Skip to the record
Mmm.. taste the original NoosaWatch™

Original source · versioned page text

3. FINAL-160721-BA4090-Town Planning Report

Attached to the e-mail MCU16/0084 & OPW16/0157 Development Application IDAS Forms, Planning report & Plans email 1 of 3.

of 143

Page text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Page text read automatically using OCR, there may be inaccuracies

(6) Development is not located in an erosion prone    Not Applicable (6)
area within a coastal management district unless:
                                                      The proposal is not located within an erosion prone
(a) it cannot feasibly be located elsewhere, and      area.

(b) is coastal-dependent development, or
temporary, readily relocatable or able-to-be-
abandoned development.

(7) that is the redevelopment of existing             Not Applicable (6)
permanent buildings or structures, is located
outside an erosion-prone area or, where this is not   The proposal is not located within an erosion prone
feasible, redevelopment:                              area

(a) is located:

i. as far landward from the seaward property
boundary as possible, or

ii. landward of the seaward alignment of the
neighbouring buildings, and

(b) provides space seaward of the development
within the premises to allow for the future
construction of erosion control structures, such as
a seawall.

(8) Development proposes to undertake coastal         Not applicable
protection work (excluding beach nourishment)
only as a last resort where coastal erosion           The proposal does not involve coastal protection
presents an imminent threat to public safety or       work.
existing buildings and structures, and all of the
following apply:

(a) the property cannot reasonably be relocated or
abandoned, and

(b) any coastal protection work to protect private
property is located as far landward as practicable
and on the lot containing the property to the
maximum extent reasonable, and

(c) the coastal protection work mitigates any
increase in coastal hazard risk for adjacent areas.

Emissions and Hazardous Activities                    Not applicable

                                                      The proposal does not involve Emissions and
                                                      Hazardous Activities.

State Transport Infrastructure                        Not applicable

                                                      The proposal is located within 25m to a state
                                                      controlled road however the Noosa Plan 2013
                                                      appropriately integrated infrastructure into the


URBIS
FINAL-160721-BA4090-TOWN PLANNING REPORT                                                                 APPENDICES
Log in to download the original file

3. FINAL-160721-BA4090-Town Planning Report.pdf · 3.5 MB (large file)

Large file: the download may take up to a minute.

Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.