Skip to the record
Every meeting, every word.

Council archive · source document

planning report Jan 24 · 51984.3164.01

of 8

Text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Check the original when the exact wording matters.

(a) the statutory instrument or other document as in effect when the change application
was made (Superseded Planning Scheme); or
(b) if the statutory instrument or other document is amended or replaced after the change
application is made but before it is decided—the amended or replacement instrument or
document; or
(c) another statutory instrument—
(i) that comes into effect after the change application is made but before it is decided; and
(ii) that the responsible entity would have been required to consider if the instrument had
been in effect when the development application for the development approval was
properly made.


Assessment
Covering the roof terrace creates a storey and increases GFA. No other planning
parameters are affected. It is also noted that unit 22 was approved for a rooftop terrace
with a pool adjoining the stairwell.
The resort was approved under the 1972 Planning Scheme and the roof structures were
constructed at the time of the original approval. Therefore the 1972 Planning Scheme holds
significant weight in assessment of this minor change.
The 1972 Panning Scheme does not limit GFA for Multiple dwellings but relies on site
cover, setbacks, population density (linked to bedroom size), landscaping and building
height to govern development. Therefore, assessment for building height is the only
relevant parameter - as there is no GFA/Plot ratio provisions in the 1972 Planning Scheme.
Furthermore, the 1972 Planning Scheme was prescriptive with clauses that permitted
Council to relax or waiver any of the provisions at their discretion. On this basis, the current
Noosa Plan 2020 building height Performance outcomes of the High-density residential
zone (HDR) (current zone) is used and most appropriate for this assessment and is
provided below.

Used in these records

About this file

File size
1.1 MB (small file)
File type
PDF

No other editions are linked here.

Original file

Log in to download the original file

planning report Jan 24.pdf · 1.1 MB (small file)

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.