Skip to the record
Noosa’s premier civic archive.

Council archive · source document

Acid sulfate Management Plan Reference Document OPW19-0239 · OPW19/0239

of 26

Check the original when the exact wording matters.

Plans and drawings: the text below has words only, no drawings.

Log in to see the plans as drawn
                                                 -
                                          NOOSA COUNCIL
                                       REFERENCE DOCUMENT
                                       OPW19/0239 23 DEC 2019




  Acid Sulfate Soils Management Plan
  Proposed Unit Development
  217-219 Gympie Terrace, Noosaville




Prepared for:
Gympie Terrace Noosaville Pty Ltd
C/- Ms Sasha Hopkins
The A Team Property Group
PO Box 523
Bentleigh East VIC 3165

Report Number: J000799-003-R-Rev0
April 2019
Full text of the other 25 pages

Page 2

Gympie Terrace Noosaville Pty Ltd




Record of Issue

                                                                                     Method of
                Company                  Client Contact      Version   Date Issued
                                                                                     Delivery
                                      C/- Ms Sasha Hopkins
  Gympie Terrace Noosaville Pty Ltd   The A Team Property     Rev0     April 2019    Electronic
                                              Group




J000799-003-R-Rev0                                                                   Page i

Page 3

Gympie Terrace Noosaville Pty Ltd



Table of Contents

1.0       INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................... 1
2.0       OBJECTIVES ......................................................................................................................................... 1
3.0       PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT ............................................................................................................... 1
4.0       SITE DESCRIPTION .............................................................................................................................. 2
5.0       OVERVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES ........................................................................................ 2
5.1       ASS Summary ........................................................................................................................................ 2
5.2       Groundwater ........................................................................................................................................... 3
5.3       Potential Environmental Impacts ............................................................................................................ 3
5.3.1         Summary of ASS Management Requirements................................................................................... 3
6.0       MANAGEMENT PROCEDURES ........................................................................................................... 4
7.0       RESPONSIBILITIES ............................................................................................................................... 4
8.0       NON-CONFORMANCE AND CORRECTIVE ACTION .......................................................................... 4
9.0       AUDITING ............................................................................................................................................... 4
10.0      COMMUNITY RELATIONS .................................................................................................................... 4
11.0      TRAINING ............................................................................................................................................... 5
12.0      LIMITATIONS ......................................................................................................................................... 5



Tables
Table 1: Liming Rates ........................................................................................................................................ 2
Table 2: Summary of Groundwater Conditions ................................................................................................. 3
Table 3: Potential Environmental Impacts ......................................................................................................... 3



Appendices
Appendix A Basement Level & Elevation Plan
Appendix B Acid Sulfate Soil Management Procedures
Appendix C Limitations




J000799-003-R-Rev0                                                                                                                                Page ii

Page 4

Gympie Terrace Noosaville Pty Ltd




Definitions
Environmental Protection Act 1994

Environmental Harm -                Any adverse effect, or potential adverse effect (whether temporary or
                                    permanent and of whatever magnitude, duration or frequency) on an
                                    environmental value, and includes environmental nuisance.

Environmental Nuisance -            Any unreasonable interference or likely interference with an environmental
                                    value caused by
                                    (a)     noise, dust, odour, light; or
                                    (b)     an unhealthy, offensive or unsightly condition because of
                                            contamination; or
                                    (c)     another way prescribed by regulation.

Material Environmental Harm -       Is environmental harm (other than environmental nuisance)
                                    (a)    that is not trivial or negligible in nature, extent or context; or
                                    (b)    that causes actual or potential loss or damage to property of an
                                           amount of, or amounts totalling, more than the threshold amount but
                                           less than the maximum amount; or
                                    (c)    that results in costs of more than the threshold amount but less than
                                           the maximum amount being incurred in taking appropriate action to
                                           (i)     prevent or minimise the harm; and
                                           (ii)    rehabilitate or restore the environment to its condition before
                                                   the harm.
                                    “Maximum amount” means the threshold amount for serious environmental
                                    harm.
                                    “Threshold amount” means $5,000 or, if a greater amount is prescribed by
                                    regulation, the greater amount.

Serious Environmental Harm -        Is environmental harm (other than environmental nuisance)
                                    (a) that causes actual or potential harm to environmental values that is
                                        irreversible, of a high impact or widespread; or that causes actual or
                                        potential harm to environmental values of an area of high
                                        conservation value of special significance; or
                                    (b) that causes actual or potential loss or damage to property of an
                                        amount of, or amounts totalling, more than the threshold amount; or
                                    (c) that results in costs of more than the threshold amount being incurred
                                        in taking appropriate action to
                                          (i)     prevent or minimise the harm; and
                                          (ii)    rehabilitate or restore the environment to its condition before the
                                                  harm.

                                           “Threshold amount’ means $50,000 or, if a greater amount is
                                          prescribed by regulation, the greater amount.




J000799-003-R-Rev0                                                                                        Page iii

Page 5

Gympie Terrace Noosaville Pty Ltd



Glossary

ANC              Acid Neutralising Capacity

ANZECC           Australian & New Zealand Environmental Conservation Council

ARMCANZ          Agricultural and Resource Management Council of Australia and New Zealand

DES              Department of Environment and Science

ASS MP           Acid Sulfate Soil Management Plan

NATA             National Association of Testing Authorities

PASS             Potential Acid Sulfate Soil

pHF              Field pH

pHFOX            pH following rapid oxidation with hydrogen peroxide

QASSIT           Queensland Acid Sulfate Soils Investigation Team

TAA              Titratable Actual Acidity

TPA              Total Potential Acidity

CRS              Chromium Reducible Sulfur




J000799-003-R-Rev0                                                                           Page iv

Page 6

Gympie Terrace Noosaville Pty Ltd




1.0      INTRODUCTION
This Acid Sulfate Soil Management Plan (ASS MP) has been prepared by Core Consultants Pty Ltd (Core) in
order to manage and minimise the ASS environmental impacts during construction of a proposed unit
development at 217 to 219 Gympie Terrace, Noosaville (the site).
This ASS MP references the results of a Geotechnical and ASS Investigation undertaken by Core (refer
Core report J000799-002-R-Rev0, dated December 2018). The procedures contained within this ASS MP
should be updated and revised to address conditions encountered that vary from those indicated by
investigations or where alternative construction methodologies are adopted.
The ASS MP was prepared with consideration of the following documents:

      Queensland Acid Sulfate Soil Technical Manual: Soil Management Guidelines V4.0, 2014. Dear, S-E.,
       Ahern, C. R., O'Brien, L. E., Dobos, S. K., McElnea, A. E., Moore, N. G. & Watling, K. M. Department
       of Science, Information Technology, Innovation and the Arts, Queensland Government;

      Guidelines for Sampling and Analysis of Lowland Acid Sulfate Soils in Queensland, 1998; Ahern, CR.,
       Ahern, M.R. and Powell;

      State Planning Policy, July 2014 (SPP14);

      State Planning Policy – state interest guideline, Water quality, August 2014;

      Environmental Protection Act 1994;

      Environmental Protection Policy (Water) 2009.

A copy of the ASS MP and associated forms, registers and records shall be kept at the site office during the
construction stage of the development.

2.0      OBJECTIVES
The objective of the ASS MP is to mitigate or control potential impacts relating to the disturbance of ASS
across the site. Disturbance includes the excavation of ASS and potential dewatering of ASS impacted
groundwater.

3.0      PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
The proposed development is to comprise a three-storey apartment building with a single level basement
carpark (excavation depth of approximately 2 m). A concept sketch of the proposed development is shown in
Image 1.




Image 1: Concept sketch of proposed development (Image from Chris Clout Design, Dwg No. C4.0).



J000799-003-R-Rev0                                                                                 Page 1

Page 7

Gympie Terrace Noosaville Pty Ltd



4.0      SITE DESCRIPTION
The site is located at 217 to 219 Gympie Terrace, Noosaville; covering a total area of approximately
0.11 hectares.
The site was generally flat and clear at the time of our investigation, comprising short grass and a few small
to medium sized trees located in the south east corner.
Site conditions at the time of our investigation are shown in Photograph 1.




Photograph 1: Site conditions at the time of fieldwork, looking south west from borehole BH1.

5.0      OVERVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES
This section provides a brief overview of environmental issues related to ASS associated with the excavation
stage of the proposed development.

  5.1 ASS Summary
The results from this investigation indicate that low levels of existing acidity and potential ASS (PASS) are
distributed throughout the natural sands across the site.
The SPP14 Guidelines require that the level of treatment for management of ASS is based on treatment of
all existing and potential acidity. The results of the laboratory testing have been accumulated in an Acid-
Base Account to give the Net Acidity for each sample in units of mol H+/tonne as presented in Table C1 of
our geotechnical report (ref. J000799-002-Rev0). This value has been calculated from sulfur trail potential
acidity (SCr) plus actual acidity (TAA).
Liming rates have been calculated in kg CaCO3/m³ using a factor of safety (fineness factor) of 1.5 and an
assumed bulk density of 1.8 tonne/m3. Calculation of liming rates required for full neutralisation of combined
existing and potential acidity are presented in Table 1.
Table 1: Liming Rates
 Material Type                          Depth                         Treatment Rate

                                        0 m – 1 m BGL                 5 kg CaCO3/m³
 Natural Sands
                                        Below 1 m BGL                 15 kg CaCO3/m³
Note:    * Below Ground Level
         ** Liming rate based on maximum values.




J000799-003-R-Rev0                                                                                  Page 2

Page 8

Gympie Terrace Noosaville Pty Ltd



5.2         Groundwater
Groundwater inflow was encountered between approximately 1.2 m BGL and 1.5 m BGL during our
investigation. Table 2 summarises the groundwater conditions encountered on 14 November 2018.
Table 2: Summary of Groundwater Conditions

  Borehole Location           Groundwater Depth m BGL (~RL m AHD)

            BH1                                   1.5 (0.27)
            BH2                                   1.2 (0.55)
            BH3                                   1.5 (0.20)
            BH4                                   1.5 (0.17)

Groundwater measured in the standpipe in borehole BH1 was 2 m BGL (~RL -0.25 m) on 14 November
2018.
Given the site’s close proximity to the Noosa River, groundwater levels will likely vary with tidal influence and
prevailing weather conditions. Previous experience in the area indicates that the groundwater level can rise
close to the ground surface following periods of heavy or prolonged rainfall.
Provided that the retaining and dewatering system installed to support the basement excavation is able to
‘cut-off’ groundwater flows from the sands, seepage should be limited to flows emanating from sandy
materials in the base of the single level basement excavation. It should be possible to collect such seepage
by shallow gravel filled drains graded to a sump(s) from which the water could be removed from the
excavation to sewer or stormwater by submersible pumps (following treatment if necessary, depending on
the results of groundwater testing).

5.3         Potential Environmental Impacts
Potential environmental impacts associated with ASS disturbance during earthworks and construction for the
proposed development are summarised below in Table 3, along with the level of risk and management
strategies to mitigate the risk.
Table 3: Potential Environmental Impacts

 Activity         Issue                           Level of Risk to the Environment      Mitigation Strategies


                        Acid formation and
                         transport due to                                                Lime neutralisation treatment of
                         disturbance (by           These works present a medium risk.    excavated ASS and verification
                      excavation) of existing                                                       testing.
                       acidity and/or PASS.
 Proposed
 earthworks           Release of acidic and/or
                                                                                         Regular water quality monitoring
 and                   metals impacted waters
                                                         Medium to low level risk       and treatment (if required) prior to
 construction        from within excavations to
                                                                                                discharge off-site.
                          surface waters.
                                                                                          Regular groundwater quality
                   Potential adverse impacts
                                                                                         monitoring and development of
                  to groundwater quality due                   Low level of risk
                                                                                           contingency measures (if
                    to earthworks activities.
                                                                                                   required).

5.3.1        Summary of ASS Management Requirements
Provided the proposed ASS management procedures are effectively implemented and monitored throughout
the construction phase of the development, it is considered that there should be limited internal or external
ASS environmental impacts attributable to soils with existing or potential acidity.
The relevant issues, which are of significance when considering existing and potential acidity management
for the earthworks phase of this development, are:




J000799-003-R-Rev0                                                                                           Page 3

Page 9

Gympie Terrace Noosaville Pty Ltd



      Treatment and validation of excavated soils with existing or potential acidity

      Stockpiling, handling and transport of soils with existing or potential acidity

      Potential adverse impacts to groundwater or surface water quality on site or within the surrounding
       environment arising from the disturbance of soils with existing or potential acidity (if not managed
       correctly).

6.0      MANAGEMENT PROCEDURES
The management procedures required to address the potential ASS issues associated with the earthworks
phase of the proposed development are presented in Appendix B, and include the following:
Procedure A: Management of ASS
Procedure B: Treatment and Verification of Excavated ASS
Procedure C: Monitoring of Water Quality

7.0      RESPONSIBILITIES
This section outlines the responsibilities to manage, document and report on ASS issues for the project.

     The Project Manager is responsible for ensuring that all requirements of the ASS MP are met during the
      project.

     The Site Supervisor is responsible for ensuring the strategies and procedures prescribed in the ASS
      MP are implemented at the site in accordance with the specified performance criteria.

     The Environmental Manager is responsible for reviewing compliance with the ASS MP and
      development of actions to address non-conformance.

     All other site personnel are responsible for implementing strategies and procedures prescribed in the
      ASS MP, as applicable to their work activities.

8.0      NON-CONFORMANCE AND CORRECTIVE ACTION
Any non-conformance to the ASS MP must be addressed as soon as is practical. The personnel responsible
for the non-conformance must be notified immediately for purposes of issuing rectification instructions.

9.0      AUDITING
The Environmental Manager will be responsible for ensuring that an auditing program is implemented for
construction and treatment works. The audit program shall aim to ensure compliance with the ASS MP and
relevant statutory requirements.
The Environmental Manager shall appoint an experienced ASS practitioner to conduct regular auditing of
activities and ASS management measures. Given the expected earthworks period, a weekly auditing
schedule is recommended. The frequency of these audits may gradually decrease if a high level of
compliance with the ASS MP is evident.
The audit shall take the form of a visual inspection of the works and associated control measures and a
review of monitoring data. A written record of auditing undertaken shall be maintained, including details on
the date of the audit; activities undertaken; observations made and any non-conformances identified. A copy
of the audit report shall be forwarded to the Environmental Manager within 2 days of the audit.

10.0 COMMUNITY RELATIONS
Concerns raised by the community (or other parties) in relation to ASS will be directed to the Environmental
Manager for action.
The Environmental Manager shall maintain a concerns register recording the following information:
1)    Details: Name, address and phone number of party raising the concern.



J000799-003-R-Rev0                                                                                 Page 4

Page 10

Gympie Terrace Noosaville Pty Ltd



2)   Nature of concern: Detail of issue, date of incident, people involved, and location.

3)   Action taken or required: Any action proposed or undertaken to address the concern, including time and
     date.
4)   Response to action: Was the complainant satisfied with the outcome of the actions taken, if not, what
     else needs to be done, or is it outside the scope of the development works.

5)   Prevention or re-occurrence: What action has been taken by the nominated responsible person to
     ensure the problem will not re-occur.

11.0 TRAINING
All site staff of Mosaic, and contractors, will be required to undergo a site induction covering all the elements
of the ASS MP. The induction will aim to instil environmental awareness by personnel including:

      Introduce and explain the duty of care required under the Environmental Protection Act 1994.

      Introduce the ASS MP and the responsibilities it places on all contractors and consultants.

      Explain the various subordinate components of the ASS MP and the reporting and monitoring
       procedures of the ASS MP and how they work.

      Explain how to use the environmental procedures and plans in the ASS MP.
The content of the induction program will be endorsed and presented by the Site Supervisor, or delegate.

12.0 LIMITATIONS
Should you require any further information please contact the undersigned. We draw your attention to the
document, Limitations, which is included in Appendix C.




J000799-003-R-Rev0                                                                                    Page 5

Page 11

Gympie Terrace Noosaville Pty Ltd




Core Consultants Pty Ltd
Yours sincerely,




Simon Maggiora                            Walter Mastenbroek
BE(Civil) MIEAust CPEng NER RPEQ          MEngPr MSc BSc (Hons) PMP NER CPEng RPEQ
Associate, Senior Geotechnical Engineer   Associate, Senior Geotechnical Engineer


SM/CK/WM/sm



A.B.N. 75 603 384 050




J000799-003-R-Rev0                                                       Page 6

Page 12

Gympie Terrace Noosaville Pty Ltd




Appendix A
Basement Level & Elevation Plan




J000799-003-R-Rev0                  Page 7

Page 13

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

FLOOD HEIGHT 2700

 

 

 

Section 1

SCALE: 1: 100

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

—
LC
CHRIS

CLOUT
DESIGN

www.chriscloutdesign.com.au
OFFICE 1/20 DUKE STREET.
SUNSHINE BEACH 4567

E: [email protected]
P: (07) 54748 107

9ace 1127508

[ail

 

GENERAL NOTES:

Use written dimensions only. DO
NOT scale drawings. Contractors to
verify all dimensions on site prior to
commencing works. Site location in
accordance with engineers details.
These drawings are to be read in
conjunetion with engineers design
and details, the accompanying
building specification and schedule
offinishes. Ifin doubt, please
request clarification. DO NOT
ASSUME.

 

PROJECT
Proposed New Residence

PROJECT NAME:
WET EDGE VILLAS

CLIENT:
Sasha Hopkins

SITE ADDRESS:
Lot 1-RP66483 & Lot
4-RP70165,217-219 Gympie
Terrace, Noosaville 4567
DRAWING TITLE:

SECTION

 

 

DATE:
18/10/18

SCALE
1:100 @A2

DRAWN BY:
c.cLOUT

ISSUE:
CONCEPT SKETCH

DRAWING No:

C5.0

 

 

 

Page 14

Gympie Terrace Noosaville Pty Ltd




Appendix B
Acid Sulfate Soil Management Procedures




J000799-003-R-Rev0                        Page 8

Page 15

PROCEDURE A
Management of Acid Sulfate Soils


A1.     GENERAL
The procedures outlined below are provided for the management of the excavation, stockpiling,
handling and transport of acid sulfate soils (ASS). It is proposed to either treat ASS materials in-situ
during excavation or transport to an onsite ASS treatment area as soon as practicable. The Site
Supervisor or their delegated representative will be responsible for the excavation, stockpiling,
handling and transport of excavated ASS materials. The Site Supervisor or their delegated
representative will also be responsible for the supervision of in-situ treatment, and management of
the treatment area, and for ensuring that the excavated ASS is remediated and verified in accordance
with the ASS MP and associated procedures.

A2.       OBJECTIVES
1)    Appropriately manage the stockpiling, handling and transport of confirmed and suspected ASS
      materials

2)    Comply with conditions of licences, permits or other approvals issued for the project.

A3.       STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS AND GUIDELINES
1)    Queensland Acid Sulfate Soil Technical Manual: Soil Management Guidelines V4.0, 2014. Dear, S-
      E., Ahern, C. R., O'Brien, L. E., Dobos, S. K., McElnea, A. E., Moore, N. G. & Watling, K. M.
      Department of Science, Information Technology, Innovation and the Arts, Queensland
      Government

2)    Ahern, CR., Ahern, M.R. and Powell, Guidelines for Sampling and Analysis of Lowland Acid Sulfate
      Soils in Queensland, 1998

3)    State Planning Policy – state interest guideline, Water quality, August 2014

4)    Environmental Protection Act 1994
5)    Environmental Protection Policy (Water) 2009

A4.       MANAGEMENT MEASURES
A4 (A).          MANAGEMENT OF EXCAVATIONS
An earthworks strategy shall be developed to plan and track movement, treatment and verification of
ASS materials.
Should groundwater inflow be considered excessive during basement excavations, alternative
construction methodologies will be considered to mitigate the possible impacts of lowered
groundwater levels and the potential oxidation of surrounding sediments.
All waters collected from groundwater and surface water inflow into excavations via seepage and
runoff must be retained, monitored and appropriately treated to comply with the appropriate discharge
criteria (Procedure C) prior to discharge off site or re-use on site.

A4 (B).          STOCKPILING, HANDLING AND TRANSPORT OF ASS
Wherever practical the earthworks handling should involve transport directly from cut to treatment
areas and stockpiling of untreated soils with existing or potential acidity should be avoided. The
recommended maximum time period for which soils can be temporarily stockpiled without treatment
is 18 hours (overnight) for coarse sandy material and 3 days, (e.g. a weekend, 66 hours) for fine textured
silty clay material. The option of in-situ treatment may also be considered. However, treated soil will
still need to be stockpiled in an appropriate area for verification testing prior to removal off-site.

All confirmed ASS materials encountered during excavations will be transported to the designated ASS
treatment area or treated in-situ and stockpiled for verification sampling. Accurate details of material



April 2019
J000799-003-R-Rev0 – Procedure A                   1/2

Page 16

PROCEDURE A
Management of Acid Sulfate Soils

movements must be kept by the Site Supervisor or their delegated representative with respect to
volumes, origin, material type and destination.

Due care is to be taken when transporting saturated/supersaturated soils and sediments (e.g. wet,
silty/sandy material).

Any ASS materials that cannot be transported in the time frame detailed above must be stockpiled on
site on a suitably prepared storage area and the following additional management measures should be
followed:

     Stockpiles are to be contained by bunds with stormwater runoff directed to a collection sump.
      Bunds are to be constructed from low permeability materials that are not ASS.

     A guard layer of neutralising agent (minimum 5 kg/m2) should be spread across the soil surface
      prior to placement of the stockpile. The rate of neutralising agent applied should be based on 0.3
      times the average total potential plus existing acidity for every 1 m height of soil in the stockpile.

     The surface area of the stockpile is to be minimised by shaping and possibly capping or covering
      to prevent moisture loss and rainfall entry.

A5.        Responsibilities
During stockpiling, handling and transport the following levels of responsibility shall exist:

     The Site Supervisor or their delegated representative is responsible for ensuring that the
      requirements of the ASS MP are communicated to site staff.

     The Site Supervisor or their delegated representative is responsible for ensuring the
      management strategies and procedures prescribed in the ASS MP are implemented at the site.

     All other site personnel are responsible for implementing and undertaking the management
      strategies and procedures prescribed in the ASS MP, as applicable to their work activities.

A6.       MONITORING AND REPORTING
Records shall be kept by the Site Supervisor or their delegated representative to verify volumes of
soils excavated and transported for treatment.

In addition, specific details regarding volumes, origin, material type and destination, in conjunction
with a photographic record of site development works associated with soil movements, should be
maintained by the Site Supervisor or their delegated representative.

The Site Supervisor or their delegated representative shall be responsible for ensuring that the
excavated ASS materials are managed in accordance with details provided above.




April 2019
J000799-003-R-Rev0 – Procedure A                     2/2

Page 17

PROCEDURE B
Treatment and Verification of Excavated ASS


B1.      GENERAL
The procedures outlined below are provided for the on-site treatment and verification of identified ASS
materials located across the proposed development site to be excavated during earthworks and
construction.

B2.      OBJECTIVES
     Appropriately treat and manage ASS materials so as to minimise adverse effects on the natural and
      built environment (including infrastructure).

     Comply with conditions of licences, permits or other approvals issued for the project.

B3.      STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS AND GUIDELINES
1)    Queensland Acid Sulfate Soil Technical Manual: Soil Management Guidelines V4.0, 2014. Dear, S-E.,
      Ahern, C. R., O'Brien, L. E., Dobos, S. K., McElnea, A. E., Moore, N. G. & Watling, K. M. Department of
      Science, Information Technology, Innovation and the Arts, Queensland Government

2)    Ahern, CR., Ahern, M.R. and Powell, Guidelines for Sampling and Analysis of Lowland Acid Sulfate
      Soils in Queensland, 1998

3)    State Planning Policy – state interest guideline, Water quality, August 2014

4)    Environmental Protection Act 1994

5)    Environmental Protection Policy (Water) 2009

B4. TREATMENT MEASURES
B4 (a) Earthwork Strategy
An earthworks strategy shall be developed to plan and track movement, treatment and verification of
confirmed ASS materials.

B4 (b) Treatment Facility
A treatment area shall be constructed within the site in general accordance with the requirement detailed in
Soil Management Guidelines, 2014 (refer Figure B4-1) and the following additional requirements:

     The treatment area should be located within a suitable area of the site on non-ASS materials.

     The treatment area shall be prepared by stripping vegetation, topsoil and soil containing significant
      amounts of organic material and compacting the surface with a smooth drum roller. An area of at least
      1 m width shall be left between the treatment area and bunds to allow collection of runoff and direction
      to sumps. Refer to Procedure C for monitoring and treatment requirements applicable to collected
      waters.

     A guard layer of fine ground agricultural lime shall be applied to the treatment areas prior to placement
      of soils at a minimum rate 5 kg/m2 for each 1 m height of soil to be treated.

The treatment facility shall be inspected on a daily basis and maintained to prevent escape of soils or water
from the facility.




April 2019
J000799-003-R-Rev0 – Procedure B                       1/3

Page 18

PROCEDURE B
Treatment and Verification of Excavated ASS


Figure B4-1: Schematic cross-section of a treatment pad, including a compacted clay layer, guard
layer, leachate collection system and containment with bund




B4 (c) ASS Treatment
Excavated ASS materials shall be placed into identified treatment lots (not more than 250 m3) within the
treatment area where the material shall be spread in layers and allowed to dry (if required). The overall layer
thickness shall be a maximum 300 mm loose thickness.
Where required, drying shall be enhanced by mechanical methods (rotary hoe, disc plough, etc) to create a
relatively homogenous, friable material prior to addition of lime for neutralisation.

Maintain soil moisture through the following methods: controlled irrigation; covering with plastic to reduce
evaporation; or application of lime soon after excavation of moist soils. These measures will improve the
dispersion of lime throughout the soil profile.

Liming rates have been calculated in kg CaCO3/m³, using a factor of safety (fineness factor) of 1.5 and an
assumed bulk density of 1.8 tonne/m3. Calculation of liming rates required for full neutralisation of combined
actual and potential acidity are presented in Table B1.
Table B1: Liming rates
 Material Type                           Depth                         Treatment Rate
                                         0 m – 1 m BGL                 5 kg CaCO3/m³
 Natural Sands
                                         Below 1 m BGL                 15 kg CaCO3/m³
Note:   * Below Ground Level
        ** Liming rate based on maximum values.

These liming rates can be immediately adopted for lime neutralisation treatment.
In-situ treatment may also be carried out. This would involve the application of lime to the surface of the soil
at a rate sufficient to treat a soil thickness of 300 mm. The lime should then be mixed through the soil profile
(to a maximum depth of 300 mm) with an excavator, and validation samples collected. Once the 300 mm
layer has been treated and removed the process can start again and continue until the depth of excavation is
reached.

It should be noted that should this process be adopted then the offsite disposal location would be required to
have a bunded area for stockpiling of the treated soil until verification results have confirmed appropriate
lime treatment.

The following management measures should be followed at the offsite disposal location:

    Stockpiles are to be contained by bunds with stormwater runoff directed to a collection sump. Bunds are
     to be constructed from low permeability materials.

    The surface area of the stockpile is to be minimised by shaping and possibly capping or covering to
     prevent moisture loss and rainfall entry.

    Each stockpile will require tracking to allow for future lime treatment should it be required.




April 2019
J000799-003-R-Rev0 – Procedure B                       2/3

Page 19

PROCEDURE B
Treatment and Verification of Excavated ASS


B4 (e) Verification Testing
Verification samples shall be collected for treated material at a rate of 1 sample per 250 m3. The samples
shall be formed by compositing materials from three randomly selected locations. Samples shall be
collected over the full thickness of the treated lot. The Chromium Suite shall be conducted on each sample
to confirm net acidity by Acid Base Accounting.

B5.       PERFORMANCE CRITERIA
To confirm adequate lime treatment, laboratory testing must demonstrate the following:

     A neutralising capacity of more than 1.5 times the sum of existing plus potential acidity, all measured in
      the same units (and using a minimum safety factor of 1.5) and

     A pHKCL value of equal or greater than 6.5

B6.       CONTINGENCY MEASURES
Additional lime treatment and further verification testing shall be conducted where adequate neutralisation is
not initially indicated.

B7.      PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
           Item                                            Performance Indicator

                                  An appropriate earthworks strategy has been prepared to                   track
 Earthworks strategy
                                   characterisation, treatment and verification of each earthworks lot.

 Liming rates                     Correct liming rates have been applied

                                  Verification samples collected for each identifiable 250 m3 of treated material
 Treatment verification            If verification shows material has a positive net acidity, additional treatment
                            
                                   has been employed

 Non conformance                  All non-conformances have been reported and rectified


B8.      MONITORING AND REPORTING
Records shall be kept to verify volumes of soils transported to the treatment facility or treated in-situ.

The Site Supervisor shall be responsible for ensuring that samples are collected at a rate of 1 per 250 m3, if
the above liming rates are not used, to formulate more specific liming rates.

The Site Supervisor shall be responsible for ensuring that lime neutralisation and verification tests are
completed for each 250 m3 of excavated ASS material.
The Site Supervisor shall maintain a register of testing results and a record of inspections.

A summary report of all test results and inspections shall be complied by the Site Supervisor each week and
retained on site.




April 2019
J000799-003-R-Rev0 – Procedure B                         3/3

Page 20

PROCEDURE C
Monitoring of Water Quality


C1.       GENERAL
The procedures outlined below are provided to monitor and manage water quality in open excavations and
run-off collection in treatment areas. Contingency measures are also provided for treatment and discharge of
minor amounts of water.

C2.       OBJECTIVES
     Appropriately monitor waters entering open excavations

     Appropriately manage waters to be discharged from open excavations

     Appropriately monitor and treat (if required) run-off collected in treatment areas

     Appropriately monitor groundwater to identify water quality changes that may indicate ASS impact

     Comply with conditions of licences, permits or other approvals issued for the project

C3.       STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS AND GUIDELINES
1)    State Planning Policy – state interest guideline, Water quality, August 2014

2)    Queensland Acid Sulfate Soil Technical Manual: Soil Management Guidelines V4.0, 2014. Dear, S-E.,
      Ahern, C. R., O'Brien, L. E., Dobos, S. K., McElnea, A. E., Moore, N. G. & Watling, K. M. Department of
      Science, Information Technology, Innovation and the Arts, Queensland Government

3)    Environmental Protection Act 1994

4)    Environmental Protection Policy (Water) 2009

C4.       IMPLEMENTATION MEASURES
The following provides a list of the environmental control measures for management of surface water and
groundwater at the site:

     Water quality monitoring will be undertaken in accordance with C5

     All surface water run-off and groundwater seepage within excavations is to undergo monitoring to
      determine if treatment is required for quality correction prior to off-site discharge, or reuse on site

     Agricultural lime or caustic soda will be kept on site at all times for pH adjusting of waters before
      discharging

     Discharge to surface waters, sewers or stormwater should meet with the requirements and conditions of
      the disposal permit issued for the project

     Two groundwater monitoring wells shall be installed external to the proposed basement excavation (one
      on the northern side of the basement and one on the southern side). Groundwater monitoring wells
      shall be monitored four times over a period of one month before earthworks and construction
      commence to establish baseline levels of the following parameters;

       Field measurements of pH, redox potential (Eh or ORP), dissolved oxygen, standing water level and
          electrical conductivity (EC)

       Laboratory measurements chloride, sulfate, total acidity, total alkalinity, dissolved aluminum
          (filtered), and dissolved iron (filtered)

C5.      INSPECTION AND MONITORING
C5 (a) Surface Water Monitoring
Waters from dewatering (if required) and all surface water run-off and groundwater seepage within
excavations shall be monitored prior to discharge during earthworks and construction works. Surface water
shall be monitored for pH, dissolved oxygen, suspended solids, oil, grease floating scum, litter and total and
dissolved aluminium and iron.


April 2019
J000799-003-R-Rev0 – Procedure C                        1/3

Page 21

PROCEDURE C
Monitoring of Water Quality


Surface water not meeting the performance criteria specified in Section C6 will require treatment prior to
discharge.

C5 (b) Groundwater Monitoring
     During construction (excavation works) monitoring of groundwater shall comprise fortnightly monitoring
      of the following:

       Field measurements of pH, redox potential (Eh or ORP), standing water level and electrical
         conductivity (EC)

       Laboratory measurements chloride, sulfate, total acidity, total alkalinity, and total and dissolved
         aluminum and iron

     Post construction monitoring comprising four groundwater monitoring events over a period of two
      months for the following parameters:

       Field measurements of pH, redox potential (Eh or ORP), standing water level and electrical
         conductivity (EC)

       Laboratory measurements chloride, sulfate, total acidity, total alkalinity, dissolved aluminium
         (filtered), and dissolved iron (filtered)

Extension of the post construction monitoring program beyond this will be determined by a suitably qualified
Environmental Consultant following review of post construction results.

C6.      PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
C6 (a) Surface Water Performance Indicators
The following adopted performance indicators are considered as acceptable outcomes in relation to
ASS and disposal of all waters including stormwater run-off, groundwater seepage and leachate from
ASS will achieve the following quality prior to release from the site.

    Parameters                             Units                Performance Indicator

    pH                                     pH          Within the range of 6.5 – 8.5 pH units

    Suspended Solids                       mg/L                      < 50 mg/L
    Dissolved Oxygen                       mg/L                      > 6.0 mg/L
    Oil, grease, floating scum, litter     n/a               No visible plume or evidence
    Dissolved Iron                         mg/L                       <0.3 mg/L
    Dissolved Aluminium                    mg/L                       <0.2 mg/L




April 2019
J000799-003-R-Rev0 – Procedure C                       2/3

Page 22

PROCEDURE C
Monitoring of Water Quality


C6 (b) Groundwater Performance Indicators
                                  Baseline                      Site Specific Criteria
    Parameters*        Units      Performance
                                  Range

                                                        Baseline - 0.3 pH unit change below
                                      Yet to be          the lower baseline range and an
    pH                 pH
                                     determined                   upper limit of 8.5


    Aluminium                         Yet to be
                       mg/l                                 +/- 10% of baseline range
    (dissolved)                      determined
    Aluminium                         Yet to be
                       mg/l                                 +/- 10% of baseline range
    (total)                          determined
    Iron                              Yet to be
                       mg/l                                 +/- 10% of baseline range
    (dissolved)                      determined
                                      Yet to be
    Iron (total)       mg/l                                 +/- 10% of baseline range
                                     determined
* Note that total acidity/alkalinity & chloride/sulfate ratio should also be monitored, but no performance limits are set


C7.       CONTINGENCY MEASURES
All surface waters (any waters collected in excavations) and precipitates that cannot be contained and
treated for discharge off site, are to be removed and disposed of through trade waste or another lawful
method.

C8.       MONITORING & REPORTING
The Site Supervisor shall be responsible for ensuring all on-site monitoring listed in section C5 is conducted
at the required frequency.

The Site Supervisor shall maintain a register of all on-site testing results and a record of inspections.

A summary report of all test results and inspections shall be compiled by the Site Supervisor each week and
submitted to the Project Manager.

The Site Supervisor shall inform the Project Manager of non-compliance upon detection. The Project
Manager shall inform Council of such non-compliances as soon as practicable and instigate an assessment
of the impact.




April 2019
J000799-003-R-Rev0 – Procedure C                             3/3

Page 23

Gympie Terrace Noosaville Pty Ltd




Appendix C
Limitations




J000799-003-R-Rev0                  Page 9


[OCR of page images]
Gympie Terrace Noosaville Pty Ltd

 

Appendix C
Limitations

 

J000799-003-R-RevO Page 9

Page 24

                                             LIMITATIONS

This Document has been provided by Core Consultants Pty Ltd (“Core”) subject to the following
limitations:

This Document has been prepared for the particular purpose outlined in Core’s proposal and no
responsibility is accepted for the use of this Document, in whole or in part, in other contexts or for
any other purpose.

The scope and the period of Core’s Services are as described in C o r e ’s proposal, and are
subject to restrictions and limitations. Core did not perform a complete assessment of all possible
conditions or circumstances that may exist at the site referenced in the Document. If a service
is not expressly indicated, do not assume it has been provided. If a matter is not addressed, do not
assume that any determination has been made by Core in regards to it.

Conditions may exist which were undetectable given the limited nature of the enquiry Core was
retained to undertake with respect to the site. Variations in conditions may occur between
investigatory locations, and there may be special conditions pertaining to the site which have not
been revealed by the investigation and which have not therefore been taken into account in
the Document. Accordingly, additional studies and actions may be required.

In addition, it is recognised that the passage of time affects the information and assessment provided
in this Document. Core’s opinions are based upon information that existed at the time of the
production of the Document. It is understood that the Services provided allowed Core to form no
more than an opinion of the actual conditions of the site at the time the site was visited and cannot
be used to assess the effect of any subsequent changes in the quality of the site, or its surroundings,
or any laws or regulations.

Any assessments made in this Document are based on the conditions indicated from published
sources and the investigation described. No warranty is included, either express or implied, that
the actual conditions will conform exactly to the assessments contained in this Document.

Where data supplied by the client or other external sources, including previous site investigation
data, have been used, it has been assumed that the information is correct unless otherwise stated.
No responsibility is accepted by Core for incomplete or inaccurate data supplied by others.

Core may have retained subconsultants affiliated with Core to provide Services for the benefit of
Core. To the maximum extent allowed by law, the Client acknowledges and agrees it will not have
any direct legal recourse to, and waives any claim, demand, or cause of action against, Core’s
affiliated companies, and their employees, officers and directors.

This Document is provided for sole use by the Client and is confidential to it and its professional
advisers. No responsibility whatsoever for the contents of this Document will be accepted to any
person other than the Client. Any use which a third party makes of this Document, or any reliance
on or decisions to be made based on it, is the responsibility of such third parties. Core accepts no
responsibility for damages, if any, suffered by any third party as a result of decisions made or
actions based on this Document.




Limitations                                Page 1 of 1                                   Date: 12/07/2018
FRM-065                             Uncontrolled When Printed                                  Issue: 1.02

Page 25

Page 26

BOARD OF

PROFESSIONAL
ENGINEERS

OF QUEENSLAND

Mr Simon Andrew Maggiora

Core Consultants Pty Ltd

LO)

Date Registered 7/10/2015
From @)

Type Engineer
Category

Status Active

Date Registered to 6/30/2020

Share this page Ht) i &

Profile
Company Core Consultants Pty Ltd
Registration # 12467

Area of Engineering Civil

Contact Number 07 5475 5900
Assessment Entity

Informal Simon

Restriction on
Registration

Social Profiles

There are no social profiles defined.

Business Address

Address 52 Second Avenue MAROOCHYDORE QLD 4558

Phone 07 5475 5900

Sign In

SEARCH THE REGISTER

Used in these records

About this file

File size
8.5 MB (large file)
File type
PDF

No other editions are linked here.

Original file

Log in to download the original file

Acid sulfate Management Plan Reference Document OPW19-0239.pdf · 8.5 MB (large file)

The download may take up to a minute.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.