Original source · versioned page text
RFI - Bushfire Hazard Assessment and Management Plan
Plans and drawings
This document appears to be plans or drawings. Its page text below holds only the words printed on the drawings, without the drawings themselves, so it may be jumbled or hard to follow. To see the plans as drawn, choose Original above or download the file (both need you to log in).
Log in to see the plans as drawn Bushfire Hazard Assessment and Management Plan
3.1.2.2 Potential Fuel Loads
Fuel loads have been allocated for each VHC to represent the long-unburnt condition that would be
typically exhibited 10 years after fire. In accordance with the values provided in Figure 14 of the BRC
Technical Guide (QFES, 2019a), the potential fuel load values for ground-truthed VHCs within and
surrounding the site are as provided in Table 1.
Table 1: Potential fuel loads for classified vegetation within 150 m assessment area.
Total Total
potential overall
VHC surface potential Prone type 1 Fuel continuity2
fuel load fuel load
(t/ha) (t/ha)
Moist to dry Eucalypt Bushfire-prone –
open forest on
9.1 21 24.2 1 Forest or shrub 1 Continuous
coastal lowlands and
plains fires
Low to moderate tree Low hazard Discontinuous
39.2 cover in built-up 5 8 3 2
areas
Continuous low grass
40.4 4.5 5.0 2 Grassfire prone 1 Continuous
or tree cover
3.1.3 Step 3 - Site and Effective Slope
Two slope input parameters are required for the estimation of fire behaviour and separation. Site slope
is the slope of the ground between the edge of the proposed development (or site boundary) and the
edge of hazardous vegetation. Effective slope refers to the slope of the land beneath hazardous
vegetation. Effective slope is the more important parameter as it has a direct influence on the potential
rate of fire spread, fuel consumption and thus, potential fireline intensity. For each vegetation hazard
class, the effective slope is determined by assessing the slope beneath classified vegetation (in
degrees) which most influences bushfire behaviour and the relative position of land supporting
hazardous vegetation in relation to the development i.e. upslope or downslope. Where there is more
than one slope beneath classified vegetation, each slope should be individually assessed, and the
worst-case scenario adopted.
The topography of the site and surrounding land is steep and undulating. The site slope and effective
slope values were determined using LiDAR-derived 1 metre contour data published by the Noosa
Council. Table 2 below shows the slopes involved for the Method 2 BAL calculations. Only the
vegetation to the south, south-west and east of the dwelling site is classified hazardous vegetation.
1 Prone type taken from the VHC_Data sheet of the SPP Bushfire APZ Calculator.
2 Fuel continuity type taken from Figure 14 of the QFES BRC Technical Guide.
PR22116_BHAMP_178 Davis Rd, Cootharaba Page 17
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
Large file: the download may take up to a minute.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.