AS PUBLISHED Information Request MCU25 0057 · MCU25/0057

Additional information is required to demonstrate compliance with PO10(c)(e) of the Flood
Hazard Overlay Code – i.e., filling will not cause adverse impacts or additional ponding on
adjacent properties.
Information Required
1.   Provide additional detail to demonstrate compliance with Performance Outcome 10 (c)
     and (e) of the Flood Hazard Overlay Code. The additional detail must be prepared by a
     suitably qualified person (RPEQ).


Issue – Garage Carpark Manoeuvring
Council requires further information to demonstrate that the proposed garage and driveway
layout accommodates for on-site parking in accordance with PO13 of the Dual Occupancy
and Multiple Dwelling Code.
Information Required
2.   Provide vehicle turn paths demonstrating that a B85 vehicle can enter and exit each
     garage carpark. The turn paths must assume the adjacent carpark is occupied and
     comply with Figure 5.2 of AS2890.1.
     Note that vehicles are not required to exit the site in a forward gear.


Issue – Conflicting Footpath Widths
Skale’s Conceptual plan – Ground floor (05, Rev, DA02) dated 16 May 2025 proposes a 1.8m
wide footpath along the site’s frontage.
SCG’s Driveway & Access Plan (00469-OW4.1) dated March 2025 proposes a 1.2m wide
footpath along the site’s frontage.
Table SC6.7.2 of PSP6 Engineering Design Standards requires a minimum footpath width of
1.5m.
Information Required
3.   Provide revised drawings to include a 1.5m wide footpath for the length of the site’s
     frontage to George Street width in accordance with SC6.7.2 of PSP6 Engineering
     Design Standards for a ‘Local’ order road.




                                                                                   Page 2 of 5