Skip to the record
NoosaWatch™: The source of truth.

Council archive · source document

MCU25 0087 - Reference Document - Geotech assessment report (As Published) · MCU25/0087

of 45

Text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Check the original when the exact wording matters.

        protection shall taper from a minimum depth of 2 m BGL in the west, deepening to the east to tie into
        the shear pile wall along the eastern edge.
        Whether the pile wall will also need to extend around the side boundaries will depend on the dimensions
        and strength of the grout curtain installed and its ability to provide at least emergency support to the
        retained sand. This should be considered as part of the detailed design.
        General geotechnical recommendations for site development are provided in the following sections.


        6.1             Earthworks
        Bulk excavations in the order of up to 4 m depth are anticipated for the basement level construction.
        Isolated deeper excavations may be required for underground services and footings. The pool is shown
        to be below ground, and will require excavation of up to about 3 m below existing ground levels, close to
        the site’s northern boundary. Filling is anticipated to be for landscaping only, and should be less than
        0.5 m high.
        The advice give herein should be treated as preliminary to aid in project planning, and Tectonic must
        review detailed design drawings for the residence prior to construction.

        6.1.1           Site Preparation and Trafficability
        Following clearing of existing vegetation, any tree stumps and large roots should be ‘grubbed out’. Any
        organic rich topsoil should then be stripped and set aside. Similarly, all foundations and remaining
        structural elements from the existing residence should be removed. Based on the boreholes and site
        observations, stripping depths to remove existing unsuitable upper soils should be relatively shallow,
        however, deeper areas of unsuitable materials may be present across the site, particularly related to the
        existing structure (e.g. retaining wall backfill, service trenches, footing excavations). Topsoil materials
        must not be used in structural fill; however, may be placed across landscaping areas.
        It should be noted that compaction of such relatively ‘clean’ sands as structural fill requires the addition
        of substantial volumes of water (‘flooding’) combined with the use of vibratory compaction equipment
        (typically a vibrating plate). Care must be taken with the use of vibratory equipment (e.g. compactors or
        sheet piling) to ensure that there are no adverse impacts on surrounding structures. The impacts from
        ground vibration must be closely monitored and managed during construction. It would be prudent to
        conduct a dilapidation survey of neighbouring structures prior to commencement of construction; and
        furthermore it is recommended that a suitably qualified and experienced civil/structural RPEQ is engaged
        to provide a vibration management plan for the proposed construction works.
        The exposed natural subgrade following excavations will likely be in a loose condition (even where
        indicated to be denser in our investigation boreholes) and must be compacted by several passes of a
        vibrating plate or minimum 4 tonne vibrating smooth drum roller, in conjunction with surface application
        of ample water, to achieve the required compaction.
        Due to the potential for development of poor trafficability during construction, placement of a minimum
        150 mm thick granular working platform may be required across laydown areas. Specific platform
        design would be required prior to mobilisation and trafficking of any heavy mobile plant on the site (e.g.
        mobile cranes, concrete pumps or piling rigs).
        Due to the highly permeable nature of the sands at this site, stormwater is expected to rapidly infiltrate
        the ground, making un-sealed surface drainage ineffective for the control of flows. Any sealed areas




        Geotechnical investigation
        19 November 2025 | 25289-001-Rev0                                                                            17
Document Set ID: 24631529
Version: 1, Version Date: 24/03/2026

Used in these records

About this file

File size
2.9 MB (large file)
File type
PDF

No other editions are linked here.

Original file

Log in to download the original file

MCU25 0087 - Reference Document - Geotech assessment report (As Published).pdf · 2.9 MB (large file)

The download may take up to a minute.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.