Skip to the record
Accept no imitations.

Council archive · source document

MCU25 0087 - Reference Document - Geotech assessment report (As Published) · MCU25/0087

of 45

Text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Check the original when the exact wording matters.

        6.4             Drainage
        Adequate site drainage must be installed to ensure that stormwater runoff is directed away from building
        walls, footings, batters and retaining walls. Although unlikely, if groundwater seepage is encountered
        during excavations, Tectonic must be notified to assess the impact on stability.
        Subsurface drainage must be installed behind any retaining walls (e.g. slotted ‘aggi’ pipe wrapped in
        filter ‘sock’ placed in gravel backfill). Depending on matters such as the extent of drainage installed and
        site-specific groundwater conditions, the designer must make an assessment of hydrostatic pressure to
        be accounted for in the design of the retaining structure.
        Collected roof water should be directed by pipes to the council stormwater system along The Esplanade.
        Hydraulic design should be such that under no circumstances are uncontrolled stormwater flows
        permitted over the dune face; where channelised erosion and scour features could be allowed to
        develop.
        Design of the stormwater system should be undertaken by a suitably qualified and experienced RPEQ.



        7.              Conclusion
        Based on the findings of our assessment it is concluded that a Low Risk of slope instability could be
        achieved for the proposed development, subject to the following:
             Implementation of the recommendations given in this report in formulating the feasibility of the
              development, and preparing the final design; and
             Review of the detailed design by Tectonic to confirm compliance with the recommendations herein.

        Confirmation of the deeper subsurface profile present along the eastern boundary would be required to
        enable detailed design of the shear pile wall system, if required, via further ground investigation
        following access being facilitated by the demolition of the existing residence. This should comprise a
        borehole taken to a depth in the order of 20 m BGL, using a rotary drill rig capable of solid flight
        augering and deep cased wash boring, with standard penetration tests (SPTs).



        8.              Limitations
        Your attention is drawn to the document Limitations, which is included in Appendix D of this report. The
        statements presented in this document are intended to advise you of what your realistic expectations of
        this report should be, and to present you with recommendations on how to minimise the risks associated
        with the services provided by Tectonic for this project.




        Geotechnical investigation
        19 November 2025 | 25289-001-Rev0                                                                        22
Document Set ID: 24631529
Version: 1, Version Date: 24/03/2026

Used in these records

About this file

File size
2.9 MB (large file)
File type
PDF

No other editions are linked here.

Original file

Log in to download the original file

MCU25 0087 - Reference Document - Geotech assessment report (As Published).pdf · 2.9 MB (large file)

The download may take up to a minute.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.