Original source · versioned page text
Annex 11 - Code 11 - Marine Plants
Attached to the e-mail DA Application - Noosa Oyster Project (2 of 3).
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
2. Tidal fish habitats, erosion control and beach AO4.2 The extent of marine plants removed, damaged or Complies with AO4.2
replenishment (FHMOP 010), Department of Primary destroyed does not exceed two metres along the waterway
Industries and Fisheries, 2007 frontage (width). At Tewantin, there will be a temporary impact only on
3. Dredging, extraction and spoil disposal activities macroalgae (as outlined above in PO1). The
(FHMOP 004), Department of Primary Industries, 1998 AND
structures (oyster reef patches) will reduce or prevent
4. Departmental procedures for permit applications
erosion from boat wake around the boat ramp,
assessment and approvals for insect pest control in
protecting the narrow fringe of mangrove habitat
wetlands (FHMOP 003), Department of Primary
Industries, 1996
along the foreshore and result in a net increase in
potential habitat for macroalgae as a result of the
5. Fisheries guidelines for fish-friendly structures (FHG
006), Department of Primary Industries and Fisheries,
placement of habitat structures on bare substrate
2006. around the existing rock patches. The area of
restoration substrate placement at Tewantin is within
a zone of past historic oyster reef growth and is
designed to minimise disturbance to marine plants
(including macroalgae) where practical.
Marine plants are protected by minimum distances in
all other restoration areas, thus no loss of higher
value marine plants along the waterway frontages is
expected.
AO4.3 The long-term use and and operability of the Complies with AO4.3.
development will not result in ongoing adverse impacts or
new adverse impacts or additional development. For The long term performance and functionality of the
example, a proposed jetty will not result in the need to works has been considered. The works will require
dredge navigation access to the development in the future.
monitoring and maintenance initially, in particular top-
up and reprofiling in response to expected settlement
to ensure the structure remains within a desirable
depth range for optimal settlement and growth of the
target species (rock oysters). The works include
subsequent placement of restoration modules as the
basis for oyster ecosystem formation at additional
sites as part of Phase 2 activities to further enhance
and expand available habitat (as resources allow).
Once established, the structures are expected to
require little maintenance, be self-sustaining and will
form part of the natural river habitat.
AND one of the following acceptable outcomes apply Not a pontoon or jetty development.
State Development Assessment Provisions – version 2.6
State code 11: Removal, destruction or damage of marine plants Page 7 of 24
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalSearchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.