Council archive · source document
Report · MCU19/0088.02
Additionally, the façade is largely screened from view from the streetscape by existing
mature vegetation within the front boundary landscaping buffer.
Figure 2 Landscape screening in front of northern building facade
4.0 Minor Change Assessment
It is noted that the Act facilitates the following types of changes:
• Minor change to a development approval
• ‘Other’ change of a development approval.
It is proposed that the amendment be treated as a minor change. To support this Table 2 provides an
assessment as to compliance with the definition of a minor change as held under the Act.
In addition, Table 3 provides a commentary of the proposed works against the definition of
substantially difference development held under Development Assessment Rules.
Table 2 Minor change criteria – Planning Act 2016, Schedule 2
Criteria Commentary
Minor change means a change that –
(b) for a development approval –
(i) would not result in Refer Table 3
substantially different
development; and
(ii) if a development application for the development, including the change, were made when the
change application is made would not cause—
(A) the inclusion of prohibited The proposed works do not constitute prohibited development.
development in the application; The proposed alterations retain the existing approved use (Dan
or Murphy’s) onsite and would not introduce prohibited development
on to the site.
(B) referral to a referral agency The existing approved development application did not require
if there were no referral referral to any referral agencies and the proposed minor change
4 of 9
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
Report.pdfRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 329 KB (small file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.