Skip to the record
The definitive source for everything Noosa Council.

Council archive · source document

Cover Letter - Response to Information Request · 132003.221108.3

of 6

Text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

The proposal must clearly demonstrate how these trees will be protected and managed to ensure their
retention throughout all stages of development.

Information Required:

Provide an Arboricultural Impact Assessment (AIA) prepared by an AQF Level 5 qualified arborist in
accordance with AS4970 Protection of trees on development sites, including:
6.1 Identification of all trees within proximity to the development site, including calculation and mapping of
     Tree Protection Zones (TPZ) and Structural Root Zones (SRZ) for each tree, in relation to proposed
     works
6.2. Demonstrate the proposal will not encroach into the TPZ of any trees or compromise their ecological or
     structural integrity.
6.3. If encroachment is unavoidable, provide details of the extent, justification, and proposed mitigation
     measures.
6.4. A tree protection plan, including tree protection specifications and a tree protection plan, outlining
     measures necessary to protect and manage the trees throughout all stages of the development.
     Specifications should include fencing, signage, soil protection, and any special construction techniques
     required.

Response


An Arboricultural Impact Assessment (AIA) has been prepared by Specialist Arbor Services (AQF Level 5
qualified Consulting Arborist) to address this item (refer Attachment 3). The AIA identifies six (6) trees within
proximity to the proposed works, including species such as Ficus benjamina (Weeping Fig), Eucalyptus
microcorys (Tallowwood), Elaeocarpus obovatus (Hard Quandong), Buckinghamia celsissima (Ivory Curl
Tree)and Cupaniopsis anacardioides (Tuckeroo). These trees are generally in fair to good condition and are
suitable for retention.

The assessment demonstrates that the proposed works are largely confined to existing disturbed areas,
including the current driveway and hardstand surfaces, and will result in minor and manageable impacts
only. While limited encroachment into the calculated Tree Protection Zones (TPZ) may occur, this is minor in
extent, does not affect the Structural Root Zones (SRZ), and will not compromise the structural or ecological
integrity of the trees. The trees are considered resilient, with root systems unlikely to extend significantly into
existing hardstand areas due to site constraints.

A detailed Tree Protection Plan has been prepared and will be implemented throughout all stages of
development. This includes the installation of TPZ fencing, arborist supervision during any works within
proximity to trees, controlled root management where required, and post-construction certification. These
measures will ensure the ongoing health and viability of the trees and maintain their contribution to the
established streetscape character and local amenity.


Proceeding

This office trusts that the information supplied comprehensively addresses all of the issues relating to the
information request. Should you have any further questions in relation to the proposal, please do not hesitate
to contact the undersigned on 0423 952 928 or via email at [email protected] sincerely,



Marcus Brennan
B. Urb. Reg. Plan.

Used in these records

About this file

File size
976 KB (small file)
File type
PDF

No other editions are linked here.

Original file

Log in to download the original file

Cover Letter - Response to Information Request.pdf · 976 KB (small file)

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.