Council archive · source document
OPW14/0334 (14857 Db - Gia) Approved Document
Report No.: 1011 — Lot 1-5 “Bayview Woods’, Bayview Road, Noosa Heads, 4567, QLD. Property Vegetation Hazard / Risk Assessment / Appraisal. (21-08-2014) Visual Tree Assessment — VTA. (21-08-2014) 1.4. CONCLUSIONS / RECOMMENDATION 1.4.1. NOTE: This “Property Vegetation Hazard / Risk Assessment / Appraisal”, “Visual Tree Assessment” (V.T.A.), and “Arboricultural Report” was based off and compiled with “On-Site Consultations’, “On-Site Assessments / Appraisal” and “Acknowledged References”. 1.4.2. With these “Conclusions” founded in “Comments and Observations” on pages 5 to 8 and the “Acknowledged References’ in “Appendix 2.4” on page 21, also referring to “Photographs” in “Appendix 2.1. on pages 11 to 18 of the eight Subject Tree's “Species Suitability’, “Age Class and Size”, “POSITION / LOCATION”, “STRUCTURAL STABILITY / INTEGRITY’, “History” and the repercussions if these trees are allowed to remain. 1.4.3. Taking into consideration that tree health and hazard are not equivalent; trees that are apparently healthy may possess significant structural defects. In such cases, trees normally considered healthy and or vigorous may fail. While tree health and structural stability are related, they are not equivalent. 1.4.4. My “Recommendations”; given all considerations to all the issues and concerns associated with these eight “Subject Trees” in question only, having an unacceptable risk to safety, including foreseeable extensive damage (attached and or associated with this property), and as long term management is unsustainable; and at this stage no remedial work can be used to reduce the risk of total tree failure and or stem failure, as stem failure in these two species is “UNPREDICTABLE” and not an annual event, adding the unpredictability with total tree failure and or stem failure in the future, and will only increase as the Lophostemons and me older and taller (Over mature / Senescent), plus extreme weather events or ‘able acknowledged phenomenon such as “Summer branch drop” or “Sudden limb drop”, which the Arboriculture industry discusses and debates still today why this phenomenon occurs without any signs, warning and or reasoning, these eight “Subject Trees” in question only should be removed, out of this high usage urban gated residential and public community / environment, and suitable endemic vegetation species should be reinstated. 1.4.5. Note: A list of suitable endemic species has been compiled and submitted to the “BAYVIEW WOODS" Body Corporate for the replacernent vegetation; referring to the “Noosa Plan - Noosa Landscape Guidelines’. Regional Arboricultural Services
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
OPW14/0334 (14857 DB - GIA) APPROVED DOCUMENTRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 5.7 MB (large file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.
Original file
Log in to download the original file
The download may take up to a minute.