Council archive · source document
MCU14/0087 Notice of Submission - Kai Tolhurst
.'
4. Confinn that the foilowing mandatory supportinglnfonnatJon accompanies thl. appliell1ion
Manda10ry supporting information Confinnanon of hlethod of
lodgement lodgement
All applications
A sit. pl<lndrllW!lto an appmpriale scale (1:100. 1:2ll0 or 1:500 are g.c"nRrmed
recommended >Clliesl which shows Ihe following:
0 tM location and slle area of the Iond 10wllieh the applicali"" relalo.
~""t land)
• Ihe nonn point
• Ihe boundaries of the relevanlland
0 any IVad fIVntawes of lhe relevant land. Including the name althe mad
0 the location and use al any existing or proposed bullding$ or strue!urel
on the relevant land (n01e: wIlere extenslve demolition 0<new toJil<lings
are proposed. two separate plans Ian existing Site plan and proposad site
pl<lnlmay be sPllfopriate)
0 any o,.;stIng or pr<>po$ed•• semonts on tho relevanlland and tneir
funCtion
0 the locetion and use 01 bullding$ on land adjoJning the relevanlland
0 all venlcle """"ss points .nd any existing or pr<>posedcar pal1<ingarea.
on tne relevant land. Car parking .paces for per"'"' wllh disabil~ies and I
any service velliclll aecess and par1ling mould be cleany ma_ I,
o 10<any naw building on lhe ",Iavant land. tholocatlon at refuse storage
• tnelocatlon of "{"I proposed retairing walls (J(\ tna relevant land and ll1ell
nelght
.
I
0
0
tnelocation of ony proposed landscaping on the reI!vanllani1
th8locatlon of any stonnwater detention on the relevant land. I
The Mandatory supporting information is lacking In its requirements in regards to the site
plan provided and there is lack of detail in particular to car parking areas, provision for those
with disabilities, service vehicle access etc.
The applicant confirmed that information provided demonstrated the on site parking
provisions, yet the hand drawn plan (not numbered) merely shows a line demonstrating
where access would occur and no direct provision or plans of car parking spaces.
When the application invol ••'tts new operational work
Plans shomg the nature. location. number of new on-51l. elll por1<.Ingbays, .l2rconfirrned
proposed area of new landscaping, proposed type 01new vehicle ClOss-over
(non-'eSidel1\lal useS), ptcposcd maximum naw venlall., setVldng .
o Not applicable
arrangement (non-,esldenUal uses) ofU,. pr<>po$ednew operatlonal..or1<..
The applicant has also confirmed that plans have been submitted to meet this mandatory
requirement but those provided do not achieve this requirement.
Due to the poor material submitted it is not possible to ascertain the use area, how operation
will occur, and how car parking will be provided.
Size and Scale of development
The submitted plans suggest a use area of 9m2 yet this makes no provisions for how the
boards will be ioaded and unloaded of trailer. These boards are up to 35m in length and
require to be removed from the trailer to provide to customers. This will in effect make the
use area of the business expand out from the footprint pro'posed of 3.6m x 204m to approx.
75m x So4m (40m2). This is in estimation what will be required to service customers as they
chose the hire equipment from the trailer.
•
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
MCU14/0087 Notice of Submission - Kai TolhurstRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 2.1 MB (large file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.
Original file
Log in to download the original file
The download may take up to a minute.