Original source · versioned page text
Annex 11 - Code 11 - Marine Plants
Attached to the e-mail DA Application - Noosa Oyster Project (2 of 3).
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
observed on and around the existing rocky reef and
rubble areas, with some sections of reef having a high
coverage of fine sediment.
ESP also confirmed that given the speed at which
Padina can colonise hard surfaces (dead oyster shell)
elsewhere in the estuary, it is anticipated that
supplementary habitat provided as part of the
proposed restoration project would be colonised
rapidly within 1 year of deployment, and that coverage
is expected to be similar to the current condition
within 2 to 3 years post deployment, particularly in
sections that remain subtidal and not covered by fine
silt.
Mangroves and seagrasses are not within the
footprint of this project and will not be impacted at any
restoration site.
Alternatives to the oyster ecosystem restoration
methodology proposed are evaluated in the Project
Restoration Plan, Section 6.3. Impact minimisation
PO2 Only those aspects of a development that No acceptable outcome is prescribed. Complies with PO2
have a functional requirement to be located on
tidal land create the requirement to remove, The works are intended to restore intertidal and
destroy or damage marine plants. Ancillary subtidal rock oyster ecosystems throughout the
Noosa River estuary. Due to the nature of the works
elements (for example: car and trailer parks, rest
and the growth of oysters typically below high tide, the
rooms, offices) occur outside of tidal land. works are required to be on tidal land.
Note: Tidal land within the development site The restoration substrates have been designed by the
should be accurately identified on plans provided project’s contracted coastal engineers, Integrated
with the application, together with the location of Coastal Management (ICM), to be the most suitable
highest astronomical tide, mean high water designs and configurations for each site.
spring and mean low water spring tide heights.
The module designs provide design tolerances, which
The extent, location, species and condition of are then applied to the bathymetric character of each
individual restoration site. The substrate may be laid
marine plants that are proposed for removal,
as fingers, set perpendicular to the shore (concept
damage or destruction and retained have been layout 1), or as large or small patches set parallel
State Development Assessment Provisions – version 2.6
State code 11: Removal, destruction or damage of marine plants Page 3 of 24
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalSearchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.