Original source · versioned page text
Annex 11 - Code 11 - Marine Plants
Attached to the e-mail DA Application - Noosa Oyster Project (2 of 3).
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
fragmentation of fish habitats and their values The restoration of oyster ecosystems aims to
and the loss of fish movement. enhance and augment existing fish habitat and avoid
unnecessary loss, degradation or fragmentation of
Note: For more information, refer to relevant fish fish habitats and their values and the loss of fish
movement through a supplemental restoration
habitat management operational policies and fish
approach to improve the mosaic of habitats available
habitat guidelines: to fish and restore once prolific oyster ecosystems
1. Management and protection of marine plants and other and associated fish habitat in the estuary.
tidal fish habitats (FHMOP 001), Department of Primary
Industries and Fisheries, 2007 The design is below Mean High Water Spring and
2. Tidal fish habitats, erosion control and beach requires works to have no adverse effects on higher
replenishment (FHMOP 010), Department of Primary value marine plant habitat including seagrass,
Industries and Fisheries, 2007 saltmarsh and mangroves. Minimum distances from
3. Dredging, extraction and spoil disposal activities
marine vegetation are specified to ensure high value
(FHMOP 004), Department of Primary Industries, 1998
marine plants are protected (as outlined in Section
4. Departmental procedures for permit applications
assessment and approvals for insect pest control in
2.3, Table 2.2. of the Project Restoration Plan and in
wetlands (FHMOP 003), Department of Primary ICM drawing NROR-2021-00). The exception to this is
Industries, 1996 the temporary impacts at the Tewantin site, which is
5. Fisheries guidelines for fish-friendly structures (FHG an existing degraded rocky substrate with some
006), Department of Primary Industries and Fisheries, marine plants (macroalgae) present that would benefit
2006. from the habitat restoration proposed.
The design ensures the structures do not impose on
fish movement, with 1m to 4m distance between rock
patches maintained, and is expected to enhance
habitat complexity and connectivity within a
restoration site. This restoration substrate provides
structured 3-dimensional habitat that is known to
support diverse fish assemblages elsewhere. The
plans are designed to fit within the existing mosaic of
available fish habitats and improve connectivity
between existing fringing marine plant and reef
habitats.
PO7 Development does not increase the risk of No acceptable outcome is prescribed. Complies with PO6
mortality, disease or injury, or compromise the
health, productivity, marketability or suitability for The project does not increase risk of mortality,
human consumption of fisheries resources, disease or injury, or compromise the health,
productivity, marketability or suitability for human
having regard to (but not limited to):
consumption of fisheries resources as a result of
State Development Assessment Provisions – version 2.6
State code 11: Removal, destruction or damage of marine plants Page 9 of 24
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalSearchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.