Council archive · source document
Appendix C Traffic Assessment · 132005.1133.13
With respect to the external users residing outside of the site, it is likely that they will be visiting a
relative/resident of the proposed development and will be captured under the residential visitor parking. As a
result, the visitor parking spaces are essentially being double counted.
Based on the above commentary, it is TTM’s recommendation that a lower parking rate be considered. As
such, it is considered that the village mix zone rate is a more appropriate parking provision. Therefore, this
equates to a supply of 11 spaces for the food and beverage use and an overall facilities building component of
28 spaces. Due to the reasons outlined above, it is expected that the 28 spaces, including 5 staff spaces, for
the facilities building component and the residential visitor spaces will be adequate to cater for the facilities
building demand.
4. Conclusion
Based on this assessment TTM see no traffic engineering reason why the request for a minor change to amend
the existing approval for the facilities building parking spaces cannot be granted.
I trust the information provided herein is adequate for your purposes. Should you require any further
information, please contact me by phone on (07) 3327 9500 or by email at [email protected] sincerely,
Arthur Stamatiou
Project Consultant
TTM Consulting Pty Ltd
Attachments
• Approved Development Plans
4
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
Appendix C Traffic Assessment.pdfRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 8.1 MB (large file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.
Original file
Log in to download the original file
The download may take up to a minute.