none of the above

 

10 Tidal work is defined in sch 10 of the IPA.

11 Prescribed tidal work is defined in the Coastal Protection and Management Regulation 2003 and includes certain tidal works completely or partly within a local government tidal area.
12 Canal means canal as defined under the Coastaf Protection and Management Act 1995

13 Tidal work is defined in sch 10 of the IPA.

14 Prescribed tidal work is defined in the Coastal Protection and Management Regulation 2003 and includes certain tidal works completely or partly within a local government tidal area.

15 Coastal management district is defined in sch 10 of the IPA and means a coastal management district under the Coastal Protection and. Management Act 1995, other ihan an area declared as a
coastal management district under section 47{2) of that Act.

16 GFA is defined in sch 14 of the IPA to mean the gross floor area. For a definition of how to calculated GFA, go to the planning scheme against which the application is being assessed.

17 Under $117 of the Coastal Protection and Management Act 1995, an application for reconfiguration, where the reconfiguration is associated with the constuction of an artificial waterway, must be
accompanied by the application for the operational works to construct the artificial waterway.

Page 4

Page 14

INTEGRATED PLANNING ACT 1997,

Development within the limits of a

port

For more information refer to Guide 18. For

information about prescribed tidal work refer to

Guide 24.

if you answered "YES" to Q12, the application

triggers referral to the Port Authority.

The Port Authority is a concurrence agency if the

development is —

¢ within 200m of a shipping channel or an entry
and exit shipping corridor for the port

* within 1000m of a swing basin, a commercial
shipping wharf, a mooring, anchorage or spoil
grounds;

* within 1000m of a planned port facility
identified in a land use plan approved under
the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994.

In all other situation the Port Authority is an

advice agency.

IDAS Assessment Checklist, Version 20, 2 April 2007
Does the application involve development below high water mark'® and within the limits of a port
under the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994?

KINO

(C1 YES - complete Part M of Form 4, or Part P of Form 1 if the work is prescribed tidal work

 

 

 

 

 

Marinas 13. Does the application involve operational work that is tidal work for a marina’? with more than 6
For more information refer to Guide 18, For vessel berths?

information about whether a marina is prescribed NO

tidal work refer to Guide 24, The local &

govemment is the assessment manager for all (11 YES - complete Part M of Form 1, or Part P of Form 1 if the tidal work is prescribed tidal work

prescribed tidal work.

\fyou answered “YES” to Q13, the application

triggers referral to Queensland Fire and Rescue

Service as an advice agency.

Tidal works in strategic port land tidal} 14. Does the application involve tidal works within a strategic port land tidal area20?

areas
For mare information refer to Guide 18,
Unless you answered "NO" to Q14, the relevant

Port Authority is the assessment manager for the
application and the Environmental Protection

Agency (EPA) and Queensland Transport (QT)
are concurrence agencies for the application,

Heritage

For further information refer to Guide 19.

Ifyou answered "YES" to Q15, the application
triggers referral to the Queensland Heritage
Council as concurrence agency for the
application.

 

Unless you answered “none of the above" to
Q15(b), the application involves referral to the

Environmental Protection Agency as an advice
agency for the application

15,

JNO

(C1 YES - complete Part M of Form 1

Does the application involve development in a heritage registered place as defined under the
Queensland Heritage Act 1992?

Ne)

C1 YES - complete Part C of Form 1

15(b)The application involves: (tick applicable boxes)

C1 (i) material change of use assessable against the planning scheme and the lot shares a
common boundary with a protected area or registered place under the Queensland
Heritage Act 1992;

CI (ii) reconfiguring a lot if the lot shares a common boundary with a protected area or
registered place under the Queensland Heritage Act 1992;

Dili) none of the above.

 

Declared catchment areas

For more information, including a list of the
declared catchment areas within Queensland,
refer to Guide 13.

Unless you answered “none of the above” to
Q16, the application requires assessment by the
Oepartment of Natural Resources and Water
(NRW),

If an agency other than NRW is the assessment
manager for the application, NRW is a
concurrence agency for the application in
felation to this matter.

 

16,

The application is in an area declared to be a catchment area under the Water Act 2000 and

involves: (tick the applicable box/es}

C1(i) reconfiguring a fot if any lot resulting from the reconfiguration is less than 16 hectares;

C1 (ii) development assessable against the planning scheme involving the establishment or
expansion of a waste water disposal system, other than a disposal system for carrying
out an environmentally relevant activity under the Environmental Protection Act 1994;

XX (iii) none of the above

 

18 High water mark is defined in the Coastal Protection and Management Act 1995 and means the ordinary high water mark at spring tide,
19 Marina is defined in the Transport Operations (Maritime Pollution) Regulation 1995,
20 Strategic port land tidal areas are the areas generally 50 metres seaward of high water mark adjacent to strategic port land.

Page 5

Page 15

INTEGRATED PLANNING ACT 1997

IDAS Assessment Checklist, Version 20, 2 April 2007

 

 

 

 

Contaminated fand 17. The application involves: (tick the applicable box/es)

Applications involving material change of use LD (i) reconfiguring a lot for which ail of part of the premises are -

an econiguring alot may Wager tis (a) premises mentioned in the IPA, schedule 8, part 1, table 2 -

For more information refer to Guide 5. « item 5, including the exemption otherwise provided for by paragraph (d);

Untess you answered ‘none of the above” to « item 6, including the exemption otherwise provided for by paragraph (e); or

017, the application requires assessment by the « item 7, including the exemption otherwise provided for a mining activity or petroleum
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). If an activity; or

agency other than EPA is the assessment . , . . .

manager for the application, EPA will be a {b)_ in an area for which an area management advice has been given for unexploded
concurrence agency for the application in ordnance - complete Part N of Form 1

relation to this matter.

XX) (ii) a material change of use -

{a) made assessable under the IPA, schedule 8, part 1, table 2, items 5 to 7; or

{b) assessable against the planning scheme and if all or part of the premises is in an area

for which an area management advice has been given for unexploded ordnance -
complete Part N of Form 1
C1 tii) none of the above
Electricity infrastructure 18. The application involves: (tick the applicable box/es)
For mare information refer to schedule 2of the (P (1 () reconfiguring a fot where any part of the lot is -
Regulation. . . eg . se .
Uniess you answered “none ofthe above to ° subject to an easement in favour of a distribution entity or transmission entity under the
18, the application tiggers referral to the Electricity Act 1994 and the easement is for a transmission grid or supply network under
ageney to which the easement is granted in that Act; or
favour of as advice agency. « situated within 100m of a substation site;

CO (ii)_ a material change of use, assessable against a planning scheme and not associated
with reconfiguring a lot if -
any part of the premises is subject to an easement in favour of a distribution entity or

transmission entity under the Electricity Act 1994 and the easement is for a transmission
grid or supply network under that Act; and

any structure or work that is the natural and ordinary consequence of the use is, or will be,
located wholly or partly in the easement;

C1 (iii) a material change of use, assessable against a planning scheme and not associated
with reconfiguring a lot if any part of the premises is situated within 100m of a substation
site;

LC (iv) operational work that is filling or excavation assessable against the planning scheme,
not associated with reconfiguring a lot, if -

* any part of the premises is subject to an easement in favour of a distribution entity or *
transmission entity under the Electricity Act 1994 and the work is located wholly or partly in
the easement;

« the work is located wholly or partly within 10m of a substation site;

(v)_ none of the above.

Land designated for community 19. Does the application involve development assessable against the planning scheme and on land

infrastructure

Applications involving development on land
designated for community infrastructure may
trigger this referral.

For more information refer to schedule 2 of the
IP Requtation.

If you answered “YES" to Q19, the application
requires assessment by the chief executive of
the department administering the Act authorising
the development for the designated purpose.
tf an agency other than the designator is the
assessment manager for the application, the
designating agency will be a concurrence
agency for the application in relation to this
matter.

 

designated for community infrastructure?
(i) intended to be supplied by a public sector entity; and
(ii) on land not owned by or on behalf of the State; and
(iii) other than development -—

(a) for the designated purpose; or

(b) carried out by, or on behalf of, the designator.
NO
CO Yes

 

Page 6

Page 16

INTEGRATED PLANNING ACT 1997

SEQ Regional Plan

For more information refer to schedule 2 of the
IP Regulation.

Refer to Chapter 2, part 5A and schedule 10 of

the Integrated Planning Act 1997, and schedule
2 of the Regulatory Provisions for relevant

definitions.

Unless you answered “none of the above” to
Q20, the application requires assessment by the
Office of Urban Management (OUM).

IDAS Assessment Checklist, Version 20, 2 April 2007
20. The application involves (tick applicable box/es) -
C1 (i) a material change of use of premises -
(a) in a Major Development Area in the Urban Footprint for -
OO (i) anurban activity -
(11 inan area included in a structure plan where the IPA, section 3.1.6
applies;
(11 inan area not included in a structure plan where -
« the IPA, section 3.1.6 applies to the application for the material change
of use; or
the premises exceeds 10,000m2; or
+ the gross floor area (GFA) on the premises will exceed 10,000m2; or
« impact assessment is required under the relevant planning scheme
(1 (ii) intensive animal! husbandry, or

1 (iii) residential development involving a rural residential purpose

{b) in the Regional Landscape and Rural Production Area for -
O (i) anurban activity and not specified in section 2.4(2); or
(5 (ii) residential development involving a rural residential purpose and not
specified in section 2.6(2)
(c) in the Rural Living Area for an urban activity and not specified in section 2.8(2);

(d) in the Investigation Area for -
O) (i) anurban activity and not specified in section 2.10(2);

O (ii) residential development involving a rural residential purpose and not
specified in section 2.12(2); or

CD (ii) intensive animal husbandry

 

Fisheries matters

For more information refer to schedule 2of the IP
Regulation.

Untess you answered “none of the above" to
Q21, the application requires assessment by the
Department of Primary Industries and Fisheries
(DPI8F).

If an agency other than DPISF is the assessment
manager for the application, DPI&F Is a
concurrence agency for the application In
relation to items (i) - {iv} and an advice agency
in relation to item {v).

 

LD (ii) reconfiguring a fot-
On land in a Major Development Area in the Urban Footprint that is:
{a) not included in a structure plan; and
(b) not specified in section 3.1(2).
Bd (iii) none of the above
21. The application involves: (tick the applicable box/es)
C() an assessable material change of use for aquaculture - complete Part 0; of Form 1;
Li (ii) assessable operational work that is the construction or raising of a waterway barrier -
complete Part O3 of Form 7;
Li {iii) assessable operational work completely or partly within a declared fish habitat area-
complete Part O2 of Form 1;
(C1 (iv) assessable operational work that is the removal, destruction or damage of a marine
plant - complete Part O2 of Form 1;
(J (v) development assessable under the IPA, schedule 8, part 1, on land that adjoins a

declared fish habitat area;
EX] (vi) none of the above.

 

Page7

Page 17

INTEGRATED PLANNING ACT 1997

Integration of land use and public
transport

For more information refer to Guide 23, schedule
8A of the IPA, & schedute 2 of the IP Reauiation.
Unless you answered “none of the above’, the
application triggers referral to OT as a
concurrence agency.

IDAS Assessment Checklist, Version 20, 2 April 2007

22. The application involves: (tick the applicable box/es}—

Ci (i) a material change of use assessable against the planning scheme for a purpose
mentioned in schedule 13C of the IP Regulation and exceeding the thresholds set by that
schedule.

OO (ii) reconfiguring a tot—

C2 (@) _ onland that is completely or partly within a public transport corridor, and the
total number of lots increases;

(1 (b) on land that is completely or partly within a future public transport corridor or
an airport's public safety area;

(1 (©) _ onland that is within 400m of a public passenger transport facility or a future
public passenger transport facility, and the total site area is 5000m? or greater;

(J (@) _ for a residential purpose within the 25 ANEF contour for an airport;

(1 (e) _ for a residential purpose resulting in 100 or more allotments.

C (iii) operational work assessable against the planning scheme, but not associated with a
material change of use mentioned in (i) above or reconfiguring a lot mentioned in (ii)
above, on land that—

[1 (a) __ is completely or partly within a public transport corridor or a future public
transport corridor;

()(b) _ will result in work that encroaches into an airport's operational airspace.
1 (iv) none of the above.

 

 

Railway safety and efficiency

For more information refer to Guide 23, schedule
8A of the IPA & schedule 2 of the IP Requlation.
Unless you answered “none of the above’, the
application triggers referral to QT as a
concurrence agency.

23. The application involves: (tick the applicable box/es)—

C1 (i) a material change of use assessable against the planning scheme for a purpose
mentioned in schedule 13D of the IP Regulation and exceeding the thresholds set by that
schedule.

CO (ii) reconfiguring a fot—

C1 (a) onland that is completely or partly within a future public transport corridor,
future railway land or a railway tunnel easement;

(1 (b) on land that is within 400m of a Citytrain passenger railway station or a future
Citytrain passenger railway station, and the total site area is 5000m2 or
greater;

(©) __ onland that abuts rail corridor land, commercial corridor land or future failway
land, and the total number of lots increases;

(0 @)__ onland that abuts rail corridor land, commercial corridor land or future railway
{and and an easement abutting the corridor or future railway land is created;

(1 (e) _ onland that is completely or partly within 100m of, and abutting an approach
to, a railway level crossing, and the total number of lots increases;

((f) for a residential purpose resulting in 100 or more allotments.

Li (iii) operational work assessable against the planning scheme, but not associated with a
material change of use mentioned in (i) above or reconfiguring a lot mentioned in (ii)
above, involving extracting, excavating or filling greater than 50m3, on land that—

(a) _ is completely or partly within rail corridor land or commercial corridor land, and
the work is not for rail transport infrastructure or other rail infrastructure;

{1 (b) _ is completely or partly within future railway land, or a railway tunnel easement;

[1 () abuts rail corridor land, commercial corridor land or future railway land, and
the work is within 25m of the railway boundary.

£4] (iv) none of the above.

 

 

Moonie to Brisbane pipeline

For more information refer to schedule 2of the IP
Regulation.

Unless you answered “none of the above’, the
application triggers referral to the holder of
pipeline licence No 1 issued under the Petrofeum
Act 1923, currently Santos QNT Pty Ltd, for
advice.

 

24. The application involves the easement for the construction or operation of the Moonie to

Brisbane strategic pipeline, and involves: (tick the applicable box/es)—

CO (i) a material change of use assessable against the planning scheme and not associated
with reconfiguring a lot, and any structure or work will be located wholly or partly in the
easement.

OO (ii) reconfiguring a lot

CO (iii) operational work assessable against the planning scheme, that is filling, excavation,
compaction, drilling, boring or piling not associated with a reconfiguring a lot, and the
work is located wholly or partly in the easement.

EX (iv) none of the above.

 

Page 8

Page 18

INTEGRATED PLANNING ACT 1997

Koala habitat area

For more information, refer to Guide 26 and
schedule 2 of the IP Requlation.

Unless you answered “none of the above”, the
appiication requires referral to the Environmental
Protection Agency as a concurrence agency.

Wild river area
For more information, refer to Guide 27

Ifyou answered YES to Q26, you must also
complete section 2 of this checklist. This will
enable you to determine if your application can
proceed in a wild river area and which referral
agency will assess your application against the
Wild Rivers Code, or if the proposed
development is “prohibited” in a wild river area.
Note: Development can be ‘prohibited’ in a witd
Aver area because the application cannot be
accepted by the assessment manager.

 

IDAS Assessment Checklist, Version 20, 2 Aprit 2007
25. The application involves: (tick the applicable box/es)—
(1 (i) a material change of use of premises in a koala conservation area or koala

sustainability area made assessable under a planning scheme, that is not for a domestic
activity and will result in —

(J (a) clearing of native vegetation over an area greater than 2500m2,

(1) (b) anew building and any reasonably associated structure with a total footprint
greater than 1000m?2;

(ce) an extension to an existing building and any reasonably associated structure if
the extension has a total footprint greater than 1000m2;

(1 (d) extracting gravel, rock or sand from an area greater than 5000m2;

CJ (e) excavating or filling an area greater than 5000m2,

(1 (f} additional traffic in a koala conservation area or koala sustainability area,

between 6p.m. on a day and 6a.m. on the following day.

O (ii) reconfiguring a lot in a koala conservation area or koala sustainability area that will
result in -

(1 (a) an increased number of lots;
(_] (b) clearing of native vegetation over an area greater than 2500m?.

(1 (iii) operational work in a koala conservation area or koala sustainability area made
assessable under Schedule 8, Part 1, Table 4, items 1A to 1G (not associated with
reconfiguring a fot mentioned in (ii) above) that will result in the clearing of native vegetation
over an area greater than 2500m2.

C1 (iv) operational work in a koala conservation area or koala sustainability area made
assessable under a planning scheme (not associated with a material change of use
mentioned in (i) or reconfiguring a lot mentioned in (ii) above) that is not for a domestic activity
and will result in -

[1 (a) clearing of native vegetation over an area greater than 2500m?;
(J (b) extracting gravel, rock or sand from an area greater than 5000m?;
(1 (c) excavating or filling an area greater than 5000m2,

BX] (v) none of the above.

26. Does the application involve development in a wild river area declared under the Wild Rivers Act
2005?
NO
C1 yYes

 

Preliminary Approval

Ifyou answered YES to Q27, the application
triggers referral to the Department of Local

Government, Planning, Sport and Recreation as
an advice agency.

27. Does the application involve a development for which preliminary approval is sought under
Section 3.1.6 of the Integrated Planning Act 1997?

NO
Clyes

 

 

Wetlands

Domestic activity means the construction or use
of a single residence on a lot and any reasonably
associated building or structure. Examples of a
building or structure that could be reasonably
associated with a single residence include:
caretaker's residence, granny flat, building or
structure used for a home business.

Note: Wetland is defined in the Integrated
Planning Regulation 1998,

Unless you answered “none of the above” to
Q28, the application involves referral to the

Environmental Protection Agency as an advice
agency for the application.

28. The application involves: (tick the applicable boxes) -

C1 (i) amaterial change of use, other than for a domestic activity, assessable against the
planning scheme that is in or within 100m of a wetland;
OO (ii) reconfiguring a tot ~

In or within 100m of a wetland that will result in
(J (a) more than 10 lots being created; or
{J (b) lots tess than 5 hectares;

EX] (iii) none of the above

 

Page 9

Page 19

INTEGRATED PLANNING ACT 1997
Conservation Estate

Urban purposes is defined in the integrated
Planning Act 1997 as “purposes for which land is
used in cities or towns, including residential,
industrial, sporting, recreation and commercial
purposes, but not including environmental,
conservation, rural, natural or wildemess area
purposes”.

Uniess you answered “none of the above” to
Q29, the application involves referral to the
Environmental Protection Agency as an advice
agency for the application.

 

IDAS Assessment Checklist, Version 20, 2 April 2007
29. The application involves: (tick the applicable box/es}—
(1 (i) a material change of use for urban purposes that is in or within 100m of any of the
following -
Ci (a) a protected area, forest reserve, critical habitat or area of major interest under
the Nature Conservation Act 1992;:
CJ (b) a State forest or timber reserve under the Forestry Act 1959;
C1 (c}_ a marine park under the Marine Parks Act 2004;
[1 (d) a recreation area under the Recreation Area Management Act 1988;
[1 (e) a world heritage area listed under the World Heritage Convention;
Li (f) Brisbane forest park under the Brisbane Forest Park Act 1977.
(1 (ii) reconfiguring a lot if —
(1 {a) any part of the lot is situated in, or within 100m of, any of the following ~
L(i) _ a protected area, forest reserve, critical habitat or area of major
interest under the Nature Conservation Act 1992;
C(ii) a State forest or timber reserve under the Forestry Act 1959;
D1 (iii) a marine park under the Marine Parks Act 2004;
Li (iv)  arecreation area under the Recreation Area Management Act 1988;
[J (v) — aworld heritage area listed under the World Heritage Convention;
Brisbane forest park under the Brisbane Forest Park Act 1977; and
(J (b) the reconfiguration involves more than 10 lots being created, or any lot
resulting from the reconfiguring is less than 5ha;
EX] (iii) none of the above.

 

Page 10

Page 20

INTEGRATED PLANNING ACT 1997

(DAS Assessment Checklist, Version 20, 2 April 2007

SECTION 2 - ASSESSMENT IN A WILD RIVER AREA
(completion mandatory if the proposed development is located in a wild river area)

 

 

Wild River Area

tt the responsibility of the applicant to
determine if the development is proposed in
a wild river area.

Information about wild river areas including the
geographical location and position of
management areas in relation to properties, can
be accessed by contacting the Department of
Natural Resources and Water (NRW), accessing
the department's website www.nrw.qid.gov.au oF
contacting the department by email on:

wild [email protected]

Note on Referrals

Referrals for development in a wild river area
{other than for agricultural activities and anima!
husbandry activities) are not changed from the
existing referral arrangements.

Notes on development assessable
against the Wild Rivers Code

For information regarding development in a wild
fiver area, see the relevant wild river declaration
and Guide 27, The relevant wild river
declaration will provide Information regarding
which types of development must be assessed
against the Wild Rivers Code, and in some
cases which types of development are exempt
from wild river requirements.

The notes on development assessable against
the Wild Rivers Code in this section of the
checklist provide some guidance however this
may vary between wild river areas, The relevant
declaration will provide the information applying
to each wild river area.

Applications for some new developments will not
be accepted if the proposed development is in a
high preservation area (HPA). Most applications
for development activities which may be made
including those in a preservation area (PA), must
be assessed against and must comply with the
Wild Rivers Code where indicated in a relevant
wild river declaration.

 

1.

Which wild river area is the development proposed in?
NIA

 

 

 

 

The proposed development is to be located in: (tick the applicable box/es)
(_] i) a high preservation area (HPA);

(ii) a preservation area (PA) ;

(J iti) a wild river floodplain management area (FMA);

(J iw) a wild river nominated waterway;

(_] v) a designated urban area (DUA).

 

Environmentally relevant activities
(ERAs) in a designated urban area

ifyou answered YES, your application for an
ERA is exempt from any wild river requirements
and provided there are no other aspects of this
development that require assessment against
wild rivers, you do not need to complete the
temaining questions in Section 2.

Ifyou answered NO to Q2, please complete the
remaining questions in Section 2.

Does the proposed development only involve any of the following environmentally relevant
activities (ERAs) in a designated urban area (as mapped in the relevant wild river declaration)?
i) An ERA 28 or ERA 14; or

ii) Alevel 2 ERA except ERA 1, 2, 3, 4, 20, 22 or 59.
NO O YES (ensure you have completed Part G of Form 1)

 

Clearing native vegetation

If YES, there are a limited number of purposes
for which an apptication to clear native
vegetation may be accepted in a HPA. Sea
Guide 27 for a list of relevant purposes for
which an application may be made in a HPA.

If YES and you ticked Q4 box j} the application
may be made and is assessable against the Wild
Rivers Code. If YES and you ticked Q4 box ii)
the application will not be accepted.

Note: If clearing native vegetation is ina PA,
there are no wild river requirements and
provided there are no other aspects of this
development where wild river requirements
apply, do not complete the remaining questions
in Section 2.

 

ls the application operational work for clearing native vegetation in a HPA?
XK) NO | YES (ensure you have completed Part J of Form 1)

If YES, is the clearing?

(1 }) clearing regrowth (as defined in the Vegetation Management Act 1999) in a registered
area of agriculture in a HPA (see Guide 27); or

(_] ii) in a HPA outside a registered area of agriculture?

Page 11

Page 21

INTEGRATED PLANNING ACT 1997

Works in tidal areas, coastal
management districts and fish habitat
areas

if you answered YES to Q5, and ticked any
boxes in Q6), your application is required to be
assessed against and must comply with the Wild
Rivers Code.

Ifyou answered YES to Q5 and ticked box i) in
Q6, your application is required to be referred to
the EPA.

Note: If specified works are proposed in a local
government area, it is prescribed tidal work — the
relevant local government will be the
assessment manager with the EPA as a
concurrence agency

Ifyou answered YES to Q5, and ticked box ii) or
if) in Q6, your application requires referral to
OPIF.
lf you answered NO to Q5 and ticked box j) in
Q6, the application will not be accepted.

If you answered NO to Q5, ticked box ii) in Q6
and the development is necessary to install
authorised works or infrastructure where a
development permit is not required, or if a
required permit is held, the application must be
assessed against and must comply with the Wild
Rivers Code. Applications for purposes other
than specified works or as described above will
not be accepted.

Ht you answered NO at Q5 and ticked box iii) in
Q6, the application may be made if the works are
in aPA. These applications must be assessed
against and must comply with the Wild Rivers
Code. The application will not be accepted if the
development is proposed to be located in a HPA,

For more information about specified works refer
to Guide 27

Residential, commercial or industrial
development

Ifyou answered YES to Q7, your application is
Not subject to wild river requirements, Provided
there are no other aspects af this development
that require assessment against the relevant wild
river declaration or Wild Rivers Code, you do not
need to complete the remaining questions in
Section 2,

If you answered NO to Q7 and ticked either box
\) or ii} in Q8, the assessing agency Is the
televant local government. The application must
be assessed against and must comply with the
Wild Rivers Code.

IDAS Assessment Checklist, Version 20, 2 April 2007

Is the development for specified works? (see definition in the Wild Rivers Act 2005 and Guide 27-
Development in a wild river area)

NO [J yYes

The application is for one or more of the following:

OO i) Operational works that is tidal works or works in a coastal management district (ensure you
have completed Part M and/or Part P of Form 1); OF

(ii) Operational works for the removal, destruction or damage of marine plants (ensure you have
completed Part O2 of Form 1); or

oO iii) Building or operational works in a fish habitat area (ensure you have completed Part O2 of Form 1).

Is the application for residential, commercial or industrial development in a designated urban

area?
[No Clyes

If NO, does the application for residential, commercial or industrial development involve:

[_Ji) a material change of use made assessable in a local government planning scheme
(ensure you have completed Part D of Form 1); or

{_Jii) operational works associated with reconfiguring a lot (ensure you have completed Part F
of Form 1).

 

Animal husbandry activities

If you answered YES to Q9 your application
Tequires assessment against and must comply
with the Wild Rivers Code.

The assessing agency is NRW.

Note: Applications for animal husbandry
activities will not be accepted if praposed in a
HPA. For more details and a definition of animal
husbandry activities see the Wild Rivers Act
20085 and refer to Guide 27.

Does the application involve a material change of use for animal husbandry activities (as defined
under the Wild Rivers Act 2005) in a PA?

—XJ No

OO YES (ensure you have completed Part R of Form 1)

 

 

Agricultural activities

If you answered YES to Q10, your application
fequires assessment against and must comply
with the Wild Rivers Code.

The assessing agency is NRW.

Note: Applications for agricultural activities will
not be accepted if proposed in a HPA. For more
details and a definition of agricultural activities
see the Wild Rivers Act 2005 and refer to Guide
27,

The production of fodder In a PA, and pasture
improvement using low impact soil disturbance
techniques is not an agricultural activity as
defined under the Wild Rivers Act 2005. For
more information see Guide 27.

 

10.

 

Does the application involve agricultural activities (as defined under the Wild Rivers Act 2005) in
aPA?

XI NO

If YES is the application for:
(Ji) a material change of use; or
(J ii) operational works.

CJ YES (ensure you have completed Part Q of Form 1)

Page 12

Page 22

INTEGRATEO PLANNING ACT 1997
Works that take overland flow water

The retevant wild river declaration will state
works that take overland flow water are either
self assessable of assessable, of are exempt
from wild river requirements.

Hyou ticked Q13 i), your application must be
assessed by NRW against the Wild Rivers Code
and must comply with the code.

Hyou ticked Q13 i) an application is not required
to be made however the works must comply with
the relevant self-assessable section of the Wild
Rivers Code, otherwise the works become
assessable development for which an application
is required and must be assessed by NRW
against the relevant part of the Wild Rivers Code
and must comply with the code.

if you ticked Q13 iii) your application is not
Subject to wild river requirements.

Applications for development that is other than
that stated to be assessable, self-assessable or
exempt will not be accepted.

13,

{DAS Assessment Checklist, Version 20, 2 April 2007
Does the application involve works that take overland flow water in a HPA or an FMA?

[no [1 YES (ensure you have completed Part Ks of Form 1}

If YES, is the application for works stated in the relevant wild river declaration to be?
(J i) assessable works

(J ii) self-assessable works

(J iii) exempt works

 

Works that interfere with overland
flow water

The relevant wild river dectaration will state
works that interfere with overland flow water that
are either self assessable, assessable or exempt
from wild river requirements.

If you ticked Q15 i), your application must be
assessed by NRW against the Wild Rivers Code
and must comply with the code.

if you ticked Q15 if) an application is nat required
to be made however the works must comply with
the retevant self-assessable section of the Wild
Rivers Code, otherwise the works become
assessable development for which an application
is required and must be assessed by NRW
against the relevant part of the Wild Rivers Code
and must comply with the code.

Ifyou ticked Q15 iii) your application is not
subject to wild river requirements.

Apptications for development that is other than
that stated to be assessable, self-assessable or
exempt will not be accepted.

14.

Does the application involve works that interfere with overland flow water in a FMA?

[XJ] No

If YES, is the application for works stated in the relevant wild rivers declaration to be?
(11) assessable works

(CJ ii) self-assessable works

(7 ii) exempt works

(J YES (ensure you have completed Part Kio of Form 1)

 

 

Waterway barrier works

Applications for building or raising waterway
barrier works in a HPA will not be accepted,
Ifyou answered YES to Q16, your application
must be assessed by DPIF against the Wild
Rivers Code and must comply with the code.

16.

Does the application involve building or raising waterway barrier works in a PA?
NO C YES (ensure you have completed Part Os of Form 1)

 

 

Aquaculture (non ERA)

Applications for aquaculture in a HPA will not be
accepted.

If you answered YES to Q17, your application
Must be assessed by DPIF against the Wild
Rivers Code and must comply with the code.

Does the application involve aquaculture in a PA?

KJ] No

J YES (ensure you have completed Part O; of Form 1}

 

Works that interfere with water in a
watercourse

Note: If the development is proposed in a HPA,
applications for all works that interfere with water
in a watercourse (Including dams or weirs,
steam realignment or stream diversion) will not
be accepted.

Ina PA, applications for instream dams and
weirs may be accepted in nominated waterways.
If you ticked box ii) in Q19, your application will
not be accepted.

Note: Operational works outside a HPA or
nominated waterway are not subject to wild
river requirements.

More information and locations of nominated
waterways is available by contact NRW,
accessing the depariment's website
www.nrw.qld.gov.au or contacting the
department by email an:

wild [email protected] the application involve operational works that interfere with water in a watercourse that is in
a nominated waterway in a PA?

No

If YES,
(J i) The application is for an instream dam or weir: or

oO i) The application is for operational works that interfere with water in a watercourse, and is
for development other than a dam or weir.

YES (ensure you have completed the relevant Part K of Form 1)

Page 13

Page 23

INTEGRATED PLANNING ACT 1997
Environmentally relevant activities

Most applications for an ERA in a HPA will net
be accepted. Applications which may be made
require referral to the EPA. The assessment of
some ERAs is assessed by NRW, others have
been devotved to DPIF, NRW or delegated
local government (see EPA website for more
information on devolved ERAs)

Ifyou answered NO to Q20 you do not need to
complete Qs 21-24.

tf you answered YES to Q20 and the
development is in a PA, your application must be
assessed by the administering authority!
against the Wild Rivers Code and must comply
with the code, unless the proposal is for
development where an application will not be
accepted, or is exempt from wild river
requirements (see Q2), You will be able to
determine if an application will not be accepted
for the development by answering Q21 - Q24.

If you answered NO to Q21, you do not need to
complete 22. If you answered YES to Q21 you
are required to complete Q22.

If you answered NO to Q22, the application will
not be accepted. If you answered YES to Q22,
the application must be assessed by NRW
against the Wild Rivers Code and must comply
with the code.

If you answered NO to Q23 and the development’
is proposed in the HPA the application will not be
accepted. if you answered YES to 023, the
application must be assessed by the EPA or
NRW (as prescribed in schedule 8A of the IPA)
against the Wild Rivers Code and must comply
with the code.

If you answered YES to Q24 the application will
not be accepted. If you answered NO to Q24,
your application must be assessed by NRW
against the Wild Rivers Code and must comply
with the code.

Exempt ERAs in a designated urban
area

If the development is proposed in a designated
urban area there may be no wild river
requirements. See Section 2 Q2.

Note: All applications that can be accepted must
be assessed against and must comply with the
Wild Rivers Code (other than exempt ERAs in a
designated urban area).

20.

22.

IDAS Assessment Checklist, Version 20, 2 April 2007
Does the application involve an ERA?

4] NO O YES (ensure you have completed Part G of Form1}

Is the application for an ERA 20 instream?

i] No Clyes

ls a quarry allocation notice held for the proposed ERA 20 instream?

BJ no Dyes

Does the application involve any of the following in a HPA?

i) a level 2 ERA 11, (and is for specified works or a residential complex)

ii) an ERA 19 (dredging)

il) Low impact ERA 20 (out of stream) for specified works or a residential complex (as defined in
the Wild Rivers Act 2005, and Environmental Protection Act 1994)

iv) an ERA 22 (out of stream)

XJ No CyYes
Is the proposed development for ERA 20 (out of stream) and;
— inaFMA; and

— not low impact; and
— Not for a residential complex in the area, or for specified works.

No Dyes

 

Documentation

If you answered NO to Q25, your application
may be subject to an information request and
processing of the application may be delayed.

 

25.

Has documentation been included with the application describing how the applicant proposes to
comply with the mandatory requirements, required outcomes, and/ or performance requirements
as set out in the relevant part/s of the Wild Rivers Code?

NO Clyes

2 The administering authority may be either the EPA, or if devolved or delegated, the local goverment, DPIF or NRW.

Page 14

Page 24

 

 

INTEGRATED PLANNING ACT 1997 IDAS Assessment Checklist, Version 20, 2 April 2007

SECTION 3 - BUILDING REFERRALS (completion not mandatory)

Below is a list of the referrals that can apply to an application for building work assessable against the Building Regulation 2006. This section of the IDAS
Assessment Checklist is provided for advice only. This section of the IDAS Assessment Checklist is not required to be completed and lodged with an
application for building work assessable against the Building Regulation 2006 only.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Special fire services - generally 1. An application may trigger referral to Qld Fire and Rescue Services as an advice agency if the building work

For more information go to schedule 2 table 1 and tequires special fire services mentioned in schedule 2A part 1 of the Integrated Planning Regulation 1998

schedule 2A of the IP Regulation. (IP Regulation) or includes an alternative solution assessed against the performance requirements of the

Assessment period 15 days. No response is a Building Code of Australia.

deemed refusal.

Fire safety for budget accommodation {2. An application may trigger referral to Qld Fire and Rescue Services as an advice agency if the building work

For more information go to schedule 2 of the IP the subject of the application requires the installation of a fire safety system for a budget accommodation

Regulation building.

Spray painting 3. An application may trigger referral to the Department of Industrial Relations (DIR) as a concurrence agency

For more information go to schedule 2 of the IP if the application involves a workplace incorporating spray painting.

Regulation

Retail meat premises 4. An application may trigger referral to Safe Food Qld as a concurrence agency if the application involves a

For more information go to schedule 2 of the IP retail meat premises.

Regulation

Private health facilities 5. _ An application may trigger referral to the Department of Health as a concurrence agency if the application

For more information go to schedule 2 of the IP. involves a private health facility.

Regulation

Workplace area less than 2.3m? 6. An application may trigger referral to the Department of Industrial Relations (DIR) as an advice agency if the

For mora information go to schedule 2 of the IP application involves a work place area less that 2.3m2.

Regulation

Land contiguous to a State-controlled |7. An application may trigger referral to the Department of Main Roads as a concurrence agency or advice

road agency if the application involves land contiguous to a State-controlled road.

For more information go to schedule 2 of the iP

Regulation

Pastoral workers accommodation 8. An application may trigger referral to the Department of Industrial Relations (DIR) as a concurrence agency

For more information go to schedule 2 of the iP if the application involves pastoral workers accommodation.

Regulation

Child care centre 9. An application may trigger referral to the Department of Communities as a concurrence agency if the

For mora information go to schedule 2 of the (P application involves a childcare centre.

Regulation

Coastal development 10. An application may trigger referral to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) as a concurrence agency

For more information go to schedule 2 of the (P if the application involves land completely or partly seaward of a coastal building line22,

Regulation

Heritage 11. An application may trigger referral to the Heritage Council as a concurrence agency if the application

For more information go to schedule 2 of the iP involves a heritage registered place.

Reguiation

Fisheries matters 12. An application may trigger referral to the Department of Primary Industries and Fisheries (DPI&F) as a

For more information go to schedule 2 of the iP concurrence agency if the application involves assessable building work in a declared fish habitat area; or

Regulation as an advice agency if the application involves assessable building work on land that adjoins a declared fish
habitat area.

{integration of land use and public 13. An application may trigger referral to Queensland Transport as a concurrence agency if the application

transport involves existing or future public transport corridors, or airport operational airspace?3,

For more information go to schedule 2 of the IP

Regulation

Railway safety and efficiency 14. An application may trigger referral to Queensland Transport as a concurrence agency if the application

For more information go to schedule 2 of the IP involves future railway land.

Regulation

 

 

 

NOTE: CONCURRENCE AGENCY ASSESSMENT PERIODS

The local government, as the concurrence agency, is required to assess and provide a response for the following building applications within a prescribed
time. For applications retating to design and siting (17, 18 & 19), and building work for removal or rebuilding (23), the assessment period is 5 days. For all
other applications the assessment period is 15 days. If no response is received from the local goverment for an application, it is taken to be a deemed
refusal. However for amenity and aesthetics impact of particular building work for a single detached class 1a or class 10 building or structure (15), no
Tesponse is taken to be a deemed approval.

 

Amenity and aesthetic impact of 15. An application will trigger a referral to the local government if it is :

particular building work for single * fora single detached class 1 building or class 10 structure; and

detached class 1 building or class 10 the local government has declared by resolution the following:

building or structure — the appearance of the building or structure will have an extremely adverse impact on the amenity of
For more information go to schedule 2 table 1 of the the locality; and

LP Requlatlon, . | — the appearance of the building or structure would be in extreme conflict with the character of the
Assessment period 15 days. No response is a locality

deemed approval. .

 

 

 

2 Coastal building lines are prescribed under the Coastat Protection and Management Act 1995.
2 Operational airspace is as defined in State Planning Policy 1/02 “Development in the Vicinity of Certain Airports and Aviation Facilities”.

Page 15

Page 25

INTEGRATED PLANNING ACT 1997

IDAS Assessment Checklist, Version 20, 2 April 2007

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Whether particular buildings may be |16. An application to use an existing building that is not class 1, 2, 3 or 4 for residential purposes may trigger a

occupied for residential purposes referral to the local government as the concurrence agency.

For more information go to schedule 2 table 1 of the

IP Requlation.

Assessment period 15 days. No response Is a

deemed refusal.

Design and siting 17. An application may trigger referral to the local government as the concurrence agency if the building work

For more information go to schedule 2 table 1 of the does not comply with the performance criteria of parts 11 and 12 of the Queensland Development Code.

IP Reaulation. 18. An application may trigger referral to the local government as the concurrence agency if the building work

Assessment period 5 days. No response is a does not comply with the qualitative statement for building clearance and site cover.

deemed refusal, 19. An application may trigger referral to the local government as the concurrence agency if the building work
does not comply with the qualitative statement for performance criteria 4, 5, 7, 8 or 9 of the Queensland
Development Code, part 11 or 12.

Fire safety in particular budget 20. An application may trigger referral to the local government as the concurrence agency to determine the

accommodation buildings building will comply with the fire safety standard under the Building Act 1975 when the building work has

For more information go to schedule 2 table 1 of the been completed.

IP Requtlation,

Assessment period 15 days. No response is a

deemed refusal,

Higher risk personal appearance 21. An application may trigger referral to the local government as the concurrence agency to determine if the

services building work

For more information go to schedule 2 table 1 of the ® — complies with the performance criteria of the Queensland Development code part 15; and

IP Regulation and the QOC part 15. ¢ — the work does not comply with an acceptable solution stated in the part.

Assessment period 15 days, No response is a

deemed refusal,

Building work for residential service | 22. An application for building work for premises in which residential care service under the Residential

For mora information go to schedule 2 table 1 of the Services (Accreditation) Act 2002, section 4, is conducted, or is proposed to be conducted, wilt trigger

(P Regulation and the QDC part 20. referral to the local government as the concurrence agency.

Assessment period 15 days. No response is a

deemed refusal.

Building work for removal or 23. An application for the removal and/or rebuilding at another site of a building or other structure, will trigger

rebuilding referral to the local government as the concurrence agency.

For more information go to schedule 2 table 1 of the

IP Regulation,

Assessment period 5 days. No response is a

deemed refusal.

Building work for rainwater tank in |24, An application may trigger referral to the local government as the concurrence agency to determine if the

designated rainwater tank area

For more information go to schedule 2 table 1 of the
IP Regulation and the QDC part 25.

Assessment period 15 days. No response is a
deemed refusal.

 

building work or structure complies with the relevant performance criteria if -

¢ Under the Building Regulation 2006, a rainwater tank is proposed to be installed as part of relevant
building work, in a designated rainwater tank area; and

¢ Under the Queensland Development Code, part 25, the rainwater tank does not include an acceptable
solution for a relevant performance criteria.

 

Page 16

 

Page 26

|

elstra DALY

INTERNATIONAL

Our Reference No: 4002972.01

Telstra Reference No: Noosa South

30 October 2007

General Manager
C/: Planning Department
Noosa Shire Council

PO Box 14] ™ 1 NOV 2007
Tewantin Qld 4565 Noosa

SHIRE CoUNC)L

For the attention of: Neil Blamey

 

Dear Sir

Development Application —- Proposed Mobile Phone Base Station
Land off Noosa Springs Drive, Noosa Heads, Qld 4567 (Lot 15 SP177649)

| refer to the attached Development Application for a new Mobile Phone Base
Station, being a 30m monopole with 6 no. antennas turret mounted and 1 no.
equipment shelter located on land off Land off Noosa Springs Drive, Noosa Heads,
Qld 4567 (Lot 15 SP177649)

Telstra is proposing a new telecommunications facility in the Noosa Heads and Noosa
Springs area to improve local services on our new Next G™ Network. The Next G™
Network provides customers with all existing, essential mobile services, as well as live
video calling, video-based content services including news, finance and sports
highlights, and a high-speed, wireless internet service via the mobile phone network -
Wireless Broadband.

Telstra has carefully weighed potential options for alternative sites before lodging this
Development Applications with Council, and considers this proposal to be the most
appropriate solution to improve and expand mobile communications around Willow
Vale.

This Application has been prepared having regard for the Planning Laws and
Regulations, Noosa Plan 2006, administered by Council, that apply to the proposed
site.

As a Licensed Carrier under the Commonwealth Telecommunications Act 1997,
Telstra is also obliged to comply with the Industry Code on the Deployment of Mobile
Phone Network Infrastructure, (the Code}, in relation to this proposal. In particular,
Sections 5.1 and 5.2 of the Code relate to the adoption of a precautionary approach
to the site selection and design of a proposed new facility and are relevant to the
preparation of this Development Application.

 

DALY INTERNATIONAL Pty Ltd, A.C.N. 054 002 461
Level 3, Suite 3.02, 131 Leichhardt Street, SPRING HILL, QLD, 4000
Telephone: 07 3832 5333 Facsimile: 07 3832 5322

www.dalyinternational.com

Page 27

Celstra DALY

INTERNATIONAL
Our Reference No: 4002972.01
Telstra Reference No: Noosa South

Telstra confirms that it has applied a Precautionary Approach in selecting the
proposed site at Land off Noosa Springs Drive, Noosa Heads, Qld 4567 (Lot 15
SP177649), and in designing the proposed facility, in accordance with the Code.

If you have queries regarding the contents of our application, please do not hesitate
to contact me. Our contact details are provided below.

Telstra Attn: Stephen Bullock
C/o Daly International

Queensland Office

Suite 3.02, Level 3, Ph: (07) 3832 5333

131 Leichhardt Street Fax: (07) 3832 5322
Spring Hill QLD 4000

  

Acquisitions Team for Telstra

E-mail: mariae@dalyinternational,com.au

Enclosed: Application Fee of $8875.00
Development application forms
Planning Report (X6)}
Drawings (X5)

 

DALY INTERNATIONAL Pty Ltd, A.C.N, 054 002 461
Level 3, Suite 3.02, 131 Leichhardt Street, SPRING HILL, QLD, 4000
Telephone: 07 3832 5333 Facsimile: 07 3832 5322

www. dalyinternational.com

Page 28

   

New Telecommunications Tower on

Land off Noosa Springs Drive, Noosa Heads, Qid 4567

October 2007

PROJECT NO: 4002972.01

Daly International,

Suite 3.02,

131 Leichhardt Street,

Spring Hill, QLD 4000, Australia.
Tel: (07) 3832 5333

Fax: (07) 3832 5322

  

DALY

INTERNATIONAL

(known as Lot 15 on SP177649).
for TelStra

 

Clelstra

   

Page 29

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

OOCUMENT REVIEW SHEET

CLIENT: Telstra
PROJECT: Noosa South
TITLE: Environmental Planning Report for Noosa South
DOCUMENT REFERENCE NO: EPR 4002972.01
PROJECT MANAGER Mark Edwards FILE NO: 4002972.01
SPELL CHECK (WP OPERATOR) BY: SECTION:

Document Details Preparation & Independent Corrective Action Sent To/ Date:

Self Check

Review By:

/Approved by:

 

REVA
Initial Draft

Date

Name:

Date:

Signature:

Stephen Bullock

 

Name:

Date:

Signature:

 

Name:

Date:

Signature:

 

 

Name:

Date:

Signature:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Reviewers Comments:

 

 

Page 30

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ooo. cecccee cece cece eters ceceeeeneeecnatepeaaeeseaeerenrenssesennesesieesepsaeeen 1
] INTRODUCTION |... cece ceceeeceseeeececeeeeeesenaneeceseneeeeesesnaeeeseeaaaeeesenuaeeeesnnniaeeess 2
2 PROCESS FOR IDENTIFYING THE NEED AND PLANNING A MOBILE BASE
STATION oo... ceceecceescceeseceeenceceneeseeeneceeeessececsaeecaeeceauceseateeeceeecteeecseseesseseaeessaeenaaes 3
2.1 INTOCUCTION ooo. ceeeeecee cee ceeeceeeceeeteneeneeeeneteneeeaepesetaeesaeseerecneeseaeeeaee 3
2.2. Network requirements and Radio frequency objectives.............. 3
2.3 Process of site SEIECTION «oo... eect cere cee etree teeeeeeeeaeseaeeeeenneeetenas 4
2.4 Preferred Nominated canditate ..... ee eeeeeeneetseeeneeeeeeneeeee 6
2.5 Site GESCTIDTION oo... eeecccccccssceceseseeeecessseeeeecseneeeesscesueeesceeaseeeceeenaneeess 7
3 PROPOSAL ooo. eeeecccecesesseeesecnseecsnseeeneecenaeeeaeensaeeeneeesnaeesaneecstaeessaeeeaeeesaneeeeaees 9
4. COMMONWEALTH REGULATORY FRAMEWORK ........cccsescetcetseeneeeteenatens 10
4.1 Telecommunications ACt 1997 oo... ccc cece tee tseceeeeetneesseseeneeees 10
4.2. Telecommunications Code of Practice 1997 .....cee ec eeeeee 10
4.3 The Telecommunications (Low-impact Facilities) Determination
VOT iiccccecceceseecsstseeeseeececeecsceecaeeacsceecaceecsesessesseaseneescsseaeeececaseesacateneaeesssenas 1
4.4 The Australia Communications Industry Forum (ACIF} - Industry
Code for the Deployment of Mobile Phone Network Infrastructure...... 11
4.5 The Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation
(EPBC) ACT 1999 oii cccecccceeneesseseneescssseeaeesssesseesceseesaseesiesecsssesiersenssesnaseees 11
5 STATE PLANNING LEGISLATION AND GUIDELINES 0.00... cece eee eeetee reece 11
5.1 The Integrated Planning Act 1997 and Intgrated Planning
REQUIATION 1998 oo. eceeeceeecscceeneceeeeeseeceeeeeesnaeeeeneestaseseeeesenesteaeetennesetseeees 11
5.2. The South East Queensland Regional Plan 2005-2026...........0.66 11
5.3. Applicable State Planning Policies ........ ci cecceeeesseeeeseeeeteerensees 11
5.4 Referral AGENCIES 00.0... cceeeeceseeeeeeeeuneeeesseeuseeecesaeesseeeesaceenseescatees 11
5.5. Local Government Regulatory Framework — NOOSA PLAN
2006 oceereeececececcscecsececeseseeeescsseecnececaeecssnaceneecsscseseeassessesavereecssrsereenseersaeeees 11

Page 31

6 OTHER ENVIRONMENTAL CONSTRAINTS, OPPORTUNITIES AND

MITIGATION oo... ceceeceeenceeneeeteteneccretaeecsneeessarenseeccstacsereeeneeseeespaeecnneprsaserseates
6.) Heritage Conservation ISsueS oo... ee ececeeeceeeeeteeeesneeeteneseaneeeee
6.2 Native Title oe eee cereene ete cneeteenteeesesesesneeteeneetees
6.3 FOP AN FQUNG oe eee eet eects eee cnaaseeecnterieersepseenetennes
6.4 Site CONTAMINATION 0.0... ee cece ete teeceneeteetntetaecneetnrersetenee
6.5 VISUAL AMENITY occ ecccsseecsceeneecrseneeseeecnauseesteeeseeeseeeesaccusesensees
6.6 — Stormwater Draindge 0... eee ceeee cee eeeneeeeseeenteterentensrenenes
6.7 — Noise and Vibration EMISSIONS 0.0.0... cecneseeeneee eee teeereeeees
6.8 — Traffic, ACCESS AN POKING oo... eee esseeeeeeceteeeeeeeenneecteeeennaees
6.9 Utility SErVICES 00... ccc cececccesteeecceseseeeccsseeeeceneeesensaneeestenaeesenees
6.10 Public Health and Safety... cecscceccseessescsseersseseseescseeenseees
6.11 Statement in Relation to the removal of redundant facilities

7 CONCLUSION oo. eececeecereeneeceneeerneeeeeeeeeeseeestneesineeentesseeseneeniaeeentaas

Page 32

Telstra
MCU for Noosa South, Lot 15 on SP177649

DALY

INTERNATIONAL

 

Appendix

Appendix A - Proposed Plans

Appendix B - Section 5.1 & 5.2 Assessment
Appendix C - Noosa Plan Codes
Appendix D - Environmental Land Register
Appendix E - Regional Ecosystem Map

Appendix F — ARPANSA EME Report

 

31/10/07

Page 33

Telstra

DALY

MCU for Noosa South, Lot 15 on SP177649 INTERNATIONAL

 

 

 

Applicant:

 

 

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Proposed telecommunications facility, within an enclosed fenced off
compound area would comprise the following:-

e A30m monopole with headframe 6 no. panel antennas (each
antenna measuring 2620mm (h) x 370mm (w) x 185mm (d))}
affixed to the top of the pole; and

e Prefabricated equipment shelter (measuring 2.28m x 3.28m x
3.0m;

« Associated ancillary works including mounting methods, new
cable trays, cabling, safe access, earthing, electrical and air-
conditioning works at the proposed telecommunications
facility.

A The telecommunications facility is necessary to improve depth of

coverage and call performance to the Noosa Heads area and to
address the poor network coverage in Noosa Springs.

Property description: Lot 15 on SP177649
Physical address: Land off Noosa Springs Drive, Noosa Heads, Qld 4567

i Site area: 9.559ha with a lease area for Telstra of 66m?

Property owner: Noosa Shire Council

Planning Scheme: Noosa Plan 2006

Zoning: Open Space Conservation

Overlays: None

Proposed Use: Telecommunications Tower — infrastructure — Type 3

Impact assessable Material Change of Use application (MCU) seeking
a development permit for the installation of a Telecommunications
Tower.

Telstra Corporation Limited
C/- Daly International
Level 3

Suite 3.02

131 Leichhardt Street
Spring Hill QLD 4000

Contact Person: Stephen Bullock
Our ref: MCU Noosa South

 

31/10/07

Page 34

_ DALY

MCU for Noosa South, Lot 15 on $P177649 INTERNATIONAL

 

1 INTRODUCTION

Telstra have commissioned Daly International to prepare this Impact Assessable Material
Change of Use application (MCU}, seeking a development permit for the installation of a
new telecommunications base station on land off Noosa Springs Drive, Noosa Heads, Qid
4567 (known as Lot 15 on SP177649).

Pursuant to Chapter 3 of the Integrated Planning Act 1997 (the Act) this Planning Report
outlines an assessment of issues relevant to a Development Application for Material
Change of Use (Impact Assessable) for a telecommunication tower under the Noosa Plan
2006.

The report will demonstrate that the site has been selected on the basis that:
. the site achieves radio frequency objectives for the search area;

e the proposal would operate within the regulatory framework of Commonwealth,
State and Local Government; and

° the facility would operate within all current and relevant standards regulated by the
Australian Communications and Media Authority.

Therefore the purpose of this Environmental Planning Report is demonstrate that the
development is appropriate and justified, and therefore Council's approval of the
application is sought.

 

31/10/07 2

Page 35

om DALY

MCU for Noosa South, Lot 15 on SP177649 INTERNATIONAL

 

2 PROCESS FOR IDENTIFYING THE NEED AND PLANNING A MOBILE BASE STATION

2.1 INTRODUCTION

Mobile phone networks and mobile phone use have become an integral part of society's
and businesses every day functioning.

The mobile phone industry is rolling out a comprehensive third generation (3G) of mobile
phone technology. The new 3G network is the next step in cellular network technology
that enables the delivery of high speed data services as well as voice and messaging
services to mobile phones and other wireless products, such as personal digital assistants,
and handheld or laptop computers.

The main distinguishing feature between 2G and 3G is the increased data rates, where 3G
can be thought of as an equivalent to the internet's ‘broadband’ for your mobile phone.
3G networks can send data up to 40 times quicker than earlier digital networks, which
means that in addition to audio, graphics and text it can also send and receive video,
email, and live TV.

Telstra has released a mobile broadband vision for Australia announcing a three-year plan
for a single, super-fast national 3G mobile service {commonly known as 'NextG'}. The
Network Plan seeks to provide the means of establishing a number of new 3G mobile
telecommunication facilities across Australia in order to cater for the rapidly increasing
demand for mobile phone coverage and services.

2.2 NETWORK REQUIREMENTS AND RADIO FREQUENCY OBJECTIVES

It should be noted that the basic role and objectives of the proposed 3G sites are
somewhat different to those of the existing 2G sites. Where existing sites have laid down
the foundations of the network to primarily provide coverage for calls and basic data
transfer, the proposed site is an “infilling” area between existing sites to provide adequate
coverage and capacity handling.

The basic essential requirements for 3G sites can be considered as three-fold:

° Firstly, 3G technology utilises a higher range of the radio frequency (RF) spectrum.
Because the range of radio waves decreases as frequency increases, the
propagation of each 3G base station is smaller than other typical analogue and
digital technology sites. More 3G sites are therefore required to cover the same area
as other existing 2G sites.

° Secondly, 3G technology, due to its role of handling and processing increased data,
has a greater dependency on capacity as well as coverage. Greater numbers of
base stations are therefore required to provide additional capacity and to facilitate
interdependency and sharing capabilities within times of high network demand.

. Thirdly, the types of areas where people will be utilising 3G technology and services
are quite different to the broad areas that people use traditional 2G call and data
services. Overseas experience from countries such as the UK indicate that the
greatest demand for 3G services is likely to initially come from small to medium
business customers. Base stations must therefore be located in close proximity to
these locations and be able to provide in-building and in-vehicle coverage.

 

31/10/07 3

Page 36

_ DALY

MCU for Noosa South, Lot 15 on $P177649 INTERNATIONAL

 

These operational factors all influence the size of the search area within which a suitable
site has to be identified.

Geographical Constraints - The geographical form of the surrounding landscape also
plays a large part in determining network design. Many of the rural landscapes comprise
of undulating landscapes including, trees and other features that obstruct radio frequency
(RF) coverage.

The number of required sites and pattern of the network design will also have to account
for the particular rural landscape.

2.3 PROCESS OF SITE SELECTION

Planning for a new mobile telecommunications base station is a complex process, which in
this case involved the following activities:

. Telstra uses a number of methods to identify those parts in the 3G network that
require improved coverage, capacity and call performance. These methods include
drive surveys, statistical measures, Computer modelling of coverage, and the
evaluation of customer complaints. When an area within the Telstra network is
identified as providing poor services and performance, investigations are
undertaken to determine the measures required to rectify theses services and
performance deficiencies. In this case Telstra has identified the rural and nearby
residential areas around Willow Vale, as requiring 3G mobile coverage, where there
is presently poor to nil coverage.

e Telstra radio frequency engineers assessed this deficiency and devised measures
necessary for rectification. The first stage of the process was to consider if the
deficiency can be improved through the optimisation of the existing network
hardware to avoid the deployment of additional infrastructure. However if
optimisation can not deliver a satisfactory outcome, the deployment of a new site is
considered. The initial research undertaken is used to define the scope of the
network deficiency and the performance objective of the proposed new facility. In
this instance, the radio frequency engineer determined that a new site
(telecommunication tower) is required.

e Telstra identified an area where a telecommunications facility would be most
required (a "search ring") and undertakes a preliminary investigation with the
relevant planning/environmental and property consultants, RF engineers and
designer of this search ring to identify possible locations or options for the facility.

Whilst the operational and geographical aspects of deploying new mobile base
stations are primary factors, there are many other critical issues that have to be
effectively resolved in parallel that also influence network design.

Some of the issues which need to be considered are visual amenity, co-location, the
availability and suitability of land and a willing site provider, occupational health
and safety, construction issues - structural and loading feasibility, access for

 

31/10/07 4

Page 37

on DALY

MCU for Noosa South, Lot 15 on $P177649 INTERNATIONAL

maintenance purposes, topographical constraints, legislative policy constraints,
environmental impacts, and cost implications.

The number, type and height of facilities required to complete the 3G network are
largely determined by the above operational, geographical and other factors
discussed that influence final network design. These compounded factors often
severely restrict the available search area within which a facility can be established.

Comments: In this instance, while there are existing Telstra mobile telecommunications
facilities in the surrounding areas, the technical requirements of this facility resulted in a
small "search ring". One of the major coverage objectives for this site is to provide
improved coverage to Noosa Springs and surrounding area.

ve SWE \y é re "eR q

 

oN
By,
e
2
ee
Figure 2.1 - Location of Discounted Options.
Sites that were considered include the following:
° 1. Greenfield site at Water Treatment Works, Wallum Lane - This candidate is a

“Greenfield” site, located on land at a Water Treatment works. This site is within a
rural type area. This proposal would involve the erection of a 30m high facility to
achieve radio frequency objectives above the surrounding tree canopy for the
search area. This site has been discounted as much of the site has underground
services and the land owner will not allow building to take place over these
underground services.

° 2. Greenfield site on land off Wallum Lane - This candidate is a "Greenfield” site,
located off Ruffles Road/Wallum Lane. This site is within a rural area. This proposal
would involve the erection of a 35m high facility to achieve radio frequency
objectives for the search area. This site was in a lower location than the preferred
option, therefore a 35m mast would be required. This site has been discounted as

 

31/10/07 5

Page 38

_ DALY

MCU for Noosa South, Lot 15 on SP177649 INTERNATIONAL

 

much of the site has underground services and the land owner does not want
building to take place over these underground services.

. 3. Existing Communications Tower, Noosa Heads Police Station, Langura Street - The
proposal would involve the installation of antennas on an existing communications
tower at a located next to the courthouse and police station. The site is located in
close to the built up area and is adjacent to a retirement home. The site has been
discounted as it is too far form the target area (Noosa Springs) to provide the
required network coverage.

° 4. Existing Structure - Tower at Noosa Heads Fire Station, Langura Street - The
proposal would involve the installation of antennas on the rescue training tower. The
site is opposite the police station and courthouse and is located in an elevated
position. The site has been discounted as it is too close to an existing Telstra facility
and is also too far from the target area to provide the required network coverage.

Operators are committed where practically possible to locate antennas and other
telecommunication equipment on existing towers and _— structures where
telecommunications equipment already exists. A search of the area revealed that there
are no existing telecommunications in the area.

2.4 PREFERRED NOMINATED CANDITATE

A preferred nominated candidate, based on radio frequency, planning/environmental
issues, engineering criteria and real estate considerations as mentioned in Section 2.3
(bullet point 1) is then selected. In this instance, the Greenfield on land off Noosa Springs
Drive, Noosa Springs was selected as the preferred nominated candidate. This proposal
would involve the erection of a 30m high facility to achieve radio frequency objectives for
the target area. Other criteria in favour of this site:

° It is situated in an rural area, in the middle of the search ring;

. It is within dense woodland providing good screening;

° the site is an elevated location providing wider coverage;

. the site will not require the removal of any vegetation;

e the proposal will not restrict other development on the property; and
. the property owner is in favour of the proposed facility.

Daly International, as planning and site acquisition consultants to Telstra, then undertook a
detailed assessment of the preferred candidate. This involved an investigation of the
compliance of the proposed facility with the relevant processes and objectives of the
applicable Commonwealth, State and Local Government planning and environmental
legislation, policies, standards and guidelines. It also involved an investigation of the
possible impacts of the proposed facility on areas potentially affected by the proposal.

 

31/10/07 6

Page 39

_ DALY

MCU for Noosa South, Lot 15 on $P177649 INTERNATIONAL

 

2.5 SITE DESCRIPTION

The site is located in the middie of a vegetated parcel of land which was formally used by
Council as an informal tip and storage area. The surrounding land uses are a mixture of
residential and other public utility land uses. According to the Noosa Plan Planning
Scheme 2006, the Noosa Head {Zone Map ZMé6) land zoning in and around the subject site
is classed as Open Space Conservation.

The surrounding land uses forms an open space area, with the residential area of Noosa
Heads to the north and west of the subject site. South of the subject site beyond the
recently formed Eenie Creek Road, is a waste water treatment works, which adjoins Noosa
Springs Golf Course.

Noosa Council owns Lot 15 on SP177649, which is currently zoned as “Open Space
Conservation" on an area of open land which was previously used for storage and deposit
of inert Council waste. See Figure 2.3 for an aerial photo of the site and surrounding area.
Noosa Council has stipulated that Telstra must try where possible not to remove or
damage any trees or other vegetation.

The site for the proposed development is a 66m? leased area, on a 9.559ha lot that is
located off Leslie Drive and Noosa Springs Drive. The telecommunication tower lease area
is located in the centre of the property, approximately 190m to the closest residential
property. See Figure 2.2 Locality Plan, for a map showing the location of the site.

Figure 2.2: Site Location Plan

 

  
   

 

 

 

 

T: gl Tiina 1 Be I
ae]
ne SF. lies
L/S oN
gh S\N
/ a \ \
\ \
%
“genie ceeek Rd -
ie
\
\
a
31/10/07 7

Page 40

DALY

Telstra

INTERNATIONAL

MCU for Noosa South, Lot 15 on SP177649

 

Figure 2.3: Aerial View of Site

4
&

 

 

31/10/07

Page 41

os DALY

MCU for Noosa South, Lot 15 on $P177649 7 INTERNATIONAL
3. PROPOSAL

Infrastructure: Proposed telecommunication facility, within an enclosed fenced off
compound area would comprise the following:-

. A new 30m monopole with a headframe mount and 6 no. panel antennas (each
antenna measuring 2620mm (h) x 370mm (w) x 185mm (d)} affixed to the top of the
pole; and

. Prefabricated equipment shelter (measuring {2.28m x 3.28m x 3.0m).

Associated ancillary works including mounting methods, new cable trays, cabling, safe
access, earthing, electrical and air-conditioning works at the proposed
telecommunications facility. Refer to Appendix A - Proposed Plans.

Utility service details: Power will be sourced from the existing power supply on Leslie Road
and will run up the existing track in a shallow trench. Refer to Facility Drawings in Appendix
A.

Access and parking details: Access to the site for construction and servicing the site will be
gained via an existing track off Leslie Road as highlighted on drawing no. Q107632. An
assessment of the site access has concluded that no trees will need to be removed to
improve or form the access track. In relation to parking it is considered that there Is
sufficient car parking space on the site.

There is adequate room for parking of construction vehicles on site. In the operational
phase, maintenance technicians will occasionally need to gain access to the site.
However, given the tow demand for maintenance, dedicated car parking spaces are not
required.

Installation details: A total construction period of approximately four weeks is anticipated
(depending on the weather conditions). Construction activities will involve site preparation
such as field testing, excavation and foundations, tower construction, shelter construction
antenna installation, fencing and testing of equipment.

Maintenance details: The proposed telecommunications facility is self-contained and
operates on a continuous unstaffed basis. Once operational, and integrated within the
mobile network, the base station typically requires infrequent maintenance inspections {up
to 4 visits per year on average).

 

31/10/07 9

Page 42

os DALY

MCU for Noosa South, Lot 15 on SP177649 INTERNATIONAL

 

4 COMMONWEALTH REGULATORY FRAMEWORK

As a licensed telecommunications carrier, Telstra must operate under the provisions of the
Telecommunications Act 1997, and the following supporting legislation
Telecommunications Code of Practice 1997, Telecommunications (Low-impact Facilities)
Determination 1997 (as amended) and the Australia Communications Indusiry Forum
(ACIF} - Industry Code for the Deployment of Mobile Phone Network Infrastructure.

4.1 TELECOMMUNICATIONS ACT 1997

The Telecommunications Act 1997 {the Act) is the principal Act that governs the activities
of telecommunication carriers. The aim of the Telecommunications Act 1997 is to provide a
regulatory framework that promotes:

fa} “the long-term interests of end users of carriage services or of services provided by
means of carriage services; and

(b} the efficiency and international competitiveness of the — Australian
Telecommunications Industry.”

Schedule 3 of the Act sets out the powers and immunities of telecommunication carriers.
The principal powers of telecommunications carriers without obtaining State and Territory
laws are:

. The power to inspect land for the purpose of determining whether fhe land is
suitable for the carriers purposes;

e The installation of specified facilities, including low-impact facilities; and

° The power to maintain a facility that is situated on the land.

In exercising Powers under this part Telstra must comply with certain conditions including:

° Doing as little damage as possible:

. Acting in accordance with good engineering practice and complying with
recognised industry standards;

° Taking reasonable steps to restore the land and to protect the environment; and

. Giving notice to the owner of the land.

Comment: The proposed installation can not be considered as “low-impact facility" and is
therefore subject to the provisions of the Integrated Planning Act 1997 and accordingly,
the provisions of Noosa Plan 2006.

4.2 TELECOMMUNICATIONS CODE OF PRACTICE 1997

Under the Telecommunications Act 1997 the Government established the
Telecommunications Code of Practice 1997, which sets out the conditions under which a
carrier must operate.

 

31/10/07 10

Page 43

os DALY

MCU for Noosa South, Lot 15 on SP177649 INTERNATIONAL

 

The Code of Practice sets out the obligations on telecommunications carriers when
undertaking activities such as inspecting land, installing facilities and maintaining facilities.
In particular, Clause 3.13 of the Code directs felecommunications carriers to take all
reasonable steps to ascertain whether any existing facility of another telecommunication
carrier or a ‘Public Utility’ is available for co-location, when proposing fo install a new
facility.

Also, section 2.11 of the Telecommunications Code of Practice 1997 sets out the design,
planning and installation requirements for the carriers to ensure the installation of facilities is
in accordance with industry 'best practice’. This is required to:

. minimise the potential degradation of the environment and the visual amenity
associated with the facilities.” [Section 2.11(3)]

Best practice also involves the carrier complying with any relevant industry code or
standard that is registered by the Australian Communications and Media Authority
(ACMA) under Part 6 of the Act.

Comment: The siting and design of the proposal has taken place in accordance with
Section 3 (Planning and Siting) of the Australian Standard, Siting of Radiocommunications
Facilities (AS 3516.2).

In accordance with the requirements of the Code of Practice, Daly International in
conjunction with Telstra, assessed the viability of the co-location of other existing
telecommunication facilities in the search area during the site selection process. However,
no existing telecommunication facilities are located in the search area that will provide
the required radio frequency objectives. This proposal therefore, fully complies with the
Code of Practice.

43 THE TELECOMMUNICATIONS (LOW-IMPACT FACILITIES) DETERMINATION 1997

The Telecommunications (Low-impact Facilities) Determination 1997 (‘the Determination’)
identifies both the type of facilities that can be “Low-impact", and the areas in which
these facilities can be installed. The Determination specifies when a telecommunication
carrier can enter land and install a low- impact telecommunication facility without seeking
approval under State and Territory laws. The Determination also ensures that such
installations are subject to the processes for negotiation and dispute resolution set out in
the Telecommunications Code of Practice 1997.

Where a facility is not defined as "low-impact", it is subject to State and Territory planning
laws and regulations.

Comments: In this instance, the current proposal is not defined as a low-impact facility and
therefore it is subject to State laws and the provisions of the Noosa Plan 2006. This is
because the proposed Telstra facility does not comply with Part 3 —- Low impact Facilities of
the Determination.

 

31/10/07 1

Page 44

on DALY

MCU for Noosa South, Lot 15 on SP177649 INTERNATIONAL

 

4.4 THE AUSTRALIA COMMUNICATIONS INDUSTRY FORUM (ACIF) - INDUSTRY CODE FOR
THE DEPLOYMENT OF MOBILE PHONE NETWORK INFRASTRUCTURE

The Australian Communications Industry Forum (ACIF) Industry Code is a mandatory code
developed by the operators and ratified by the ACMA. The Code provides for greater
transparency and accountability of carriers' activities through the publication of network
information on an internet based National Site Archive (NSA) and increased public
consultation on individual sites.

The general objectives of the code are:

a) To apply a Precautionary Approach to the deployment of radiocommunications
infrastructure;

b) To provide best practice processes for demonstrating compliance with relevant
exposure limits and the protection of the public:

c} To ensure relevant stakeholders are informed and consulted before
radiocommunications infrastructure is constructed;

d) To specify standards for consultation, information availability and presentation;

e) To consider the impact on the well being of the community, physical or otherwise, of
radiocommunications infrastructure; and

f) To ensure Council and community views are incorporated into the
radiocommunications infrastructure site selection.

Section 5.1 of the Code requires that a carrier must have written procedures for site
selection for radiocommunications infrastructure and to adopt a precautionary approach
to the design and siting of facilities. In particular, the Code requires the following matters to
be taken into account when designing and siting radiocommunications infrastructure:

a) Reasonable service objectives of the carrier including:
i) the area the planned service must cover,
ii) power levels needed to provide quality of service;
ii) the amount of usage the planned service must handle;

b) Minimisation of electromagnetic energy (EME) exposure to the public;

c) The likelinood of an area being a community sensitive location (Examples of sites
which sometimes have been considered to be sensitive include residential areas,
childcare centres, schools, aged care centres, hospitals and regional icons);

da) The objective of avoiding community sensitive locations;

e) Relevant state and local government telecommunications planning policies;

f} The outcomes of consultation processes with Councils and communities as set out in
Section 5.5 of the Code;

g) The heritage significance (built, cultural and natural);

h) The physical characteristics of the locality including elevation and terrain;

i) The availability of jand and public utilities;

 

31/10/07 12

Page 45

_ DALY

MCU for Noosa South, Lot 15 on SP177649 INTERNATIONAL

 

j) The availability of transmission to connect the radiocommunications infrastructure
with the rest of the network, eg, line of sight for microwave transmission or fibre
connection;

k) The radiofrequency interference the planned service may cause to other services;

\) The radiofrequency interference the planned service could experience at that
location from other services or sources of radio emissions;

m} Any obligations, and opportunities, to co-locate facilities: and

n) Cost factors.

Comment: The precautionary approach ouilined in the ACIF Code has been considered
in the design of this proposal. Refer to Appendix B: Section 5.1 and 5.2 assessments.

45 THE ENVIRONMENT PROTECTION AND BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION (EPBC) ACT
1999

The Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation (EPBC) Act 1999 obliges
telecommunications carriers to consider 'matters of national environmental significance’.
Under this legislation, an action will require approval from the Minister of Environment if the
action has or is likely to have an impact on a matter of ‘national environmental
significance’.

According to the EPBC Act 1999, there are matters of national significance, which must be
considered. These matters do not apply to the proposed telecommunications facility.
Table 4.1 provides a summary of these issues and outlines compliance with the EPBC Act.

 

31/10/07 13

Page 46

Telstra
MCU for Noosa Souih, Lot 15 on SP177649

DALY

INTERNATIONAL

 

World Heritage Properties

The subject site is not listed on the World Heritage list.

 

Nationa! Heritage Places

The subject site is not listed on the National Heritage
list.

 

Ramsar Wetlands of
International Significance

The site is located within the Great Sandy Strait
RAMSAR catchments area. It is noted that the
proposed telecommunications facility will not have
any significant impact on the mentioned weiland,
when evaluating the impact according to the criteria
for significant impact on Wetlands of International
importance as per the "EPBC Act Policy Statement 1.1
Significant Impact Guidelines - Matters of National
Environmental Significance, May 2006’.

 

National Threatened species
and Ecological Communities

No native, rare or endangered species or ecological
communities would be affected by this proposal.

 

Migratory Species protected
under international agreements

No rare, native or endangered migratory species are
known to exist on site or within the immediate
surrounds.

 

Commonwealth marine
environment

The subject site is not located within or near a
Commonwealth Marine area identified as having
‘national environmental significance’.

 

Nuclear Actions

 

 

The subject site does not affect and is not located
within a nuciear zone.

 

 

31/10/07

14

 

Page 47

os DALY

MCU for Noosa South, Lot 15 on $P177649 INTERNATIONAL

 

5 STATE PLANNING LEGISLATION AND GUIDELINES

As indicated at Section 4.3, the proposed facility does not fall within the definition of the
Telecommunications (Low-impact Facilities) Determination 1997 and is therefore subject to
State and Territory Environmental Planning Instruments and regulations in addition to
Commonwealth regulatory framework.

There are several state government laws and guidelines that apply to the proposed Telstra
facility. These include:

° Integrated Planning Act 1997 and the Integrated Planning Regulation 1998;
. South East Queensland Regional Plan.

5.1 THE INTEGRATED PLANNING ACT 1997 AND INTGRATED PLANNING REGULATION
1998

The purpose of the Integrated Planning Act 1997 (IPA) (section 1.2.1) is fo seek to achieve
ecological sustainability by (a) coordinating and integrated planning at local, regional
and State levels and (b) managing the process by which development occurs and (c)
managing the effects of the development on the environment (including managing the
use of the premises).

Pursuant to Chapter 3 of the Integrated Planning Act 1997, this application has been
prepared to form part of a Impact Assessable Material Change of Use application seeking
a development permit under the Noosa Plan 2006. This application will be subject to the
Integrated Development Assessment System (Chapter 3 of IPA 1997 - IDAS).

Comment: As the proposed facility in question is not "Low-impact”, then the provisions of
the Noosa Plan 2006 apply, and this Planning Report has been compiled with the intention
of accompanying a Impact Assessable Material Change of Use Development Application
to Noosa Council seeking a development permit for a telecommunication facility at land
off Noosa Springs Drive, Noosa Heads.

3.2 THE SOUTH EAST QUEENSLAND REGIONAL PLAN 2005-2026

The South East Queensland Regional Plan 2005 - 2026 (SEQ Regional Plan) is intended to
"map out a better future for everyone living and working" in SEQ. The plan seeks to
balance the economic and environmental forces which compete in the regions through
delivering viable long term strategies. The plan includes specific policies for the region that
set out the desired regional outcomes, principles and policies to address growth
management in SEQ.

 

31/10/07 15

Page 48

oe DALY

MCU for Noosa South, Lot 15 on $P177649 INTERNATIONAL

The relevant SEQ Regional Plan policy (section 10.6 Information and communication
technologies}, principle seeks to:

"Provide affordable access to high-speed broadband telecommunications...",
and the accompanied policy:

"10.6.1 Expedite the deployment of high-speed broadband telecommunications in
SEQ...”

Compliance: This proposal is consistent with the intent of this policy as it will introduce the
new 3G network. This proposed 3G technology enables access to video and internet
services not provided with previous communications services and will improve mobile
communications within the local network, providing a direct benefit to the community and
economy in general.

This proposal aims to address the current shortfall in the latest 3G technology coverage in
Noosa Heads and Noosa Springs area.

The site is located within the Regional Landscape and Rural Production Area in the SEQ
Regional Plan 2005-2026.

The intent of the Regional Landscape and Rural Production Area is to identify “lands that
have a regional landscape, rural production or other non-urban values and protects these
areas from encroachment by inappropriate development or rural residential
development” (SEQ Regional Plan 2005-2026). The development of telecommunications
does not conflict with any other rural precinct.

5.3 APPLICABLE STATE PLANNING POLICIES

Overview: There are no applicable State Planning Policies for this development
application.

5.4 REFERRAL AGENCIES

Under Schedule 8 of the Integrated Planning Regulation 1998, this development
application will require referral as the land is registered on the Environmental Management
Register as a notifiable activity pursuant to section 374 of the Environmental Protection Act
1994,

5.5 LOCAL GOVERNMENT REGULATORY FRAMEWORK — NOOSA PLAN 2006

In addition to the Commonwealth and State government regulatory requirements, the
proposed facility is also subject to the relevant Local Government regulatory framework. In
this case the relevant Local Government regulatory framework is the IPA compliant Noosa
Plan 2006 (Planning Scheme).

 

31/10/07 16

Page 49

on DALY

MCU for Noosa South, Lot 15 on SP177649 INTERNATIONAL

 

Noosa Plan 2006 was prepared in accordance with the Integrated Planning Act 1997 (IPA),
as a framework for managing development.

Part 3 — Desired Environmental Outcomes Noosa Plan 2006 aims to produce ecologically
sustainable development outcomes by considering the influences on ecological
sustainability. Noosa Plan DEO sets out in a number of primary land uses and set out the
desirable outcomes for each use, including community implications.

It is important that each DEO had regard to another; however this development
application has made particularly consideration to part |) Infrastructure and Services.

« The proposed telecommunications facility will improve and provide high quality
mobile phone and broadband coverage to the Noosa Heads and Noosa Springs.

With regards to Community Implications of Infrastructure & Services the following points
have been considered:-

« Coastal urban residents and visitors expect a certain level of infrastructure and
servicing, which includes power, telecommunications, garbage collection, running
water and flush toilets. — The infroduction of the proposed telecommunications
facility will improve mobile coverage to the Noosa Heads area, while also provide
coverage to areas within Noosa Springs that currently experience no network
coverage.

« Broadband telecommunications infrastructure allows people to work and study
from home and access goods and services over the Internet. The introduction of a
new telecommunications facility at the subject site willimprove and expand 3G
coverage {mobile broadband}, which will have benefits to local community and
businesses.

e While telecommunication facilities are very important, towers and other
installations are not located in visually prominent locations. The location of the
proposed telecommunications tower and the specific design has been selected as
not cause and detrimental harm to the visual amenity of the area and is not
considered to be in a prominent location.

§.5.1 Application Requirements

Part 2 of the Noosa Plan 2006 defines a telecommunications facility in a Primary Use as
“Infrastructure Use". Within this Primary Use the land uses are broken down into Use Class —
of “Service & Utility’, and then divided into three “Use” types. This development
application is considered to be Type 3 - Tower.

"Type 3 Tower “

The use of premises for a tower, antennas or mast and supporting shelter or equipment, in
the provision or supply of electricity or telecommunications. The use excludes facilities
deemed to be "Low Impact Facilities” under the Telecommunication (Low Impact Facility]
Determination Act 1997, and excludes power poles. The use includes a
telecommunication tower, wind turbine, high voltage transmission lines (110kv or greater)

 

31/10/07 7

Page 50

on DALY

MCU for Noosa South, Lot 15 on SP177649 INTERNATIONAL
The area in which the subject site is situated is "Open Space Conservation" as defined in
the Noosa Heads Zone Map ZMé6 under the provisions of the Noosa Plan 2006. The
proposed Material Change of Use will be Impact Assessable according to Part 9 Noosa
Heads Locality Plan - Division 11 Open Space Conservation. This Impact Assessable
Material Change of Use application is subject to the Noosa Heads Locality Plan DEO's and
codes:

 

The applicable codes for this proposal are as follows:

Locality Plan - Part 9 Noosa Heads

Division 11 - Assessment table for the Open Space Conservation

Division 14 - Overall Outcomes for the Noosa Heads Locality

Division 15 - Specific Outcomes for the Noosa Heads Locality

Division 24 - Open Space Conservation Zone

Assessment Criteria (Use Code) - Part 14

. Division 5 — Infrastructure Use Code
5.5.2 Noosa Heads Locality Plan
Noosa Heads area is defined by a number of varied and complex areas and land uses.

The site is designated as “Open Space Conservation" as set out in the Noosa Heads Zone
Map 6.

Division 11 of the Noosa Heads Locality table expresses that any Infrastructure use would
be impact assessable, and also considered it as an inconsistent use. It is however
considered that this land use does not fairly reflect the previous activities on the land. The
land has been previously used by Council for the storage and disposal of inert material,
meaning that some land including the subject site is clear of any flora and fauna.

Part 9 — Division 14 of the Planning Scheme sets out the overall outcomes for the Noosa
Heads locality, and the solutions that have to be addressed (see Appendix C). The
proposed development has specific regards to the visual amenity of its locality and also
high regard to natural conservation issues. .

Comments: The proposed felecommunication tower will comply with the general intent of
the Noosa Heads Locality. The proposed development will not cause any undue harm to
the visual amenity of the area and by using an area that have been previous disturbed no
flora or fauna will be adversely effected. The location of the site has been selected to
provide the required network coverage will have the least amount effect on the visual
impact, as viewed from the local road network and nearby residential areas. The other
important consideration is the effect of the proposed development on the nature

 

31/10/07 18

Page 51

on DALY

MCU tor Noosa Souih, Lot 15 on SP177649 INTERNATIONAL

 

conservation in the locality. By using previously developed land and an existing access
into the site there will be not need to remove any trees or other vegetation (see Appendix
C - Codes).

5.5.3. Assessment Criteria (Use Code)

Part 14 - Division 5 sets out the assessment criteria for all general Infrastructure type
developments and also then sets out the criteria for Type 3 towers.

A search of the surrounding area reveals that there are not suitable structures in the area
that would be capable of hosting telecommunications equipment. It is considered that
the land use is rural and therefore the assessment criteria allows for a maximum height of
25m. The proposed development requires a 30m tower to provide the required network
coverage, which include Noosa Springs. Due to the topography around Noosa Springs
and the adjoining golf course there is no network coverage. The increased height will also
allow the antennas to be clear and above the surrounding trees, which also provide good
lower level screening.

Comments: It is considered that the proposed telecommunications tower generally
complies with assessment criteria for Infrastructure and sub class Type 3 Towers. The
location of the site which is set back from, housing and main roads in the area, along with
mature trees are all factors which will reduce the visual impact. Views of the site from
passing vehicles and nearby dwellings will be limited, and the structure does not affect
any of the important vistas in Noosa Heads. The additional 5m to the accepted 25m limit
will allow provide the ideal network coverage and reduce the need for Telstra to consider
telecommunication facilities in this locality. The proposed development generally complies
with this criterion. The access track to the site already exists and previous activity on the
site means that no trees or other vegetation will be affected by the proposed
development.

5.5.4 Policy 23 Telecommunication Tower:

The main purposes of the code as stated in the Noosa Plan 2006, is as follows;

a) Encourage telecommunications to only be located in areas that will not cause
impact on existing character

b) Provide site selection to assist applicants

c) Ensure that telecommunications towers meet the aims of The Noosa Plan; and

d) Provide guidance to the community

Comments: - The proposal has been assessed against the details set out in Policy 23
Telecommunication Tower. The proposed telecommunications tower has been assessed
against the criteria sets out in policy 23 and it is considered that the proposed
telecommunications tower complies with the criteria.

 

31/10/07 19

Page 52

Telstra

MCU for Noosa South, Lot 15 on SP177649

DALY

INTERNATIONAL

 

5.5.5 Overlay and Constraint Codes

Part 9 of Noosa Plan 2006 identifies through Overlay Maps constraints or issues that may
need to be addressed as part of the Development Assessment process. The table below
summaries the constraints and overlays for the proposed telecommunications facility.

Table 4.2 Overlay Maps 6.1 to 6.5

 

 

Overlays Applicable or not
Not Applicable — The subject site is not allocated within any Biodiversity area.
The subject site is tocated on a small clear area (Unallocated) and
Map 6.1- surrounded to the west by Environmental Enhancement and to east by
Biodiversity Environmental Protection. The proposal is therefore not subject to the

Biodiversity overlay code.

 

Map 6.2 - Heritage

Not Applicable — There are no Heritage sites close to site. The proposal is
therefore not subject to the Heritage overlay code.

 

Map 6.3 - Natural
Hazard Flooding
and Landslide

Not Applicable — The subject site or adjoining land is not subject to flooding
or landslides. The proposal is therefore not subject to the Natural Hazard —
Landslide and Flooding Overlay

 

Map 6.4 - Natural
Hazard Bushfire and
Acid Sulphate

Not Applicable - The subject site or adjoining land is not subject fo acid
sulphate soils or bushfire risk. The proposal is therefore not subject to the
Natural Hazard - Bushfire and Acid Sulphate

 

Map 6.5 Nature
Resources

 

 

Not Applicable - The subject site or adjoining land is not located on any
Nature Resource. The proposal is therefore not subject to the Natural
Resource overlay.

 

As can be seen from the above fable no other codes are applicable fo the proposed

development.

 

31/10/07

20

 

Page 53

oe DALY

MCU for Noosa South, Lot 15 on $P177649 INTERNATIONAL

 

6 OTHER ENVIRONMENTAL CONSTRAINTS, OPPORTUNITIES AND MITIGATION
6.1 HERITAGE CONSERVATION ISSUES

In order to determine any possible natural or cultural values of state or national
significance associated with the site, a search was conducted of the following registers:

. Register of the National Estafe (administered by the Australian Heritage Council
under the Australian Heritage Council Act 2003);

. Queensland Heritage Register (administered by the Environmental Protection
Agency under the Queensland Heritage Act 1992);

° Register of Indigenous Cultural Heritage Sites (administered by the Department of

Natural Resources and Mines under the Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Act 2003; and

The Register of the National Estate listed as Great Sandy Strait {Wetlands of International
Significance) as Matters of National Environmental Significance. It further indicated that
the proposed Telstra facility is located within 10km of the Ramsar site.

The other three searches of the Queensland Heritage Register, Indigenous Cultural
Heritage Sites Register and established that the site is not subject to nor has any
recognised cultural or natural heritage significance.

6.2 NATIVE TITLE

The area is not covered Native Title claim, there are no Native Title claims or Indigenous
Land Use Agreements over the site as it is freehold.

63 FLORA AND FAUNA

The subject site is located in a vegetated area which is characterised by tall eucalyptus
trees up to a height of 20m. The Planning Scheme zones the site as Open Space
Conservation to protect the biodiversity value of the land, and maintain the Open Space
quality of the land. The site is located on area of land that has not been zoned for Koala
Conservation in the SEQ Regional Plan; however given the small footprint of the
compound area the proposed development will not prevent the movement of wildlife
across the land.

It is understood that the site is currently been located within the proposed Girraween
Estate Nature Refuge (IUCN Category VI}. The proposed fower is however sited on an area
of land that is allocated “Public utilities - excluded”. The previous use of the land for
storage and disposal of inert waste materials allows the proposed tower and compound
area to be on land that has been previously cleared of trees and other vegetation. The
site has an existing access track and this track will also be used for the underground
services such as fibre and electricity.

 

31/10/07 21

Page 54

on DALY

MCU for Noosa South, Lot 15 on SP177649 INTERNATIONAL

 

6.4. SITECONTAMINATION

A search of the registers administered by the Environmental Protection Agency of
Queensland has established that the site is not included on either the Contaminated Land
Register (CLR). The site is included in the Environmental Management Register (EMR}, as
the site is subject to a notifiable activity pursuant to section 374 of the Environmental
Protection Act 1994. The site has been subject to operating a defence establishment or a
training area used for handling ammunition in a way that may have caused, or may
cause, remnant unexploded ordnance.

Advice has been sort regarding the above issue from Bactec SE Asia Pty Ltd (DoE
approved) who will be engaged to undertake any work that may be required in the
construction phase of the proposed development.

The proposed construction and ongoing operation telecommunication facility will not
generate any solid or liquid waste that could contaminate the site.

65 VISUAL AMENITY

In order to achieve its desired coverage in the area, Telstra needs to sufficiently elevate its
antennas above physical obstructions, including the adjacent trees. The adjacent trees
are approximately 20m in height, therefore the structure will have to be higher than the
trees to allow for the tilt on the antennas and also the potential for the trees to grow.

Telstra proposes to minimise potential impacts of the proposed facility on the visual
amenity of the site and surrounding area by locating the proposed facility within mature
trees which will screen the majority of the tower. The tower and antennas will be painted
an appropriate colour to blend into vegetated area. Views of the site are limited from the
surrounding area due to the surrounding topography and dense tree coverage close to
the site.

6.6 STORMWATER DRAINAGE

There will not be any need for a stormwater drainage system following construction of the
proposed facility, as it has a small “foot print” area. Nonetheless, the Telstra installation will
be designed to further minimise any impact upon the existing on-site drainage. The
equipment shelter will be raised on piers so as to not create an impediment that would
change stormwater flows and allow rainwater to dissipate evenly over the site compound
area.

67 NOISE AND VIBRATION EMISSIONS

Noise generated during the construction phase will be of short duration and will be in
accordance with the standards outlined in the Environmental Protection Regulation 1998
and Environmental Protection (Noise) Policy 1997.

 

31/10/07 22

Page 55

_ DALY

MCU for Noosa South, Lot 15 on SP177649 INTERNATIONAL

 

There will be some low level! noise from the on-going operation of air-conditioning
equipment associated with the equipment shelter once installed. Noise emanating from
the air-conditioning equipment would be similar to those used in domestic situations, and
will generally accord with the background noise levels given in Australian Standard AS
1055.

68 TRAFFIC, ACCESS AND PARKING

During the construction phase, a truck will be used to deliver the equipment and a crane
will be utilised to lift most of the equipment into place. Traffic impacts associated with
these vehicles will be of a short-term duration and is not anticipated to adversely impact
upon the surrounding road network.

Once the proposed Telstra facility is operational, there will be minimal traffic generated by
the site. The maintenance requirements of the proposed Telstra facility will include
maintenance activities on an “as-required”" basis. In conclusion, this development is a
minimal traffic generator and will not require on-site parking.

69 UTILITY SERVICES

There will be no adverse environmental impacts by supplying power to the site. The power
to the site will be provided from the existing power sources on off Leslie Road by cable to
the telecommunication facility. Refer to Appendix A plans.

6.10 PUBLIC HEALTH AND SAFETY

All Telstra facility installations are designed and certified by qualified professional engineers
and are in accordance with all relevant Australian Standards. This ensures that the
proposed Telstra facility does not result in any increase in the level of risk to the public.

Telstra operates the facility in compliance with the ACMA mandatory standard, for human
exposure to EME - currently the Radiocommunications {Electromagnetic Radiation -
Human Exposure} Standard 2003. Appendix F shows that the predicted EME will be 0.1% of
the ACMA mandated exposure limit.

The proposed facility will have warning/restrictive access signs aimed at preventing public
access, including a green 2.3 m high secured compound fence.

6.11 STATEMENT IN RELATION TO THE REMOVAL OF REDUNDANT FACILITIES

In the event of the Telstra facility becoming redundant to their requirements, the facility
would be removed. Telstra would ensure that the site is left in a similar condition to that
when their facility was first installed.

 

31/10/07 23

Page 56

_ DALY

MCU for Noosa South, Lot 15 on SP177649 INTERNATIONAL

 

7 CONCLUSION

The proposed telecommunication facility is located on Lot 15 on S177649, land off Noosa
Springs Drive, Noosa Heads. This proposed facility will be an integral element of the 3G
mobile digital telephone network that Telstra is establishing throughout Queensland and
the rest of Australia.

Telstra together with Daly International have undertaken an assessment of the relevant
matters as required by the Commonwealth, State and Local legislation, environmental,
technical, radio coverage and public safety requirements.

The proposed facility is considered suitable for this location for the following reasons:

. the site has been assessed as the most viable option to effectively deliver Telstra
coverage/radio frequency objectives for the search area, greatly improving access
to mobile telecommunications in the Willow Vale and surrounding areas.

° the facility will operate within the regulatory framework of Commonwealth, State
and Local Governments;
. the facility will operate within all current and relevant Standards;

. the facility is located on the site that allows a solution that is the most compatible
option available with the existing land uses in the area;

. the proposed Telstra base station facility will not have any significant adverse
environmental impact on the subject site and the surrounding area.

. the proposed pole will not detract from the existing and future anticipated use for

the site;

. the proposed facility provides a structure on which telecommunications carriers can
co-locate in the future if required; and

. the installation will provide Telstra customers with the very latest 3G mobile telephone

services, coverage and capacity within the residential and commercial areas in
Noosa Heads and Noosa Springs Area.

It is recommended that the Noosa Council approve the application and grant a
Development Permit for a Material Change of Use (telecommunication facility) generally
in accordance with the following drawings:

Drawing no. - Q107632 $1
Q107632 S2
Q107632 S3

Q107632 Gi

 

31/10/07 24

Page 57

APPENDIX A

Proposed Plans

 

Appendix MCU Noosa South

Rev: 1

31/10/2007
- Appendix -

Page 58

DRAWING DRAWING =
SUMMARY NUMBER e S ra
ISSUE NUMBER
SITE LOCALITY AND ACCESS PLAN 107632

SITE LAYOUT Q107632
ca i NOOSA SOUTH

‘SITE PLAN FOR LEASE PURPOSES 0107632

 

 

SHEET NO.

 

 

 

 

ADDRESS: LESLIE DRIVE,
NOOSA HEADS, QLD, 4567

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

=

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

QOOCOO eresane on
Level 3, Northpoint
299 North Guay
Griaane @. 4000

BUVSOTeT Kae PRELIMINARY
[| Awexowenr__ Buu appo owe Tiss

a Es aT “|__Gelstra |
ORAWING STATUS MOBILE NETWORK SITE
sx Tr oo 7 re Te cal
FOR CONSTRUCTION . .
[© ese copotin ne A 3 0 Are o_O re

AS BUILT fe ee ee
© Telstra Corporotion Limited ABN 33 051 775 556 All rights reserved. Q107632
oA

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Page 59

BRE RBEE RBBB EB ERB BEBE RBBB RE RBREERBERPREReReeeeee
5

 

FIBRE & ELECTRICAL
CONNECTIONS AT LESLIE
ORIVE (TO BE CONFIRMED)

EXISTING
SITE ACCESS

PROPOSED
TELSTRA

SITE \

Copyright © Universat Press Pty Ltd,

 

SITE

LOCALITY PLAN

MAP REFERENCE:
SUNSHNE COAST UBD MAP 19 GRID F2

RESIN

SITE ACCESS PLAN

SCALE 1:3000

OOOOOG senana

CO-ORDINATES PROPERTY DESCRIPTION QOOGOO sei cece Seay soon eota toutwee
CO-ORDINATES PROPERTY DESCRIPTION Hoodoo eases 2338 NOOSA SOUTH

(O-ORDINATE DATUM MGA94 LOT 15.0N SP 177649 LARKIN TEYS 52 <4) gaze ris”
ONE 56 PARISH OF WEYBA CONSULTING PTY CTD ERamgunsisnecmes SITE LOCALITY AND ACCESS PLAN
= se, i paceman

 

 

Page 60

BRB HEBEBEREBEBERBERBEBEBEB BEEBE BBEBRBB BERR eReeeee 6
ZS —— [_——¢

   

PROPOSED PS LINK PIT

PROPOSED 2No.
EARTH PITS

 

NOTES:-

 

4, MINOR VARIATIONS IN POLE & HUT DIMENSIONS MAY OCCUR.

6000 |
O/A LEASE AREA

SITE LAYOUT

SCALE 1:75

pa o oo o BRIBEANE
oo o a o o Lever 3, Northpoint
OOOOOD Scones. $988
LARKIN TEYS

conucrmornrewe

Exgmeern & Managers Wt wesierkinieynenm a ¢
‘aeaecsvr m an 9 tme we

 

 

PROPOSED TELSTRA FIBRE
(TO BE CONFIRMED)

a PROPOSED TELSTRA POWER

ROUTE (TO BE CONFIRMED)

PROPOSED TELSTRA MANPROOF FENCE
TO EXTENT OF LEASE AREA

PROPOSED TELSTRA ICS MLIS3.1
LOW IMPACT HUT

'110000/A LEASE AREA

PROPOSED 300mm WIDE CABLE GANTRY

PROPOSED MONOPOLE FOOTING
{TO BE CONFIRMED}

PROPOSED TELSTRA
30m (NOMINAL)
STEEL MONOPOLE

PROPOSED 6No.CPX310R ON
MODULAR READFRAME TELSTRA
PANEL ANTENNAS

 

JORIGIN: LARKIN TEYS PRELIMANARY DESIGH
MOBILE NETWORK SITE
NOOSA SOUTH
SITE LAYOUT

 

Page 61

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

  
 

 

 

 

   
  

 

 

      

 

  

 

 

 

 

    

 

 

PROPOSEO TELSTRA
300mmWIDE CABLE TRAY

PROPOSED MANPROOF FENCE

    

      

  
    
         

 
  
 

J zZ J 3 ZN Z I > I 6
EL. 30.4m.
STRUCTURE DESIGN CRITERIA / TOP OF MONOPOLE
PROPOSED STRINTURE TYPE PROPOSED STEEL MOKOPOLE we EL 30.0m
-( PROPOSED 6No. CPX310R
TELSTRA PANEL ANTENNAS
A PROPOSED HEAOFRAME TYPE TELSTRA
MODULAR HEADFRANE
PRapos a
TYPE ORIEHTATION | HEIGHTS ta) | POROXTEEDE | =
2x CPXIUR Sa <—_
Ie (XBR an 35a
22 PBR ae 3am Ba ZN
1. MINOR VARIATIONS IN ANTENNA & HUT —— PROPOSED TELSTRA 30m
DIMENSIONS MAY OCCUR. 24) J3 STEEL POLE
2. THE OVERALL HEIGHT OF THE POLE, ZN
HEAOFRAME AND ANTENNAS SHOULD NOT EXCEED PROPOSED TELSTRA FEEDERS
32m ABOVE THE TOP OF THE FOUNDATION, TO RUN INSIDE POLE
B

<—_
<—_
—_
—_
<—_
<—_

LOW IMPACT HUT

    
 

  

 

PROPOSED TELSTRA ICS MLIS3.1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

E
\ 1
\ i
too J iJ PROPOSED FOOTING DESIGN TO
BE CONFIRMED UPON RECEIPT OF
EASTERN ELEVATION GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION
00 NOT | REF Tg REPORT. s
= °
pane PRELIMINARY A
4 ~YORDER [DRAWN] CHKO ANEXONENT EXAM] PPO DATE _[issy —
OS | AP JORIGR: LARKR TEYS PRELMBARY DESGN PrB | MRL 1 qelstra
DODOGO srtemane gen
pooogG Soe MOBILE NETWORK SITE
oooggo
W LARKIN TEYS ~ NOOSA SOUTH
coxsucn ere ito SITE LAYOUT
cows eee Renna
oH © Telstra Corporation Limited ABN 33 051 775 556 All rights reserved. Roe Q107632 [sag
T I Z I 3 ~Z z I 5 I CAS

 

 

Page 62

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

 

      
                   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

  

   

 

         
  

     

 

        

 

                     

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

 

ie 9 I c I ¥ ZS ¢ I g I L ay
am x ZE9 LOLO oa ‘ponesos swybu iv 96S SZZ 1S0 EC NAY PayuN] uoNoIdscD DNSIe] GO) Pye
PROT EMT ET ameter TDNNO) 3S 3S00N Lesptou N i
4 S350duNd ISI YOd NVTd LIS 0g tau oeer cigs ana Gaon? Puan OHSS ss Moz
. SAIL Ni
HLNOS ¥SOON Aa con sete 2 Apr see g oo oon GPOLEL ASNO SL 101 S6¥OW WLW BL WNIOHO-03 4
ALIS MHOMLIN JTIGOW "Se cece eee OOOOOO NOlduySI0 Aluadoud SU VNIGUO-0)
paisio® | a au fos eine Sa MeN sew! av | 750 os anveems OOOOOO IWS
H 3S/9D ssi] [Oaav [wa TGRTGNY eo [weed | 0 | ae
{i26@l)
AYYNIWI13ud ——— oe .st.0L.802
Woot 08 «09 kk born) (zee)
, AOU.2L252 WSE.T%6 982
3 0 TS, fi S722) azeey "q
NV 1d 3SV31 ALYSdOUd — -to.to.o8z 05, 7Lol8z
(26°84)
en ee agu) 0094642
vl @ 9 % 2 0 2 “Ep.A0.€9%
| 0024 J1Y)S
NV1d 4SV31 SLIS (soe) ;
u 268)
\ \ oSL.L00822 “onge.t62
\ \ (te 7) u (1990)
q \ \ 07.00.66 50.22 .€62 qd
otk BE zee} i
a AG AOL LOELL
& GB ee
o my (9€€°92) -—-
wy \ SLE (SLL'ESHY (ue'7Sl)
q 1 \ SE-ET=ES sues 44 \ 9TLEBIE -—
\ 1
\ \
1 1
7g (0009) vauv 4sv31
£E.E7.697 VulsTal 9
G3S0d0ud 679621 dS
3 Fed $1 101
vauv 4asv31
VuLSTHL ee wr;
q a3S0d0ud ED
By Sy g
2 =
Set oat
2G wy -
a? at {297°9]
y, y, OT ETSESL (2012)
L / / (992'9) E8769
aS7.076LEL y
i69u'82
(Em, ~0E.6£.601 NWNL
EOABAUNS GSaIT¥AD _ (a07'e)
¥ AS G3WUIINOD 39 01 ONY tosz'92) 200.5767
yf [AIM BIVHIKOUddY SI NOIL¥907 07.00.00 (g0z'e)
W3UV 3SVI1 O3SOd0ud SIHL {515'82) 00.2062L v
"3L0N an (e0z'e)
ov ~00.07.001

cj
BHRHREHBEBESEEHBHEHEHERHRESBEHE EE S&B

 

 

J L
BHRESE#A Ss

Page 63

APPENDIX B
Section 5.1 & 5.2 Assessment

 

Appendix MCU Noosa South

Rev: 1

31/10/2007
- Appendix -

Page 64

D R L EME Precautionary Approach Checklist — Noosa South gels tra

INTERNATIONAL

 

 

 

lissue|Date:) 30/10/07

Land off Noosa Springs Drive, Noosa Heads, Qid
oa] NSA: 4567008

 

Peete The proposed facility consists of the installation of 30m monopole with turret mounting, 6 no. antennas (each 2.63m long) (to a level of 32.9m
Infrastructure to the centre line of the antennas).

One equipment shelter (2.28m x 3.28m x 3.0 High) to be located in a 63m? compound area, to house electronic equipment associated with the
antennas.

Associated ancillary works including mounting methods, new cable trays, low-noise amplifiers, cabling, safe access, earthing, electrical and
air-conditioning works at the proposed telecommunications facility.

5.1 Application of Precautionary Approach to Site Selection — Additional Consideration Items

Section | ACIF Code Requirement : Comments
No |; For each site the Carrier have regard to:

The reasonable service objectives of the carrier including: (i) This facility is intended to provide WCDMA850 coverage to the Noosa Heads

(i) the area the planned service must cover and Noosa Springs including adjacent Gold Course.

(ii) power levels needed to provide quality of service

(iii) the amount of usage the planned service must handle (ii) The transmit power settings at this facility will be set to accomplish the
desired coverage, capacity and call quality within the areas listed above.
The Over the Air specifications provide for the ability for the facility to
reduce the transmitting power to each user based on the radio environment.

 

 

 

 

 

Page 65

5p @ ®
DALY EME Precautionary Approach Checklist — Noosa South Gels ura

 

 

 

 

 

 

INTERNATIONAL

5.1.4 (b) Minimisation of EME exposure to the public This facility is designed and will be installed in accordance with Telstra Document
005486 to restrict public access to any areas that exceed the general public EME
exposure limits.
The environmental EME level is minimised through the radio network design and
reducing the transmit power to each user based on the radio environment

5.1.4 (c) The likelihood of an area being a community sensitive location The site is not considered to be a community sensitive location, not located close to
schools, hospital, etc

5.1.4 (d) The objective of avoiding community sensitive locations The site has been selected as to provide the required network coverage, whilst being

in an area that screens the majority of the proposed development.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5.1.4 (e) Relevant state and local government telecommunications The proposal has been reviewed against State and Local environmental planning
planning policies instruments. The proposal is considered an appropriate use against the relevant
instruments.
5.1.4 (f) The outcomes of consultation processes with Councils and No consultation has been carried out, however impact Assessable application will
communities as set out in Section 5.5 require consultation to take place.
5.1.4 (g) The heritage significance (built, cultural and natural) This site is not considered to have any heritage, cultural or natural significance.
5.1.4 (h) The physical characteristics of the locality including elevation The physical characteristics of this site have been considered during the site

 

 

 

 

and terrain selection and design of this facility. Factors considered included terrain, site

 

 

 

Page 66

= D ° e
DALY EME Precautionary Approach Checklist — Noosa South elstr @

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

INTERNATIONAL
elevation and the height of the surrounding obstacles. Radio propagation analysis
indicates that selecting the appropriate antenna tilts will meet the requirements for
coverage from this facility.

5.1.4 (i) The availability of land and public utilities The use of the existing facility represents an appropriate use of an existing
telecommunications site. The further availability of land and public utilities is
inconsequential.

5.1.4 (j) The availability of transmission to connect the Transmission will be via the existing Telstra radio communications fibre

radiocommunications infrastructure with the rest of the network,
e.g. line of sight for microwave transmission

5.1.4 (k) The radiofrequency interference the planned service may cause to
other services No interference issues expected.

5.1.4 (I) The radiofrequency interference the planned service could Radio propagation analysis has been used to ensure the new facility can be
experience at that location from other services or sources of integrated with the existing network while minimising the interference to the new
radio emissions facility.

The Telstra Mobile Network is licensed for the exclusive use of sub bands of
WCDMA 850 frequency bands. Any ACMA approved equipment operating outside
these sub bands will not cause interference to the Telstra Mobile Network. Telstra
will promptly investigate any interference issues that are reported.

5.1.4 (m) Any obligations, and opportunities, to co-locate facilities There are no existing telecommunications structures in the area and no suitable
structures to host telecommunications facilities.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Page 67

D ° Celstra

L Y EME Precautionary Approach Checklist — Noosa South
INTERNATIONAL

 

  

 

5.1.4 (n) Cost factors The cost of deployment is considered appropriate.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Page 68

 

DA L EME Precautionary Approach Checklist — Noosa som Selstr Qi

INTERNATIONAL

; yee Application of Precautionary Approach to Infrastructure Design — EME Precautionary Approach Checklist

Section ACIF Code Requirement | Comments
No i For each site the Carrier have regard to:

 

 

5.2.3 (a) The reason for the installation of the infrastructure considering — This facility is intended to provide WCDMA850 coverage to the Noosa Heads and
coverage, capacity and quality Noosa Springs.

5.2.3 (b) The positioning of antennas to minimise obstruction of Antennas are positioned so that wherever possible a clear line-of-sight can be
radio signals achieved to the target area of coverage. This location meets the objectives outlined

in Section No 5.2.3 (a).

 

5.2.3 (c) The objective of restricting access to areas where RF exposure This facility is designed and will be installed in accordance with Telstra Document
may exceed limits of the EME standard 005486 to restrict public access to any areas that exceed the general public EME
exposure limits.

 

5.2.3 (d) The type and features of the infrastructure that are required to This facility consists of macro utilising directional antennas to meet the objectives
meet service needs including: outlined in Section No 5.2.3 (a).

(i) the need for macro, micro or pico cells; and
(ii) the need for directional or non-directional antennas

 

5.2.3 (e) The objective of minimising power whilst meeting service The transmit power settings at this facility will be set to accomplish the desired
objectives coverage, capacity and call quality within the areas listed in 5.2.3 (a). The Over the

 

 

 

 

 

 

Page 69

 

: DY ° ° Ist
D Y L EME Precautionary Approach Checklist — Noosa South © S Fal

 

 

 

INTERNATIONAL
Air specifications provide for the ability for the facility to reduce the transmitting
power to each user based on the radio environment.

5.2.3 (f) Whether the costs of achieving this objective are reasonable Telstra has under taken preliminary costing of this facility and are of the opinion

these costs are reasonable.

5.2.5 If the radiocommunications infrastructure is associated with a base | An EME Assessment has been undertaken in accordance with the ARPANSA
station used for the supply of public mobile telecommunications prediction methodology and report format. The assessment has confirmed that the
services, site EME assessments must be made in accordance with | EME emission will be in compliance with the ACMA EME regulatory arrangements.
the ARPANSA prediction methodology and report format.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Page 70

APPENDIX C

Noosa Plan Codes

 

Appendix MCU Noosa South

Rev: 1

31/10/2007
- Appendix -

Page 71

Division 5—Infrastructure Uses Code

14,37 Infrastructure Uses Code
The provisions in this division comprise the Infrastructure Uses Code. They are—
* compliance with the Infrastructure Uses Code (section 14.38);
e overall outcomes for the Infrastructure Uses Code (section 14.39);
© — specific outcomes and probable solutions for the Infrastructure Uses Code(sections 14.40—14.47).
.
14.38 Compliance with the Infrastructure Uses Code
Development that is consistent with the specific outcomes in sections 14.40—14.47 complies with the Infrastructure Uses Code.

14.39 Overall outcomes for the Infrastructure Uses Code
14.39.1 The overall outcomes are the purpose of the Infrastructure Uses Code.

14.39.2 The overall outcomes sought for the Infrastructure Uses Code are the following—

a) Residents and visitors have access to adequate levels of infrastructure to meet their needs;

b) Infrastructure Uses do not detract from the visual amenity of the a/or road network nor on the rural or residential amenity enjoyed by residents of and
visitors to the Shire,

c) Facilities are co-located where appropriate and practical;

d) Infrastructure uses are energy efficient;

e) Infrastructure Uses do not pose a threat to public safety;

f) The natural character and environmental values of the Shire are protected from adverse impacts associated with Infrastructure Uses; and

g) Convenient, comfortable and safe access is provided with the design of infrastructure uses.

14.40 Specific outcomes and probable solutions for the Infrastructure Uses

Code

The specific outcomes sought for the Infrastructure Uses Code are included in column 1 of Table 14-17 to Table 14-20. Probable solutions for code assessable
development are included in column 2 of Table 14-17 to Table 14-20.

Page 72

Table 14-17 — For all Infrastructure Uses

Column 1
Specific Outcomes

    

Location and siting

O1 The location and siting of Infrastructure
Uses—

a) maximises accessibility for maintenance
purposes; and

b) does not disrupt @CCés5 for other purposes

Separation from incompatible uses

O2 Sufficient separation distance is provided
between Infrastructure Uses and incompatible
uses on the same S/fe and neighbouring premises
to maintain amenity for neighbouring uses.

O3 Vehicular access to the s/te of the
Infrastructure Use does not adversely impact on
residential amenity.

Column 2
Probable Solutions (if Code Assessable)

$1.1 For Installations and Towers, where
practicable, infrastructure is —

a) co-located with existing Infrastructure Uses; or
b) located on or within an existing building;

AND

$1.2 Easements for 2ccess to

Infrastructure Uses are granted to the Council or
the beneficiary of the easement to ensure suitable
aCCEeSS can be gained, where practicable.

No solution provided

$3.1. Vehicle access to the infrastructure is
gained from roads other than local
residential streets to maintain residential amenity.

Column 3
How does the proposal comply with Probable
Solutions and Specific Outcomes

  

PS 1 — Acceptable
A search of the area revealed that there were no
suitable structures or existing telecommunications
mast suitable for a new facility. The waste treatment
works has been discounted as redevelopment and
underground infrastructure would prevent the build of
a monopole structure.

An access road already exists.

PS2 - Acceptable

Although the site is not industrial the subject site has
been selected as to provide a good separation
between the proposed telecommunications site and
nearby housing. The closest house is approx. 190m
away from the subject and does not have direct views
over the site due to the topography and existing
vegetation in the area.

PS3 — Acceptable

Following the construction of the proposal
development the site will have only 4 vehicle
movement into and out of the site pera year. The
proposed development will not have a traffic impact.

 

 

Building siting and design

04 The siting and design of bui/dings or other
structures reflects and is compatible with the
setting and character of the locality in which the

No solution provided

 

—

 

 

—_—|
PS4 — Acceptable
The proposed telecommunications facility is a slim
pole type which will be painted an appropriate colour
to blend in and reduce the impact of the development

on the amenity of the area.

 

Page 73

 

Infrastructure Use is located, including the use of
sympathetic colour schemes.

 

Safety and security
O5 Infrastructure Uses are secure and potential
impacts from vandalism are minimised.

Artificial lighting

O06 The generation of spill light by development,
which gives rise to annoyance, discomfort,
distraction or a reduction in the ability to see
essential information, is avoided.

$5.1 For Installations and Towers—the use is
fenced with security fencing;

$5.2 For other Infrastructure Uses—no probable
solution

$6.1 Lighting associated with the use is

designed, installed, operated and

maintained in accordance with Section 3 of
AS4282 The Control of the Obtrusive Effects
of Outdoor Lighting

PS5 — Acceptable

The proposed compound area will be surrounded be
a secure man proof fence to prevent unauthorised
access and vandalism.

PS6 ~ Acceptable

There will be no associated fighting with the proposed
development.

 

Mechanical plant and equipment

07 Mechanical plant and equipment (including air
conditioning equipment) are—

a) positioned to minimise adverse impacts on

the amenity of any residential premises;

b) designed and positioned to visually integrate
with the building and roof design; and

c) appropriately screened.

Environment & heritage values

O8 There are no significant adverse effects on

the biodiversity, natural vegetation, native wildlife,
habitats, landscape quality, water quality or heritage
values, including those related to—

i) changes to natural drainage;

j) disturbance to any of the wet/and systems;

k) management of landstide and fire risk;

|) erosion and the transport of sediments offsite;

m) unmanaged public access,

n) effluent disposal11;

0) changes to fauna habitat and behaviour; and

p) disturbance of buildings and features, including
natural features, of heritage significance.

 

$7.1 Plant and equipment are—

a) located more than 2m from any property boundary;
and

b) screened by dense vegetation or fencing (i.e.
1.5m wide vegetated buffer area),

OR

$7.2 Plant and equipment are located within a
building.

No solution provided
Advisory note

PSP24 ~ Effluent Disposal details
equirements for the design and siting of effluent

         

disposal systems where located outside a sewerage
ervice ared,

Compliance with PSP24 will be considered as part of

Council's assessment of the plumbing and drainage

application,

 

 

 

———_—}

PS7 - Acceptable

The site is about 200m away from the closet
residential property; therefore the noise impact form
air-conditioning will not be audible.

The current vegetation surrounding the site will
screen views of the compound from outside of the
site.

PS8 - Acceptable

The location of the proposed telecommunications
tower has been selected as to cause not harm to the
biodiversity, natural vegetation, native wildlife or
landscape quality.

The proposed compound area is located on
previously disturbed land, and therefore there will be
no need to remove any vegetation or lop or cut back
any trees.

 

The proposed compound area is located on
previously cleared land and no vegetation will need
to be removed or cut back.

 

Page 74

Table 14-19 —Service & Utility Type 3 - Tower

Column 1
Specific Outcomes

Visual amenity

O10 The tower is visually integrated with its
landscape or townscape setting so as not to be
visually dominant or obtrusive.

Column 2
Probable Solutions (if Code Assessable)

$10.1 The tower is—

a) not established in the Detached Housing, Semi
attached Housing,

Attached Housing or Visitor Mixed Use Zones;
(b) camouflaged through the use of colours and
materials which blend into the surrounding
Jandscape; and

(c) unobtrusive when viewed from any part of the
major road network.

OR

$10.2 The tower is co-located on an existing
telecommunication tower;

AND

$10.3 The height of the tower does not exceed—
(a) 20 metres where on land in the Community
Services, Business Centre or Industry Zones; or
(b) 25 metres where on land in the Rural Zone.

Column 3
How does the proposal comply with Probable

Solutions and Specific Outcomes

 

PS10

The proposal is not considered to be unduly
prominent or visually dominant to the Noosa Heads
locality.

The site is not located in a residential area and
appropriate colours to be agreed in writing with
Council will be used.

The site is set back from the main road network
including the nearby Eeenie Creek Road, therefore
no views of the site will be observed from passing
vehicles.

The proposed telecommunications tower is 30m high,
which is 5m higher than the rural maximum height.

 

Health and safety

071 The development avoids or effectively
manages any emissions of light, noise, vibration or
radiation beyond the site such that—

a) environmental nuisance to occupants or users
of surrounding premises is not caused;

b) unacceptable risks to the environment or to
personal and public safety are unlikely to be caused;
and

c) public access is restricted to meet workplace,
health and safety requirements.

No solution provided

 

 

PS - Acceptable

Attached to this development application is an EME
certificate that demonstrates that the site complies
will ARPANSA standards.

 

 

Page 75

 

Access to sunlight $12.1 For proposed buildings or structures 012 — Acceptable

O12 The Tower does not cast shadows such that having a height exceeding 8.5m above ground level The proposed development has been sited as to be
the amenity of surrounding premises or useability of and a cross sectional area exceeding 20ma, away from any built up area and therefore there will
public open space is unduly reduced. shadowing does not affect residential lots, child care | be no shadowing of adjoining properties.

centres or PUDIIC OpeN Space to the extent of more
than 20% of their site area for a period in excess of
three hours on any day of the year.

Page 76

Division 15—Specific Outcomes and Probable Solutions for the Noosa Heads Locality

Table 9.11

Column 1
Specific Outcomes

Column 2
Probable Solution {if code assessable)

Column 3
How does the proposal! comply with Probable
Solutions and Specific Outcomes

 

9.9 Effects of use

 

 

Amenity

O01 USéS are located, designed and operated to
avoid significant adverse changes to the light, air
quality, noise, accessibility, or other conditions
enjoyed by users of associated, adjoining or nearby
uses.

O2 The visual amenity and character

surrounding the Ma/or road network, including
Sunshine Beach Road (David Low Way), Eenie
Creek Road, Noosa Drive and Noosa Parade, is
protected and enhances the entrances to Noosa
Heads through—

a) retaining and enhancing the visual and physical
separation of Noosa Heads from neighbouring
localities;

b) ensuring future development does not encroach
upon existing Vegetation within the road reserve;
and

Cc) utilising dense landscaping and earth mounding
(rather than fencing and walls) for visual screening
and noise attenuation;

AND

03 Development generates traffic demands that
are consistent with the future capacity of the road

 

No solution provided.

 

 

O01 - Acceptable

The proposed development will not have any
significant adverse changes to light, air quality, noise,
accessibility or any other condition of nearby uses.

The location away from housing and general public

access to the site will not be available.
Major road network No solution provided. O02 - Acceptable

The subject site is set back from Eenie Creek Road,
and given that the road passes through a cutting
there will be no views of the site from this major road.

The development will not encroach on any
vegetation.

The development will be screened at lower levels by
the existing trees..

With only 4 trips per a year the proposed
development will not create any traffic issues.

7

 

Page 77

 

network.

 

Scenic vistas

04 Aesthetic and cultural vaiues of the natural
landscape are maintained through protecting
important scenic vistas—

a) from the streets, beaches and other public spaces;
b) to the ocean, river, coastal lowlands and the
vegetated backdrop of Noosa Hill;

c) within Little Cove— vistas over Laguna Bay and to
the Noosa National Park and the vegetation
stands, part of the hills and sand dunes;

d) within Cooloola and Weyba Park Estates— the
scenic view of Noosa National Park and Weyba
Creek; and

O5 Business Uses located within the road reserve
or on the beach (particularly in the vicinity of Hastings
Street, Noosa Main Beach and Noosa National Park)
offer goods and services that directly benefit visitors
and complement the range of visitor experiences
available in the locality, such as mobile food vendors
and learn to surf classes.

9.10 Built form

Density
O6 The density of development within the s/te
area—

a) is compatible with surrounding deve/opment,
b) does not exceed—

i. for the Semi-Attached Housing Zone:

 

1. for sites between 500mz2 and 599mz inclusive —

 

 

 

4.8 persons per hectare;

No solution provided.

e) within Noosa Sound- vistas across Noosa River.
Mobile business uses No solution provided. 05 — Not Applicable

  

No solution provided

04 - Acceptable

a) the subject is located away from the coast
and will not harm any of the important vista
in the Noosa Heads locality

b) the site is set from the river and coastal
lowlands and views of the site will be limited.

c) Not located in these areas or cause any
visual harm

d) Not located in these areas or cause any
visual harm

e) Not located in these areas or cause any
visual harm

 

  

06 - Not Applicable

 

 

Page 78

 

-

2. for sites 600m2 or more — 6.6 persons or 100
persons per hectare;

ii. for the Attached Housing Zone—a maximum
population density of 160 persons per hectare,
with the following exceptions:-

A. Lots 55-61 on RP90598 and Lots 81-85 on
RP92518 at the corner of Noosa Drive and Grant
Street where the allowable Population densityis
320 persons per hectare exclusively for the use of a
visitor hostel and

B. Lot 4 on SP 100064 in Serenity Close, where the
allowable population densityis 250 persons per
hectare

C. Lot 110 on Plan 98016L19.DGW-RevA being the
Viridian Noosa Resort in Viewland Drive where the
allowable Population densityis 100 persons per
hectare exclusively for the use of Visitor
accommodation Type 4

iii. Business Centre Zone—a maximum

population density of 100 persons per hectare;
and

iv. Visitor Mixed Use Zone—a maximum population
density of 280 persons per hectare; and

c) has a low site impact to enhance the

opportunity to maintain natural site

characteristics, including native vegetation

and natural landforms \

 

 

 

 

 

Page 79

 

Height

07 Buildings and other structures—

a) present a building height consistent with structures
on adjoining and surrounding

land;

b) do not exceed a maximum building height
of—
i For the Business Centre Zone— 3 storeys; or
ii For the Visitor Mixed Use Zone—
A. Northern side of Hastings
Street—
* within 7m of the Hastings St alignment — 2
storeys, or
* balance area of site - 4 storeys with a 3
storey presentation to the beach; or
°
B. Southern side of Hastings Street—
e within 10m of the Hastings St or Noosa Drive
alignments— 2 storeys, or
* balance area of site -— 4 storeys, or
iti For Attached Housing Zone — 3 storeys with the
exception of Lot 4 on SP 100064 in Serenity Close,
where a maximum height of 4 storeys is permitted; or
iv For any other zone— 2 storeys,

c) do not visually dominate the street or
surrounding spaces;

d) preserve the amenity of surrounding land;
e) respect the scale of surrounding vegetation;
f) respond to the topography of the s/te by

minimising cut and fill (eg. stepping down the site or
using a suspended pole construction); and

S7.1 Buildings and other structures do not
exceed a maximum building height of—
a) for the Business Centre Zone-12m; or

b) for the Visitor Mixed Use Zone—

i. Northern side of Hastings Street—

A. within 7m of the Hastings St alignment — 6m;
B. balance area of site — 15m with a 12m
presentation to the beach; or

ii. Southern side of Hastings Street—

A. within 10m of the Hastings St or Noosa Drive
alignments — 6m;

B. balance area of site — 15m; or

c) for Attached Housing Zone—12m with
the exception of Lot 4 on SP 100064 in
Serenity Close, where a maximum

d) for any other zone— 8m;

 

"| O7 — Not Acceptable

The proposed telecommunication tower will be
approximately 30m in height. The height is require to
provide the required network coverage, while reducing
the need to construct further base station in the area.
The height will allow the tower to provide coverage
above the trees

 

 

Page 80

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

r
g) maintain a mature vegetated skyline.

height of 15m is permitted; or

Setbacks $8.1 Buildings and structures comply with O8 - Acceptable

08 Buildings and other structures are the minimum setbacxs identified in Schedule The subject site is set back from the adjoining roads,

 

Page 81

 

 

appropriately designed and sited to— 1 - Minimum Boundary Setbacks. which will reduce the visual impact of the proposed |
a) provide amenity for users of the premises as weil tower.
as preserve the visual and acoustic amenity of
adjoining and nearby properties;

b) preserve any existing vegetation that will buffer
the proposed building;

Cc) allow for landscaping to be provided between
buildings;

d) maintain the visual continuity and pattern of
buildings and landscape elements within the street;
e) protect public safety and property within erosion
prone areas by ensuring such areas are maintained
largely free of development; and

f) protect the natural character and visual amenity of
coastal areas and watercourses.

 

 

Site cover, gross floor area and plot ratio No solution provided O9 - Not Applicable
O09 The site cover, gross floor area and plot
ratio

of buildings and other roofed structures—

a) results in a building scale that is compatible
with surrounding development;

b) does not present an appearance of

excessive bulk to adjacent properties, roads

or other areas in the vicinity of the s/té.

c) maximises the retention of existing

vegetation and allows for additional soft
landscaping between buildings;

d) allows for adequate area at ground level for
outdoor recreation, entertainment, clothes

drying and other s/te facilities, and

e) facilitates onsite stormwater management

and vehicular access.

 

 

 

 

 

010 Site cover does not exceed— 010 to 016 Not Applicabie

Page 82

a) for the Detached Housing Zone—50% for a single
storey building and 40% for a double storey building;
b) for the Semi-attached Housing Zone—40%;

c) for the Attached Housing Zone—40%; or

d) for the Visitor Mixed Use Zone—45%;

O11 For Multiple Housing Type 2, buildings have a
maximum plot ratio of 0.45:1.

O12 For Multiple housing Type 3 or 4, Visitor
accommodation Type 4 and the accommodation
unit component of an Entertainment and dining
business Type 3—the maximum a gross floor
ara is equivalent to the maximum allowable
population in persons multiplied by 40mz.

O13 For the Attached Housing Zone Dui/dings have
a bulk and architectural scale that has a maximum
plot ratio of 0.5:1 up to 1.0ha of site area and 0.3:1
for that part of the site area above 1.0ha.

014 For the Visitor Mixed Use Zone the maximum a
gross floor area is equivalent to the maximum
allowable population in persons multiplied by 40ma,
provided that gross floor area does not exceed a
total of 13,600mz.

0715 For the Neighbourhood Centre Zone and the
Business Centre Zone, the maximum plot ratio
does not exceed —

a) 0.8:1 for the first 2,000mz of site area; plus

b) 0.3:1 for the balance of the site area in excess
of 2,000mz.

016 For the Detached house Zone and Semi
attached Housing Zone —Soft landscaping is
provided and retained over a minimum of 20% of the
site area.

 

 

 

 

Page 83

 

[

 

Roof form

017 Roof forms—

a) contribute positively to the local skyline;

b) complement the character of the locality;

c) use soft and articulated, pitched, skillion or curved
roof forms;

d) avoid low pitched (eg. less than 5 degrees) or box
profiles/parapets; and

e) do not create opportunities for residents to
overlook the private open space areas of
neighbouring properties.

$17.1 The main roof of the Oui/ding has roof
Ditch no less than 5 degrees and has roof forms a
minimum of 600mm wide;

AND

$17.2 Buildings and structures do not include roof
top terraces.

017 Not Applicable

 

Flooding and drainagess

018 Buildings and other works are designed and
sited to—

a) provide flood free access to premises and

flood free habitable areas;

b) allow only m inor, short term and infrequent
flooding of non-habitable areas;

c) ensure drainage does not adversely impact upon
other premises; and

d) ensure filling or excavation does not adversely
impact upon other premises by—

i. causing ponding of water on the s/te or nearby
land;

ii. increasing flooding, which adversely affects the
safety or use of any land upstream and downstream;
and

iii. adversely affecting the flow of water in any
overland flow path.

$18.1 Floor levels for habitable rooms are not less
than the specified minimum floor levels;

AND

$18.2 Where Council infrastructure is available—
a) any drainage (from buildings and land) flows to
that infrastructure; and

b) the infrastructure has the capacity to accept any
additional loading.

018 Not Applicable

 

 

Sloping sites and ridgelines

019 Development on s/oping sites ~

a) is responsive to the natural topography of the s/te
and minimises cut and fill;

b) does not visually dominate the hill slope or

constructed on land with a slope greater than 25% (1
in 4);

 

AND

 

$19.1 Buildings and associated accessways are not Lo 9 to 20 Not Applicable

 

Page 84

 

 

 

interrupt the skyline;

c) is integrated with the natural site characteristics
including vegetatiory, and

d) for Multiple housing, takes the form of small
separate buildings;

AND

020 On steep slopes or ridgelines which are
visible from the ‘major road network, areas of
public open space, the Noosa River or the
beaches—

a) new buildings and structures including
outbuildings, are designed so as not to
dominate or detract from the scenic and
environmental qualities of the s/teé and its
setting; and

b) the external colour scheme of buildings is
designed to blend with the natural elements of
its surroundings.

021 An accessible and safe public transport node
is established and operated within Noosa Heads
that—

a) links public transport services to other centres in
the Shire and to key destinations outside the Shire;
and

b) forms part of an integrated transport network that
is accessible via pedestrian and bicycle pathways.

 

       

Environmental and cultural heritage values
022 There are no significant adverse effects on
biodiversity, native vegetation, habitats, landscape

 

$19.2 Buildings are of split level design that step
down the slope or have suspended floor construction;
AND

$19.3 Cut or fill is less than 1.2m in depth;
AND

$19.4 The distance between the ground and

the lowest part of the floor of the building does not
exceed 3m;

AND

$19.5 Buildings present no more than 2 or 3 storeys
at any one point.

$20.1 No solution provided

Heads as identified in Schedule 5 — Ma p 1

 

No solution provided

 

 

Public transport node $21.1 A public transport node is located within Noosa | 021 Not Applicable

9.11 Environment, conservation and recreation

022 ~ Acceptable
The proposed development will used previously
cleared Jand, therefore not flora or fauna will be

 

 

Page 85

 

[ quality, water quality or cultural heritage values,
including those related to—

a) changes to natural drainage;

b) disturbance to any of the wet/and systems;
c) management of landslide and fire risk;

d) erosion and the transport of sediments off site;
e) unmanaged public access;

f) changes to fauna habitat and behaviour; and
g) disturbance of buildings and features, including
natural features, of cultural

heritage significance.

Open space network

023 The integrated open space network is
established, enhanced and protected throughout
the locality to—

a) provide for both passive and active
recreational pursuits;

b) provide connectivity for pedestrians and
cyclists;

c) provide access to community uses and
buildings, public open space and recreation
areas, the beaches, Noosa National Park

and Noosa River;

d) provide habitat connectivity for wildlife;

e) protect watercourses and drainage lines.
f) protect vegetation on steep slopes, and
g) form a scenic backdrop for residential
development.

$23.4 Open space corridors and existing
native vegetation in areas indicated in
Schedule 5 — Map 4 are protected from
fragmentation and encroachment by
development.

effected.

The small compound area will not restrict the
movement of fauna in the area.

023 — Acceptable

The small footprint of the proposed development will
not cause any harm to the open space of the area,
any the use of previously cleared land will prevent
any harm to the biodiversity in the open space

 

Pedestrian and bicycle pathways

024 Safe and convenient pedestrian and bicycle
pathways are provided and retained between and
around key destinations.

 

$24.1 Pedestrian and bicycle pathways are provided
and retained where indicated in
Schedule 5 — Map 2;

 

AND

 

 

024 Not Applicable

 

Page 86

 

$24.2 Contributions toward a Pathways Network are |
provided in accordance with PSF20.

 

Recreational opportunities No solutions provided 025 Not Applicable
O25 Key recreation focal points, including Noosa

National Park, Noosa River foreshore and mouth,

Noosa Main Beach and Lion's Park are maintained

without significant changes to their landscape

character, including as a result of increased

infrastructure.

 

 

 

Page 87

APPENDIX D

Environmental Land Register

 

Appendix MCU Noosa South

Rev: |

31/10/2007
- Appendix -

Page 88

QLD Environmental Management Register and Contaminated Land Register Results Page 1 of 4

QLD ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT REGISTER (EMR)
CONTAMINATED LAND REGISTER (CLR)

Transaction ID: 964182 EMR Site Id: 55045 06 August 2007
This response relates to a search request received for the site:
Lot: 15 Plan: SP177649

EMR RESULT

The above site !S included on the Environmental Management Register.

The site you have searched has been subdivided from the following site, which is included
on the EMR. Subdivided new parcels will remain on the EMR unless it can be shown that
they are not located near the contaminating activity.

Lot: 14 Plan: RP836646
Address: BEN LEXCEN DRIVE
SUNRISE BEACH QLD 4567

The site has been subject to the following Notifiable Activity pursuant to section 374 of the
Environmental Protection Act 1994.

DEFENCE ESTABLISHMENTS OR TRAINING AREAS - operating a defence
establishment or a training area used for handling ammunition in a way that may have
caused, or may cause, remnant unexploded ordnance.

A site management plan has been prepared for this site and is included with this search
response as Annexure 1. It has been determined that this site is suitable for the following
uses, providing the site is used and managed according to the site management plan:
Details of suitable uses are available by contacting the Environmental Protection Agency.
Following the date of effect of the site management plan, subsequent uses of the site for
notifiable activities or for situations where a hazardous contaminant is released into the
soil may result in the need to review suitable uses or amend the attached site
management plan.
CLR RESULT

The above site is NOT included on the Contaminated Land Register.

ADDITIONAL ADVICE

Note: Searches maybe conducted online through the State Government Website
www.smartservice.qid.gov.au or Citec Confirm www.confirm.com.au.

if you have any queries in relation to this search please phone (07) 3227 7370.

https://www.confirm.citec.com.au/weblogic/C2Dispatcher 6/08/2007

Page 89

QLD Environmental Management Register and Contaminated Land Register Results Page 2 of 4

Lindi Bowen
Registrar, Contaminated Land Unit

AREA MANAGEMENT ADVICE
Unexploded Ordnance
LOT : 15 PLAN : SP177649 FILE REF : AMA Site 1d:32865 PRINTED:
06/08/2007

The lot that is the subject of this search is part of a large area of land or contains land on
which the Department of Defence (Defence), due to the land's previous military use, has
assessed the potential for residual unexploded ordnance (UXO) to be ‘substantial’.

UXO is explosive ordnance such as artillery shells, mortars or grenades, that did not
explode when used, and much of it results from military training during World War II.

The above assessment is published on Defence's website http:/Avww.defence.gov.au/uxo
and in a Defence UXO report on the local government area in which the lot is located.
Defence has advised that it has also published newspaper warnings and distributed UXO
warning and advice brochures in the area.

in support of any Defence initiatives to warn land owners, residents and workers of land in
such areas and, in particular, Defence's recommendations in regard to land usage, the
Environmental Protection Agency has issued this “Area Management Advice ” for the
subject lot and others affected by Defence's assessment. This “Area Management Advice
” does not constitute a listing of the lot on the Environmental Management Register or the
Contaminated Land Register that is maintained by the Environmental Protection Agency
pursuant to the Environmental Protection Act 1994 .

Defence recommends that any land usage rezoning or development of land with
‘substantial’ UXO potential should only proceed following the conduct of UXO investigation
and any necessary remediation by a qualified UXO investigation and remedial search
contractor. Defence maintains a list, on its website, of commercial UXO contractors that it
accredits to carry out this work.

Accordingly, any development application for material change of use of the lot or
reconfiguration of the lot will require referral to the Environmental Protection Agency as a
concurrence agency for the application - pursuant to sections 3.3.16 and 3.3.18 of the
Integrated Planning Act 1997 . Conditions typically applied by the Environmental
Protection Agency provide for investigation and any necessary remediation of the land as
part of the development process.

Notwithstanding the above requirement, Defence also recommends that the current usage
of land with ‘substantial’ UXO potential may continue without specific need for further UXO
investigation. Defence advises that there are no known instances, in Australia, where
UXO have caused injuries unless they were deliberately and intentionally disturbed.

The procedure, if an object suspected of being UXO is found in the area, is as follows:

* Do not touch or disturb the object.
* Take action, where appropriate, to prevent it being disturbed by another person.

https://www.confirm.citec.com.au/weblogic/C2Dispatcher 6/08/2007

Page 90

QLD Environmental Management Register and Contaminated Land Register Results Page 3 of 4

+ Note its approximate dimensions and general appearance.
+ Note the route to its location.

+ Advise the Police as soon as possible.

Please read on for further information.

Defence operators will dispose of any UXO that has been found and reported. Requests
are to be made through the Queensland Police Service.

Additional Information
Land owners who believe their particular lots may actually be affected by UXO may wish
to contact Defence for more detailed information. Any who may choose, of their own

accord, to subject their lots to further investigation should use a Defence-accredited UXO
contractor.

ANNEXURE 1 - SITE MANAGEMENT PLAN
LOT : 14 PLAN : RP836646 FILE REF : 901216 PRINTED: 06/08/2007
DATE OF EFFECT :

Further information relating to the conditions of use of this site is available by contacting
the Environmental Protection Agency.

https://www.confirm.citec.com.au/weblogic/C2Dispatcher 6/08/2007

Page 91

APPENDIX E

Regional Ecosystem Map

 

Appendix MCU Noosa South

Rev: I

31/10/2007
- Appendix -

Page 92

 

153°05'E

 

 

26°25",

 

 

 

 

 

* Mapinfo Australia Pty Lid 2006

Bioregion boundary

National Park, Conservation Area State Forest

and other eserves

Cadastre line

The maximum spatial error of parcels extracted for this
map from the Digital Cadastral Data Bsse{DCDB) range
from: 14m to 251m at 9 95% confidence level. Property
boundaries shown are provided as a locational aid only.
Towns

 

 

 

 

 

©@ 2003 REGIONAL ECOSYSTEM MAP
2003 Remnant endangered raglonal ecosystem Based on 2003 Landsat TM imagery
£21 Dominant Requested By; [email protected]
EEE] sub-dominent Date: 30 Oct 07 Time: 12.03.09
nant at jon: mM ni on in Plan: ‘ i
2003 Remnant af concern regional ecosyste Centered on Lot on Plan: Defined map areas are labelled with the regional ecosystem (RE) code
FE): Dominant along with the excoritage preaKdown itmore than one RE one within
. the - i Ste ilabla
(771 sub-dominant This is a copy of the certifled regional ecosystem pcbeimnpaeert igovauFeDO. Detned ap EE ee ie cha
TJ 2003 Remnant not of concern regional ecosystem otshs Vagulatbn Management Act 1960.7 may nat be laballed.
CIE Non-remnant Areas of Property maps of assessable Regional ecosystem fnework has been compited ata scata of 1:100 000,
cl i vegetation (PMAVs) are not shown on this map. excaptin designated areas where a compilation scale of 1: S
Plantation Forest fegetation ( s) ° avaiable, Linowore should be used as a quide only, The positonal
De Reservaii accuracy o! ta mapped at a scale of 4:1 Is +/-100 metres,
jam or Reservoir ; The extant of remnant regional scamysiems as of 2003, dapcted on this
ESSAI 2003 Remnant Vegetation Cover {RVC] map Is based on rectified 2003 Landsat TM Imagery (supplied by
WZZZA. Vegetation Management Act Essential Habitat SLATS, Department of Natural Reources and Water).
Area identitied as essential habitat by the EPA for a species vy Disclaimer:
of wildlife listed as endangered, vulnerable, near threatened Queensland While every cara Is taken to ensure the accuracy of this product, the
orrare under the Natura Conservation Act 1992. m1 Department of Natural Resources and Water, the Environmental
For further information on VMA Essential Habitat, please see Government Protection Agency and Mapinto Australia Pty Ltd, makes no
the attached VMA Essential Habitat map. representa of warranties about is accuracy relay completeness
. o+ sultabaity for any particular purpose ar fespor
/N/ Subject Lot LOCALITY DIAGRAM and ai fabity fiecluding without iia, labiltyin negligence)
all expenses, losses, damages (including indirect or consequent
/\/  Garilfted Map Amendment area damage) and costs which you might incur as a result of the product
Roads i

being Inaccurate of Incomplete in any way and for any reason,

All datasets are updated as they become available to provide the
most current information as of the date shown on this map.

Additional Information is required for the purposes of tand clearing or
assassment of a regional acosystem map ot PMAV applications. For
further information go to the web site: www.nrw qld.

v.aulvegetation

or contact the Department of Natural Resources and Water.

Horlzontal Datum: Geocentric Datum of Australia 1894 (GDAS4)

Digital regional ecosystem data is available in shapefile format, for Lot
on Plans from www.epa.cid.gav-au/REDATA or from tha Queens!
Herbariurn for larger areas.

Email: [email protected]

land

© The Stata of Queensland, 2007

 

 

Page 93

 

183°05°E

 

193*03"

 

 

26°25'S

 

 

 

 

<Mapinto Australia Pty Ltd 2006

Bioregion boundary

National Park, Conservation Area State Forest

and other reserves

Cadastre line

The maximum spatial error of parcels extracted for this
map trom the Digital Cadastral Date Base(DCDB} range
trom: 14m to 251m at a 95% confidence level. Property
boundaries shown are provided as locational aid only.

Towns

Horizontal Datum: Geocentric Datum of Australia 1994 (GOA94)

 

 

 

 

 

1
‘
\

1000 m

 

 

@ VEGETATION MANAGEMENT ACT

2003 Remnant endangered regional ecosystem ESSENTIAL HABITAT MAP
C7 Dominant Requested By: [email protected]
[=] sub-dominant Oate: 30 Oct 07 Time: 12,03.28

2003 Remnant of concern regional ecosystem Centered on Lot on Plan:
I Dominant 15 SPI77649 Labels for Vegetation Management Act Essential Habitat are cenved
cy : on the area of interest (1. km surrounding and including a Cot on

Sub-dominant Plan or 2,2km around the selected coordinates). Labels relate to
FI 2003 Remnant not of concern regional ecosystem the attached species Ist.
(7) Non-remnant Regional ecosystem tnewark has been compiled ata scala of 1:100 000,

except in designated areas where a compilation scale of 1:50 000 is
(_] Plantation Forest avaiable, Linwark should bo usod as a quia only, Tha pasiéonal
4 Dam or Reservoir accuracy of ‘ta mapped ata scala of 1:1 is +/-100 mates.
= , The extant of remnant ragional ecosystems as of 2003, depicted on this
°F 2003 Remnant Vegetatian Cover (RVC) map is based on rectified 2003 Landsat TM Imagery (supplied by
i i ‘ SLATS, Department of Natural Reources and Watar).

2222] Vegetation Management Act Essential Habitat

Area identified as essential habitat by the EPA for a species vy Disclaimer:

of wildlife listed as endangered, vulnerable, near threatened Queensland While every care is taken to ensure the accuracy of this product, the

or rare under the Nature Conservation Act 1992. Covert, nt Oepartment of Natural Rasources and Water, the Environmental

: . : Protection Agency ard Mapinfo Australla Pty Lid, makes no
© — Vegetation Management Act Essential Habitat Species Records resesortatans of warranties about ite aecuicy aby completeness

AZ Subject Lot or suitability for any particular purpose and digclalms all responsibility

R a LOCALITY DIAGRAM and al liability {including without imitation, llabllity in negligence)

‘oads

tar all expenses, losses, damages (including indirect or consequential
damage} and costs which you might incur as a result of the product
being inaccurate or incomplete in any way and for any reason.

All datasets are updated as they become available to provide the
most currant information as of the date shown on this map.

Additional information is required tor the purpases of land clearing or
assessment of a regional ecosystem map or PMAV applications, For
further information go to the web site: www.nrw.qid.gav.au/vagetation:
or contact the Department of Natural Resources and Water.

 

Digital regional ecosystem data is available in shapefile tormat, for Lot
on Plans tram www.epa.qid.gov.awREOATA or from the Queenstand
Herbarium for larger areas.

Email: [email protected]

© Tho State of Quesneland, 2007

 

 

Page 94

APPENDIX F
ARPANSA EME Report

 

Appendix MCU Noosa South

Rev: 1

31/10/2007
- Appendix -

Page 95

 

Summary of Estimated RF EME Levels around the Proposed
Mobile Phone Base Station at Noosa South, Wallam Lane, Noosa

Introduction: Date 28/06/07 NSA Site No 4567008

This report summarises the estimated maximum cumulative radiofrequency (RF) electromagnetic energy (EME) levels at
ground level emitted from the proposed Mobite Phone Base Station antennas at Noosa South Wallam Lane, Noosa. Maximum
EME levels are estimated in 360° circular bands out to 500m from the base station. The procedures for making the estimates
have been developed by the Australian Radiation Protection And Nuclear Safety Agency (ARPANSA)'. These are documented
in the ARPANSA Technical Report; “Radio Frequency EME Exposure Levels - Prediction Methodologies” which is available at

htto:/Awww.arpansa.gov.au
EME Health Standard

ARPANSA, an Australian Government agency in the Health and Ageing portfolio has established a Radiation Protection
Standard? specifying limits for continuous exposure of the general public to RF transmissions at frequencies used by mobile
phone base stations. Further information can be gained from the ARPANSA web site.

The Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA)? mandates exposure limits for continuous exposure of the
general public to RF EME from mobile phone base stations. Further information can be found at the ACMA website

http://emr.acma.gov.au
Proposed Site Radio Systems
Telstra CDMA800 (inc WCDMA)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Table of Predicted EME Levels - Proposed

 

 

 

 

Maximum Cumulative EME Level— All carriers at this site
Distance from the antennas at Noosa South
in 360° circular bands (% of ARPANSA exposure limits?)
Public exposure limit = 100%
Om to 50m 0.0088%
50m to 100m 0.044%
100m to 200m 0.19%
200m to 300m 0.11%
300m to 400m 0.051%
400m to 500m 0.029%
Maximum EME level
135.95 m, from the antennas at Noosa South 0.19%

 

 

 

Tabke: Estimation for the maximum level of RF EME at 1.5m above the ground from the proposed antennas assuming level ground. The
estimated levels have been calculated on the maximum mobile phone call capacity anticipated for this site. This estimation does not include
possible radio signal attenuation due to buildings and the general environment. The actual EME levels will generally be significantly less than
predicted due to path losses and the base station automatically minimising transmitter power to only serve established phone calls*. Where
applicable, particular locations of interest in the area surrounding the base station, including topographical variations, are assessed in Appendix
A“ Other areas of Interest” table on the last page.

Summary — Proposed Radio Systems

RF EME levels have been estimated from the proposed antennas at Noosa South Wallam Lane, Noosa. The maximum
cumulative EME level at 1.5 m above ground level is estimated to be 0.19 % of the ARPANSA public exposure limits.

Environmental EME report (2007 ARPANSA Format) Page 1 of 3

 

 

 

Page 96

 

Existing Site Radio Systems

There are currently no existing radio systems for this site.

 

 

Reference Notes:

1.

The Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Agency (ARPANSA) is a Federal Government agency incorporated under

the Health and Ageing portfolio. ARPANSA is charged with responsibility for protecting the health and safety of people, and the
environment, from the harmful effects of radiation (ionising and non-ionising).

Australian Radiation Protection and Nudear Safety Agency (ARPANSA), 2002, ‘Radiation Protection Standard: Maximum Exposure
Levels to Radiofrequency Fields — 3 kHz to 300 GHz’, Radiation Protection Series Publication No. 3, ARPANSA, Yallambie Australia.
[Printed version: ISBN 0-642-79400-6 ISSN 1445-9760]

(Web version: ISBN 0-642-79402-2 ISSN 1445-9760]

The Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) is responsible for the regulation of broadcasting,
radiocommunications, telecommunications and online content. Information on EME is available at http://emr.acma.qov.au/

The EME predictions in this report assume a near worst-case scenario including:

~ base station transmitters operating at maximum power (no automatic power reduction)

- simultaneous telephone calls on all channels

- an unobstructed line of sight view to the antennas.

In practice a worst-case scenario is rarely the case. There are often trees and buildings in the immediate vicinity, and cellular
networks automatically adjust transmit power to suit the actual telephone traffic. The level of EME may also be affected where
significant landscape features are present and predicted EME levels might not be the absolute maximum at all locations.

Further explanation of this report may be found in “Understanding the ARPANSA Environmental EME Report” and other documents
on the ARPANSA web site, http://www.arpansa.gov.au

 

 

Issued by: Telstra Corporation Limited, Data reference file - Waltam Lane, Noosa -
20070628143137

Environmental EME report (2007 ARPANSA Format) Page 2 of 3

 

 

 

Page 97

 

 

 

 

Appendix A
Table of Other Areas of Interest
Height / Scan Maximum Cumulative EME Level
Additional Locations / ; All Carriers at this site
relative to location
ground level (% of ARPANSA exposure limits?)

Public exposure limit = 100%

 

None Identified

 

 

 

 

 

Table: Estimation for the maximum EME levels at selected areas of interest over a height range relative to the specific ground level
at the area of interest. This table includes any existing and proposed radio systems.

 

Estimation Notes / Assumptions — Other Areas of Interest
Variable ground topography has been included in the assessment of the “Other Areas of Interest” as per ARPANSA methodolagy

 

 

Environmental EME report (2007 ARPANSA Format) Page 3 of 3

 

 

Page 98

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

DATE
A DRAWING DRAWING 2 ey A
SUMMARY NUMBER a els tra
“ ISSUE NUMBER G
SITE LOCALITY AND ACCESS PLAN 0107632 si}
SITE LAYOUT 0107632 sz] n
SITE ELEVATION 0107632 $341 N O O S A S 0 U 7 H
SITE PLAN FOR LEASE PURPOSES 0107632 G2} 4

 

 

B ADDRESS: LESLIE DRIVE, 5
NOOSA HEADS, QLD, 4567

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Level 3, Northpoint

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

E oooooo 231 North Quay TOOWOOLBA E
DOOOOD Brisvene a. 4000
LARKIN TEYS Jct 1917 2222 02 -r,
CONSULTING PTY LTD: Htcbnesdtarkinteye.comau
ceo TR Lae PRELIMINARY
(not Sy ms BH
pn ORDER [ DRAWN] CHKD AMENDMENT EXAM | APPD| DATE _|ISS Gelstra
SCALE DSL | AJP ORIGIN: LARKIN TEYS PRELIMINARY DESIGN PFB | MRL \
MOBILE NETWORK SITE
F DRAWING STATUS NOOSA SOUTH
j PRELIMINARY x DRAWING INDEX F
\1/ FOR CONSTRUCTION |. ft. gd. df. fed.
: ow SHT DC
+ AS BUILT Who © Telstra Corporation Limited ABN 33 051 775 556 _ All Tights reserved. NO. Q107632 NO. INDEX
j { 2 LT 3 AZ _4 | 2 _| 6 A3

 

 

——————— CE

Page 99

 

 

 

 

 
    
     
      
     
  
 
  

 

FIBRE & ELECTRICAL
CONNECTIONS AT LESLIE
DRIVE (TO BE CONFIRMED)
[Ea an

EXISTING
SITE ACCESS

PROPOSED
TELSTRA

SITE \

 

    
      
    
  
     
   
     
   

Copyright © Universal Press Pty Ltd,
SITE

LOCALITY PLAN

MAP REFERENCE:
SUNSHINE COAST UBD MAP 19 GRID F2 TN MN

 

SITE ACCESS PLAN MD 11°

SCALE 1:3000

 

PRELIMINARY
Coaefomn| oxo [who [oailwot oe IS Gelstra

    
  
 
 
  
  
       
    

 
  
    
  
   
  
  

      
    
 

Fi 617 3235 YONEY
CONSULTING PTY LTD f tubeeBlukniernconen 8
Engineers & Managers $= W. wunw.tarkinteys.comsu < VIC

ACH O83 17 722 ABN 70083 7 222 MELBOURNE

   

ZONE 56 PARISH OF WEYBA
E: 508660 - COUNTY OF MARCH
N: 7078507 NOOSA SHIRE COUNCIL

  

    
       

   

NE OOOO SRISBANE orces DSL_] AP. [ORIGIN: LARKIN TEYS PRELIMINARY DESIGN MOBILE NETWORK [__Gelstra__|
COOOOG ers. Mornpsin aus
CO-ORDINATES PROPERTY DESCRIPTION OOOOOD Sree 6. 3353 can ao ES
CO-ORDINATE DATUM MGA94 LOT 15 GN SP 177649 LARKIN TEYS [st +617 3238 m0 - usw SITE LOC ALTTY AN ESS
DG

 

© Telstra Corporation Limited ABN 33 051 775 556 = All rights reserved. Q107632 INDEX

d —

Og

 

 

 

Page 100

 

 

LN)
Dy
Ls!
a

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

A =
= eee PROPOSED TELSTRA FIBRE
a tes (TO BE CONFIRMED)
TNMN =
=~ —% ae
= to PROPOSED TELSTRA POWER
+ a a & ROUTE (TO BE CONFIRMED)
—
OE t
Bmp 1e | \
4 ‘\
| B “ P|
| Ppp se TELSTRA MANPROOF FENCE
PROPOSED PS LINK PIT NY - TO EXTENT OF LEASE AREA
| Po
® | MN
PROPOSED 2No.
EARTH PITS < PROPOSED TELSTRA ICS MLIS3.1
| a 77] & LOW IMPACT HUT
Cc uw
un
<<
6s
<<
~
Qo
Qo
K | P——_ 5 |
Pini 300mm WIDE CABLE GANTRY
; PROPOSED MONOPOLE FOOTING
(TO BE CONFIRMED)
|
D |----__—_____ PROPOSED TELSTRA
30m (NOMINAL)
STEEL MONOPOLE
. P|
 ) | -——_-_—_—-—_—_—— PROPOSED 6No.CPX310R ON
0 MODULAR READFRAME TELSTRA
PANEL ANTENNAS
6000
O/A LEASE AREA '
E SITE LAYOUT
SCALE 1:75
1 0 2 3 & 75m
a PRELIMINARY
Ej
00 NT ( YY ORDER | DRAWN] CHKD AMENDMENT EXAM | APPD| DATE _[ISS\” “elstra »
SCALE OOODOO00 SF eeane ores DSL | AJP ORIGIN: LARKIN TEYS PRELIMINARY DESIGN PFB | MRL 1 G
F gogood 237 worth dss sual MOBILE NETWORK SITE
LARKIN TEYS Tet 1917 0220 100 «ow NOOSA SOUTH
CONSULTING PTY LTD f hase hnenee ee ‘SYONEY SITE LAYOUT
W/ NOTES:- | Endoeere & Wanecers ve memlttepe com Me
1. MINOR VARIATIONS IN POLE & HUT DIMENSIONS MAY OCCUR. DWG SsHT SS
+H © Telstra Corporation Limited ABN 33 051 775 556 All rights reserved. NO. Q107632 NO. Nex
i I 2 I 3 SZ 4 L_ 2 _I 6

 

 

 

 

 

Page 101

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1 2 (eo; ZN 4_—-@ 1 5 6
ih fl EL. 30.4m
STRUCTURE DESIGN CRITERIA / TOP OF MONOPOLE
PROPOSED STRUCTURE TYPE PROPOSED STEEL MONOPOLE H Fd w FL. 30.0m
~( PROPOSED 6No. CPX310R
A PROPOSED HEADFRAME TYPE TELSTRA J3 | TELSTRA PANEL ANTENNAS
MODULAR HEADFRAME UW i A
PROPOSED ANTENNAS |
TYPE ORIENTATION | HEIGHTS im) | AP*ROX FEEDER | <——
2x CPX310R 9° (T} 30.0 35m <—> ~
2x CPX310R 120° (7) 30.0m 35m | —>
2x CPX310R 240° (T) 30.8m 35m | ZN
1. MINOR VARIATIONS IN ANTENNA & HUT | > IX 2 PROPOSED TELSTRA 30m |_|
DIMENSIONS MAY OCCUR. | A A) J3 STEEL POLE
2. THE OVERALL HEIGHT OF THE POLE, | ZN
HEADFRAME AND ANTENNAS SHOULD NOT EXCEED | A PROPOSED TELSTRA FEEDERS
32m ABOVE THE TOP OF THE FOUNDATION. rY TO RUN INSIDE POLE
| a
| ) <>
|
is —
I <—
|
|
IY ZO
=
|
|
|
|
| =
c | C
| —
| AN
|
|
| ! D
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D | D
|
|
|
|
PROPOSED TELSTRA |
300mmWIDE CABLE TRAY |
| PROPOSED TELSTRA ICS MLIS3.1
PROPOSED MANPROOF FENCE mA LOW IMPACT HUT
BIOS Ree SS
ae
E : TET E
pn pncocd XK “sr _0.0m
1 otf || GROUND LEVEL
1 ot | RR
Po 14d li | ~~ PROPOSED FOOTING DESIGN To
EASTERN ELEVATION BE CONFIRMED UPON RECEIPT OF
hv tenet vat GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION
DO NOT 1 SCALE M00 , 3 ri 5 REPORT. i
SCALE 9 ' ‘ : 7m
Sasa PRELIMINARY =———
IN
r { “Y ORDER | DRAWN | CHKD AMENDMENT EXAM] APPO| DATE _[ISsyY” “elstra
° — OSL | AJP ORIGIN: LARKIN TEYS PRELIMINARY DESIGN PFB | MRL %'
@Re SANE
COOOGG ters tertpot Soe MOBILE NETWORK SITE
jorth Quay
Briebene OQ. 4000
gagocs Teh o0t ¥ 2230 1100 . now NOOSA SOUTH F
W CONSULTING PTY LTD Lee atin cones wrorer SITE LAYOUT
Engineers & Manegere = W. www.lerkinteys.comsu + VIC
AACN IT IR AMINO Ti MELBOURNE
r 7 OWG SHT S3
@} © Telstra Corporation Limited ABN 33 051 775 556 All rights reserved. NO. Q107632 NO. INDEX
1 I Z l 1 9 \Z 4 i 2 | 5 ASV

 

 

 

Page 102

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    
      
                                 

   

    

    

  

    

         
            

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1 I Zz J 3 aS 4 ] 5 ] 6
100°20'00" soueus'as
(3.208) “49°45”
A 72°02'00" (28.515) NOTE:
(3.208) 100°00'40" THIS PROPOSED LEASE AREA A
43°45'00" (26.250) LOCATION IS APPROXIMATE ONLY,
(3.2 , AND TO BE CONFIRMED BY A
IN 208) 12270150" QUALIFIED SURVEYOR,
M 109°39°30"
N (28.769) eh
oop age 1962'65"
“ato2s) (6.268) / / a
953°23"40" is en
(6.268) ge ae
evi Vib
ABUI3 OE PROPOSED
/__{6.000) é TELSTRA
LEASE AREA
aE “8 7
e LOT 15 ale ale
SP 177649 PROPOSED
c TELSTRA 269°L,3'33”
LEASE AREA (6,000) c
\ \
VA \ \
\ \
fa 348°37°46" VA 170°4,9'26" \
aa (154.817) \ A (153.775) 153°43'35" \ - N
‘ (24.336) lw as
& We
‘i 173°07'10" a 3 3
\\ (20.322) a4 “4 .
M\ 2
D 293°22'05" \ \ \
199°07'40" |
(10.667) \ (22.312) \ \ p
291°38'10" \ \ |
(18.921) \ 228° 07 15" \ \
mee SITE LEASE PLAN
SCALE 1:200 |
963° 01.05"
277° 46°00" (140.622)
(18.921)
281°14'50" onan"
E (18.921) 2soror03" + PROPERTY LEASE PLAN
ep yaee (22.457) SALE 72000 c
284°4,2'35 959°22°20"
(18.921) (1.701) 2009 = 20406080 100m
21075 at PRELIMINARY
DO NOT (ORDER [DRAWN] CHKD AMENDMENT EXaw | PPD] are [Issy” =~elstr \
SCALE CO-ORDINATES PROPERTY DESCRIPTION OOOO ®Rteeane once OSL] AIP JORICIN: LARKIN TEYS PRELIMINARY DESIGN PrB | MRL 1 & a
F £0 DOOD se ieie ent tae MOBILE NETWORK SITE
CO-ORDINATE DATUM MGA94 LOT 15 ON SP 177649 OOOO Brenene a. 000
ZONE 56 PARISH OF WEYRA LARKIN TEYS Js +81? 9238 1100 . ow NOOSA SOUTH
W ar NODSE SHIRE CCUN CONSULTING PTY LTD EichnAiersemat SITE PLAN FOR LEASE PURPOSES
|! N: 7078507 - NOOSE SHIRE COUNCIL Engineers & Mangere Vi wewlarkinaye come + Mc Fi
oy 7 I 7 © Telstra Corporation Limited ABN 33 051 775 556 = All rights reserved. PNG Q107632 a INDEX

 

 

 

 

Page 103

 

 

xm . LAND USE SECTION FEES
a MNSOLOSEA

RECEIPT TYPE

SALE OF DOCUMENTS
Superseded Planning Scheme Documentation . 520
Copy of Permit/Approval Letter 110
The Noosa Plan Documentation 111
APPLICATION FEES .
Material Change of Use - Coyefipact >
. Consistent ¥ 57 x §21
Ciitansisioh 521
Assessment under Superseded Planning Scheme 521
Modification to a Development Permit 521
Extension of a Currency Period . 521
Operational Works - Landscaping 521
@ Bldg Work assessable against the Planning Scheme 521
PRE LODGEMENT REVIEW
Half Hour §22
One Hour 522
ADVERTISING
Purchase Advertised Applications 523
JETTIES
Jetty Application Fee 524
Jetty Bond 51
(Category 4)
BONDS :
Performance Bond . : 51
(Category 9)
SIGNS
Registration Fee : : . 222
se@ruree
Search of Land Use Section file 112
Liquor Licensing Request 113

 

TOTAL $ SF S7S_

 

NAME: S ase, be ah oa?
ADDRESS: bette ZB Sucte 3a DB) ben Chearcic Se
SPAinSG Hicvr QP Wooo

 

 

 

FILE NO: O7/.323¢ DATE: — Z2/ufoz

RECEIPT NO: I Iu wal Signature of TP Officer: PS Arwen 24
i959 +045

AUTHORITY NO: vf ‘ J

 

(3f2eeq/[r23¢4;

Page 104

CALCULATION OF FEES

 

APPLICATION

FEE

TOTAL
FEES

 

MCU - CODE ASSESSMENT
Details of Development

Consistent 1.0
Inconsistent 3.0

FEE CALCULATION

<I

 

MCU (IMPACT-ASSESSMENT
Details of Development = Ti~-fKerstricti
( ng) fe- S Jeune

Consistent 1.0

nsistentss xe Fee
‘ Muerte, vise
AS (ER KOT Inseg
wo

FEE CALCULATION

 

OPERATIONAL WORKS
Details of Development

FEE CALCULATION

¢$ S875

 

 

 

 

TOTAL FEES

§ ORI.