Council archive · source document
MCU13_0092_-_Resident_objection_Armistead · MCU13/0092
Attached to the e-mail Properly made submission (object) Amanda Armistead & BARCOO Body Corporate MCU13/0092.
2|Page
Noise Impact
In terms of the Councils requirement of the developer in its letter on the 18th June, 2013 with regards to
noise,
“The car parking areas increased traffic in the local street, loading bay service area
and operation of commercial plant and equipment (after hours deliveries, air
conditioning and refrigeration units, waste collection and vehicle noise), has the
potential to denigrate the amenity of the adjacent properties to the north west and
east of the site. A noise impact assessment is required addressing the potential
noise impacts that may be generated by the use. Where potential impacts are
identified, which can be viably controlled, the assessment should provide
recommendations for noise amelioration. This assessment is to be prepared by a
suitably qualified person and in accordance with the, Environmental Protection
(Noise) Policy 2008, and relevant Australian Standards, e.g. AS1055 series.”
I believe that my property will be negatively impacted by noise as a direct impact of the proposed
development and as such should have had a noise impact assessment conducted specifically on 243
David Low Way. The proposed development extends to the back corner boundary of my property. The
Noise Impact Assessment, in my opinion, did not evaluate noise in this area of the development. See the
photo below….taken from the Noise Impact Assessment document, I have overlayed my property
location on the photo and the available site plan
243 David Low Way.
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
MCU13_0092_-_Resident_objection_Armistead.pdfRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 790 KB (small file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.