OPW1/0370 Operational Works Application for Prescribed Tidal Works · OPW14/0370

Page 2

 

Email address (non-mandatory requirement) [email protected]

 

 

Applicant’s reference number (non-mandatory
requirement)

 

 

 

1. What is the nature of the development proposed and what type of approval is being sought?

 

 

Table A—Aspect 1 of the application (If there are additional aspects to the application please list in Table B—Aspect 2.)

 

a) What is the nature of the development? (Please only tick one box.)

LC] Material change of use LC Reconfiguring a lot LC] Building work xX Operational work

b) What is the approval type? (Please only tick one box.)

| Preliminary approval [ira Preliminary approval Development permit
under s241 of SPA under s241 and s242
of SPA

c) Provide a brief description of the proposal, including use definition and number of buildings or structures where
applicable (e.g. six unit apartment building defined as a multi-unit dwelling, 30 lot residential subdivision etc.)

 

Revetment wall and footpath upgrade

 

 

 

d) Whatis the level of assessment? (Please only tick one box.)

LC] Impact assessment Code assessment

 

 

Table B—Aspect 2 of the application (If there are additional aspects to the application please list in Table C—
Additional aspects of the application.)

 

a) What is the nature of development? (Please only tick one box.)

CL] Material change of use L] Reconfiguring a lot C Building work CL Operational work

b) What is the approval type? (Please only tick one box.)

CL Preliminary approval fal Preliminary approval CL Development
under s241 of SPA under s241 and s242 permit
of SPA

c) Provide a brief description of the proposal, including use definition and number of buildings or structures where
applicable (e.g. six unit apartment building defined as a multi-unit dwelling, 30 lot residential subdivision etc.)

 

 

 

 

d) Whatis the level of assessment?

L] Impact assessment LC] Code assessment

 

 

Table C—Additional aspects of the application (If there are additional aspects to the application please list in a
separate table on an extra page and attach to this form.)

 

C] Refer attached schedule LE] Not required

 

 

 

yplication details
1 July 2013

  

Page 3

 

2. Location of the premises (Complete Table D and/or Table E as applicable. Identify each lot in a separate row.)

 

 

Table D—Street address and lot on plan for the premises or street address and lot on plan for the land adjoining or
adjacent to the premises (Note: this table is to be used for applications involving taking or interfering with water).
(Attach a separate schedule if there is insufficient space in this table.)

 

| Street address and lot on plan (All lots must be listed.)

Xx] Street address and lot on plan for the land adjoining or adjacent to the premises (Appropriate for
development in water but adjoining or adjacent to land, e.g. jetty, pontoon. All lots must be listed.)

 

 

 

 

 

Street address Lot on plan Local government area
description (e.g. Logan, Cairns)
Lot Unit Street Street name and official Post- Lot no. Plan type
no. no. suburb/ locality name code and plan no.
i) Cnr Gympie Terrace and 4565 1 RP65319 Noosa Shire Council
William Street
ii)
iii)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Planning scheme details (If the premises involves multiple zones, clearly identify the relevant zone/s for each lot ina
separate row in the below table. Non-mandatory)

 

 

 

 

 

Lot Applicable zone / precinct Applicable local plan / precinct Applicable overlay/s
i) Road Reserve, adjacent attached | Noosaville Locality High Potential Acid Sulfate Soil
housing Flooding
Riparian
ii)
iii)

 

 

 

 

Table E—Premises coordinates (Appropriate for development in remote areas, over part of a lot or in water not
adjoining or adjacent to land e.g. channel dredging in Moreton Bay.) (Attach a separate schedule if there is insufficient
space in this table.)

 

 

 

Coordinates Zone Datum Local government
(Note: place each set of coordinates in a separate row) reference area (if applicable)
Easting Northing Latitude Longitude
507130.415 | 7080612.705 | 26.39456 153.07154 56 GDA94__| Noosa Shire

L] wese4

LC] other

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3. Total area of the premises on which the development is proposed (indicate square metres)

 

 

Max 1,000m

 

 

4. Current use/s of the premises (e.g. vacant land, house, apartment building, cane farm etc.)

 

 

 

Dilapidated pathway, revetment and jetty pylons

 

 

IDAS form 1—Application d

Version 3.0—1 Jul

  

Page 4

 

5. Are there any current approvals (e.g. a preliminary approval) associated with this application? (Non-
mandatory requirement)

 

x] No [_] Yes—provide details below

 

List of approval reference/s Date approved (dd/mm/yy) Date approval lapses (dd/mm/yy)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

6. Is owner’s consent required for this application? (Refer to notes at the end of this form for more information.)

 

[L] No

XX Yes—complete either Table F, Table G or Table H as applicable

 

Table F

 

Name of owner/s of the land State of Queensland (Department of Natural Resources and Mines)

 

We, the above-mentioned owner/s of the land, consent to the making of this application.

 

Signature of owner/s of the land

 

 

Date

 

 

Table G

 

Name of owner/s of the land State of Queensland (Department of Transport and Main Roads)

 

Xx The owner's written consent is attached or will be provided separately to the assessment manager. |

 

 

Table H

 

 

Name of owner/s of the land

 

| By making this application, |, the applicant, declare that the owner has given written consent to the making of the application.

 

 

 

es Identify if any of the following apply to the premises (Tick applicable box/es.)

 

 

Adjacent to a water body, watercourse or aquifer (e.g. creek, river, lake, canal)—complete Table |
On strategic port land under the Transport Infrastructure Act 1 994—complete Table J
In a tidal water area—complete Table K

On Brisbane core port land under the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 (No table requires completion.)

OOO

On airport land under the Airport Assets (Restructuring and Disposal) Act 2008 (no table requires completion)

 

Table |

 

Name of water body, watercourse or aquifer

 

Noosa River

 

 

Table J

 

Lot on plan description for strategic port land Port authority for the lot

 

 

 

 

 

 

IDAS form 1—Application de
Version 3.0—1 July

 
 

w&

Page 5

 

Table K

 

Name of local government for the tidal area (if applicable) Port authority for the tidal area (if applicable)

 

 

Noosa Shire Council

 

 

8. Are there any existing easements on the premises? (e.g. for vehicular access, electricity, overland flow,
water etc)

 

xX No f=] Yes—ensure the type, location and dimension of each easement is included in the plans submitted

 

9. Does the proposal include new building work or operational work on the premises? (Including any
services)

 

CL No xX Yes—ensure the nature, location and dimension of proposed works are included in plans submitted

 

10. Is the payment of a portable long service leave levy applicable to this application? (Refer to notes at the
end of this form for more information.)

 

[-] No—go to question 12 x] Yes

 

 

11. Has the portable long service leave levy been paid? (Refer to notes at the end of this form for more
information.)

 

ix] No

CJ Yes—complete Table L and submit with this application the yellow local government/private certifier’s copy of the
receipted QLeave form

 

Table L

 

Amount paid Date paid QLeave project number (6 digit number
(dd/mm/yy) starting with A, B, E, L or P)

 

 

 

 

 

 

12. Has the local government agreed to apply a superseded planning scheme to this application under
section 96 of the Sustainable Planning Act 2009?

 

 

Xx] No

LE Yes—please provide details below

 

Name of local government Date of written notice given | Reference number of written notice given
by local government by local government (if applicable)
(dd/mm/yy)

 

 

 

 

 

IDAS form 1 ation details

BSG 1 July 2013
Versio July 20

  
 

 

 

Page 6

 

13. List below all of the forms and supporting information that accompany this application (Include all IDAS
forms, checklists, mandatory supporting information etc. that will be submitted as part of this application. Note:
this question does not apply for applications made online using MyDAS)

 

 

 

Description of attachment or title of attachment Method of lodgement to
assessment manager

IDAS form 23 Tidal works and development within coastal management Over counter

districts

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

14. Applicant’s declaration

 

 

 

LC] By making this application, | declare that all information in this application is true and correct (Note: it is unlawful to
provide false or misleading information)

 

 

Notes for completing this form

e Section 261 of the Sustainable Planning Act 2009 prescribes when an application is a properly-made application.
Note, the assessment manager has discretion to accept an application as properly made despite any non-
compliance with the requirement to provide mandatory supporting information under section 260(1)(c) of the
Sustainable Planning Act 2009

Applicant details
e Where the applicant is not a natural person, ensure the applicant entity is a real legal entity.

Question 1
e Schedule 3 of the Sustainable Planning Regulation 2009 identifies assessable development and the type of
assessment. Where schedule 3 identifies assessable development as “various aspects of development” the
applicant must identify each aspect of the development on Tables A, B and C respectively and as required.

Question 6

e Section 263 of the Sustainable Planning Act 2009 sets out when the consent of the owner of the land is required for
an application. Section 260(1)(e) of the Sustainable Planning Act 2009 provides that if the owner’s consent is
required under section 263, then an application must contain, or be accompanied by, the written consent of the
owner, or include a declaration by the applicant that the owner has given written consent to the making of the
application. If a development application relates to a state resource, the application is not required to be supported
by evidence of an allocation or entitlement to a state resource. However, where the state is the owner of the
subject land, the written consent of the state, as landowner, may be required. Allocation or entitlement to the state
resource is a separate process and will need to be obtained before development commences.

Question 11
e The Building and Construction Industry (Portable Long Service Leave) Act 1991 prescribes when the portable long
service leave levy is payable.

e The portable long service leave levy amount and other prescribed percentages and rates for calculating the levy
are prescribed in the Building and Construction Industry (Portable Long Service Leave) Regulation 2002.

IDAS form 1—App:

Version 3.0

  

Page 7

Question 12

e The portable long service leave levy need not be paid when the application is made, but the Building and
Construction Industry (Portable Long Service Leave) Act 1991 requires the levy to be paid before a development
permit is issued.

e Building and construction industry notification and payment forms are available from any Queensland post office or
agency, on request from QLeave, or can be completed on the QLeave website at www.qleave.qid.gov.au. For
further information contact QLeave on 1800 803 481 or visit www.qleave.qid.gov.au.

Privacy—The information collected in this form will be used by the Department of State Development, Infrastructure
and Planning (DSDIP), assessment manager, referral agency and/or building certifier in accordance with the
processing and assessment of your application. Your personal details should not be disclosed for a purpose outside of
the IDAS process or the provisions about public access to planning and development information in the Sustainable
Planning Act 2009, except where required by legislation (including the Right to Information Act 2009) or as required by
Parliament. This information may be stored in relevant databases. The information collected will be retained as
required by the Public Records Act 2002.

 

OFFICE USE ONLY

 

 

Date received Reference numbers

 

 

 

 

 

NOTIFICATION OF ENGAGEMENT OF A PRIVATE CERTIFIER

 

To Council. | have been engaged as the private certifier for the
building work referred to in this application

 

 

 

 

BSA Certification license Building

Date of engagement | Name number classification/s

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

QLEAVE NOTIFICATION AND PAYMENT (For completion by assessment manager or private certifier if
applicable.)

 

Date receipted
form sighted by
assessment
manager

Name of officer
who sighted the
form

QLeave project Amount paid

Description of the work Ruimber ($) Date paid

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The Sustainable Planning Act 2009 is administered by the Department of State Development, Infrastructure and
Planning. This form and all other required application materials should be sent to your assessment manager and any
referral agency.

Department of State Development, Infrastructure and Planning
PO Box 15009 City East Qld 4002

tel 13 QGOV (13 74 68)

[email protected] IDAS form 1—Application

Version 3.0.

 

 

www.dsdip.qld.gov.au

Page 8

Department of State Development, Infrastructure and Planning

IDAS form 23—Tidal works and development within
coastal management districts
(Sustainable Planning Act 2009 version 3.0 effective 1 July 2013)

This form must be used for development applications for:

e operational work that is tidal works (including prescribed tidal works) or operational work within a coastal
management district (mentioned in the Sustainable Planning Regulation 2009, schedule 7, table 2, item 13)

e material change of use that requires referral under the Sustainable Planning Regulation 2009, schedule 7, table 3,
item 5 because it involves:

- operational work carried out completely or partly in a coastal management district; or

- building work carried out completely or partly in a coastal management district that is the construction of a new
premises with a gross floor area (GFA) of at least 1000m? or the enlargement of the GFA of an existing
premises by more than 1000m?

e reconfiguring a lot that requires referral under the Sustainable Planning Regulation 2009, schedule 7, table 2, item
14 because the land is situated completely or partly in a coastal management district or the reconfiguration is in
connection with the construction of a canal

° building work that requires referral under the Sustainable Planning Regulation 2009, schedule 7, table 1, item 11
because it is on land completely or partly seaward of a coastal building line.

You MUST complete ALL questions that are stated to be a mandatory requirement unless otherwise identified on this
form.

Notes for completing this form

For all development applications you must:

° complete /DAS form 1—Application details

° complete any other forms relevant to your application

e provide any mandatory supporting information identified on the forms as being required to accompany your
application.

Attach extra pages if there is insufficient space on this form.

All terms used on this form have the meaning given in the Coastal Management and Protection Act 1995, the Coastal
Protection and Management Regulation 2003, the Sustainable Planning Act 2009 (SPA) or the Sustainable Planning
Regulation 2009.

 

This form can also be completed online using MyDAS at www.dsdip.qld.gov.au/MyDAS

 

 

Mandatory requirements

 

 

1. Confirm the following mandatory requirements accompany Confirmation of Method of
this application lodgement lodgement

 

Written description of the proposal, including a report that addresses any | X] Confirmed
relevant policies.

 

 

 

 

 

2. What is the nature of the work or development proposed by the application? (Tick all applicable boxes.)

 

 

xX] Operational work—complete table A EC] Material Change of Use—complete table B
LC Reconfiguring a Lot—complete table C L] Building Work—complete table D

 

Great state. Great opportunity.

Queensland
Government

Page 9

 

Table A—Operational Work

 

 

Does the operational work involve the following? (Tick all applicable boxes.)

a) Tidal works as defined under the Coastal Protection and Management Act 1995 (e.g. basins, breakwater, bridges,
boat ramps, decks and boardwalks, docks, dockyards, groynes, jetties, marinas, pipelines, pontoons, powerlines,
seawalls, slips, training walls, wharves and the reclamation of land under tidal water)?

C] No xX Yes

If yes, what is the purpose?

 

Replacement of failed revetment wall, reinstatement of footpath, stonepitched headwall at existing stormwater pipe
outlet.

 

 

 

CL] Private purpose (e.g. private pontoon)
Another purpose (e.g. commercial marina)

Does the tidal works also require resource allocation under the Coastal Protection and Management Act 1995?

LC] No C] Yes

If applicable what is the estimated value of the proposed works?

 

 

 

 

b) Interfering with quarry material as defined under the Coastal Protection and Management Act 1995 (e.g.
excavating or moving sand, gravel or any other earth material on state coastal land such as roads, esplanades,
parks or unallocated state land) on state coastal land above high-water mark.

xX No | Yes
If yes, which of the following?

C] Works for coastal management purpose involving beach nourishment, dune fencing, revegetation of dunal areas
with endemic native plants, or stinger net enclosures.

O For purposes directly related to the provision of lifesaving or rescue services by a volunteer community
organisation.

L] For other purposes (please state below).

 

 

 

 

If applicable what is the estimated value of the proposed works?

 

 

 

c) Disposing of dredge spoil or other solid waste material in tidal water?
No CL] Yes

If applicable what is the estimated value of the proposed works?

 

 

 

d) Constructing an artificial waterway?

Xx No LE] Yes

If applicable what is the length of the waterway?

 

 

 

 

e) Removing or interfering with coastal dunes on land, other than state coastal land, that is in an erosion prone area
as defined in the Coastal Protection and Management Act 1995 and above high water mark (e.g. lowering dune
vegetation on freehold and leasehold land)?

xX No CL Yes

If applicable what is the estimated value of the proposed works?

 

 

 

 

 

IDAS form 23

 

Page 10

 

Table B—Material change of use

 

a) Does the material change of use involve the following? (Tick all applicable boxes.)

LJ Operational work carried out completely or partly in a coastal management district
b) Does the material change of use involve building work carried out completely or partly in a coastal management

district that is:

C the construction of new premises with a gross floor area of at least 1000 m?

LC] the enlargement of the gross floor area of existing premises by more than 1000 m?

 

 

Table C—Reconfiguring a lot

 

a) Does the reconfiguring a lot involve the following? (Tick all applicable boxes.)

O Land situated completely or partly in a coastal management district

Cc The construction of a canal
b) How many lots will be created?

 

 

 

 

 

 

Table D—Building work

 

a) _ Is the building work on land completely or partly seaward of the coastal building line under the Coastal Protection

and Management Act 1995?

CL No L] Yes

 

 

3. Is the tidal works located within a local government tidal area? (Tick all applicable boxes)

 

L] No

Yes—provide details below

 

Noosa Shire

 

Local government:

 

 

Mandatory supporting information

 

 

4. Please provide the following information

Confirmation of
lodgement

Method of
lodgement

 

For all applications

 

A statement addressing the relevant part(s) of the State Development
Assessment Provisions (SDAP).

Confirmed
LJ Not applicable

 

For applications involving operational work that is tidal works

 

A copy of the certificate of title for the land (including tidal land) that
would abut or adjoin the proposed works.

CL] Confirmed
LJ Not applicable

 

Plans showing:

e the real property description and boundaries of the land (including
tidal land) that would abut or adjoin the proposed works

e the proposed works (including existing works to be removed) in
relation to relevant tidal planes (e.g. mean high water springs)

e the slope angles of the beds and banks of the tidal area and the
finished levels of the proposed works.

Confirmed
LE] Not applicable

 

 

For tidal work that will occupy a navigable waterway provide a water
allocation area plan providing evidence that the proposed work will not
prejudice the access rights of adjoining property owners.

| Confirmed
Xx Not applicable

 

 

 

IDAS form 23.

Tidal wo)

   

 

Page 11

RPEQ certified Detail Design Plans

Page 12

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

PROJECT INDEX

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

SHEET No. SHEET DESCRIPTION
0000009 01 PROJECT COVER SHEET
0000009 02 EXISTING FEATURES
0000009 03 PLAN AND CROSS-SECTIONS
0000009 04 LONGSECTION aLIGNMENT 1
0000009 05 LONG SECTION ALIGNMENT 2
$ 0000009 06 LONG SECTION ALIGNMENT 2 (2)
é 0000009 07 TYPICAL CONSTRUCTION DETAIL 1
8 0000009 08 TYPICAL CONSTRUCTION DETAIL 2
ee £ 0000009 09 GENERAL NOTES
noosa
oe SITE OF
WORKS f
a ;
9 a 2
ce a ‘ +
oy” a 0 Noncy Cata Park
oO yor? creek.
S|
x f
SERVICE LOCATIONS et
BY
It is the responsibility of the Foreman to I we .
contact the relevant service authorities th St Personal Protective
to ascertain the exact location of Equipment
services prior to construction. HEAD
EVES
EARS
BODY
HANDS:
PLEASE CONTACT NOOSA'S LOCALITY PLAN
ARBORIST PRIOR TO ANY NTS Ts FEET
CONSTRUCTION FOR ADVICE ON TREE uu ry
ROOT PROTECTION IN THE VICINITY HEALTH AND
OF THE WORKS TO BE CARRIED OUT. SAFETY
ADVISOR
John McCarron:
rr : . - 53296131 / 049195967
By the signing ofthis statement | deem to certify all drawings in this contract/project as listed in the Ist
drawing index, Shown on sheet 01, as being in accordance with this Project's Objectives. ae str a
AUSTRALI
at
PROJECT REVIEW)- RECOMMENDED FORAPPROVAL [)FSiGn SEavicéS MadIBKE: WARNING: OPTIC FIBRE
: EXTREME CARE TO BE TAKEN WHILE EXCAVATING IN THE
. . VICINITY OF OPTIC FIBRE CABLES, LOCATIONS ARE TO
SIGNED: DATE: te / l 0 1 2014 BE CONFIRMED PRIOR TO START OF CONSTRUCTION.
.)
ENGINEERI RTIFICATION
In the effect of Section 115 of the Professional Engineers Act 2002, the professional engineering
services in the areas of engineering required for this project have been carried out by or under the
9g 9 req Pret v ENERGY SERVICE PROVIDERS TELECOMMUNICATIONS

supervision OF egistered professional engineers who are registered under the Act in respect of the
areas of engineering. | certify that the design meets the requirements of all relevant Council
Policies, References, Standards, Planners and Design Instruction, Code of Practice, Guidelines,
DTMR Specification: icable to this Project) and Brief/Functional Specifications.

   
   

my

SIGNED: MANAGER CIVIL OPERATIONS,

COMMUNITY INFRASTRUCTURE

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

~~ <P

NOTE: SERVICE LOCATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE ONLY FROM
PROVIDERS PLANS. LOCATIONS ARE TO BE CONFIRMED

 

PRIOR TO START OF CONSTRUCTION. PHONE DBYD
SERVICE LOCATIONS ON 1100 FOR DETAILS,

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

SERVICE PROVIDERS
'Giiug| Telstra

 

 

 

 

 

NOTE: SERVICE LOCATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE ONLY FROM
PROVIDERS PLANS. LOCATIONS ARE TO BE CONFIRMED.
PRIOR TO START OF CONSTRUCTION. PHONE DBYD.

 

 

Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices

CFO OS

NOTE: ALL SIGNS & LINE MARKING TO BE IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THE MANUAL OF
UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES.

 

 

SERVICE LOCATIONS ON 1100 FOR DETAILS.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

RPEQ No.: 114430 (Allan Hull) DATE: ft | so | 2014
5 cae Mat one SD TEN WILLIAM STREET - NOOSAVILLE | ogogo09
Al g SURVEY [ALLEN CRAMPTON Hee oa axe PATHWAY: RAILING AND,
. BESIGN MARS ELLIS SLO fig. FEHANTIN GAD 3606 Yt | NOO COUN IL REVETMENT WALL REHABILITATION Drawing Sheet No.
Rv| DATE REVISIONS REC. |APPR.| CHECKED [CRAIG ELDRIDGE Cp ia]i4 Fa) mien eee PROJECT COVER SHEET 01 Rv.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Page 13

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

a a SURVEY STATION TABLE
=
POINT NO. TYPE EASTING NORTHING RL
9901 Screw 507130.415 7080612.705 1.361 REMOVE AND DISPOSE OF
9902 Screw 507112,546 7080596.835 1.097 EXISTING TRAFFIC ISLAND
9903 Nail 507148,161 7080610.099 .. 1.297 EXTENT AS SHOWN
9904 Nail 507142,783 7080834765 4.368
PSM 18419 506754.241 7080419.516 9s: 1.402 . es -
7 a" ~
REMOVE AND DISPOSE OF __ .
a EXISTING RAILING” °

  

  

EXISTING FEATURES PLAN

 

 

REMOVE AND DISPOSE OF
EXISTING CONCRETE PATHWAY
_ EXTENT AS SHOWN ___

 

Number 305
Gympie Tee

 

yt
Lot

RP 65319
SEDIMENTATION CONTROL

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Number 307,
Gympie Tee.
Lott

RP 65319
REMOVE AND DISPOSE OF EXISTING
ASPHALT SPEED HUMP

 

REMOVE AND DISPOSE OF EXISTING
CONCRETE TRAFFIC ISLAND AND KERB.

RETURN EXISTING BIN TO COUNCIL DEPOT

 

 

REMOVE AND DISPOSE OF
EXISTING CONCRETE APRON
DECOMMISSION

ay

     

 

   

 
   
   
   
   
   
    
   
 
  

 

 

NOTE:

 

 

  

EX 300 DIA PIPEX

  
  

“

 

   
   
 
  
     

 

PHOTO 1 - EXISTING REVETMENT WALL AND PIE

   

RS

 

EXISTING FEATURES LEGEND

&P. E

E

 

TE Overhead Power Line and Pole

eR -—-a---—-1-—
EPTE

TE
}—or—or—or-—

Underground Telco Line and Pit
Overhead Telco Line and Pole

Underground Optic Fibre and Pit

Stormwater Pipeline & Pit ar M/H
Terrain, Bank or Drain Batter

 

K&C, channel, footpath, driveway
Rockwall or feature

vem men aoe —— Edge of bitumen road
maa oe moe = ————=_ ROad centreline

Building/structure face

 

‘ ’ Fence line
49999 Survey Control Station
RP ————aam Ke Existing RP Boundary

 

 

DEMOLISH EXISTING
i tn CONCRETE

Pred “77 EXISTING ROCK
GEE LT od “7 REVETMENT WALL

EXISTING OVERLAND
=> —> —— FLOW PATH

EXISTING CONCRETE
PIERS (TO REMAIN)

 

 

cot — -W- — -W- -~ Underground Water main & FH/SV

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

of 2 34S ENEGEX NOTE:
—— a 1, MAXIMUM DEPTH OF EXCAVATION ALLOWED AT THE BASE OF POLE 16941 iS 500mm
+400 @ MA SRS NO TREES TO BE REMOVED OR DAMAGED 2, FINISHED GROUND LEVEL AFTER WORKS ARE COMPLETED TO BE AT CURRENT
, NATURAL SURFACE LEVEL
3. MAINTAIN MINIMUM 500mm GAP BETWEEN THE POLE AND PROPOSED RAILING
E PSM PSM 18419 Project Numb
8 PLANNING INFRASTRUCTURE WILLIAM STREET, NOOSAVILLE SAAC
c AHD RL 1.402 ASSET, DESIGN AND INVESTIGATIONS| PATHWAY, RAILING AND 0000009
Al B SURVEY [ALLEN CRAMPTON 7) Noosa Counc , -
aq DESIGN [WARAELUS 7 Com Sfrol erm om REVETMENT WALL REHABILITATION Drawing Sheet No.
7d, :TELEPHOHE: FAX:
Ry DATE REVISIONS REC. |APPR.| CHECKED |CRAIG ELDRIDGE cbg «| 14)/ a (on ss296s01 a7) sezeas01 EXISTIN G FEATURES 02 Rv._

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Page 14

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2
oc
g
MATCH TO EXISTING ROCK PROFILE aE
Gilly
HS0
Ooze
2a
O=bk
E23
=2% _+2% WILLIAM STREET
MHWS (RL 0,36m) AHD (RL 0.42m) HAT (RL 0.56m) -3 i ~
MEWS (RL - 0.28m) — |
7 i
i
- {
!
Datum. _-3 Nelo
DESIGN HEIGHT 4 SERBESERS B
S seggenman 2
EXISTING SURFACE  SERBeaRReS s
N QI AeTaeagk &
Ss seaelsSes §
a an wo - 1
DESIGN OFFSET ® ZARRS2S33 2
wh att tim cdi mimi) S
hi ctoisitebet ttt S
2
~, ~ a
&
SS wi
be
a Zo
Ww
Zoho SHS
FZa2 §86
SECURE 500 mm NOMINAL SIZE g20s 395
Wea ew, fo 0

TOE-ROCK INTO RIVERBED

MHWS (RL.0.36m) AHD (RL.0.42m)_HAT(RL 0.56m)

 

MLWS (RL - 0.28m)

 

 

Detum_ =4

 

DESIGN HEIGHT

1.386

1.403 |
1413
4.373

 

 

EXISTING SURFACE

 

-0.203

 

DESIGN OFFSET

 

 

8.899 |-2467 [-2.540

3.010

 

'-3.000 |-0.200 (1.393

~2.466 [0.984
~2.000 |0.968
0.000 _|1308 _

 

TOP OF PROPOSED ROCK PITCHED
REVETMENT WALL - REFER TO TYPICAL DETAIL

 

 

TOE OF PROPOSED ROCK REVETMENT WALL

 

MHWS (RL.0.36m) AHD (RL 0.42m) HAT (RL 0.56m;

 

 

 

 

ALIGNMENT 1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

/ | \ GYMPIE TERRACE
+2% 3%
Pere Oren

GYMPIE TERRACE

NOTES:

EXCAVATION WILL BE CARRIED OUT AT LOW - OUTGOING TIDE.
WORKS WILL BE CLEAR OF EXISTING CHANNEL AND MARITIME TRAFFIC.
DO NOT DISTURB EXISTING PRIVATELY OWNED CONCRETE PILES

 

 

 

 

 

 

  
 
 
   
  

SURVEY STATION TABLE
POINT NO. TYPE EASTING NORTHING RE
9901 Screw $07130.415 7080612.705 1.361
9902 Screw §07112.546 7080596.835 4,097
9903 Nail 507148.161 7080610.099 4.297
9904 Nait 507142.783 7080614.765 4.368
PSM 18419 506754241 7080419.516 1.402 . &
a
PROPOSED SILT CURTAIN
PROPOSED TOE OF PROPOSED eso 1
ROCK REVETMENT WALL ot at
ae
es
ee
PROPOSED BUILDOUT-TYPEB2KERB 4 o Tee
er

 

JOIN NEATLY 70 EXISTING KERB

As

 

PROPOSED

CONNECT TO

 

 
 
 
  
    
  
  

KERB INLET PIT
INVER RL1.006

BIN NOTE:

SUPPLY AND INSTALL 2401 WHEELIE BIN ENCLOSURE
(GENERAL WASTE) IN LOCATION SHOWN
AND BOLT TO NEW SLAB TO MATCH ADJOINING PATHWAY.

PROPOSED ROCK PITCHED TOP REVETMENT WALL_

PROPOSED SAFETY RAILING AS SHOWN (20m LENGTH)

\ a

PROPOSED STONE PITCHED HEADWALL - TOP RL 1.45
PROVIDE CONCRETE SCOUR PROTECTION - 5.5m LONG
FROM OUTLET OF EXISTING 300 DIA RCP TO MLWM (RL -0.28)

 

BACKFILL VOIDS, PLACE GEOTEXTILE AND

ROCK REVETMENT WALL

REFER TO CONSTRUCTION DETAIL

RESTORE (CONCRETE LINE)

_EXISTING 300 DIA RCP

PROPOSED PEDESTRIAN SAFETY RAILING

REFER TO DETAIL SHEET 7
PROVIDE 2 x 150 DIA POLY RELIEF PIPES
TO CONNECT FROM KERB TO
EXISTING STORMWATER MANHOLE
CAUTION - TELSTRA CABLE 600mm DEEP

INSTALL GJ JAMES.
RUBBISH BIN
A i
Orcs Lt

Lot 20
BuP 8076
ye _4\ REMOVE AND DISPOSE OF
YAN” EXISTING KERB AND CHANEL
S

 

KI
RAISE STORMWATER

ANHOLE LID TO LEVEL OF
NEW PATHWAY

AS REQUIRED TO SUIT
YA, NEW KERB ALIGNMENTL

 

  
    
    
 
  
  

 
  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

\\ JOIN NEATLY TO Soe EXISTING MH Number 307
MLWS (RL - 0.28m) . SG , EXISTING KERB. LD tnvert RL 0.446 Symoie Tee
“ oO \s RP 65319
_ oo we \ ° . ‘
- ‘| A JOIN NEATLY TO
betun 3 QD PROPOSED PAVEMENT EXISTING PATHWAY
otum_— L -
~ aS ~ RS JOIN NEATLY TOY.
DESIGN HEIGHT aS 2 z F PROPOSED KERB BUILDOUT EXISTING KERB \,
Lat = = © WITH B1 KERB .,
EXISTING SURFACE g 2 2 x Number 305 y
a4 28 Symp Fee LEGEND Sy
oc c
DESIGN OFFSET BS B 3 TI TL IGT
$9 G = PATHWAY AND REVETMENT WALL PLAN KSEE] PROPOSED LANDSCAPED GARDEN
sci HORIZONTAL 1:100 @ A1
CROSS SECTIONS BIR oot 2 3 a8 PROPOSED ROCK REVETMENT WALL = PROPOSED PLAIN CONCRETE
HORIZONTAL 1:100 @ At oF Rs eS PROPOSED EXPOSED AGREGATE
———> —— OVERLAND FLOW PATH COLOURED CONCRETE PATHWAY
QF ee 4s ‘ REFER SHEET 8 FOR SPECIFICATION
VERTICAL 1:100 @ Ai oO Ol EXISTING PIERS (TO REMAIN)
PEDESTRIAN SAFETY RAILING
D a PLANNING INFRASTRUCTURE WILLIAM STREET - NOOSAVILLE | ,7°"""
D -
° AHD RL 1.402 ASSET, DESIGN AND INVESTIGATIONS PATHWAY, RAILING AND 0000009
At 8 SURVEY /ALLEN GRAMPTO Rooea Count , -
A DESIGN” |WARA ELLIS, 7 ra Jhesnicans REVETMENT WALL REHABILITATION Drawing Sheet No.
= 22). Jeyece:  TeuerHowe: Fa
Rv DATE REVISIONS REC. |APPR.] CHECKED [CRAIG ELDRIDGE ¢ “offal ee (ory sansor car stesso PLAN AND CROSS SECTIO NS 03 Rv

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Page 15

 

 

    

    
      

TOE ROCK WALL

  

Number 2
Wiliam Seat
Lot 20

BUP 8076

SETOUT POINTS TABLE

 

 

 

POINT NO EASTING NORTHING RL. DESC,
ALL
POINT 1 §07122.568 7080609.760 1.394 - CH 0,000
POINT 2 507125.446 7080611.349 4.386 - CH 3.460
POINT 3 §07130.278 7080613.048 1.376 - CH 8,392
POINT 4 507131.816 7080613.269 4.373 - CH 10.000
POINT 5 507135.770 7080613.883 4.364 - CH 14.000
POINT 6 507141.699 7080613.479 4.349 - CH 20.000
POINT 7 507149.777 7080607.473 1.330 - CH 30.370
POINT 8 507151.666 7080604.460 1,322 - CH 33.920
AL2:
POINT 9 §07124.299 7080604.258 1.380 - CH 0,000
POINT 10 | 507132.194 7080608.754 1.026 - CH 9.085,
ISLAND:
POINT 11 | 507141.584 7080606.388 1.200 - ISLAND
POINT 12 | 507141,584 7080606.388 1.067 - ISLAND
POINT 13 | 507142,136 7080607.107 1,220 - ISLAND
POINT 14 | 507146.979 7080601.991 1.240 - ISLAND
POINT 15 | 507145.151 7080600,804 1.220 - ISLAND

Number 305
Gymple Tee
Lot

RP 65319

tort
RP 06319

 

PLAN
0 0.02 0.04 ~— 0,06
ee
Scale 1:1 @A1

Number 307
Gymple Tee.

  
 
     
   
      
    
   
 
   
   
     
   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Horizontal Geometry Alignment 1

InSeg OutSeg Tan Chainage Coordinates.

x Y Zz

In Direction Out Direction In Rad Out Rad
Deg Min Sec Deg Min Sec

Line 0,000 §07122.502 7080609.761 1,394 29°01'36,28"

Line Arc Yes 3.456 §07125.524 7080611,438 1.386 29°01'36.28" 29°01'36,28" 14,000
Arc Line Yes 8,392 §07130.169  7080613,031 1,376 8°49'35.18"  8°49'35.18" 14.000
Line Are Yes = 14,001 507135.711 7080613.892 1,364 8°49'35,18"  8°49'35.18" 14,000
Arc Line Yes 21.061 507142.663  7080613.207 1.349 339°55'55.88" 339°S5'55.88" 14.000.
Line Arc Yes 21,120 507142.719 7080613,187 1.349 339°55'55,88" 339°55'65.88" 14.000
Arc Line Yes 30.369 507149,778 7080607.473 1.330 302°04'49,94" 302°04'49,94" 14.000
Line 33,925 507151.666 7080604.460 1.322 302°04'49.94"

FOR SURVEY SETOUT CONTACT NSC
RICHARD HENDERSON, ENGINEERING SURVEYOR
PH: 0419 651 978

NOTE:

e@ REINSTATE EXISTING SIGNS AND LINEMARKING
IF REMOVED DURING CONSTRUCTION

e TRAFFIC SIGNS TO BE MOUNTED AT A MINIMUM

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

| NATURAL SURFACE HEIGHT OF 2.1m
~ . . | DESIGN SURFACE
1 - ~ - - - ~ ~ -
Hori. t Ridm Rigm Ridm
joriz Curve Data LEGEND
Vertical Geometry Grade (%) -0.21%
Vertical Grade Length (m) 33.925m
Vertical Curve Length (m) PROPOSED LANDSCAPED GARDEN
Vertical Curve Radius (m)
DATUM R.L.0.000
NAT. SURFACE ON
& 2 3 a 3} SiS 3 a PROPOSED PLAIN CONCRETE
ALIGNMENT 1 = = = = Sale = =
CUT / FILL DEPTHS g 5 & =| 25 8 3 7a
> e 9 3 3| FF 9 ? _*. =" PROPOSED EXPOSED AGGREGATE
=e oo, | COLOURED CONCRETE PATHWAY
DESIGN LEVELS ON it
a 3 s 3 al SiS a 8
IMENT * a m a mm) aly ” 4
ALIGNMENT 1 2 2 2 = S|) Se = = OVERLAND FLOW PATH
= - o 1
CHAINAGE 8 s 5 Sly g 8
° m oo = S| SIS a fA PEDESTRIAN SAFETY RAILING
> = Horizontal scale 1:100
LONGITUBINAL SECTION ALIGNMENT 1 gg 4S oO 0 EXISTING CONCRETE PIERS (TO REMAIN)
im
0 02 04 06 08 10
Vertical scale 1:20
E PSM PSM 18419 Project Number
8 PLANNING INFRASTRUCTURE WILLIAM STREET, NOOSAVILLE
° AD [RL 1402 ASSET, DESIGN AND INVESTIGATIONS 0000009
Rooza Couned PATHWAY, RAILING AND
B SURVEY [ALLEN CRAMPTON -) 10/14 | Ssaces -
an DESIGN |WARA ELLIS 727 tora | vena REVETMENT WALL REHABILITATION Drawing Sheet No.
OFFICE: TELEPHONE: FAX:
Ry] DATE REVISIONS REC. [APPR.| CHECKED |CRAIG ELDRIDGE 7Q)& 10/14 | tewanin consseoesor(onszzaseos LONG SECTION ALIGNMENT 4 04 Rv._

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Page 16

 

 

 
 

 

th

 
  
 

: EXISTING FEATURES LEGEND

“ Ss EAEEEEEenceaiaemae EP ,
= —& ——_—————_ Overhead P
JOIN NEATLY TO $ verhead Power Line and Pole

 

   
 
    
  

EXISTING PATHWAY. apes Underground Telco Line and Pit
JOIN NEATLY TO AB ere - Underground Optic Fibre and Pit
EXISTING KERB oe E}—or— oF — oF
ee FHISV Underground Water main & FH/SV
wa Cw — -W- — -we —

 

___ Stormwater Pipeline & Pit or M/H

a2" Street_ 2 os we pee 13.———— =F _ Terrain, Bank or Drain Batter

~—__N~ oe

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

   
   
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ee PROPOSED CONCRETE DRIVEWAY K&C, channel, footpath,driveway
-@- ALIGNMENT 2 Ly, os ~ REFER TO STO OW 50 —_— Rockwall or feature
=8- . = _ ____ Edge of bitumen road
ea an _. a __ a = _ . Road centreline
Q-7 a de oO g Building/structure face
2 . 2 Sg Fence line
OQ / /
A9999 Suvey Contral Station
PLAN we i” Existing RP Boundary
0 0.02 0.04 006m fo \ oo memes EXISTING
‘eee eee CONCRETE PATHWAY
Scale 1:1 @At eer 77 J) EXISTING ROCK
naa LE REVETMENT WALL
EXISTING OVERLAND
woe FOR SURVEY SETOUT CONTACT NSC > > FLOW PATH
RICHARD HENDERSON, ENGINEERING SURVEYOR O EXISTING CONCRETE
PH: 0419 651 978 a PIERS (TO REMAIN)
1] JOIN NEATLY TO
i| EXISTING KERB
RECONSTRUCT KERB
3 SETOUT LIP OF B1 KERB AND CHANNEL,
5 NATURAL SURFACE
i} __DESIGN SURFACE __ a
3 Horiz Curve Data ~ 7 = Rim
ei
| | Vertical Geometry Grade (%) 0.378%
| | Vertical Grade Length (m) 66.604m
= —\|; Vertical Curve Length (m)
| Vertical Curve Radius (m)
| | DATUM R.L.0,.000
| NAT. SURFACE ON], al
~~ x 5 313 2 s
ALIGNMENT 2 3 = Ze = S
CUT / FILL DEPTHIE 3 gig 8 2
DESIGN LEVELS ON/_ . Tf
ALIGNMENT 2 3 5 gis 3 5
CHAINAGE 8 g
° o SIR = a
LONGITUDINAL SECTION ALIGNMENT 2
Horizontal scale 1:100
oo 1 2 3 4
a 0.2 04 06 08 19
BEST PLOTTED Vertical scale 1:20
AT AT.
E PSM PSM 18419 Project Number
PLANNING INFRASTRUCTURE
D AHD RL 1.402 ASSET, DESIGN AND INVESTIGATIONS] zs zs WILLIAM STREET, NOOSAVILLE 0000009
Al 5 SURVEY [ALLEN CRAMPTON, Hosen cove S PATHWAY, RAILING AND
8 Papo. Tevenrvts OUD 4565 : ss REVETMENT WALL REHABILITATION Drawing Sheet No.
A DESIGN |MARAELLS  (C-<-Bahof Msc waco: exe nas Me
Ry, DATE REVISIONS REC, [APPR] CHECKED [CRAIG ELDRIDGE CRE “1G fA} Tevorin tor seovec0 or ssasstos LONG SECTION ALIGN MENT 2 05 Rv.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Page 17

 

   

Number 6

 

 

Number 8

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Vitiiam Street AL Mien Steet
4
ap erere = RP 67878 a
pub i eet
« va
7 DRIVEWAY 2
wy o
— =
©
F
~
bw
__ ae
—16
o ,o
__ CONCRETE te JOIN NEATLY TO QO
__._ CROSSOVER EXISTING KERB =
—— | a
ALIGNMENT 2 oa, ~
—s = =
uy - ee
& ET ale
yn . “Oy
z2 92 8:
5 2 a
oO oO
FOR SURVEY SETOUT CONTACT NSC PLAN shunoer3
RICHARD HENDERSON, ENGINEERING SURVEYOR 0 0.02 0.04 0,06m on
PH; 0419 651 978 ae BUP 10567"
Scale 1:1 @A1
Horizontal Vertex Data for Alignment 2 RECONSTRUCT KERB AND CHANNEL
a SETOUT LIP OF KERB AND CHANNEL
InSeg  QutSeg Tan Chainage Coordinates In Direction Out Direction In Rad +
x Y z Deg Min Sec Deg Min Sec A
Line 0.000 507124295 © 7080604,264 0,992 29°37'16.12" =
Line Arc Yes 9.085 §07132.194 70B0608,754 1,026 2" 29°376.12" 7.000 z
Are Line Yes 19.778 — §07141.584 —7080806.388 1.087 .70" 302°0S'S0,70" 7.000 -
Line 84.752  807176.109  7080551.346 = 1.305 302°05'50,70" 3
Vertical Alignment Report for Alignment 2 %
InSeg OutSeg Tan Chainage iInGrade OutGrade In VCL Out VCL NATURAL SURFACE 5
% % Radius Radius a
Line 0.000 0.992 0,38
Line Line No 66,804 1.244 © 0,38 0.34 DESIGN SURFACE |
Line 84,752 4.305 0.34 = = T
Horiz Curve Oata
Vertical Geometry Grade (%) 0.378% 0.34%,
Vertical Grade Length (m)} 66.604m 18.148m
Vertical Curve Length (m)
Vertical Curve Radius (m)
OATUM R.L.0.000
NAT. SURFACE ON]. .
8 Ss a 3
ALIGNMENT 2 3 q 8 a
t
CUT / FILL DEPTH|e 5 8 8
s ad s s
DESIGN LEVELS ON - o
S s ae oS
ALIGNMENT 2 = 8 § R
oy
CHAINAGE x
o oe So 7
a 3 3a 3
LONGITUDINAL SECTION ALIGNMENT 2 (2)
Horizontal scale 1100
o 1 2 5 4 §
emery
0 02 04 O6 0.8 1.0
Vertical scale 1:20
BEST PLOTTED
AT AT.
E PSM PSM 18419 ‘ Project Number
D PLANNING INFRASTRUCTURE WILLIAM STREET, NOOSAVILLE
D AHD RL 1.402 ASSET, DESIGN AND INVESTIGATIONS PATHWAY, RAILING AND 0000009
Al B SURVEY [ALLEN CRAMPTON. ooea Ceunea : -
a DESIGN Jwara cus (ZZ 7 Jens REVETMENT WALL REHABILITATION Drawing Sheet No.
22 tof peYorrice: “verernone, ax
Ry, DATE REVISIONS REC. [APPR.| CHECKED [CRAIG ELDRIBGE COS [ig /(A"] wenn ansezecsor _omysazeesr LONG SECTION ALIGNMENT 2 (2) 06 Rv.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Page 18

 

 

STONE PITCHING AT TOP OF REVETMENT WALL
(Nominal 250mm thick, Minimum Riprap size
150mm dia.,NO FINES Concrete Mortar)

PROPOSED REVETMENT WALL
PLACE NOM 300-500mm DIA BASALT ROCK OR SIMILAR
SUITABLE FOR MARINE ENVIRONMENT

AND PATHWAY

PROPOSED TYPE B2 KERB

AND 32MPa SALT RESISTANT
EXPOSED AGGREGATE PATHWAY
200mm THICK WITH SL 102 MESH
CENTRALLY PLACED

 

 

 

 

SECURE NOMINAL 500mm TOE-ROCK INTO RIVERBED

 

MHWS (RL 0.36m) AHD (RL 0.42m)

ALIGNMENT 1 - TOP OF KERB

PROPOSED TIMBER
SAFETY RAIL

 

 

 

 

 

HAT (RL 0,86m)

 

 

 

 

MCWS TRE 028m)

EXCAVATE EXISTING ROCK REVETMENT WALL
TO EXPOSE NATURAL SURFACE

TOE OF ROCK
REVETMENT WALL

REMOVE AND DISPOSE OF EXISTING
CONCRETE TRAFFIC ISLAND

 

 

 

PAVEMENT REHABILITATION
0.5m CUTBACK AT 3% GRADE

ALLOW 50mm SETDOWN FOR

   

AC SURFACING
GYMPIE

TERRACE

300mm WIDE DRAINAGE LAYER

   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

PROFILE TO ALLOW FOR
50mm ASPHALT OVERLAY

20mm SCREENING WRAPPED IN GEOTEXTILE

 

 

 

 

 

 

PLACE 600R GEOTEXTILE BELOW PROPOSED ROCK
REVETMENT WALL AND PROVIDE 0.5m OVERLAP ON ALL JOINTS

 

EXISTING ROCK REVETMENT WALL

PROPOSED ROCK REVETMENT WALL.

PROPOSED STONE PITCHED CAPPING

EXISTING ROAD PAVEMENT

PROPOSED CUTBACK

REFER TO B2 KERB DETAL BELOW
FOR SPECIFICATION

REMOVE AND DISPOSE OF EXISTING PATHWAY AND ASPHALT PAVEMENT
BACKFILL VOIDS, PLACE ELCOMAX 600R GEOTEXTILE (OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT)

AND COMPACTED ROAD BASE

 

EXISTING CONCRETE PILES TO REMAIN

 

 

TYPICAL SECTION

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

PATHWAY - REFER

          
   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

CONSTRUCTION DETAIL 1 SHEET 8 FOR FINISHES
0 25
_ = 6 32mPa SALT RESISTANT
1200: NOMINAL SPACE BETWEEN POSTS 2550, gay MoREMorFOSTe mene EXPOSED AGGREGATE REFERENCE POINT FOR
JOIN HORIZONTAL RAILS AT POST COLOURED CONCRETE SETOUT AND LEVELS
YUNGTION EVERY SECOND POST. cs ro SL 102 MESH CENTRALLY PLACED ALIGNMENT 4
+}. . a 75 x38 ACQ OR SIMILAR STANDARD 2mWIDE
| gi eg TREATED HORIZONTAL RAILS: erm
1 ie * FIX HORIZONTAL RAILS WITH TYPE 17
8 AL ! |

TREATED HORWONTALRALS REAR, ENSUE Hn 99 EMBED INTO POST BARRIS soomm SAW CUT EXISTING

100 x 100 ACO OR SIMILAR STANDARD. fone 2 / g thee ee ACO, on SIMILAR STANDARO : j 8 /

TREATED H4 F17 HARDWOOD POSTS | a g g wire PrReMOTOe ee POSTS - 3 Pope

NOTE: ARRIS ALL EXPOSED EDGES OF. t— j | )

BOTH POSTS & HORIZONTAL RAILS. ns or NOTE: ARRIS ALL EXPOSED EDGES OF ite

U bows BOTH POSTS & HORIZONTAL RAILS. ir ay ae renrmevahoaresnenan
| 75MM (MIN) - 150
el BEDDING TO
g 500 KERB PAVEMENT REHABILITATION (MINIMUM)
FIX POSTS TO TOP OF ROCK | 2M WIDE 32mm NOMINAL THICK ASPHALT SURFACE
REVETMENT WALL 5 ss (rs “rr™ 7a PATHWAY NOMINAL 200mm DEEP CEMENT TREATED BASE (CTB)
AG \ V ¥ / hoy La pene
ds DES Aaa oe cc és sl a On, ied <
AB pe 0 ot Lp vor ste B2_KERB DETAIL
o~ om FN DIMENSIONS IN MILLIMETRES
“rons ey ve necann saeony RAILING DETAIL SIDE VIEW NOT TO SCALE
E PSM PSM 18449 Project Number
PLANNING INFRASTRUCTURE y
atl ee WILLIAM STREET, NOOSAVILLE | oGpgpg
® DESIGN [MARA ELLIS 7 2) tore? REVETMENT WALL REHABILITATION Drawing Sheet No.
CGE | ove: TeePHoNe:

Rv, DATE REVISIONS REC. [APPR.| CHECKED [CRAIG ELDRIDGE COS" of 14 in (ON SazB6s0s (ar) szaBE801 TYPICAL CONSTRUCTION DETAIL 1 07 Rv._

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Page 19

 

 

MATERIALS AND SURFACE FINISHES ~ PROVIDE SAMPLES OF ALL FINISHES FOR COMPARISON AND APPROVAL.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

CODE (TEM COLOUR AGGREGATE NOTES FINISH
P41 CONCRETE PATHWAY CCS ' DESERT BUFF" 90% HANSON 'LAWTON' AGGREGATE (7-10mm NOMINAL SIZE) + 10% WHITE ASH EXPOSED AGGREGATE COLOURED CONCRETE MEDIUM WASH FINISH
P2 PLAIN CONCRETE GREY PORTLAND BLUE METAL (5-7MM NOMINAL SIZE) MEDIUM BROOM FINISH
P3. RECONSTRUCT ASPHALT PAVEMENT PAVEMENT REHABILITATION (MINIMUM) NOMINAL 200mm DEEP CEMENT TREATED BASE 50 mm NOMINAL THICK ASPHALT SURFACE
P4 STONE PITCHING AT TOP OF REVETMENT WALL NOMINAL 250MM THICK MINIMUM RIPRAP SIZE 150MM DIA.,NO FINES CONCRETE MORTAR

 

 

 

  

PROPOSED TIMBER SAFETY RAILING
REFER DETAIL SHEET 05

PROPOSED PLAIN

 

FINISHES PLAN

> 0 0.02 0.04
=)
Scale 1:1 @A1

CONCRETE PATHWAY
JOIN NEATLY TO EXISTING

   

0.06m

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

      

 

 

 

ow 40
wa 150
be [| REFER CONTROL
Eg 150 450 LINE PLANS.
= zB SETOUT POINT
Se
28
a.
wi aé
ae zz
oe <3 2
@ I g28
: wea
Zz “ >
= ESN os Sw
& SLA wz GRR RRR RZ
SEEKER e wk (B1+ 450)
gs Re CRRA Si & BARRIER KERB AND CHANNEL.
DISIAN a 8 CLOSEST DTMR EQUIVALENT,
PSSLNISA 82 f PE 87.
REFER STD DWGS FOR

SUBSOIL SPECIFICS.

 

PATHWAY NOTE:
REFER TO STANDARD DRAWING SEQ 065
FOR PATHWAY CONSTRUCTION DETAILS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

E PSM PSM 18419 PLANNING INFRASTRUCTURE . Project Number
AAl: a a a ASSET DESIGN ANDINVESTIGATINS WILLIAM STREET, NOOSAVILLE | goqgo09
A DESIGN /MARA ELLIS Cizah o, [pew co ses REVETMENT WALL REHABILITATION Drawing Sheet No.
bof tefernce Lr
Rv, DATE REVISIONS REC. [APPR] CHECKED JCRAIG ELDRIDGE re ae ensmen nssnesn TYPICAL CONSTRUCTION DETAIL 2 08 Rv._

 

 

Page 20

 

GENERAL NOTES:

1. DESIGN CRITERIA FOR THE WALL ARE BASED ON THE FOLLOWING:
— DESIGN LIFE OF NEW ROCK PROTECTION = 50 YEARS.

Botts CRAWING SHALL BE READ IN CONJUNCTION WITH ALL OTHER
DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND WITH SUCH OTHER WRITTEN
INSTRUCTIONS

AS MAY BE ISSUED DURING THE COURSE OF THE CONSTRUCTION.
DISCREPANCIES AND VARIATIONS SHALL BE REFERRED TO THE
SUPERINTENDENT

BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK.

3. DURING CONSTRUCTION THE CONTRACTOR (AS PRINCIPAL
CONTRACTOR) SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTAINING THE
STRUCTURE IN A STABLE CONDITION AND ENSURING NO PART
SHALL BE DAMAGED UNDER CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES.

4, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE
IMPLEMENTATION OF EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL
MEASURES DURING CONSTRUCTION.

5. ON COMPLETION OF WORKS THE SITE (INCLUDING ALL ACCESS
ROUTES) SHALL BE LEFT IN A CLEAN AND TIDY CONDITION TO THE
SATISFACTION OF THE SUPERINTENDENT,

6. WORKMANSHIP AND MATERIALS TO BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
RELEVANT SAA CODES EXCEPT WHERE VARIED BY THE CONTRACT
DOCUMENTS.

7, ALL LEVELS ARE EXPRESSED IN METRES TO A CONTROLLED
DATUM (REFER LEVEL DATUM NOTE). ALL DIMENSIONS RELEVANT TO
THE SETTING OUT OF THE WORK SHALL BE VERIFIED BY THE
CONTRACTOR BEFORE CONSTRUCTION PROCEEDS,

8. THE APPROVAL OF A SUBSTITUTION SHALL BE SOUGHT FROM
THE SUPERINTENDENT BEFORE INCORPORATION INTO THE WORK.

9, CONTRACTOR TO LOCATE ALL SERVICES PRIOR TO
COMMENCEMENT OF WORK.

ARMOUR ROCK

CLASS & GRADING

1. ROCKS SHALL BE GRADED VISUALLY.

2. NOT MORE THAN 5% OF ROCKS SHALL HAVE A RATIO OF
MAXIMUM DIMENSION TO MINIMUM DIMENSION OF GREATER THAN

3 Rocks SHALL COMPLY WITH THE FOLLOWING GRADING BASED ON
ROCK COUNTS:
~ <0.45 DNSO MIN
~ <1.0 DNS5O MEAN
— >1.55 DNSO MAX
UNLESS WHEN PLACED IN THE WORKS THE GENERAL ROCK
RADING IN THE AREA OF INDIVIDUAL LARGE ROCKS IS INCREASED
SUCH THAT AT LEAST 50% OF THE SURROUNDING ROCKS ARE
GREATER THAN 0.6XDN OF THE LARGER ROCK),
WHERE ROCKS ARE MEASURED BY DN= SUM GF 3 MUTUALLY
PERPENDICULAR
DIMENSIONS.
4, THE SIZES OF THE ARMOUR ROCK TO BE USED IN THE WORKS
ARE SET OUT
BELOW:
ONSO

go
100
RELATIVE DENSITY OFOCK SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 2.6 (SATURATED

SURFACE DRY)
5. EXISTING LARGER ROCK MAY BE UTILISED IF OF SUITABLE
QUALITY.

6. MATERIAL SHALL BE PLACED SO THAT THE DISTRIBUTION OFOCKS
WITHIN ANY 5M X 5M AREA CONFORMS WITH THE ROCK COUNT
GRADING BASED ON DNSO.

7. SATURATED SURFACE DRY — LARGER SAMPLES ARE SATURATED
TO FILL ALL ACCESSIBLE VOIDS BUT THE OUTER SURFACE IS DRY.

GEQTEXTILE

1. GEOTEXTILE FABRIC SHALL BE ELCOMAX 6Q0R (NON WOVEN OR
SUITABLE EQUIVALENT)

2, GECTEXTILE SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH SOOMM OVERLAP AT

SONSTRUCTION
ROCK PLACEMENT

1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUPPLY A METHOD STATEMENT
DETAILING ITS PROPOSED METHOD OFOCK PLACEMENT AND
CONTROL TO ENSURE THE REMEDIATION MEETS THE SPECIFIED
STANDARDS.

2. ARMOUR ROCK IS TO BE PLACED ON THE GEOTEXTILE
AT THE TOE OF THE WALL IN TWO LAYERS TO THE MINIMUM
THICKNESS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS.

3. THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR
DETERMINING SATISFACTORY PLACEMENT TECHNIQUES TO
ENSURE GEOTEXTILE IS NOT DAMAGED.

4. THE METHOD OF PLACING SHALL PRODUCE A DENSE,
EVENLY DISTRIBUTED ROCK BLANKET WITH A MINIMUM OF VOIDS
AND SHALL ENSURE THE MAXIMUM
INTERLOCK BETWEEN ADJACENT ROCKS.

5. INDIVIDUAL ROCKS SHALL BE MOVED TO A NON—MOVING
STABLE POSITION IN CONTACT WITH THREE OTHER ROCKS.

8. TOLERANCE AND FINISH LEVELS:
~ THE ARMOUR ROCK THICKNESS SHALL BE WITHIN —O00 MM
AND +200 MM OF THE SPECIFIED THICKNESS AT ALL
LOCATIONS.
=- THE SLOPE OF THE ROCK LAYER SHALL NOT VARY BY MORE
THAN 10% FROM THE SPECIFIED SLOPE.

HOLD POINTS

THE FOLLOWING HOLD POINTS FOR INSPECTION SHALL APPLY
BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH EACH STAGE OF CONSTRUCTION:

1. TRAFFIC CONTROL, ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROLS, WHS
CONTROLS.

2. REMOVAL OF EXISTING CONCRETE AND ROCK

2.1. SUPPORT TO EXISTING PAVEMENT EDGE

2.2. OTHERWISE AS DIRECTED

QUALITY OF ARMOUR ROCK MATERIAL

1, ARMOUR ROCK SHALL COMPRISE INDIVIDUAL STONE WHICH
IS EITHER IGNEOUS OR METAMORPHIC IN ORIGIN AND WHICH IS
DENSE, SOUND, RESISTANT TO ABRASION AND FREE OF
CRACKS, CLEAVAGE PLANES, SEAMS AND OTHER
DEFECTS WHICH WOULD RESULT IN BREAKDOWN OF THE STONE
IN THE ENVIRONMENT OF THE SITE OF THE WORKS.

2. ANY STONE WHICH WILL UNDERGO PHYSICAL CHANGE
CAUSING SPALLING, WEATHERING OR FRACTURING IN THE
ENVIRONMENT OF THE SITE WILL NOT BE ACCEPTABLE.

3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUPPLY TESTING BY A SUITABLY
EXPERIENCED PETROLOGIST OR GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER WHO
HAS OBTAINED REPRESENTATIVE SAMPLES AND CARRIED OUT
TESTING TO DETERMINE THE MINERAL COMPOSITION AND SUCH
OTHER TESTS HE MAY DEEM NECESSARY TO DETERMINE THE
SUITABILITY OF THE ROCK.

4. THESE TESTS MUST INCLUDE THOSE LISTED BELOW,
IDENTIFIED AS (A) TO (B) INCLUSIVE, TOGETHER WITH THE
DETERMINATION AND DISTRIBUTION OF DELETERIOUS SECONDARY
MINERALS FOR ALL BASIC IGNEOUS ROCKS. FULL DETAILS OF
THIS SAMPLING AND TESTING ARE TO BE INCLUDED IN THE
REPORT.

5. ALL ARMOUR ROCK TO BE INCORPORATED IN THE WORKS
SHALL COMPLY WITH THE FOLLOWING TEST REQUIREMENTS AND
BE TESTED AT NATA ACCREDITED LABORATORY.

A) LOS ANGELES ABRASION TEST
FOR SPECIMENS TO COMPLY GRADING OF AS 1141~1980
SECTION 23, THE LOSS WHEN TESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH
THE REQUIREMENTS OF THAT STANDARD SHALL NOT EXCEED
20%

B)_DENSITY
THE PARTICLES DENSITY OF THE 37.SMM TO 63MM FRACTION
OF A CRUSHED SAMPLE EXPRESSED ON A DRY BASIS SHALL
NOT BE LESS THAN 2 600 KG/M’ AND THE WATER
ABSORPTION SHALL NOT EXCEED 3% WHEN DETERMINED BY
THE RELEVANT METHODS DESCRIBED IN AS 1141-1980,
SECTION 6 OR AS4133.2

 

 

Al

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

E PSM PSM 18419 PLANNING INFRASTRUCTURE

c AHD RL 1.402 ASSET, DESIGN AND INVESTIGATIONS
B SURVEY | ALLEN CRAMPTON peecane

A DESIGN | MARA ELLIS Ce rar ao a

Rv) DATE REVISIONS REC. j/APPR.] CHECKED] CRAIG ELD! Tewantn (07) 5320.650% 07} 83208601

 

 

 

 

 

WILLIAM STREET, NOOSAVILLE

PATHWAY, RAILING AND
REVETMENT WALL REHABILITATION

GENERAL NOTES

Project Number

009

 

 

Orawing Sheet No.

09 Rv.

 

 

Page 21

Design Plan in relation to the Established Quay Line

Page 22

 

MHWS (RL.0.36m) AHD (RL0.42m) HAT (RL 0.56m)

MATCH TO EXISTING ROCK PROFILE

MLWS (RL - 0.28m) _

Datum —3

 

PROPOSED B2 KERB
ALIGNMENT 1
CUT BACK

=2% _+2%

u

 

DESIGN HEIGHT

0.235
0.631
0.717

0.931
0.988
1.013

1.365
1371

1.372
1.392
1.352

 

EXISTING SURFACE

1.241

 

DESIGN OFFSET

 

 

-4.529 [0.117

-5.994 |0.235
-4.748 |0.631

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

-4.218 |0.931
-3.125 |1.013
-3.010 | 1.037
-3.001 [1.037
-3.000 |1.038
-2.000 |1.102
0.000

 

SECURE 500 mm NOMINAL SIZE
TOE-ROCK INTO RIVERBED

MHWS (RL.0.36m) AHD(RL0.42m) HAT (RL 0.56m)

NK

PROPOSED

Le

XISTING
RAILING
RAILING

E

 

 

MLWS (RL - 0.28m AD

©

 

OI

Datum —4

 

ALIGNMENT 1

WILLIAM STREET

PROPOSED B2 KERB

CUT BACK

/ GYMPIE TERRACE
+2% 3%

 

DESIGN HEIGHT

-2.540

1.386
1.393
1.403
1.413
1.373

 

EXISTING SURFACE

1,308

 

DESIGN OFFSET

 

 

 

-8.899 |-2.462

 

 

 

 

-3.010 |-0.203
-3.000 |-0.200
-2.466 |0.984
-2.000 |0.968

0.000

 

 

 

TOP OF PROPOSED ROCK PITCHED
REVETMENT WALL - REFER TO TYPICAL DETAIL

 

TOE OF PROPOSED ROCK REVETMENT WALL

 

MHWS (RL.0.36m) AHD (RL0.42m) HAT (RL 0.56m}
MLWS (RL - 0.28m

 

Datum —3

 

EL
Zz
Ww
=
Zz
&
5
=z

 

DESIGN HEIGHT

-0.933
-0.142

1.216
1.394

 

EXISTING SURFACE

0.933

1.216
1.392

 

DESIGN OFFSET

-5.226 |-0.142

-6.011

 

 

 

 

-1.921
0.000

 

 

 

 

CROSS SECTIONS
HORIZONTAL 1:100 @ A1
0 1 2 3 4 5

VERTICAL 1:100 @ A1

GYMPIE TERRACE

NOTES:

EXCAVATION WILL BE CARRIED OUT AT LOW - OUTGOING TIDE.
WORKS WILL BE CLEAR OF EXISTING CHANNEL AND MARITIME TRAFFIC.
DO NOT DISTURB EXISTING PRIVATELY OWNED CONCRETE PILES

 

 

 

 

 

SURVEY STATION TABLE
POINT NO. TYPE EASTING NORTHING RL
9901 Screw 507130.415 7080612.705 1.361
9902 Screw 507112.546 7080596.835 1.097
9903 Nail 507148, 161 7080610.099 1.297 .
9904 Nail 507142.783 7080614.765 1.368 <—
PSM 18419 506754,241 7080419.516 1.402 < =” .
*
Oe
-
PROPOSED SILT CURTAIN we.
PROPOSED TOE OF PROPOSED urs om {
oe ee fee
ROCK REVETMENT WALL D o —_

   
  
   

 

  
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 

  
 

  

JOIN NEATLY TO
EXISTING KERB

Number 305
Gympie Tce

PATHWAY AND REVETMENT WALL PLAN

HORIZONTAL 1:100 @ A1
oO 1 2-3 4 ~55

o 1 2 4.5

  

   

> -~—
O 0

 

PROPOSED
KERB INLET PIT
INVER RL1.006
CONNECT TO
EXISTING MH
Invert RL 0.446 Lot 4

PROPOSED PAVEMENT
REHABILITATION

BIN NOTE:

SUPPLY AND INSTALL 2401 WHEELIE BIN ENCLOSURE
(GENERAL WASTE) IN LOCATION SHOWN
AND BOLT TO NEW SLAB TO MATCH ADJOINING PATHWAY.

Kicrmorreanon’

PROPOSED ROCK PITCHED TOP REVETMENT WALL_

a

PROPOSED SAFETY RAILING AS SHOWN (20m LENGTH)

 

 

 

Number 307
Gympie Toe.

   

RP 65319

PROPOSED KERB BUILDOUT
WITH B1 KERB

   
  
 

LEGEND

PROPOSED LANDSCAPED GARDEN

PROPOSED ROCK REVETMENT WALL SS

OVERLAND FLOW PATH
EXISTING PIERS (TO REMAIN)

PEDESTRIAN SAFETY RAILING

PROPOSED STONE PITCHED HEADWALL - TOP RL 1.45
PROVIDE CONCRETE SCOUR PROTECTION - 5.5m LONG
FROM OUTLET OF EXISTING 300 DIA RCP TO MLWM (RL -0.28)

BACKFILL VOIDS, PLACE GEOTEXTILE AND
ROCK REVETMENT WALL
REFER TO CONSTRUCTION DETAIL
RESTORE (CONCRETE LINE)
| EXISTING 300 DIA RCP
PROPOSED PEDESTRIAN SAFETY RAILING

 

 

 

 

 

  
   

 
 
   
 
   
   
 
 
  
 

REFER TO DETAIL SHEET 7

PROVIDE 2 x 150 DIA POLY RELIEF PIPES
TO CONNECT FROM KERB TO

EXISTING STORMWATER MANHOLE
CAUTION - TELSTRA CABLE 600mm DEEP

INSTALL GJ JAMES
RUBBISH BIN

 

RAISE STORMWATER
MANHOLE LID TO LEVEL OF
NEW PATHWAY

Number 2
William Street
Lot 20

BUP 8076

= ReMSvE AND DISPOSE OF
EXISTING KERB AND CHANEL
AS REQUIRED TO SUIT
\\ NEW KERB ALIGNMENTL

S\\
dD

  
  
 

  
 
   
  

    
 
 
 
 

JOIN NEATLY TO
EXISTING PATHWAY.

JOIN NEATLY TO\s
EXISTING KERB

  

PROPOSED PLAIN CONCRETE

PROPOSED EXPOSED AGREGATE
COLOURED CONCRETE PATHWAY
REFER SHEET 8 FOR SPECIFICATION

 

 

Al

PLANNING INFRASTRUCTURE

 

ASSET, DESIGN AND INVESTIGATIONS

 

Noosa Council
PO Boxta1

 

‘TEWANTIN QLD 4565
OFFICE: TELEPHONE: FAX:

 

 

E PSM PSM 18419

e AHD RL 1.402

B SURVEY |ALLEN CRAMPTON
A |23-10-14| ESTABLISHED QUAY LINE DESIGN MARA ELLIS

Rv| DATE REVISIONS REC. |APPR.| CHECKED |CRAIG ELDRIDGE

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tewantin (07)5329.6501 (07) 53296501

 

 

 

 

WILLIAM STREET - NOOSAVILLE

PATHWAY, RAILING AND

REVETMENT WALL REHABILITATION

PLAN AND CROSS SECTIONS

Project Number

0000009

 

Drawing Sheet No.

03 Rv.A

 

 

 

Page 23

Module 10 of the State Development Regulatory Provisions

Page 24

 

10.1 Tidal works, or development in a coastal management district state code

Table 10.1.1: All development
Performance outcomes
PO1 Development in a coastal hazard

area is compatible with the level of
severity of the coastal hazard.

Acceptable outcomes

A01.1 Development is located outside a high coastal

hazard area unless it is:

(1) coastal-dependent development, or

(2) compatible with inundation due to its nature or
function, or

(3) temporary, readily relocatable, or able to be
abandoned, or

(4) essential community service infrastructure, or

(5) small - to medium-scale tourist development, or

(6) redevelopment within an existing built-up urban area,
or is redevelopment of built structures that cannot be
relocated or abandoned.

AND

| Response column key:
MM Achieved
P/S Performance solution
N/A Not applicable

   

Comment

The proposed revetment wall is designed to withstand
inundation and is redevelopment of an existing
unmaintained revetment wall. The proposed revetment wall
and pathway meet AO1.1 (2) and (6)

 

AO1.2 Development referred to in AO1.1(6) avoids being
located within a high coastal hazard area, or where this is
not practicable, minimises the exposure of people and
permanent structures to coastal hazard impacts.

The reconstruction of the revetment wall is proposed to
protect road infrastructure and therefore minimises the
exposure of people and permanent structures to coastal
hazard impacts.

 

 

PO2 Development siting, layout and
access in a coastal hazard area
responds to potential inundation due to a
defined storm tide event and minimises
associated risks to personal safety and
property.

AO2.1 Development within a coastal hazard area is
located, designed, constructed and operated to maintain
or enhance the community's resilience to defined storm
tide events by limiting the exposure of people and
structures to associated impacts.

AND

Given that the development layout of roads and houses is
already established, this performance outcome is not
relevant to the construction of the revetment wall.
Nevertheless, the reconstruction of the revetment wall is
proposed to protect road infrastructure and therefore allows
the community to become more resilient to coastal hazard
impacts.

 

 

AOQ2.2 Development mitigates any residual impacts from
storm tide inundation in a coastal hazard area including by
ensuring:

(1) habitable rooms of built structures are located above
the defined storm tide event level and any additional
freeboard level that would ordinarily apply in a flood
prone area under a relevant planning scheme
standard, or

(2) a safe refuge is available for people within the
premises during a defined storm tide event, or

(3) atleast one evacuation route remains passable for
emergency evacuations during a defined storm tide

 

 

Given that the development layout of roads and houses is
already established, this performance outcome is not
relevant to the construction of the revetment wall.
Nevertheless, reconstruction of the revetment wall will is
necessary to reduce potential undermining of the road and
therefore increase evacuation routes/reduce recovery time
after a surge event, thus satisfying A02.2.

 

State development assessment provisions
10 October 2014 V1.5

Module 10 — Coastal protection

10.1 Tidal works, or development in a coastal management district state code
Page 1 of 16

 

 

Page 25

  

Performance outcomes

Acceptable outcomes

event, including consideration of the capacity of the
route to support the evacuation of the entire local
population within a reasonably short timeframe (for
example, 12 hours).

AND

 

Comment

 

AO2.3 Development within a coastal hazard area is
located, designed and constructed to ensure exposed
structures can sustain flooding from a defined storm tide
event.

AND

Given that the development layout of roads and houses is
already established, this performance outcome is not
relevant to the construction of the revetment wall.
Nevertheless, reconstruction of the revetment wall will allow
the road to sustain flooding. At present the revetment wall is
inappropriately constructed/maintained and so the road is
being undermined by tidal flows.

 

AO2.4 Essential community service infrastructure is:
(1) located so that it is not inundated by a recommended
storm tide event specified for that infrastructure, or
(2) located and designed to ensure any components of
the infrastructure that are likely to fail to function or
may result in contamination when inundated by a
storm tide (for example, electrical switch gear and
motors, water supply pipeline air valves) are:
(a) located above the peak water level for a
recommended storm tide event, or
(b) designed and constructed to exclude storm tide
intrusions or infiltration (including by being
located in the ground), or
(c) able to temporarily stop functioning during a
recommended storm tide event without causing
significant adverse impacts to the infrastructure
or the community.

AND

na

 

AO2.5 Emergency services infrastructure and emergency
shelters, police facilities, and hospitals and associated
facilities have an emergency rescue area above the peak
water level for a recommended storm tide event.

na

 

PO3 Development directly, indirectly and
cumulatively avoids an unacceptable
increase in the severity of the coastal
hazard, and does not significantly
increase the potential for damage on the
premises or to other premises.

 

 

AOQ3.1 Development avoids increasing the number of
premises from which people would need to be evacuated
to prevent death or injury from a defined storm tide event.

 

 

Reconstruction of the revetment wall will not increase the
number of premises from which people would need to be
evacuated. Infact, reconstruction of the revetment wall is
necessary to prevent road collapse and associated injuries
that could be sustained in the event the road fails due to
inadequate protection associated with the existing revetment

 

 

State development assessment provisions
10 October 2014 V1.5

Module 10 — Coastal protection

10.1 Tidal works, or development in a coastal management district state code

Page 2 of 16

Page 26

Performance outcomes

Acceptable outcomes

Response

Comment
wall.

 

PO4 Development avoids the release of
hazardous materials as a result of a
natural hazard event.

Editor's note: Applications should:

(1) assess the risk of storm tide inundation
releasing or otherwise exposing
hazardous materials, including
appropriate emergency planning and
contingency measures.

(2) applications are to be supported by a
report certified by a Registered
Professional Engineer of Queensland
(RPEQ) that demonstrates this
performance outcome will be achieved.

A04.1 Development that involves the manufacture or

storage of hazardous materials in bulk are designed to:

(1) prevent the intrusion of waters from a defined storm
tide event into structures or facilities containing the
hazardous materials, or

(2) ensure hazardous materials remain secured despite
inundation, including secure from the effects of
hydrodynamic forcing associated with wave action or
flowing water.

There will be no manufacture or storage of hazardous
materials in bulk associated with the proposed works.

 

 

PO5 Natural processes and the
protective function of landforms and
vegetation are maintained in coastal
hazard areas.

 

AO5.1 Development in an erosion prone area within the

coastal management district:

(1) maintains vegetation on coastal landforms where its
removal or damage may:

(a) destablise the area and increase the potential
for erosion, or
(b) interrupt natural sediment trapping processes or
dune or land building processes

(2) maintains sediment volumes of dunes and near-shore
coastal landforms, or where a reduction in sediment
volumes cannot be avoided, increased risks to
development from coastal erosion are mitigated by
location, design, construction and operating
standards

(3) minimises the need for erosion control structures or
riverbank hardening through location, design and
construction standards

(4) maintains physical coastal processes outside the
development footprint for the development, including
longshore transport of sediment along the coast

(5) reduces the risk of shoreline erosion for areas
adjacent to the development footprint unless the
development is an erosion control structure

(6) reduces the risk of shoreline erosion for areas
adjacent to the development footprint to the
maximum extent feasible in the case of erosion
control structures.

 

 

The proposal is replacement of an existing revetment wall
and repair of the road. Natural processes and the protective
function of natural landforms and vegetation be remain
consistent with the current situation.

 

 

State development assessment provisions
10 October 2014 V1.5

Module 10 — Coastal protection

10.1 Tidal works, or development in a coastal management district state code

Page 3 of 16

Page 27

 

Performance outcomes

Acceptable outcomes
AND

Response

Cerys

 

AO5.2 Development in a storm tide inundation area is

located, designed, constructed and operated to:

(1) maintain dune crest heights, or where a reduction in
crest heights cannot be avoided, mitigate risks to
development from wave overtopping and storm tide
inundation

(2) maintain or enhance coastal ecosystems and natural
features, such as mangroves and coastal wetlands,
between the development and tidal waters, where the
coastal ecosystems and natural features protect or
buffer communities and infrastructure from storm tide
inundation.

AND

 

AO5.3 Redevelopment of built structures in the erosion

prone area within a coastal management district:

(1) avoids intensifying the use of the premises, or

(2) demonstrates that any intensification of use will not
result in an increase in the need for erosion control
structures or riverbank hardening.

AND

The redevelopment is replacement of an existing revetment
wall/erosion control structure. The net amount of riverbank
hardening will not increase.

 

 

AO5.4 Development that is coastal protection work

involves:

(1) beach nourishment undertaken in accordance with a
program of beach nourishment works that source
sediment of a suitable quality and type from outside
the active beach system, or

(2) the construction of an erosion control structure,
where it is demonstrated that installing an erosion
control structure is the only feasible option for
protecting permanent structures from coastal erosion
and those structures cannot be abandoned or
relocated in the event of coastal erosion occurring.

Editor’s note: Applications for coastal protection work should be

supported by a report certified by a Registered Professional

Engineer of Queensland (RPEQ) that demonstrates how the

engineering solution sought by the work will be achieved.

Editor’s note: Applications for erosion control structures should
demonstrate the consideration of beach nourishment techniques,

 

 

The proposal complies with AO5.4. The road that the
revetment wall is protecting cannot be abandoned.

 

 

State development assessment provisions
10 October 2014 V1.5

Module 10 — Coastal protection

10.1 Tidal works, or development in a coastal management district state code

Page 4 of 16

Page 28

    

Performance outcomes

 

  

Acceptable outcomes

and include a statement of why nourishment (in whole or part)
has not been adopted as the preferred means of controlling the
erosion risk.

AND

   

Response

  
   

beret

 

AO5.5 Development involving reclamation:

(1) does not alter, or otherwise minimises impacts on,
the physical characteristics of a waterway or the
seabed near the reclamation, including flow regimes,
hydrodynamic forces, tidal water and riverbank
stability

(2) is located outside the active sediment transport area,
or otherwise maintains sediment transport processes
as close as possible to their natural state

(3) ensures activities associated with the operation of the
development maintain the structure and condition of
vegetation communities and avoid wind and water
run-off erosion.

Editor's note: Applications for reclamation should be supported

by a report certified by an RPEQ that demonstrates how the

engineering solutions sought by the work will be achieved

na

 

PO6 Erosion prone areas in a coastal
management district are maintained as
development free buffers, or where
permanent buildings or structures exist,
coastal erosion risks are avoided or
mitigated.

 

AO6.1 Development locates built structures outside the
part of the coastal management district that is the erosion
prone area unless the development is listed under AO1.1
(1) -().

AND

The development meets AO1.1 (2). Repair of the revetment
is necessary to protect existing permanent structures.

 

AO6.2 Development is located outside the erosion prone
area unless it is redevelopment.

AND

The revetment is replacement of an existing structure.

 

AO6.3 Coastal-dependent development:

(1) locates, designs and constructs relevant buildings or
structures to withstand coastal erosion impacts,
including by use of appropriate foundations, or

(2) installs and maintains coastal protection works to
mitigate adverse impacts to people and permanent
structures from coastal erosion at the location.

AND

The revetment is necessary to protect the adjoining road
from coastal erosion and therefore complies with AO6.3.

 

 

AO6.4 Development that is temporary, readily relocatable
or able to be abandoned, or essential community service

 

 

Na. The revetment wall will facilitate repair and
reinstatement of existing infrastructure.

 

 

State development assessment provisions
10 October 2014 V1.5

Module 10 — Coastal protection

10.1 Tidal works, or development in a coastal management district state code

Page 5 of 16

Page 29

 

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

infrastructure:
(1) locates built structures landward of an applicable
coastal building line, or
(2) where there is no coastal building line, locates
habitable built structures landward of the alignment of
adjacent habitable buildings, or locates lifesaver
towers or beach access infrastructure to minimise its
impacts on physical coastal processes, or
(3) where it is demonstrated that (1) or (2) is not
reasonable and (3) does not apply:
(a) locates built structures as far landward as
practicable
(b) uses layout design to minimise the footprint of
the development that remains within the erosion
prone area.

AND

 

AO6.5 Redevelopment of existing built structures not The revetment wall is located as far landward as practical.
referred to in AO6.4, and excluding marine development:
(1) relocates built structures outside that part of the
erosion prone area that is within the coastal
management district, or
(2) relocates built structures as far landward as
practicable, and landward of an applicable coastal
building line, or
(3) where there is no coastal building line:
(a) relocates built structures landward of the
alignment of adjacent habitable buildings, or
(b) uses layout design to minimise the footprint of
the development that remains within the erosion
prone area, or
(c) provides sufficient space seaward of the
development within the premises to allow for
the construction of erosion control structures.

AND

 

AO6.6 Redevelopment of built structures in the erosion na
prone area within a coastal management district, which
results in an intensification of use, mitigates the erosion
threat to the development, having regard to:

(1) design and construction standards

(2) installing and maintaining on-site erosion control

 

 

 

 

 

State development assessment provisions Module 10 — Coastal protection 10.1 Tidal works, or development in a coastal management district state code
10 October 2014 V1.5 Page 6 of 16

Page 30

    

Performance outcomes

 

   

Acceptable outcomes

structures within the premises if the development is
not intended to be temporary.

    
 

Response

  

Comment

 

PO7 Development avoids or minimises
adverse impacts on coastal resources
and their values, to the maximum extent
reasonable.

 

AOQ7.1 Coastal protection work that is in the form of beach
nourishment uses methods of placement suitable for the
location that do not interfere with the long-term use of the
locality of, or natural values within or neighbouring, the
proposed placement site.

Na, Beach nourishment is not proposed.

The proposal is replacement of an existing revetment and
will match the revetment wall on either side of the works. As
such, the replacement of eth revetment wall will not change
the natural values of the area from the existing situation.

 

 

AND

AO7.2 Marine development is located and designed to na
expand on or redevelop existing marine infrastructure

unless it is demonstrated that it is not practicable to

co-locate the development with existing marine

infrastructure.

AND

AQ7.3 Marine development: na

(1) relies on a natural channel of a depth adequate for
the intended vessels, or
(2) where there are no feasible alternative locations for
the facility in the local area that do not require
dredging for navigation channel purposes:
(a) involves capital dredging for new navigation
channel purposes
(b) is located, designed and operated to minimise
the need for capital and subsequent
maintenance dredging for navigation channel
purposes.

AND

 

AO7.4 Development minimises dredging or the disposal
of material in coastal waters during key biological events
(such as fish aggregations or spawning) for species found
in the area.

AND

The footprint of the construction area is minimised as much
as practical for costs and therefore also meets the
requirement of minimising disposal (i.e. placement of rock).

A silt boom will be placed around the works footprint. This is
for the purpose of sediment control, but will also have a
secondary benefit of restricting access for fish and other
wildlife to the works area. The contractor can be instructed
to install the silt boom at a time and in a manner that will
reduce the number fish and other marine fauna caught
within the works footprint area.

 

 

 

AO7.5 Measures are to be incorporated as part of siting

 

 

The area where the works are proposed is mapped as

 

State development assessment provisions
10 October 2014 V1.5

Module 10 — Coastal protection

10.1 Tidal works, or development in a coastal management district state code

Page 7 of 16

Page 31

    

Performance outcomes

 

 

Acceptable outcomes

and design of the development to protect and retain

identified ecological values and underlying ecosystem

processes within or adjacent to the development site to
the greatest extent practicable. This includes:

(1) maintaining or restoring vegetated buffers between
development and coastal waters to the extent
practicable, unless the development is within ports or
airports, or is marine development

(2) maintaining or enhancing the connectivity of
ecosystems in consideration of the cumulative effect
of the development in addition to existing developed
areas

(3) retaining coastal wetlands, seagrass beds and other
locally important feeding, nesting or breeding sites for
native wildlife.

AND

 

  

Response

ery g

containing Matters of State Environmental Significance for
Regulated Vegetation intersecting a watercourse. This
mapping matter is irrelevant to the site because the area
where the works are proposed is all hard infrastructure. Due
to surrounding infrastructure, vegetation restoration and
enhancement is not appropriate or relevant in the location
for the small scale of the proposed project.

 

  

 

AO7.6 Measures are incorporated as part of siting and
design of the development to maintain or enhance water
quality to achieve the environmental values and water
quality objectives outlined in the Environmental Protection
(Water) Policy 2009.

AND

The proposal is intended to prevent the current uncontrolled
under mining and scour of the road which is currently
releasing sediments into the river.

 

AO7.7 Development avoids the disturbance of acid
sulphate soils, or where it is demonstrated that this is not
possible, the disturbance of acid sulphate soils is carefully
managed to minimise and mitigate the adverse effects of
the disturbance on coastal resources.

A small amount of insitu soils below the level of mean low
water springs will require disturbance for keying in the toe of
the batter. It is anticipated that the contractor will undertake
this section of work by pushing the bucket head in the
sediment enough to laydown the fabric and overlay the
500mm of rock. The amount of disturbance for this part of
the activity is less than 100m3 and most importantly
displaced sediment will not become oxidised.

 

 

PO8 Coastal protection work is
undertaken only as a last resort where
erosion presents an imminent threat to
public safety or permanent structures.
Editor’s note: Applications for coastal
protection work must be supported by a report
certified by an RPEQ that demonstrates how
the engineering solution sought by the work
will be achieved.

A08.1 Coastal protection work is only undertaken to
protect existing permanent structures from imminent
adverse coastal erosion impacts, and the structures
cannot reasonably be relocated or abandoned.

AND

The repair of the revetment works is necessary to allow
repair and prevent further undermining of the adjacent road.
The existing road provides access to houses and so cannot
be relocated or abandoned.

 

 

AO8.2 Coastal protection work to protect private
structures is undertaken on private land to the maximum
extent reasonable.

AND

 

 

Na the road is public.

 

 

State development assessment provisions
10 October 2014 V1.5

Module 10 — Coastal protection

10.1 Tidal works, or development in a coastal management district state code

Page 8 of 16

Page 32

Performance outcomes

Acceptable outcomes

AO8.3 Coastal protection work does not increase
the coastal hazard risk for adjacent areas or
properties.

Cory g

The works are repair of an existing revetment wall and as
such the coastal hazard risk on adjacent areas will not be
increased from the current situation.

 

PO9 Development avoids adverse
impacts on matters of state
environmental significance, or where this
is not reasonably possible, impacts are
minimised and an environmental offset is
provided for any significant residual
impacts to matters of state environmental
significance that are prescribed
environmental matters.

AO9.1 Development:

(1) is set back from matters of state environmental
significance

(2) avoids interrupting, interfering or otherwise adversely
impacting underlying natural ecosystem components
or processes and interactions that affect or maintain
the matters of state environmental significance, such
as water quality, hydrology, geomorphology and
biological processes, or

(3) incorporates measures as part of its location and
design to protect and retain matters of state
environmental significance and underlying ecosystem
processes within and adjacent to the development
site to the greatest extent practicable.

Editor's note: Applications for development should identify any

threatened species or their habitats, or threatened ecosystems

that may be affected by the proposal. In particular, applications

should identify and describe how the development avoids

adverse impacts on any critical life stage ecological processes

within or adjacent to the development area.

AND

The area where the works are proposed is mapped as
containing Matters of State Environmental Significance for
Regulated Vegetation intersecting a watercourse. This
mapping matter is irrelevant to the site because the area
where the works are proposed is all hard infrastructure. Due
to surrounding infrastructure, vegetation restoration and
enhancement is not appropriate or relevant in the location
for the small scale of the proposed project.

 

AO9.2 An environmental offset is provided for any
significant residual impact on matters of state
environmental significance that are prescribed
environmental matters caused by the development.
Editor’s note: Applications for development should identify
anticipated losses, and outline what actions are proposed to be
undertaken to offset the loss in accordance with the relevant
Queensland Environmental Offsets Policy.

na

 

 

PO10 Development maintains or
enhances general public access to or
along the foreshore, unless this is
contrary to the protection of coastal
resources or public safety.

 

A0O10.1 Development adjacent to state coastal land or
tidal water:
(1) demonstrates that restrictions to public access are
necessary for:
(a) the safe or secure operation of development, or
(b) the maintenance of coastal landforms and
coastal habitat
(2) separates residential, tourist and retail development

 

 

Repair of the revetment is necessary to also facilitate repair
of the riverside footpath access to the foreshore.

 

State development assessment provisions
10 October 2014 V1.5

Module 10 — Coastal protection

10.1 Tidal works, or development in a coastal management district state code

Page 9 of 16

 

Page 33

Performance outcomes

Acceptable outcomes
from tidal water with public areas or public access
facilities, or

(3) maintains existing public access (including public
access infrastructure that is in the public interest)
through the site to the foreshore for:

(a) pedestrians, via access points including
approved walking tracks, boardwalks and
viewing platforms, or

(b) vehicles, via access points including approved
roads or tracks.

AND

Response

Comment

 

AO10.2 Development adjacent to state coastal land,
including land under tidal water:
(1) is located and designed to:

(a) allow safe and unimpeded access to, over,
under or around built structures located on, over
or along the foreshore

(b) ensure emergency vehicles can access the
area near the development, or

(2) minimises and offsets any loss of access to and
along the foreshore within two kilometres of the
existing access points, and the access is located and
designed to be consistent with (1)(a) and (b).

AND

Repair of the revetment wall will improve reliability and
safety of access

 

A010.3 Any parts of private development that extend over
tidal water are to be designed, constructed and used for
marine access purposes only.

Na-proposed works are not for private purposes

 

PO11 Private marine development
avoids structures attaching to, or
extending across, non-tidal state coastal
land abutting tidal waters.

AO11.1 Private marine development and other structures
such as decks or boardwalks for private use do not attach
to, or extend across state coastal land that is situated
above the high water mark.

Editor's note: For occupation permits or allocations of State land,
refer to the Land Act 1994.

Na-proposed works are not for private purposes

 

 

PO12 Further development of artificial
waterways avoids or minimises adverse
impacts on coastal resources and their
values, and does not contribute to:

 

A0O12.1 The design, construction and operation of artificial
tidal waterways maintains the tidal prism volume of the
natural waterway to which it is connected.

AND

 

Na — the proposal is not for development of an artificial
waterway

 

 

 

State development assessment provisions
10 October 2014 V1.5

Module 10 — Coastal protection

10.1 Tidal works, or development in a coastal management district state code
Page 10 of 16

Page 34

      
 

  

Performance outcomes

erosion

(2) degradation of water quality

(3) degradation and loss of matters of
state environmental significance

wetlands, fish habitat areas and
migratory species habitat).

(1) an increase in the risk of flooding or

     

Acceptable outcomes

AO12.2 The design, construction and operation of artificial
tidal waterways does not increase risk from flooding.

AND

   

Response

    

    

Cory g

 

(including, but not limited to, coastal

A012.3 The design, construction and operation of an
artificial waterway in connection with the reconfiguration of
a lot ensures:

(1) water inlet and outlets structures are of sufficient
capacity to maintain the water quality within the
waterway

(2) water discharged from the artificial waterway protects
the environmental values and water quality objectives
of the receiving waters

(3) dredged material is not disposed of to tidal water
beyond the artificial waterway unless there is a
beneficial reuse, e.g. beach nourishment.

Editor's note: For more information on environmental values and
water quality objectives see Schedule 1 of the Environment
Protection (Water) Policy 2009.

AND

na

 

AO12.4 The location of the artificial waterways avoids
matters of state environmental significance, or does not
result in any significant adverse impact on matters of state
environmental significance.

na

 

PO13 Development does not involve
reclamation of land below tidal water,
other than for the purposes of:

(1) coastal-dependent development,
public marine development or
community infrastructure

(2) strategic ports, boat harbours or
strategic airports and aviation
facilities, in accordance with a

state or region and no feasible
alternative exists
coastal protection work or work

 

(3)

statutory land use plan, where there
is a demonstrated net benefit for the

 

No acceptable outcome is prescribed.

 

 

The proposal is for coastal protection work and meets
PO13 (3)

 

 

State development assessment provisions
10 October 2014 V1.5

Module 10 — Coastal protection

10.1 Tidal works, or development in a coastal management district state code

Page 11 of 16

Page 35

     

Performance outcomes

necessary to protect coastal
resources or physical coastal
processes.

   
 

 
 

Acceptable outcomes Response

 
 

   
 
 

  

 

Table 10.1.2: Operational work
Performance outcomes

PO1 Tidal works that is private marine
development does not result in adverse
impacts to tidal land.

Editor's note: In addressing this performance
outcome, the applicant should also have
regard to requirements for private marine
development in the prescribed tidal works
code in the Coastal Protection and
Management Regulation 2003.

    
  

Editor's note: Applications should be
supported by a report certified by an RPEQ to
demonstrate compliance with this performance
outcome.

 

    
   

    
   

Acceptable outcomes

AO1.1 The location and design of tidal works that is
private marine development:

(1) is on private land abutting tidal water and used for
property access purposes

occupies the minimum area reasonably required for
its designed purpose

is not to be roofed or otherwise covered

does not require the construction of coastal protection
works, shoreline or riverbank hardening or dredging
for marine access

does not adversely impact on public safety or public
access and use of the foreshore.

Response

(2)

(3)
(4)

(5)

  

Comment

   

Na — the works are for a public, not private purpose.

 

PO2 Development does not result in the

disposal of material dredged from an

artificial waterway into coastal waters,

with the exception of:

(1) reclamation works, or

(2) coastal protection works, or

(3) the maintenance of an existing
artificial waterway and the at-sea
disposal of material that has
previously been approved for the
waterway.

No acceptable outcome is prescribed.

Na — no dredging is proposed

 

PO3 The design and construction of an
artificial waterway maintains coastal
landforms.

 

AO3.1 The design and construction of the artificial
waterway provides for sand bypassing where this is
necessary to prevent erosion of adjacent coasts and
minimise sedimentation of the waterway.

AND

Na - the proposed works is not for construction of an
artificial waterway

 

AO3.2 Clean sand accumulating within an artificial
waterway is returned to the active beach system, in
preference to disposal on land.

 

 

Na - the proposed works is not for construction of an
artificial waterway

 

 

 

State development assessment provisions
10 October 2014 V1.5

Module 10 — Coastal protection

10.1 Tidal works, or development in a coastal management district state code
Page 12 of 16

Page 36

 

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

P04 Development that involves dredging | AO4.1 A management plan for the development: Na - the proposed works do no involve dredging
includes and complies with a (1) directs the operation of the development
management plan that demonstrates how | (2) identifies disposal methods and disposal sites for the
environmental impacts will be managed removed material for the construction and operational
and mitigated, and how the requirements phases of the development
of the National assessment guidelines for | (3) outlines how any adverse effects from extraction
dredging, Australia Government activities on sediment transport processes or
Department of the Environment, Water, adjacent coastal landforms will be mitigated or
Heritage and the Arts, 2009 will be met. otherwise remediated by suitably planned and
implemented beach nourishment and rehabilitation
works.

Editor's note: The development should comply with the National
assessment guidelines for dredging, Australian Government
Department of Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts, 2009.

AND

 

A0O4.2 For land based disposal of dredged material, any Na - the proposed works do no involve dredging
area used for storing, dewatering, drying or rehandling
dredged material as outlined in the dredge management
plan is:

(1) of sufficient size for the projected volume of dredged
material from relevant capital or maintenance
dredging

(2) protected from future development that would
compromise the use of the area for its intended
purpose of material storage and dewatering.

AND

 

A04.3 For at-sea disposal of suitable dredged material, Na - the proposed works do no involve dredging
the dredge management plan specifies that material is
placed at a dredged material disposal site only if it is
demonstrated that it is not feasible to:

(1) dispose of the material above the high water mark, if
the material is from maintenance works for an
existing artificial waterway for which at-sea disposal
was previously approved, or

(2) keep the dredged material within the active sediment
transport system for the locality, or

(3) use the material for beach nourishment or another
beneficial purpose.

AND

 

 

 

 

 

A04.4 For at-sea disposal of dredged material where the

 

State development assessment provisions Module 10 — Coastal protection 10.1 Tidal works, or development in a coastal management district state code
10 October 2014 V1.5 Page 13 of 16

Page 37

Performance outcomes

 
 

Acceptable outcomes

marine spoil disposal site is a retentive (ie. non-
dispersive) site, the disposal site identified in the dredge
management plan has the capacity to hold and retain the
material within its boundaries during construction and
operation of the development.

Editor's note: The use of dredged material for a beneficial
purpose could include development of port or other marine
facilities, use for construction or industrial purposes, or use to
create or modify land or waters for an approved environmental
outcome (such as creation of a bird roosting site). Further
information about beneficial uses is contained in the National
assessment guidelines for dredging, Australian Government
Department of Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts, 2009

 

Response Comment

 

Within a strategic environmental area: ri

Parian and wildlife corridor functions

 

POS Where clearing of native marine
plants cannot be avoided and the extent
of clearing has been minimised, an
environmental offsets is provided for any
significant residual impact from the
clearing.

AO5.1 Clearing of marine plants is minimised and an
environmental offset is for any significant residual impact
from the clearing

AND

 

AO5.2 Any clearing of marine plants is limited to the
minimum area required for the works and to allow for
maintenance.

 

PO6 Natural regeneration of any cleared
or work areas is facilitated

AO6.1 There is no impediments to the natural
regeneration of native plant species in the area of clearing
and works following completion of works.

 

PO7 Development avoids or minimises
adverse impacts on fish passage.

AO 7.1 Development avoids, or minimises adverse
impacts on fish passage during works and the carrying out
of the activity.

 

PO8 Development avoids or minimises
impacts on fish habitat values.

AO8.1 Works are located, designed, and constructed to
minimise impacts on fish habitat values and function.

 

Within a strategic environmental area: h

ydrological processes |

 

PO9 Development avoids or minimises
impacts on natural drainage lines or flow
paths, during both construction and

No acceptable outcome is prescribed.

 

operation.

 

 

 

 

Within a strategic environmental area: water quality

 

 

State development assessment provisions
10 October 2014 V1.5

Module 10 — Coastal protection

10.1 Tidal works, or development in a coastal management district state code
Page 14 of 16

Page 38

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment
PO10 Development avoids or minimises | AO10.1 Development demonstrates best practice
any adverse impacts on environmental environmental management to meet relevant
values and water quality objectives for environmental values and water quality objectives of the
receiving waters (surface and Environmental Protection (Water) Policy or relevant to the
groundwater) from pollutants on site or ERA to be carried out on the site.
leaving a site located in a strategic
environmental area. OR
AO10.2 All stormwater, wastewater, discharges and
overflows leaving the site are:
(1) treated to the quality of the receiving waters prior
to discharge, OR;
(1) reclaimed or re-used such that there is no export
of pollutants to receiving waters.No acceptable outcome is
prescribed.
Table 10.1.3: Reconfiguring a lot
eta celduir Ure MelUl Cexey T=} Acceptable outcomes Response Comment

PO1 Erosion prone areas in a coastal
management district are maintained as
development free buffers, or where
permanent buildings or structures exist,
coastal erosion risks are avoided or
mitigated.

 

AO1.1 Where reconfiguring a lot is proposed within the
coastal management district, the erosion prone area
within the lot, or land within 40 metres of the foreshore
(whichever is greater), is surrendered to the State for
public use unless:

(1) the development is in a port or is for coastal-
dependent development, or

(2) the surrender of the land will not enhance coastal
management outcomes, for example, because there
is already substantial development seaward of the lot.

Editor's note: Land surrendered to the State for public use under

AO1.1 is to be:

(1) placed in a State land reserve for beach protection and
coastal management purposes under the Land Act 1994,
with local government as trustee, or

(2) managed for beach protection and coastal management
purposes under another management regime to the
satisfaction of the chief executive administering the
Sustainable Planning Act 2009 and Land Act 1994, if it is
demonstrated that AO1.1(1) cannot be reasonably
achieved.

(3) The Land Act 1994 also includes provisions for voluntary

 

 

 

 

State development assessment provisions
10 October 2014 V1.5

Module 10 — Coastal protection

10.1 Tidal works, or development in a coastal management district state code
Page 15 of 16

Page 39

  

Performance outcomes

Acceptable outcomes

land surrender for freehold land to the satisfaction of the
chief executive administering the Land Act.

 

ler g

 

PO2 Development maintains or
enhances general public access to or
along the foreshore, unless this is
contrary to the protection of coastal
resources or public safety.

AOQ2.1 Reconfiguring a lot that abuts the foreshore or tidal
waters is designed to enhance public access if it involves
the creation of 10 or more lots or the opening of anew
road, unless it is for coastal-dependent development.

 

PO3 Development in connection with a
canal enhances public access to coastal
waters.

 

AOQ3.1 The canal avoids intersecting with land or tidal land
where the passage, use or movement of vessels in water
could be restricted by the registered proprietor of the land.

AND

 

AO3.2 The area of the canal relating to the development
is surrendered to the State as a public waterway.

AND

 

 

AO3.3 The plans of subdivision for the canal are
consistent with Requirements for plans of subdivision of
an artificial waterway, Department of Environment and
Heritage Protection, 2013.

 

 

 

 

State development assessment provisions
10 October 2014 V1.5

Module 10 — Coastal protection

10.1 Tidal works, or development in a coastal management district state code
Page 16 of 16

Page 40

Schedule 4A of the Coastal Protection and Management Act

Page 41

Coastal Protection and Management Regulation 2003
Schedule 4A Assessment of Compliance

 

Specific Outcome

  

AC haractemandlamenitya General:
2.1 Prescribed tidal work not in a canal
and for a private purpose is
compatible with its location, having
regard to the following—

(a) the character and amenity of the
work’s immediate surroundings

and the locality within which the

work is located;

(b) if the relevant planning scheme
states the desired character or
amenity for the work’s

immediate surroundings or the

locality within which the work

is located—the stated desired
character or amenity.

 

= proschibe ditida mworkenon Malcanal

 

A probable Solution

The design and construction of the
prescribed tidal work is consistent with
the following standards—

(a) subject to paragraph (e), prescribed
tidal work does not extend past the
side boundary or extended side
boundary of the lot connected to the
work;

(b) subject to paragraph (e), prescribed
tidal work is the only work of its

type along the edge of the tidal

water fronting the lot connected to

the work;

(c) subject to paragraph (e}, prescribed
tidal work that is a boardwalk or
independent deck is not roofed;

(d) subject to paragraph (e), prescribed
tidal work other than a boardwalk

or deck is not roofed unless it is the
main access to land;

{e) if a relevant planning scheme
standard is more stringent than the
standard mentioned in paragraph

(a), (b), (c) or (d)—the relevant
planning scheme standard, to the
extent it is more stringent than the
standard mentioned in paragraph

(a), {b), (c) or (d);

(f) any other relevant planning scheme
standard that is not inconsistent

with the standards mentioned in
paragraphs (a) to (e).

Comments

Not for a private purpose

 

2.2 Prescribed tidal work not in a canal
and for a non-private purpose is
compatible with its location, having
regard to the following—

(a) the character and amenity of the

 

 

The design and construction of the
prescribed tidal work is consistent with
the following standards—

(a) subject to paragraph (c), prescribed
tidal work used for a commercial

 

The planning scheme accepts that that the area where the
works are proposed is substantially modified from its natural
state and that the area is to provide for social needs and
accessibility to recreational opportunities.

The proposed revetment wail will be made of similar rock to

 

 

: 1|Page

Page 42

Coastal Protection and Management Regulation 2003
Schedule 4A Assessment of Compliance

 

 
 

Specific Outcome

work’s immediate surroundings
and the locality within which the
work is located;

(b) if the relevant planning scheme
states the desired character or
amenity for the work’s

immediate surroundings or the
locality within which the work

is located—the stated desired
character or amenity.

 

.1 Prescribed tidal work is of a height,
scale and size to ensure the work is
compatible with the character and
amenity of its location, having regard to
the following—

(a) the height, scale and size of the
natural features of the work’s immediate
surroundings and the locality within
which the work is located;

(b) the height, scale and size of the
existing buildings or other

structures in the work’s

immediate surroundings and the

locality within which the work

is located;

(c) if the relevant planning scheme
states the desired height, scale or size

 

jalactelsanalanie nitva Me lghiteca lela ngise

 

A probable Solution

purpose does not extend past the
side boundary or extended side
boundary of the lot connected to the
work;

(b) subject to paragraph (c), prescribed
tidal work used for a commercial
purpose is not roofed unless it is the
main access to land;

(c) if a relevant planning scheme
standard is more stringent than the
standard mentioned in paragraph (a)
or (b)}—the relevant planning

scheme standard, to the extent the
standard is more stringent than the
standard mentioned in paragraph (a)
or (b);

(d) any other relevant planning scheme
standard that is not inconsistent

with the standards mentioned in

 

     

The height, scale and size of the
prescribed tidal work is consistent with
each relevant planning scheme standard.

 

re LLLS LESS)

the existing revetment walls on either side of the proposed
works and therefore will be consistent with the existing
visual character and amenity of the immediate
surroundings. The repair of the revetment wall and footpath
will ensure safe pedestrian access for pedestrians walking
alongside the river to maintain socia! and recreational
purposes.

  

The proposed revetment wall will be made of similar rock to
the existing revetment walls on either side of the proposed
works and therefore will be consistent with the existing
visual character and amenity of the immediate
surroundings.

There is no particular planning scheme standard specific to
the type of revetment wall proposed. However, it is relevant
to note that the revetment wall is designed by Noosa
Council's inhouse designers and signed off by the in house
RPEQ who will be responsible for maintenance of the wall.

 

 

~ 2|Page

Page 43

Coastal Protection and Management Regulation 2003
Schedule 4A Assessment of Compliance

 

Specific Outcome A probable Solution Comments

of buildings or other structures in the

work’s

immediate surroundings or the

locality within which the work

is located—the stated desired

height, scale or size.
wChlarectemariolame nitya inatenialstanchcolouns

      
 

     
 

      
 

    

 

ke ts reas ge i
The materials and colours proposed in the revetment wali

 

4.1 The materials used for, and the The materials used for, and colours of,

colours of, prescribed tidal work are the prescribed tidal work are consistent are the same as the existing revetment wail that will remain
compatible with the character and with each relevant planning scheme on either side of the proposed repair works.

amenity of the work’s location, standard.

having regard to the following—
(a) the natural features of the
work’s immediate surroundings
and the locality within which the
work is located;

(b) the existing buildings or other
structures in the work’s

immediate surroundings and the
locality within which the work

is located;

(c) if the relevant planning scheme
states the desired materials to be
used for, or desired colours of,
buildings or other structures in

the work’s immediate
surroundings or the locality

within which the work is
located—the stated desired
materials or colours

   
   
  

       

5.1 Lighting, other than an aid to The lighting for the prescribed tidal The proposed revetment wall will be located outside the
navigation, for prescribed tidal work is work, other than an aid to navigation, is navigable channel and as such it is not considered that
installed in a way to ensure the security | consistent with the following lighting is necessary.

and safe use of the work without standards—

causing significant adverse effects on (a) subject to paragraph (c), lighting
the amenity of the locality within which for prescribed tidal work is hooded
the work is located. and directed downwards;

 

 

 

 

 

3|Page

Page 44

Coastal Protection and Management Regulation 2003
Schedule 4A Assessment of Compliance

 

Specific Outcome

6.1 A sign erected or otherwise placed
in position for prescribed tidal work,
other than a sign erected or placed for
safety reasons or under an Act—

amenity of the work’s immediate
surroundings and the locality within
which the work is located; and

(b) is not a dominant feature of the
work, unless the dominance is

for safety reasons.

 

   

(a) is compatible with the character and

A probable Solution

(b) subject to paragraph ({c), each
lighting standard, to the extent
relevant;

(c) if a relevant planning scheme
standard is more stringent than the
standard mentioned in paragraph (a)
or (b}—the relevant planning

scheme standard, to the extent the
standard is more stringent than the
standard mentioned in paragraph (a)
or (b);

(d) any other relevant planning scheme
standard that is not inconsistent

with the standards mentioned in
paragraphs (a) to (c

   
 

A sign erected or otherwise placed in
position for prescribed tidal work, other
than a sign erected or placed for safety
reasons or under an Act, is consistent
with the following standards—

{a) subject to paragraph (c), a sign
erected or placed in position for
identifying prescribed tidal wark, or
the owner of the work, is the only
sign erected or placed in position

for identifying the work or owner;

(b) subject to paragraph (c), a sign
erected or otherwise placed in
position for prescribed tidal work is
integrated into the design and
construction of the work;

(c) if a relevant planning scheme
standard is more siringent than the
standard mentioned in paragraph
(a)—the relevant planning scheme
standard, to the extent it is more
stringent than the standard

 

 
        

 

Comments

No signage is proposed

 

 

4|Page

Page 45

 

Coastal Protection and Management Regulation 2003
Schedule 4A Assessment of Compliance

 

Specific Outcome

  
 

 
 

RE aiihwondandivegetationnns -
7.1 Excavation and filling for prescribed
tidal work—

(a) is carried out only to the extent
reasonably necessary for the work; and
(b) does not have a significant
adverse effect on—

(i) the natural features of the

tidal water under, within or

over which the work is

located; or

(ii) the level of the surface of

the land under the tidal

water under, within or over

which the work is located,

or any foreshores near the

work.

A probable Solution
mentioned in paragraph (a);

(d) any other relevant planning scheme
standard that is not inconsistent

with the standards mentioned in
paragraphs (a), (b) and (c).

 
  
  
 

 

e earthwork and filling for the
prescribed tidal work is consistent with
each relevant planning scheme standard.

ore a ed

   

(a) in the interest of minimising costs whilst ensuring the
revetment wall is structurally sound, the works have been
designed to utilise as minimal rock and occupy as minimal
footprint as is necessary.

(b)(i)The area is already highly modified and therefore the
reinstatement of the revetment wail is unlikely to
significantly affect natural features of the tidal water.

(b)(ii)the works will increase the volume of artificial structure
under tidal water at Highest Astronomical tide by
approximately 30m*. Given the relatively large width of the
river in the area of the works, along with the existing hard
structured training walls on either side of the works, it is not
anticipated that the amount of additional rock filling
reinstatement/repair of the existing rock revetment will
significantly affect the hydrodynamics and tidal prisms in the
area. Despite this, as a project separate to this application,
Council is currently considering engaging a hydrodynamic
study for the entire Noosa River System. This will enable
the actual impact of all existing and future works in the river
to be predicted and managed appropriately. Due to the
impending failure of the road as a result of the dilapidated
existing revetment wall, it is not possible to await to results
of the hydrodynamic study prior to proceeding with
reinstatement of the revetment wall.

 

7.2 The location of prescribed tidal work
ensures vegetation is cleared or
disturbed only to the extent reasonably
necessary for the work.

 

The vegetation in the tidal water, under
within or over which the prescribed tidal
work is located, or on land under the tidal
water, is cleared or disturbed in a way

 

No vegetation will be disturbed as a result of the prescribed
tidal works.

 

 

5 | Pag e

Page 46

Coastal Protection and Management Regulation 2003
Schedule 4A Assessment of Compliance

 

Specific Outcome

A probable Solution

consistent with each relevant planning
scheme standard.

Comments

 

7.3 Any vegetation damaged, destroyed
or removed by prescribed tidal work
under, within or over tidal water

other than an artificial waterway, is
replaced with appropriate vegetation.

   

spubliclaccessemavall

8.1 Prescribed tidal work does not have
a significant adverse effect on the
availability of public access to
foreshores, including public access
proposed in the relevant planning
scheme.

 

 

 

 

Vegetation affected by the prescribed
tidal work is dealt with in a way
consistent with the following
standards—
(a) subject to paragraph (b), vegetation
damaged, destroyed or removed by
prescribed tidal work is replaced
with native vegetation for the
locality within which the work is
located, to the extent it is
reasonably practicable to replace
the vegetation with native
vegetation;
{b) if a relevant planning scheme
standard is more stringent than the
standard mentioned in paragraph
(a}—the relevant planning scheme
standard, to the extent it is more
stringent than the standard
mentioned in paragraph {a);
(c) any other relevant planning scheme
standard that is not inconsistent with
the standards mentioned in

hs

The design and construction of the
prescribed tidal work is consistent with
the following standards—

(a) subject to paragraph (b), prescribed
tidal work does not involve the

erection or placement of any

physical barrier preventing existing
access, along a public accessway, to the
foreshores near the work;

{b) if a relevant planning scheme standard
is more stringent than the standard

 

No vegetation will be disturbed as a result of the prescribed
tidal works.

 

 

 

The prescribed tidal work is necessary to reinstate safe
pedestrian access along the river foreshore footpath. The
dilapidated footpath currently has grades and cross falls that
are not compliant with the Noosa Planning Scheme Policy
5. The following aspects of the design will allow the pathway
to comply with Noosa Planning Scheme Policy 5:

e The section of footpath is part of the overall pathway
network that provides access between the restaurant
and recreation areas of Gympie Terrace to
Backpackers, camping grounds etc.

 

 

6|/Page

Page 47

Coastal Protection and Management Regulation 2003
Schedule 4A Assessment of Compliance

 

Specific Outcome

RBublicfaccessmasatet
9.1 The location and design of
prescribed tidal work does not adversely
affect the safety of members of the
public accessing the foreshores.

 

Rei
10.1 Prescribed tidal work does not
adversely affect navigable access to, or
navigable egress from, any non-tidal
work lot.

 

 

 
 
  

GablEVACCO SSM ONOMCOLOSS Om MON dA WOnol

 

A probable Solution

mentioned in paragraph

(a)—the relevant planning scheme
standard, to the extent it is more stringent
than the standard mentioned in paragraph
(a);

(c) any other relevant planning scheme
standard that is not inconsistent with the
standards mentioned in paragraphs (a)
and (b

  
 

Public access to foreshores near the
prescribed tidal work is consistent with
each relevant planning scheme standard.

   

The design and construction of the
prescribed tidal work is consistent with the
following standards—

(a) subject to paragraph (b), if the lot
connected to prescribed tidal work

{the connected lot) adjoins a

non-tidal work lot, the work does

not extend past the connected lot's

side boundary, or extended side
boundary, adjoining the non-tidal

work lot;

(b) if a relevant planning scheme
standard is more stringent than the
standard mentioned in paragraph
(a)—the relevant planning scheme
standard, to the extent it is more

stringent than the standard

 

 

ere La ly
e The design of the footpath is 2m wide concrete.
e Compliant grades and 2% crossfalls

These details are shown on Drawing 0000009 Sheet 03.

  

As shown on Drawing 0000009 Sheet 03, the following
aspects of the design will allow the pathway to comply with
Noosa Planning Scheme Policy 5:
¢ The section of footpath is part of the overall pathway
network that provides access between the restaurant
and recreation areas of Gympie Terrace to
Backpackers, camping grounds etc.
e The design of the footpath is 2m wide concrete.

The works extend past the side boundary of the adjoining non-
tidal work lot. However they do not extend beyond established
quay line and will not adversely affect navigable access and
egress to the non-tidal work allotment. The location of tidal works
in relation to the established quay line is shown on Drawing
0000009 Sheet 03 Rev A.

 

 

 7/Page

Page 48

Coastal Protection and Management Regulation 2003
Schedule 4A Assessment of Compliance

 

Specific Outcome

A probable Solution

mentioned in paragraph

intra SinUc tune witic ding maccessmpamking SeNe Lag eranOlWalenmsenvic

  

11.1 Prescribed tidal work has
appropriate infrastructure, including, in
particular, road access, parking
facilities, sewerage services and water
services, having regard to—

(a) the nature and scale of the work;
and

(b) the number of people that may be on
or at the work at any time; and

(c) the number of vehicles that may be
on or moored at the work at any time;
and

(d) the protection of any foreshores near
the work and the vegetation and marine
lants on the foreshores.

 

   
 

12.1 Prescribed tidal work is designed
and constructed in a way to ensure it is
structurally sound, having regard to
the following—

(a) relevant engineering standards;

(b) the location of the work;

(c) the purpose for which the work is to
be used;

(d) the impact of flooding, tidal
influences and hydrodynamic
changes.

aDeSigndconstiuctionfanclsatetyseallpre scribe diidalwo

 

The infrastructure for prescribed tidal work
is consistent with each relevant planning
scheme standard.

The design and construction of the
prescribed tidal work is consistent with the
following standards—

(a) subject to paragraph (b), each
Australian Standard relevant to the design
or construction of structures,

to the extent requirements stated in the
Standard apply to the design or
construction of prescribed tidal work;

(b) if a relevant planning scheme standard
is more stringent than any standard
mentioned in paragraph

{a)—the relevant planning scheme
standard, to the extent it is more stringent
than the standard mentioned in paragraph

(a).

 

 
 

Comments

Noosa Councils in house RPEQ has certified the design and
will certify the construction.

 

12.2 Prescribed tidal work does not
adversely affect the structural integrity
of any existing revetment or seawall or
another existing structure.

 

The design and construction of the
prescribed tidal work is consistent with
the following standards—

(a) subject to paragraph (b), prescribed

 

 

The only structure connected to the revetment wall is the
footpath. The footpath is proposed to be founded on natural
ground behind the revetment wall and therefore not impose
a surcharge load on the revetment wall.

 

 

8|Page

Page 49

Coastal Protection and Management Regulation 2003
Schedule 4A Assessment of Compliance

 

Specific Outcome

 

  

A probable Solution
tidal work, including any shore
abutment, piling or other structure
connected with the work—

(i) does not place an additional
load on any existing revetment

or seawall or another existing
structure; or

(ii) can be structurally supported
by an existing revetment or
seawall or another existing
structure;

(b) if a relevant planning scheme
standard is more stringent than the
standard mentioned in paragraph
(a)—the relevant planning scheme
standard, to the extent it is more
stringent than the standard
mentioned in paragraph (a).

  

   

ere aL)

  

 

12.3 Prescribed tidal work is designed
and constructed in a way to ensure it
does not adversely affect the stability of
the bed and banks of any tidal water.

The design and construction of the

.| prescribed tidal work is consistent with the

following standards—

(a) subject to paragraph (b), prescribed
tidal work does not cause, by
changing the flow of water, the
removal of, or disturbance to, the
sediment on the bed and banks of
any tidal water;

(b) if a relevant planning scheme
standard is more stringent than the
standard mentioned in paragraph
(a)—the relevant planning scheme
standard, to the extent it is more
stringent than the standard
mentioned in paragraph (a).

The works are proposed specifically to maintain existing tidal
movements and prevent the tidal water scouring behind the
existing revetment wall, scouring out the road base and therefore
changing the flow of tidal water.

The certification by Councils RPEQ means that the design has
been checked to be stable and achieve the intended function.

 

12.4 Prescribed tidal work is designed
and constructed using materials having
a long life in marine environments,
having regard to their ability to resist

 

 

The design and construction of the
prescribed tidal work is consistent with
the following standards—

(a) subject to paragraph (b), each

 

300 @ -500@ basalt rocks have been selected and are
commonly used in construction of revetment walls due to
their ability to resist

(a) attack by marine organisms;

 

 

9[Page

Page 50

Coastal Protection and Management Regulation 2003
Schedule 4A Assessment of Compliance

 

  

Specific Outcome
the following—

(a) attack by marine organisms;
(b) corrosion;

(c) deterioration resulting from
abrasion or immersion in
seawater.

  

A probable Solution
Australian Standard relevant to the
materials that should be used, or the
measures that should be taken to
treat materials used, for structures,
to the extent the requirements stated
in the Standard apply to structures
located in a marine environment;

(b) if a relevant planning scheme
standard is more stringent than the
standard mentioned in paragraph
(a}the relevant planning scheme
standard, to the extent it is more
stringent than the standard
mentioned in paragraph (a).

 

 
  
 

Comments
(b) corrosion;
(c) deterioration resulting from abrasion or immersion in seawater.
The specifications for materials proposed to be used is detailed on
Drawing 0000009 Sheet 07.

 

12.5 Prescribed tidal work is designed
and constructed in a way to ensure it
does not adversely affect the operation
or maintenance of any existing
stormwater outlet.

The design and construction of the
prescribed tidal work is consistent with
the following standards—

(a) subject to paragraph (c), vessels
moored at prescribed tidal work do
not impede the discharge of
stormwater;

(b) subject to paragraph (c), prescribed
tidal work does not restrict access to
any stormwater outlet;

(c) if a relevant planning scheme
standard is more stringent than the
standard mentioned in paragraph (a)
or (b)—the relevant planning

scheme standard, to the extent it is
more stringent than the standard
mentioned in paragraph (a) or {b).

The works incorporate replacement of the outlet of an
existing stormwater pipe. The Noosa Plan Planning
Scheme Policy 5 requires that:

The outlets of all pipes shall be provided with standard concrete or
grouted rock headwalls. Canal and river outlets are to end at the
revetment wall and are to be provided with a standard concrete
apron to low water level.

At inlets and outlets of open-ended piped stormwater drains in
excess of 600mm, a childproof safety grill with horizontal spacing
not exceeding 150mm must be provided.

The drawings show that both these requirements are met.

 

12.6 Prescribed tidal work is designed
and constructed in a way to ensure it
does not adversely affect the water
quality of any tidal water, including, in
particular, as a result of—

(a) release, into the tidal water, of
materials used in the

 

 

The design and construction of the
prescribed tidal work is consistent with
the following standards—

(a) subject to paragraph (b), each
Australian Standard relevant to the design
or construction of structures

under, within or over tidal water, to the

 

In order to protect water quality from turbidity, a silt boom
will be placed around the in water construction footprint. The
silt boom will located within the established quay line as
shown on Drawing 0000009 Sheet 03 Rev A.

 

 

10|Page

Page 51

Coastal Protection and Management Regulation 2003
Schedule 4A Assessment of Compliance

 

Specific Outcome

construction of the work; or

(b) disturbance to the sediment on the
bed and banks of the tidal water; or
(c) exposure to acid sulphate soils.

OW elcelel- le] (-msle) Lace)

extent the requirements stated in the
Standard are directed at maintaining the
water quality of tidal water;

(b) if a relevant planning scheme standard
is more stringent than the

standard mentioned in paragraph
(a)—the relevant planning scheme
standard, to the extent it is more stringent
than the standard mentioned in paragraph

{a).

fey nit aate yee)

 

12.7 Prescribed tidal work is designed
and constructed in a way to ensure it is
safe for persons standing or walking
on the work.

The design and construction of the
prescribed tidal work is consistent with
the following standards—

(a) subject to paragraph (c), any

surface of prescribed tidal work on which
a person may stand or walk is—

(i) not slippery; and

(i) does not have any feature that may
cause the person to trip or fall;

(b) subject to paragraph (c), any part of
prescribed tidal work that is unsafe for
persons standing or walking on the work
is surrounded by adequate

barriers to deter persons from

entering the part;

(c) if a relevant planning scheme standard
is more stringent than the

standard mentioned in paragraph (a)

or (b)—the relevant planning

scheme standard, to the extent it is more
stringent than the standard mentioned in
paragraph (a) or (b).

The part of the prescribed tidal works intended for a person
to stand or walk on is the concrete footpath. This concrete
footpath includes a 2% crossfall to reduce likelihood of
slippery moss growth.

For safety, a railing is proposed to deter pedestrians from
walking off the pathway onto the revetment wall.

Details for the safety rail are shown on Drawing 0000009
Sheet 07.

 

 

12.8 Appropriate measures are taken
for prescribed tidal work for a non-
private purpose to ensure an
unsupportable live load is not applied to
the work by persons or vehicles.

 

The design and construction of the
prescribed tidal work is consistent with
the following standards—

(a) subject to paragraph (b), prescribed
tidal work has erected or placed in
position on or near the work, a sign

 

The railing will prevent vehicles driving onto the revetment
wall.

 

11|Page

 

Page 52

Coastal Protection and Management Regulation 2003
Schedule 4A Assessment of Compliance

 

Specific Outcome

A probable Solution

that—

(i) is visible at all times; and

(ii) states the maximum live load
that may be applied to the

work, in terms of the maximum
number of persons that may be

on the work at any given time

or the maximum number of
vehicles of a particular type

that may be on or moored at the
work at any given time;

(b) if a relevant planning scheme
standard is more stringent than the
standard mentioned in paragraph
(a)—the relevant planning scheme
standard, to the extent it is more
stringent than the standard
mentioned in paragraph (a).

Comments

 

12.9 Prescribed tidal work, other than a
boardwalk or an independent deck

for a private purpose, is designed and
constructed in a way that ensures
theuse of tidal water in a canal for a
non-maritime purpose is minimised.

The design and construction of the
prescribed tidal work is consistent with

each relevant planning scheme standard.

Na — not a private purpose

 

 

12.10 Prescribed tidal work that is a
boardwalk or an independent deck and
for a private purpose, is designed

and constructed in a way that ensures
the use of tidal water in a canal for
anon-maritime purpose is minimised.

 

(s 6(2) solution)

The design and construction of the
boardwalk or deck is consistent with the
following standards—

(a) subject to paragraph (c), ai
boardwalk or independent deck
does not extend more than 3m from
the waterfront boundary of the lot
connected to the boardwalk or deck;
(b) subject to paragraph (c), a
boardwalk or independent deck is at
least 3m inside of the side boundary
or extended side boundary of the lot
connected to the boardwalk on deck;

 

Na — not a private purpose

 

, 12|Page

 

Page 53

 

Coastal Protection and Management Regulation 2003
Schedule 4A Assessment of Compliance

 

 
  
  
   
 

Specific Outcome

    

BDESignkconstiuctlomanalsatetyes S
17.1 The design and construction of
prescribed tidal work that is a pipeline,
or another underground
service used instead of a pipeline, does
not adversely affect the ability of
vessels to be anchored near the work.

 
  

mmandisatetyesrre
19.1 Prescribed tidal work that is a
retaining wall, revetment or seawall, is
designed and constructed in a way to
ensure it is able to support its intended
loads, having regard to its
relevant loading matters.

 

 

 

  

  

  

ble Solution
(c) if a relevant planning scheme
standard is more stringent than the
standard mentioned in paragraph (a)
or (b}—the relevant planning
scheme standard, to the extent itis
more stringent than the standard
mentioned in paragraph (a) or (b).
andlothenundengnoundisenvicese
(s 6(2) solution) |
The design and construction of the
pipeline or underground service is
consistent with the following
standards—
(a) subject to paragraph (b), a
other underground service is
least 1.2m below the surface
it is installed;
(b) if a relevant planning scheme standard
is more stringent than the
standard mentioned in paragraph
(a)}the relevant planning scheme
standard, to the extent it is more
stringent than the standard
mentioned in paragraph (a).

  
  
 

 

 
 
 

pipeline or
installed at
of land, after

(s 6(2) solution)
The design and construction of the
retaining wall, revetment or seawall is
consistent with the following
standards—

(a) subject to paragraph (b), al retaining
wall, revetment or seawall is able to
support at least a distributed live

load of 3.0kPa;
(b) if a relevant planning scheme standard
is more stringent than the standard
mentioned in paragraph
(a)—the relevant planning scheme

 

ey aL)

The works will involve restoration of an existing stormwater
pipe and outlet. The footprint of this infrastructure will
remain the same as the existing and will also remain
landward of the established quay line. It is very unlikely any
vessel will need to moor near it.

 
  
  

  

The RPEQ responsible for the project has certified the
design of the proposed works is in accordance with the
projects objectives. The objectives require structural
integrity adequate for the purpose.

 

 

“13|/Page

 
    

 

 

Page 54

Coastal Protection and Management Regulation 2003
Schedule 4A Assessment of Compliance

 

Specific Outcome

A probable Solution

standard, to the extent it is more
stringent than the standard
mentioned in paragraph (a).

Comments

 

19.2 Prescribed tidal work that is a
retaining wall, revetment or seawall, is
designed and constructed in a way

to ensure it can withstand—

(a) any tendency of overturning or
sliding; and

(b) any other effects of waves or
changes in water levels on the
retaining wall, revetment or

seawall.

(s 6(2) solution)

The design and construction of the
retaining wall, revetment or seawall is
consistent with the following
standards—

(a) subject to paragraph (c), a retaining
wall, revetment or seawall has a
factor of safety of no less than 1.5;
(b) subject to paragraph (c), a retaining
wall, revetment or seawall is able to
withstand the effect of waves, or
waves and water levels, resulting
from a storm or other natural event
of a magnitude that has a 2%.or
lower probability of occurring in

any calendar year; :

(c) if a relevant planning scheme
standard is more stringent than the
standard mentioned in paragraph (a)
or (b}—the relevant planning

scheme standard, to the extent it is
more stringent than the standard
mentioned in paragraph (a) or (b).

The RPEQ responsible for the project has certified the
design of the proposed works is in accordance with the
projects objectives. The objectives require structural
integrity adequate for the purpose.

 

 

19.3 Prescribed tidal work that is a
retaining wall, revetment or seawall not
founded upon rock, is designed and
constructed to protect the seaward side
of retaining wall,

revetment or seawall from erosion.

 

(s 6(2) solution)

The design and construction of the
retaining wall, revetment or seawall is
consistent with the following
standards—

(a) subject to paragraph (c), a.retaining
wall, revetment or seawall provides
for a sub-layer or enough filter
material to ensure it is reasonably
likely to remain in place for at ieast
50 years;

 

The construction technique for the revetment wall is detailed
on Drawing 0000009 Sheet 09 and certified by the inhouse
RPEQ to meet the project objectives.

 

14/Page

 

Page 55

Coastal Protection and Management Regulation 2003

Schedule 4A Assessment of Compliance

 

Specific Outcome

A probable Solution

(b) subject to paragraph (c), the bottom
edge of the base of a retaining wall,
revetment or seawall is reasonably
likely to prevent any adverse effects
from potential erosion of the soil
under the retaining wall, revetment
or seawall for at least 50 years;

(c) if a relevant planning scheme
standard is more stringent than the
standard mentioned in paragraph (a)
or (b)—the relevant planning
scheme standard, to the extent it is
more stringent than the standard
mentioned in paragraph (a) or (b).

Comments

 

 

19.4 Prescribed tidal work that is a
retaining wail, revetment or seawall, is
not adversely affected by hydrostatic
pressure behind the retaining wall,
revetment or seawall.

 

The design and construction of the
retaining wall, revetment or seawall is
consistent with the following

standards—

(a) subject to paragraph (b), airetaining
wall, revetment or seawall provides for
drainage holes, and suitable filter material
behind the holes, to

telieve any hydrostatic pressure

behind the retaining wall, revetment or
seawall;

(b) if a relevant planning scheme standard
is more stringent than the

standard mentioned in paragraph
(a)—the relevant planning scheme
standard, to the extent it is more
stringent than the standard

mentioned in paragraph (a).

 

Geotextile behind the rock wall will provide necessary
protection against hydrostatic pressure.

 

15|Page

 

 

Page 56

Owners Consent

Page 57

 

 

 

Queensland
Author: Charmaine Duke Government
Our File / Ref number: 2014/005390
Your File / Ref number: William Street Revetment

Direciorate / Unit: State Land Asset Management
Phone: (07) 54512243 Natural Resources and Mines

Department of

8 August 2014

Attn: Martin Drydale
Noosa Shire Council

PO Box 141

TEWANTIN QLD 4565

Dear Mr Drydale

APPLICATION FOR OWNER’S CONSENT — GYMPIE TERRACE AND WILLIAM STREET,
NOOSAVILLE

Reference is made to the request for owners consent required to accompany the development
application for proposed construction of revetment wall, Noosa River.

The department hereby gives owner's consent to the above development application for tidal
works outside of a canal.

Although owners consent to the development application has been provided and ‘no tenure under
the Land Act is required, you are to undertake works on the land only if and when the
development application has been approved by the assessment manager, and in accordance
with the conditions of that approval.

A copy of this letter is to be attached to your IDAS Form 1 as the required evidence of owners
consent.

You will also need to comply with ail other legislative and regulatory requirements which may
also include approvals that are not part of the assessment of the development application under
the Sustainable Planning Act 2009 (SPA) e.g. a marine park permit if in a marine park.

Further, please note that the above consent will expire on 7 February 2015. Should the
development application not be lodged with the assessment manager prior to this date, you will
be required again to lodge the IDAS Form 1 and any attachments with this Department with a
further request for owners consent - any further request will need to be reconsidered by the
Department.

 

A
Postal : Telephone : (07)54512215 ” O
DNRM Nambour Faxt 54512262 Sy’ PO

PO Box 573 fo? ee aly
Nambour ’

4560 QLD

 

Box!..,

 

 

Page 58

Itis also advised that any land use activities must comply with the Aboriginal Cultural Heritage
Act 2003 or the Torres Strait Islander Heritage Act 2003.

Finally, owner's consent is required under SPA to enable the application to be considered
properly made for lodging with the assessment manager and is a completely separate process to
assessment of the application under SPA,

Accordingly, the Department may act at a later date as assessment manager, oncurrence/referral
agency, or advice agency in the assessment of the development application - providing owners
consent will not influerice any statutory role the Department may have in this assessment.

If you wish to discuss this. matter please contact Charmaine Duke on (07) 54512243.

All future correspondence relative to this matter is to be referred to the contact Officer. at the
address below or by email to [email protected]. Any hard copy correspondence
received will be electronically scarined and filed. For this reason, it is recommended that any
attached plans, sketches or maps be no larger than A3-sized.

Please quote reference number 2014/005390 ih any future correspondence,

Yours sincerely -

Renee.Grant. .

Senior Land Officer

A duly authorised delegate of the Minister

under the current Land Act (Ministerial) Delegation

- Page 2 of 2