Skip to the record
The gold standard in government transparency.

Council archive · source document

MCU25 0087 - Reference Document - Geotech assessment report (As Published) · MCU25/0087

of 45

Text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Check the original when the exact wording matters.

        3.              Method of Investigation
        3.1             Fieldwork
        An experienced geotechnical engineer from Tectonic undertook a site walk-over survey on 24 September
        2025 to visually assess indicators of past slope instability. The walk-over included assessment of soil
        exposures, surface drainage conditions, topography, evidence of erosion or past instability, and
        vegetation coverage/condition.
        In conjunction with the walk-over survey, two hand auger boreholes (designated BH1 and BH2) were
        drilled. Borehole BH1 was drilled within the garden bed along the eastern boundary of the site, whilst
        borehole BH2 was drilled within the proposed building footprint in the western part of the site. In situ
        testing utilising the DCP method was completed from surface adjacent to each borehole, and at selected
        downhole depths. In addition, three standalone DCP tests were conducted, from near the crest of the
        sand dune and further down the dune face, extending to depths of between 2.1 m and 2.9 m below
        ground level (BGL). Hand augers were taken to practical refusal at depths of between 3 m and 4 m BGL,
        with DCP testing extending below the bases of the boreholes to depths of up to 6.9 m BGL.
        Boreholes were backfilled with drilling spoil and left slightly mounded at the ground surface. Disturbed
        soil samples were recovered from the auger cuttings. The engineer was responsible for logging soil
        profiles and maintaining investigation practices in accordance with AS1726 Geotechnical site
        investigations, supervising in situ testing, and recovering samples.
        Borehole and DCP reports are attached in Appendix A, together with explanatory notes. Test locations
        are shown in Figure 1 and subsurface conditions are discussed in Section 4.4.


        3.2             Geotechnical Laboratory Testing
        One selected disturbed soil sample from borehole BH1 was dispatched to a NATA accredited laboratory
        for geotechnical testing, which comprised a particle size distribution (PSD) test for soil classification
        purposes. Geotechnical laboratory testing was undertaken in accordance with Australian Standard
        AS1289 Method for Testing Soils for Engineering Purposes.
        Laboratory test results are summarised in Section 4.6, and the test certificate is attached in Appendix B.




        Geotechnical investigation
        19 November 2025 | 25289-001-Rev0                                                                            3
Document Set ID: 24631529
Version: 1, Version Date: 24/03/2026

Used in these records

About this file

File size
2.9 MB (large file)
File type
PDF

No other editions are linked here.

Original file

Log in to download the original file

MCU25 0087 - Reference Document - Geotech assessment report (As Published).pdf · 2.9 MB (large file)

The download may take up to a minute.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.